现代地质 ›› 2023, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (05): 1385-1397.DOI: 10.19657/j.geoscience.1000-8527.2023.044
陈全红1(), 阳怀忠1, 赵红岩1, 张科1, 黄海滨2, 郭家铭1, 刘新颖1, 袁野1
收稿日期:
2022-06-22
修回日期:
2023-04-14
出版日期:
2023-10-10
发布日期:
2023-11-14
作者简介:
陈全红,男,博士,高级工程师,1975年出生,沉积学专业,主要从事沉积-储层学方面的研究。Email:529568@qq.com。
基金资助:
CHEN Quanhong1(), YANG Huaizhong1, ZHAO Hongyan1, ZHANG Ke1, HUANG Haibin2, GUO Jiaming1, LIU Xinying1, YUAN Ye1
Received:
2022-06-22
Revised:
2023-04-14
Online:
2023-10-10
Published:
2023-11-14
摘要:
加蓬盆地盐下储层物源主要来自上地壳,以长英质岩石为主,主要为元古宙汇聚及俯冲构造背景下的变火山-沉积岩组成的古老变质岩系,同时具有一定量碱性玄武岩和花岗岩的混合。盐下Gamba组及Dentale组地层物源碎屑成分及微量元素与源区构造背景继承性好,不同地层差异不明显。主量元素、微量元素及稀土元素特征值分析表明盐下Gamba组及Dentale组物源主要来自具有沟-弧-盆体系的活动大陆边缘的汇聚及俯冲带,具有低SiO2、Na2O的特征,与刚果克拉通西缘元古宙大陆岛弧背景沉积的基麦赞超群、马永贝超群及西刚果超群等变沉积-火山岩系等有亲缘关系。盆地盐下Gamba组及Dentale组储层具有较高的稀土总量,稀土元素配分模式与刚果克拉通元古宙的西刚果造山带的外部带和中间褶皱带具有亲源性,但与南美圣弗朗西斯科克拉通元古宙—太古宙不同构造活动带差异较大,表明它们不是盆地的主要物源,说明盆地盐下Gamba组及Dentale组物源主要来自刚果克拉通。
中图分类号:
陈全红, 阳怀忠, 赵红岩, 张科, 黄海滨, 郭家铭, 刘新颖, 袁野. 加蓬盆地盐下裂谷期碎屑岩储层地球化学特征及物源分析[J]. 现代地质, 2023, 37(05): 1385-1397.
CHEN Quanhong, YANG Huaizhong, ZHAO Hongyan, ZHANG Ke, HUANG Haibin, GUO Jiaming, LIU Xinying, YUAN Ye. Geochemical Characteristics and Provenance Analysis of Clastic Reservoirs in Sub-Salt Rift Period in Gabon Basin[J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(05): 1385-1397.
图2 刚果克拉通和南美圣弗朗西斯科克拉通碰撞造山及主要构造带示意图(据文献[6??-9]修改)
Fig.2 Collision orogeny and main tectonic belts of the Congo Craton and San Francisco Craton in South America(modified after references [6??-9])
图3 加蓬盆地Gamba组和Dentale组储层岩石组分三角图(L1、L2和N1分别为取自L1井、L2井和N1井的样品,钻井位置见图1;下文同)
Fig.3 Ternary petrological discrimination plot for the Gamba and Dentale Formation reservoir in the Gabon basin
地层及构 造环境 | SiO2 | TiO2 | Al2O3 | TFe2O3 | MnO | MgO | CaO | Na2O | K2O | P2O5 | LOI | TFe2O3+ MgO | Al2O3/ SiO2 | K2O/ Na2O | Al2O3/ (CaO+Na2O) | TFe2O3/ K2O | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gamba 组 | L1(6) | 52.2 | 00.89 | 15.05 | 5.68 | 0.04 | 3.32 | 1.90 | 0.47 | 4.38 | 0.32 | 11.41 | 09.00 | 0.29 | 10.35 | 06.43 | 1.30 |
L2(9) | 47.03 | 00.68 | 12.34 | 4.77 | 0.07 | 3.07 | 5.00 | 0.59 | 3.35 | 0.28 | 16.40 | 07.84 | 0.27 | 05.84 | 02.91 | 1.42 | |
N1 | 52.94 | 00.90 | 15.05 | 5.27 | 0.08 | 2.63 | 2.09 | 1.23 | 4.12 | 0.29 | 10.71 | 07.90 | 0.28 | 03.34 | 04.53 | 1.28 | |
Tsi(2) | 64.52 | 0 | 21.54 | 3.73 | 0 | 4.17 | 0.33 | 0.46 | 4.65 | 0 | - | 07.90 | 0.34 | 10.13 | 28.36 | 0.80 | |
Dentale 组 | L1 | 56.02 | 0.81 | 14.70 | 4.74 | 0.05 | 2.80 | 1.98 | 0.47 | 5.25 | 0.30 | 08.91 | 07.54 | 0.26 | 11.11 | 06.00 | 0.90 |
L2 | 53.61 | 0.74 | 13.16 | 4.49 | 0.03 | 2.41 | 2.20 | 1.03 | 4.31 | 0.28 | 11.22 | 06.90 | 0.25 | 04.20 | 04.08 | 1.04 | |
N1(6) | 53.86 | 0.86 | 13.90 | 5.78 | 0.06 | 2.67 | 2.26 | 1.61 | 4.11 | 0.32 | 09.99 | 08.45 | 0.26 | 02.57 | 03.60 | 1.41 | |
Oba(2) | 68.09 | 0 | 13.10 | 3.55 | 0 | 7.18 | 0 | 0.46 | 5.29 | 0 | - | 10.73 | 0.22 | 09.40 | 26.59 | 0.67 | |
OIA | 58.83 | 01.06 | 17.11 | 01.95 | 0.15 | 3.65 | 5.83 | 4.10 | 1.60 | 0.26 | 5.52 | 11.73 | 00.29 | 0.39 | 01.72 | 01.22 | |
CIA | 70.69 | 00.64 | 14.04 | 01.43 | 0.10 | 1.97 | 2.68 | 3.12 | 1.89 | 0.16 | 3.05 | 06.79 | 00.20 | 0.61 | 02.42 | 00.76 | |
ACM | 73.86 | 00.46 | 12.89 | 01.30 | 0.10 | 1.23 | 2.48 | 2.77 | 2.90 | 0.09 | 1.58 | 04.63 | 00.17 | 1.05 | 02.46 | 00.45 | |
PCM | 81.95 | 00.49 | 08.41 | 01.32 | 0.05 | 1.39 | 1.89 | 1.07 | 1.71 | 0.12 | 1.76 | 02.89 | 00.10 | 1.60 | 02.84 | 00.77 | |
上地壳 | 66 | 00.64 | 15.20 | 04.50 | 0.08 | 2.20 | 4.20 | 3.90 | 3.40 | 0.15 | - | 07.15 | 00.23 | 0.87 | 01.88 | 01.32 |
表1 加蓬盆地盐下碎屑岩储层主量组分统计结果
Table 1 Contents of major elements of subsalt clastic reservoir in the Gabon basin
地层及构 造环境 | SiO2 | TiO2 | Al2O3 | TFe2O3 | MnO | MgO | CaO | Na2O | K2O | P2O5 | LOI | TFe2O3+ MgO | Al2O3/ SiO2 | K2O/ Na2O | Al2O3/ (CaO+Na2O) | TFe2O3/ K2O | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gamba 组 | L1(6) | 52.2 | 00.89 | 15.05 | 5.68 | 0.04 | 3.32 | 1.90 | 0.47 | 4.38 | 0.32 | 11.41 | 09.00 | 0.29 | 10.35 | 06.43 | 1.30 |
L2(9) | 47.03 | 00.68 | 12.34 | 4.77 | 0.07 | 3.07 | 5.00 | 0.59 | 3.35 | 0.28 | 16.40 | 07.84 | 0.27 | 05.84 | 02.91 | 1.42 | |
N1 | 52.94 | 00.90 | 15.05 | 5.27 | 0.08 | 2.63 | 2.09 | 1.23 | 4.12 | 0.29 | 10.71 | 07.90 | 0.28 | 03.34 | 04.53 | 1.28 | |
Tsi(2) | 64.52 | 0 | 21.54 | 3.73 | 0 | 4.17 | 0.33 | 0.46 | 4.65 | 0 | - | 07.90 | 0.34 | 10.13 | 28.36 | 0.80 | |
Dentale 组 | L1 | 56.02 | 0.81 | 14.70 | 4.74 | 0.05 | 2.80 | 1.98 | 0.47 | 5.25 | 0.30 | 08.91 | 07.54 | 0.26 | 11.11 | 06.00 | 0.90 |
L2 | 53.61 | 0.74 | 13.16 | 4.49 | 0.03 | 2.41 | 2.20 | 1.03 | 4.31 | 0.28 | 11.22 | 06.90 | 0.25 | 04.20 | 04.08 | 1.04 | |
N1(6) | 53.86 | 0.86 | 13.90 | 5.78 | 0.06 | 2.67 | 2.26 | 1.61 | 4.11 | 0.32 | 09.99 | 08.45 | 0.26 | 02.57 | 03.60 | 1.41 | |
Oba(2) | 68.09 | 0 | 13.10 | 3.55 | 0 | 7.18 | 0 | 0.46 | 5.29 | 0 | - | 10.73 | 0.22 | 09.40 | 26.59 | 0.67 | |
OIA | 58.83 | 01.06 | 17.11 | 01.95 | 0.15 | 3.65 | 5.83 | 4.10 | 1.60 | 0.26 | 5.52 | 11.73 | 00.29 | 0.39 | 01.72 | 01.22 | |
CIA | 70.69 | 00.64 | 14.04 | 01.43 | 0.10 | 1.97 | 2.68 | 3.12 | 1.89 | 0.16 | 3.05 | 06.79 | 00.20 | 0.61 | 02.42 | 00.76 | |
ACM | 73.86 | 00.46 | 12.89 | 01.30 | 0.10 | 1.23 | 2.48 | 2.77 | 2.90 | 0.09 | 1.58 | 04.63 | 00.17 | 1.05 | 02.46 | 00.45 | |
PCM | 81.95 | 00.49 | 08.41 | 01.32 | 0.05 | 1.39 | 1.89 | 1.07 | 1.71 | 0.12 | 1.76 | 02.89 | 00.10 | 1.60 | 02.84 | 00.77 | |
上地壳 | 66 | 00.64 | 15.20 | 04.50 | 0.08 | 2.20 | 4.20 | 3.90 | 3.40 | 0.15 | - | 07.15 | 00.23 | 0.87 | 01.88 | 01.32 |
图6 加蓬盆地Gamba组和Dentale组砂岩样品风化特征A-CN-K图(CIA=[Al2O3/(Al2O3+K2O+Na2O+CaO*)]×100,其中CaO*=CaO-(10/3P2O5);底图据文献[15])
Fig.6 Ternary A-CN-K diagram for evaluating sandstone weathering process of Gamba and Dentale formations in the Gabon Basin (basemap after reference [15])
图7 加蓬盆地Gamba组和Dentale组砂岩样品物源判别图解(F1=-1.773(TiO2)N+0.607(Al2O3)N+0.76(Fe2O3)N-1.5(MgO)N+0.616(CaO)N+0.509(Na2O)-1.224(K2O)N-9.09,F2=0.445(TiO2)N+0.07(Al2O3)N-0.25(Fe2O3)N-1.142(MgO)N+0.438(CaO)N+1.475(Na2O)N+1.426(K2O)N-6.681;底图据文献[16])
Fig. 7 Provenance discrimination diagram for sandstone of Gamba and Dentalein Formations in the Gabon basin (basemap after reference [16])
图10 加蓬盆地Gamba和Dentale组砂岩La-Th-Sc (a)、Th-Co-Zr/10 (b)、Th-Sc-Zr/10 (c)及Hf-La/Th (d)判别图解(底图据文献[11])
Fig.10 La-Th-Sc (a),Th-Co-Zr/10 (b),Th-Sc -Zr/10 (c) and La/Th-Hf (d) distinction diagrams of Gamba and Dentale sandstones(basemap after reference[11])
构造环境及层段 | La | Ce | Nd | ∑REE | LREE/HREE | δEu | (La/Yb)N | La/Y | La/Yb | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
大洋岛弧 | 杂砂岩* | 8.72±2.5 | 22.5±35.9 | 11.36±2.9 | 58±10 | 3.8±0.9 | 1.04±0.11 | 2.8±0.9 | 0.48±0.12 | 4.2±1.3 |
大陆岛弧 | 杂砂岩* | 24.4±2.3 | 50.5±4.3 | 20.8±1.6 | 146±20 | 7.7±1.7 | 0.79±0.13 | 7.5±2.5 | 1.02±0.07 | 7.5±2.5 |
活动陆缘 | 杂砂岩* | 33.0±4.5 | 72.7±9.8 | 25.4±3.4 | 186 | 9.1 | 0.6 | 8.5 | 1.33±0.09 | 8.5 |
被动陆缘 | 杂砂岩* | 44.5±5.8 | 71.9±11.5 | 29.0±5.03 | 210 | 8.5 | 0.56 | 10.8 | 1.31±0.26 | 10.8 |
Gamba组 | L1(7) | 35.3 | 64.1 | 29.9 | 159 | 9.2 | 0.61 | 10.2 | 1.6 | 15.8 |
L2(8) | 43.1 | 82.2 | 36.6 | 210 | 9.2 | 0.72 | 9.4 | 1.7 | 14.5 | |
N1(1) | 78.2 | 139 | 50 | 319 | 12 | 0.97 | 15.7 | 2.8 | 24.2 | |
Tsi(23) | 6.2 | 10.2 | 4.6 | 26.1 | 8.4 | 0.81 | 8.9 | 1.6 | 13.8 | |
Dentale组 | L1(2) | 37.3 | 68.5 | 32 | 169.2 | 9.4 | 0.67 | 10.2 | 1.6 | 15.8 |
L2(2) | 54.7 | 106 | 46.2 | 273.2 | 10.9 | 0.67 | 10.9 | 1.9 | 6.9 | |
N1(6) | 58.9 | 110.7 | 43.5 | 263 | 9.7 | 0.95 | 11.3 | 2 | 17.4 | |
Oba(43) | 9.4 | 15.7 | 7.3 | 39.9 | 9.4 | 0.79 | 11.1 | 1.8 | 17.1 | |
构造环境及层段 | Zr | Sc | V | Co | Ti | La/Sc | Ti/Zr | Sc/Cr | ||
大洋岛弧 | 杂砂岩* | 96±20 | 19.5±5.2 | 131±40 | 186.3 | 4800±1200 | 0.55±0.22 | 56.8±2.14 | 0.57±0.16 | |
大陆岛弧 | 杂砂岩* | 229±27 | 14.8±1.7 | 89±13.7 | 122.7 | 3900±600 | 1.82±0.3 | 19.7±4.3 | 0.32±0.06 | |
活动陆缘 | 杂砂岩* | 179±33 | 8.0±1.1 | 48±5.9 | 101.7 | 2600±200 | 4.55±0.8 | 15.3±2.4 | 0.30±0.02 | |
被动陆缘 | 杂砂岩* | 298±80 | 6.0±1.4 | 31±9.9 | 52.4 | 2200±600 | 6.25±1.35 | 6.74±0.9 | 0.16±0.02 | |
Gamba组 | L1(7) | 176 | 11.7 | 74 | 15.7 | 0.48 | 3.1 | - | 0.16 | |
L2(8) | 299 | 15.4 | 125 | 17.8 | 0.83 | 2.9 | - | 0.18 | ||
N1(1) | 301 | 19.8 | 157 | 25.5 | - | 3.9 | - | 0.17 | ||
Tsi(23) | 100.2 | 1.9 | 17.6 | - | - | 4 | - | 0.61 | ||
Dentale组 | L1(2) | 186 | 12.4 | 76 | 17.8 | - | 3 | - | 0.17 | |
L2(2) | 354 | 16.3 | 133 | 15.4 | - | 3.4 | - | 0.17 | ||
N1(6) | 334.5 | 17.4 | 133.7 | 19.4 | - | 3.4 | - | 0.18 | ||
Oba(43) | 115.7 | 2.2 | 30.8 | - | - | 4.8 | - | 0.79 |
表2 不同构造环境微量元素及稀土元素参数特征
Table 2 Parameter characteristics of trace elements and REE in different tectonic environments
构造环境及层段 | La | Ce | Nd | ∑REE | LREE/HREE | δEu | (La/Yb)N | La/Y | La/Yb | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
大洋岛弧 | 杂砂岩* | 8.72±2.5 | 22.5±35.9 | 11.36±2.9 | 58±10 | 3.8±0.9 | 1.04±0.11 | 2.8±0.9 | 0.48±0.12 | 4.2±1.3 |
大陆岛弧 | 杂砂岩* | 24.4±2.3 | 50.5±4.3 | 20.8±1.6 | 146±20 | 7.7±1.7 | 0.79±0.13 | 7.5±2.5 | 1.02±0.07 | 7.5±2.5 |
活动陆缘 | 杂砂岩* | 33.0±4.5 | 72.7±9.8 | 25.4±3.4 | 186 | 9.1 | 0.6 | 8.5 | 1.33±0.09 | 8.5 |
被动陆缘 | 杂砂岩* | 44.5±5.8 | 71.9±11.5 | 29.0±5.03 | 210 | 8.5 | 0.56 | 10.8 | 1.31±0.26 | 10.8 |
Gamba组 | L1(7) | 35.3 | 64.1 | 29.9 | 159 | 9.2 | 0.61 | 10.2 | 1.6 | 15.8 |
L2(8) | 43.1 | 82.2 | 36.6 | 210 | 9.2 | 0.72 | 9.4 | 1.7 | 14.5 | |
N1(1) | 78.2 | 139 | 50 | 319 | 12 | 0.97 | 15.7 | 2.8 | 24.2 | |
Tsi(23) | 6.2 | 10.2 | 4.6 | 26.1 | 8.4 | 0.81 | 8.9 | 1.6 | 13.8 | |
Dentale组 | L1(2) | 37.3 | 68.5 | 32 | 169.2 | 9.4 | 0.67 | 10.2 | 1.6 | 15.8 |
L2(2) | 54.7 | 106 | 46.2 | 273.2 | 10.9 | 0.67 | 10.9 | 1.9 | 6.9 | |
N1(6) | 58.9 | 110.7 | 43.5 | 263 | 9.7 | 0.95 | 11.3 | 2 | 17.4 | |
Oba(43) | 9.4 | 15.7 | 7.3 | 39.9 | 9.4 | 0.79 | 11.1 | 1.8 | 17.1 | |
构造环境及层段 | Zr | Sc | V | Co | Ti | La/Sc | Ti/Zr | Sc/Cr | ||
大洋岛弧 | 杂砂岩* | 96±20 | 19.5±5.2 | 131±40 | 186.3 | 4800±1200 | 0.55±0.22 | 56.8±2.14 | 0.57±0.16 | |
大陆岛弧 | 杂砂岩* | 229±27 | 14.8±1.7 | 89±13.7 | 122.7 | 3900±600 | 1.82±0.3 | 19.7±4.3 | 0.32±0.06 | |
活动陆缘 | 杂砂岩* | 179±33 | 8.0±1.1 | 48±5.9 | 101.7 | 2600±200 | 4.55±0.8 | 15.3±2.4 | 0.30±0.02 | |
被动陆缘 | 杂砂岩* | 298±80 | 6.0±1.4 | 31±9.9 | 52.4 | 2200±600 | 6.25±1.35 | 6.74±0.9 | 0.16±0.02 | |
Gamba组 | L1(7) | 176 | 11.7 | 74 | 15.7 | 0.48 | 3.1 | - | 0.16 | |
L2(8) | 299 | 15.4 | 125 | 17.8 | 0.83 | 2.9 | - | 0.18 | ||
N1(1) | 301 | 19.8 | 157 | 25.5 | - | 3.9 | - | 0.17 | ||
Tsi(23) | 100.2 | 1.9 | 17.6 | - | - | 4 | - | 0.61 | ||
Dentale组 | L1(2) | 186 | 12.4 | 76 | 17.8 | - | 3 | - | 0.17 | |
L2(2) | 354 | 16.3 | 133 | 15.4 | - | 3.4 | - | 0.17 | ||
N1(6) | 334.5 | 17.4 | 133.7 | 19.4 | - | 3.4 | - | 0.18 | ||
Oba(43) | 115.7 | 2.2 | 30.8 | - | - | 4.8 | - | 0.79 |
图11 加蓬盆地Gamba(a)和Dentale(b)组砂岩碎屑锆石年龄分布概率图
Fig.11 Probability plots of detrital zircon age of Gamba (a) and Dentale Formation sandstones (b) in the Gabon basin
图12 加蓬盆地Gamba和Dentale组砂岩样品在La/Yb-∑REE图解中的分布(底图据文献[23])
Fig.12 La/Yb- ∑REE diagram for Gamba and Dentale Formation sandstone samples in the Gabon basin (basemap after reference [23]))
图13 加蓬盆地与刚果克拉通及南美圣弗朗西斯科克拉通稀土元素配分模式((c)和(d)稀土元素数据分别来自文献[25]和[26]) (a)Gamba组L1井砂岩储层; (b)西非刚果卡拉通元古宙地层; (c)南美圣弗朗西斯科克拉通太古宙结晶基底; (d)南美圣弗朗西斯科克拉通太古宙弧后地层
Fig.13 Chondrite-normalized REE patterns of Gabon basin, Congo Craton and San Francisco Craton in South America (REE data of Fig.(c) and (d) are from references [25-26])
[1] | 阳怀忠, 邓运华, 黄兴文, 等. 西非加蓬盆地深水盐下油气勘探技术创新与实践[J]. 中国海上油气, 2018, 30(4): 1-12. |
[2] | 黄兴文, 胡孝林, 于水, 等. 南加蓬次盆盐下油气分布规律与成藏特征[J]. 中国海上油气, 2015, 27(2): 17-23. |
[3] | 张磊. 南加蓬次盆L气田盐胶结储层特征分析与识别[J]. 地质学刊, 2021, 45(1): 37-41. |
[4] | 黄健良, 阳怀忠, 李海滨, 等. 西非加蓬盆地深水区复杂盐下圈闭落实关键技术探索与实践[J]. 海洋地质前沿, 2020, 36(12): 56-64. |
[5] | 韩嵩, 王嗣敏, 李杰, 等. 南大西洋两岸盆地白垩系森诺曼—土仑阶烃源岩特征差异及其主控因素[J]. 中国海上油气, 2021, 33(2): 78-88. |
[6] |
TACK L, WINGATE M T D, LIÉGEOIS J P, et al. Early Neoproterozoic magmatism (1000-910 Ma) of the Zadinian and Mayumbian Groups (Bas-Congo): Onset of Rodinia rifting at the western edge of the Congo craton[J]. Precambrian Research, 2001, 110(1/2/3/4): 277-306.
DOI URL |
[7] |
AGUILAR C, ALKMIM F F, LANA C, et al. Palaeoproterozoic assembly of the São Francisco Craton, SE Brazil: New insights from U-Pb titanite and monazite dating[J]. Precambrian Research, 2017, 289: 95-115.
DOI URL |
[8] |
DEGLER R, PEDROSA-SOARES A, NOVO T, et al. Rhyacian-Orosirian isotopic records from the basement of the Araçuaí-Ribeira orogenic system (SE Brazil): Links in the Congo-São Francisco palaeocontinent[J]. Precambrian Research, 2018, 317: 179-195.
DOI URL |
[9] |
PERCIVAL J J, KONOPÁSEK J, EIESLAND R, et al. Pre-orogenic connection of the foreland domains of the Kaoko-Dom Feliciano-Gariep orogenic system[J]. Precambrian Research, 2021, 354: 106060.
DOI URL |
[10] | 陈有炘, 裴先治, 王盟, 等. 伊犁地块北缘别珍套山中泥盆统汗吉尕组物源特征及其地质意义[J]. 地球科学与环境学报, 2021, 43(3): 469-486. |
[11] |
BHATIA M R, CROOK K A W. Trace element characteristics of graywackes and tectonic setting discrimination of sedimentary basins[J]. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 1986, 92(2): 181-193.
DOI URL |
[12] |
BHATIA M R. Plate tectonics and geochemical composition of sandstones[J]. The Journal of Geology, 1983, 91(6): 611-627.
DOI URL |
[13] |
ZANONI G, ŠEGVI B, MOSCARIELLO A. Clay mineral diagenesis in Cretaceous clastic reservoirs from West African passive margins (the South Gabon Basin) and its impact on regional geology and basin evolution history[J]. Applied Clay Science, 2016, 134: 186-209.
DOI URL |
[14] | 陈全红, 李文厚, 胡孝林, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地晚古生代沉积岩源区构造背景及物源分析[J]. 地质学报, 2012, 86(7): 1150-1162. |
[15] |
NESBITT H W, YOUNG G M. Early Proterozoic climates and plate motions inferred from major element chemistry of lutites[J]. Nature, 1982, 299: 715-717.
DOI |
[16] |
ROSER B P, KORSCH R J. Provenance signatures of sandstone-mudstone suites determined using discriminant function analysis of major-element data[J]. Chemical Geology, 1988, 67(1/2): 119-139.
DOI URL |
[17] | 刘俊海, 吴志轩, 于水, 等. 丽水凹陷古新统微量元素地球化学特征及其地质意义[J]. 中国海上油气, 2005, 17(1): 8-11. |
[18] | MCLENNAN S M, HEMMING S, MCDANIEL D K, et al. Geochemical approaches to sedimentation, provenance, and tectonics[M]// Processes Controlling the Composition of Clastic Sediments. McLean: Geological Society of America, 1993: 21-40. |
[19] |
THIÉBLEMONT D, BOUTON P, PRÉAT A, et al. Transition from alkaline to calc-alkaline volcanism during evolution of the Paleoproterozoic France villian Basin of eastern Gabon (Western Central Africa)[J]. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 2014, 99: 215-227.
DOI URL |
[20] |
MCLENNAN S M, TAYLOR S R, KRÖNER A. Geochemical evolution of Archean shales from South Africa: I. the Swaziland and Pongola supergroups[J]. Precambrian Research, 1983, 22(1/2): 93-124.
DOI URL |
[21] |
BHATIA M R. Rare earth element geochemistry of Australian Paleozoic graywackes and mudrocks: Provenance and tectonic control[J]. Sedimentary Geology, 1985, 45(1/2): 97-113.
DOI URL |
[22] | BOYNTON W V. Cosmochemistry of the rare earth elements:Meteorites studies[J]. Development in Geochemistry, 1984, 63-114. |
[23] |
ALLÈGRE C J, MINSTER J F. Quantitative models of trace element behavior in magmatic processes[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1978, 38(1): 1-25.
DOI URL |
[24] | 王彤, 朱筱敏, 董艳蕾, 等. 基于微量元素分析的古沉积背景重建: 以准噶尔盆地西北缘古近系安集海河组为例[J]. 地质学报, 2020, 94(12): 3830-3851. |
[25] | WANG Tong, ZHU Xiaomin, DONG Yanlei, et al. Trace elements as paleo sedimentary environment indicators: a case study of the Paleogene Anjihaihe Formation in the northwestern Junggar basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2020, 94(12):3830-3851. |
[26] |
SOH TAMEHE L, NZEPANG TANKWA M, WEI C T, et al. Geology and geochemical constrains on the origin and depositional setting of the Kpwa-Atog Boga banded iron formations (BIFs), northwestern Congo Craton, southern Cameroon[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2018, 95: 620-638.
DOI URL |
[27] |
SPREAFICO R R, FIGUEIREDO BARBOSA J S, BARBOSA N S, et al. Tectonic evolution of the Neoarchean Mundo Novo greenstone belt, eastern São Francisco Craton, NE Brazil: Petrology, U-Pb geochronology, and Nd and Sr isotopic constraints[J]. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 2019, 95: 102296.
DOI URL |
[28] | 肖淳, 刘国荣, 肖红, 等. 西刚果造山带与卢菲利弧形造山带区域地质背景和铜矿成矿特征对比[J]. 黄金, 2018, 39(11): 23-29. |
[1] | 胡生平, 韩善楚, 张洪求, 张勇, 潘家永, 钟福军, 卢建研, 李惟鑫. 庐枞盆地西湾铅锌矿床黄铁矿微量元素组成特征及成矿启示[J]. 现代地质, 2024, 38(01): 183-197. |
[2] | 刘金波, 张德贤, 胡子奇, 陈绍炜, 谢小雨. 豫西熊耳山蒿坪沟Ag-Au-Pb-Zn多金属矿床闪锌矿矿物学和微量元素组成特征及其成矿启示[J]. 现代地质, 2024, 38(01): 198-213. |
[3] | 师良, 范柏江, 王霞, 李亚婷, 黄飞飞, 戴欣洋. 鄂尔多斯盆地长9页岩烃源岩的元素组成及其古沉积环境[J]. 现代地质, 2023, 37(05): 1254-1263. |
[4] | 李慧, 温汉辉, 蔡立梅, 徐耀辉, 罗杰, 梅敬娴, 徐述邦. 广东省揭阳市揭东区微量元素分布特征及其影响因素分析[J]. 现代地质, 2023, 37(01): 208-216. |
[5] | 翟佳宇, 张松航, 唐书恒, 郭慧秋, 刘冰, 纪朝琪. 云南老厂雨汪煤层气区块气水成因及产能响应[J]. 现代地质, 2022, 36(05): 1341-1350. |
[6] | 第鹏飞, 汤庆艳, 刘聪, 宋宏, 张家和, 刘东晓, 王玉玺, 蒲万峰. 西秦岭夏河—合作地区早子沟和加甘滩金矿床石英微量元素特征及意义[J]. 现代地质, 2021, 35(06): 1608-1621. |
[7] | 丁坤, 王瑞廷, 刘凯, 王智慧, 申喜茂. 南秦岭柞水—山阳矿集区夏家店金矿床黄铁矿微量元素和氢、氧、硫同位素对矿床成因的制约[J]. 现代地质, 2021, 35(06): 1622-1632. |
[8] | 陈海云, 孙晓东, 张志. 西昆仑上其木干花岗岩锆石饱和温度和Ti温度的地质意义[J]. 现代地质, 2021, 35(05): 1206-1217. |
[9] | 柯昌炜, 李素梅, 张洪安, 徐田武, 张云献, 曾凡纲, 张树海, 张韩静. 东濮凹陷盐湖相烃源岩有机硫同位素分布特征及其地球化学意义[J]. 现代地质, 2021, 35(02): 301-314. |
[10] | 蔺东林, 唐书恒, 郗兆栋, 张松航, 周淑林. 湘西北ZY3井五峰组页岩地球化学特征与有机质富集控制因素[J]. 现代地质, 2020, 34(06): 1144-1152. |
[11] | 蒋苏扬, 黄文辉, 张永生. 鄂尔多斯盆地西缘中奥陶统地球化学特征及古环境意义[J]. 现代地质, 2020, 34(03): 545-553. |
[12] | 袁伟恒, 顾雪祥, 章永梅, 杜泽忠, 于晓飞, 孙海瑞, 吕鑫. 甘肃北山地区小西弓金矿床成矿流体性质及矿床成因[J]. 现代地质, 2020, 34(03): 554-568. |
[13] | 张倩, 吴湘滨, 杨牧, 钱美平, 刁谦, 孟斐斯. 福建紫金山矿集区浸铜湖花岗斑岩的成因及构造意义[J]. 现代地质, 2019, 33(05): 1025-1035. |
[14] | 郭林楠, 黄春梅, 张良, 陈炳翰, 李瑞红, 刘跃. 胶东罗山金矿床成矿流体来源:蚀变岩型和石英脉型矿石载金黄铁矿稀土与微量元素特征约束[J]. 现代地质, 2019, 33(01): 121-136. |
[15] | 陈晶, 黄文辉, 何明倩. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南部本溪组—下石盒子组泥岩元素地球化学特征[J]. 现代地质, 2018, 32(02): 240-250. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||