渝东南地区龙马溪组高演化页岩微纳米孔隙非均质性及主控因素

现代地质 ›› 2016, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (1): 163-171.

渝东南地区龙马溪组高演化页岩微纳米孔隙非均质性及主控因素

唐相路^1,2，姜振学^1,2，李卓^1,2，李卫兵^1,2，杨佩佩^1,2，黄何鑫^1,2，郝进³

(1.中国石油大学(北京)油气资源与探测国家重点实验室，北京 102249；
2.中国石油大学(北京)非常规天然气研究院，北京 102249；
3.中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所中国科学院页岩气与地质工程重点实验室，北京 100029)

出版日期:2016-01-29 发布日期:2016-05-01
作者简介:唐相路，男，博士，1988年出生，地质资源与地质工程专业，主要从事非常规油气储层预测与评价方面的研究。Email：xianglu.tang@outlook.com。
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项课题(2011ZX05018-002)；国家自然科学基金项目(41472112)；国土资源部项目(12120114046701)；重庆市国土资源和房屋管理局科技计划重大项目(CQGT-KJ-2012)。

Micro/Nano Pore Heterogeneity and Main Controlling Factors of the High-Maturity Longmaxi Formation Shale in Southeastern Chongqing

TANG Xiang-lu^1,2，JIANG Zhen-xue^1,2，LI Zhuo^1,2， LI Wei-bing^1,2，YANG Pei-pei^1,2，HUANG He-xin^1,2，HAO Jin³

(1. State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China；
2. Institute of Unconventional Natural Gas Research, China University of Petroleum, Beijing 102249, China;
3. Key Laboratory of Shale Gas and Geoengineering, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing100029, China)

Online:2016-01-29 Published:2016-05-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

对页岩气赋存的主要场所页岩孔隙的研究是解决页岩气赋存和保存机理的关键，但目前缺少有效的手段去定量刻画高演化页岩微纳米孔隙的非均质性特征。通过低压N2吸附/解吸、高压压汞、场发射扫描电镜(FE-SEM)等实验，运用分形维数对渝东南地区龙马溪组高演化页岩微纳米孔隙非均质性进行了定量分析。结果表明：高演化页岩的微纳米级孔隙非均质性极强。中孔(2.0~50.0 nm)中2.0~4.5 nm 的孔隙分形维数平均2.853 4，4.5~50.0 nm 的孔隙分形维数平均2.7367，这种极强非均质性主要受有机质控制。总有机碳(TOC)含量大于1.7 %时，有机质孔在中孔中占主导地位，粘土矿物含量的增加会在一定程度上增加中孔的非均质性。宏孔(＞50.0 nm)分形维数平均2.8441，非均质性较强，主要受石英和碳酸盐等脆性矿物控制，随着碳酸盐矿物含量的增大，非均质程度增加，有机质对页岩宏孔的非均质性影响不明显。

关键词: 非均质性, 主控因素, 分形维数, 孔隙结构, 高演化页岩

Abstract:

Studying shale pores is the key to understand the mechanism of shale gas occurrence and accumulation. But there is little effective means to quantitatively depict micro/nano pore heterogeneity characteristics of high-maturity shales. This article quantitatively analyzed micro/nano pore heterogeneity and main controlling factors of the high-maturity Longmaxi Formation Shale in southeastern Chongqing through the low pressure N2 adsorption/desorption, high-pressure mercury injection (MIP), and field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) experiment together with the use of the fractal dimension. The results show that micro/nano pores develop very well in high-maturity shale. Mesopores are mainly slit-shaped clay interparticle pores and ink-bottle-shaped organic pores. Fractal dimensions of pores between 2.0 nm and 4.5 nm in diameter have an average value of 2.853,4, while fractal dimensions of pores between 4.5 nm and 50.0 nm in diameter have an average value of 2.736,7. The strong heterogeneity is mainly controlled by organic matters. When total organic carbon (TOC) content is less than 0.9%, the pores provided by minerals play dominant role, while the TOC content is larger than 1.7%, organic pores play dominant role. In addition, the increase of clay mineral content will increase the mesopores heterogeneity in a certain extent. Macropores are mainly composed of slit-shaped interparticle pores and a small amount of ink-bottle-shaped organic pores. Fractal dimensions of macropores have an average value of 2.844,1, which show strong heterogeneity, indicating the pore structure is complex. The heterogeneity of macropores is mainly controlled by quartz and carbonate minerals. With the increase of carbonate minerals content, the degree of heterogeneity increases. As organic pores size is relatively small, they have no obvious influence on shale macropore heterogeneity.

Key words: heterogeneity, main controlling factor, fractal dimension, pore structure, high-maturity shale

中图分类号:

TE122.2

唐相路，姜振学，李卓，李卫兵，杨佩佩，黄何鑫，郝进. 渝东南地区龙马溪组高演化页岩微纳米孔隙非均质性及主控因素[J]. 现代地质, 2016, 30(1): 163-171.

[1]	张宇慧, 朱正平, 罗文军, 潘仁芳, 刘曦翔. 四川盆地高石梯地区震旦系灯影组四段微生物碳酸盐岩微相组合发育特征与储层主控因素分析[J]. 现代地质, 2023, 37(05): 1282-1292.
[2]	李东升, 高平, 盖海峰, 刘若冰, 蔡益栋, 李刚, 周秦, 肖贤明. 川东南地区龙马溪组页岩有机质纳米孔隙结构表征[J]. 现代地质, 2023, 37(05): 1293-1305.
[3]	张金晴, 李贤庆, 张博翔, 张学庆, 杨经纬, 于振锋. 沁水盆地武乡区块上古生界煤系页岩气储层孔隙特征和孔隙结构[J]. 现代地质, 2022, 36(06): 1551-1562.
[4]	李庆, 李江山, 卢浩, 齐奉强, 何羽, 安可钦, 李隆禹, 张厚民, 伍岳. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部长7₃页岩层系储层特征及主控因素[J]. 现代地质, 2022, 36(05): 1254-1270.
[5]	漆洋, 吕春研, 王宇慧, 唐书恒, 郗兆栋. 生物地层格架下湘西北地区五峰组—龙马溪组孔隙结构特征[J]. 现代地质, 2022, 36(05): 1292-1303.
[6]	姜秉仁, 邓恩德, 韩明辉, 马子杰. 黔西北地区石炭系祥摆组页岩微观孔隙结构及分形特征[J]. 现代地质, 2022, 36(04): 1065-1073.
[7]	崔维平, 杨玉卿, 刘建新. 基于岩性相单元和孔隙结构的低孔低渗储层有效性测井识别方法:以西湖凹陷NB1构造为例[J]. 现代地质, 2022, 36(01): 140-148.
[8]	杨毅, 张恒荣, 袁伟, 杨冬, 胡德胜. 常规砂岩与砂砾岩分形特征对比及成因分析:以乌石凹陷X构造流沙港组为例[J]. 现代地质, 2022, 36(01): 149-158.
[9]	刘文锋, 张小栓, 刘谨铭, 艾力曼·道尔吉, 杨远峰, 张曦文, 祁利祺, 于景维. AH5井区八道湾组砂质和砾质储层孔隙结构特征及评价[J]. 现代地质, 2021, 35(06): 1844-1853.
[10]	李阳阳, 李贤庆, 张学庆, 杨经纬, 张博翔, 肖贤明, 于振锋. 沁水盆地阳泉区块太原组煤系页岩孔隙结构特征[J]. 现代地质, 2021, 35(04): 1033-1042.
[11]	饶权, 康永尚, 黄毅, 赵群, 王红岩. 蜀南地区龙马溪组页岩气工业建产区游离气和孔隙度下限讨论[J]. 现代地质, 2021, 35(04): 1054-1064.
[12]	崔改霞, 魏钦廉, 肖玲, 王松, 胡榕, 王翀峘. 鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区二叠系盒8_下段致密砂岩储层特征[J]. 现代地质, 2021, 35(04): 1088-1097.
[13]	于景维, 牛志杰, 祁利祺, 孙新铭, 柳妮, 张进, 曹嵩. 准噶尔盆地阜北地区头屯河组非均质性综合研究[J]. 现代地质, 2021, 35(03): 819-831.
[14]	王会来, 孙瑞娜, 张锐锋, 刘喜恒, 刘静, 田思思, 肖锦霞. 河套盆地厚层砂砾岩油藏特征及成藏主控因素:以临河坳陷吉华2X油藏为例[J]. 现代地质, 2021, 35(03): 861-870.
[15]	姜秉仁, 杨通保, 石富伦, 韩明辉, 付炜. 黔西地区下石炭统旧司组页岩气聚集条件及含气性分析[J]. 现代地质, 2021, 35(02): 338-348.