基于低场核磁共振的煤润湿性分析

现代地质 ›› 2015, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (1): 190-197.

基于低场核磁共振的煤润湿性分析

孙晓晓^1,2，姚艳斌^1,2，陈基瑜^1,2，谢松彬^1,2，李臣臣^1,2

(1.中国地质大学(北京)非常规天然气地质评价及开发工程北京市重点实验室，北京100083；
2.中国地质大学(北京)能源学院，北京100083)

出版日期:2015-01-29 发布日期:2015-04-21
通讯作者: 姚艳斌，男，教授，1978年出生，能源地质工程专业，主要从事非常规油气地质与开发的研究。
作者简介:孙晓晓，女，硕士研究生，1990年出生，能源地质工程专业，主要从事非常规油气研究。Email：sunny_cugb@sina.cn。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（41472137，U1262104）；中国石油科技创新基金项目（2014D-5006-01-02）；全国优秀博士学位论文作者专项资金项目（201253）。

Determination of Coal Wettability by Using Low-field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance

SUN Xiao-xiao^1,2, YAO Yan-bin^1,2, CHEN Ji-yu^1,2, XIE Song-bin^1,2, LI Chen-chen^1,2

(1.Beijing Key Laboratory of Unconventional Natural Gas Geology Evaluation and Development Engineering,China University of Geosciences,Beijing100083,China;
2.School of Energy Resources, University of Geosciences, Beijing100083, China)

Online:2015-01-29 Published:2015-04-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

煤润湿性在煤化工、煤矿安全生产及煤层气开发利用中有重要意义。目前煤的润湿性测定方法过程繁琐、操作困难、现场实用性差、测量结果可对比性差，不能快速有效地应用于煤层气储层的润湿性评价研究。基于系列低场核磁共振(LFNMR)实验，探讨了LFNMR应用于煤润湿性研究的可行性与研究方法。研究发现，LFNMR可应用于识别煤粉中不同状态水分：对于强水湿性煤粉，其T₂弛豫谱仅存在吸附态水峰与颗粒间水峰，而弱水湿性煤粉则存在吸附态水峰、颗粒间水峰和自由态水峰3个峰值；煤的水湿性越强，其颗粒间水峰和自由态水峰弛豫时间越短，并随着润湿时间的增加弛豫逐渐变快。当水对煤的润湿达到稳定状态时，煤样的自由态水峰和颗粒间水峰的加权平均值与型煤接触角法测得的接触角呈相关性较好的对数关系。该对数关系可应用于煤水润湿性的定量、半定量评价，这为采用该方法进一步研究煤储层的气、水相互作用提供了理论基础。

关键词: 煤的润湿性, 接触角, NMR, T2弛豫时间, 煤层气

Abstract:

The research on coal wettability is significant in coal chemical industry, safety of coal mining, and coalbed methane (CBM) production. The conventional methods for coal wettability determination are difficult to be performed and unsuitable for an in-situ measurement, which make it difficult to be used as in-situ analysis method for determining wettability of CBM reservoirs. Based on a series of low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (LFNMR) experiments, this paper discussed the practicality of the application of LFNMR in evaluation of the wettability of CBM reservoirs. It was found that moistures in the coals have different phases including the free water, interparticle capillary confined water, and adsorption water that can be distinguished by the water transverse relaxation time (T₂) spectra in a LFNMR measurement. For the hydrophilic powdered coal, there are adsorbed water and interparticle water that correspond to two distinct peaks in the T₂ spectra. For hydrophobic powdered coal, there exist adsorbed, interparticle and free waters, corresponding to three distinct peaks in the T₂ spectra. The stronger the hydrophilicity is, the faster the relaxation time of capillary water and free water is. In an equilibrium system of the coal-water wettability, the geometric mean value of T₂ for free and capillary waters is found to be logarithmically correlated with the contact angle between coal and water that is determined from a conventional method. We suggest that the low-field NMR is quantifiably or semiquantifiably applicable for estimation of coal wettability, which provides an important theoretical foundation for evaluating the water-gas interactions in a CBM reservoir by using LFNMR.

Key words: coal wettability, contact angle, NMR, T₂ relaxation time, coalbed methane

中图分类号:

TE132.2

孙晓晓，姚艳斌，陈基瑜，谢松彬，李臣臣. 基于低场核磁共振的煤润湿性分析[J]. 现代地质, 2015, 29(1): 190-197.

SUN Xiao-xiao, YAO Yan-bin, CHEN Ji-yu, XIE Song-bin, LI Chen-chen. Determination of Coal Wettability by Using Low-field Nuclear Magnetic Resonance[J]. Geoscience, 2015, 29(1): 190-197.

[1]	魏永恒, 葛燕燕, 王刚, 王文峰, 田继军, 李鑫, 吴斌, 张晓. 新疆库拜煤田铁列克矿区地应力分布及其对煤层气开发的影响[J]. 现代地质, 2022, 36(05): 1324-1332.
[2]	翟佳宇, 张松航, 唐书恒, 郭慧秋, 刘冰, 纪朝琪. 云南老厂雨汪煤层气区块气水成因及产能响应[J]. 现代地质, 2022, 36(05): 1341-1350.
[3]	李金龙, 李倩, 蔡益栋, 陈伟, 陈志柱, 王坚, 薛晓辉. 云南老厂矿区煤层气储层地质条件及其资源潜力[J]. 现代地质, 2022, 36(05): 1351-1359.
[4]	闫涛滔, 郭怡琳, 孟艳军, 常锁亮, 金尚文, 康丽芳, 付鑫宇, 王青青, 赵媛, 张宇. 基于煤层气井生产数据的储层含气量校正新方法[J]. 现代地质, 2022, 36(05): 1360-1370.
[5]	戴朝霞, 孙蓓蕾, 曾凡桂. 沁水盆地南部长治区块煤层气田的地应力特征[J]. 现代地质, 2020, 34(02): 266-272.
[6]	高北斗, 王海超, 田继军, 韩旭, 冯烁, 王迪, 张振东. 准南煤田硫磺沟矿区向斜-承压式煤层气富集模式[J]. 现代地质, 2020, 34(02): 281-288.
[7]	吴春正, 薛海涛, 卢双舫, 田善思. 几种常见矿物的油-水-矿物接触角测量及其讨论[J]. 现代地质, 2018, 32(04): 842-849.
[8]	吕玉民, 柳迎红, 王存武, 郭广山, 朱学申, 蒋锐. 沁水盆地寿阳区块煤层气井高产水影响因素[J]. 现代地质, 2017, 31(05): 1088-1094.
[9]	杨延辉，姚艳斌，王辉，陈龙伟. 基于地震多属性的郑庄区块煤层气开发甜点区优选[J]. 现代地质, 2016, 30(6): 1390-1398.
[10]	吕玉民, 柳迎红, 汤达祯, 李治平. 欠饱和煤储层渗透率动态变化模型及实例分析[J]. 现代地质, 2016, 30(4): 914-921.
[11]	许启鲁，黄文辉，唐书恒，刘贝，杨延绘，闫德宇，陆小霞. 深部中-高煤级煤储层孔隙结构与吸附性[J]. 现代地质, 2016, 30(2): 413-419.
[12]	侯宏冰，陈立，郭晓静，马琳娜. 压裂液在煤层中的运移模拟研究[J]. 现代地质, 2015, 29(2): 331-336.
[13]	周三栋，刘大锰，孙邵华，蔡益栋. 准噶尔盆地南缘硫磺沟煤层气富集主控地质因素及有利区优选[J]. 现代地质, 2015, 29(1): 179-189.
[14]	马火林，汪剑，王文娟，谭青松，张祎然，罗正龙. 构造煤煤层气及裂隙的测井响应和敏感参数分析：以沁水盆地郑庄地区为例[J]. 现代地质, 2015, 29(1): 171-178.
[15]	李俊乾，刘大锰，姚艳斌，蔡益栋，郭晓茜. 基于主地质参数的煤层气有利开发区优选及应用[J]. 现代地质, 2014, 28(3): 653-658.