东营凹陷南斜坡沙四下亚段—孔店组原油地球化学特征及成因分类

现代地质 ›› 2010, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (6): 1085-1092.

东营凹陷南斜坡沙四下亚段—孔店组原油地球化学特征及成因分类

孟江辉^1,2,刘洛夫^1,2,姜振学^1,2,高永进³

1.中国石油大学油气资源与探测国家重点实验室，北京102249；2.中国石油大学盆地与油藏研究中心，北京102249；
3.中国石化胜利油田分公司地质研究院，山东东营257015

出版日期:2010-11-19 发布日期:2010-12-30
作者简介:孟江辉，男，博士研究生，1983年出生，地质学专业，主要从事油气成因机理及分布预测研究。 Email: mjhyzu@163.com。

Characteristics and Origin Classification of the Oils from the Lower Section of the 4th Member of Shahejie Formation and Kongdian Formation in the Southern Slope of Dongying Depression, Bohai Bay Basin

MENG Jiang-hui ^1,2,LIU Luo-fu ^1,2,JIANG Zhen-xue ^1,2,GAO Yong-jin³

1.State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources and Prospecting, China University of Petroleum, Beijing102249, China;
2.Basin and Reservoir Research Center, China University of Petroleum, Beijing102249, China;
3.Research Institute of Geological Science, Shengli Oilfield Company Limited, Dongying, Shandong257015, China

Online:2010-11-19 Published:2010-12-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

东营凹陷南斜坡沙四下亚段—孔店组为一套紫红色或红色碎屑岩沉积，本身不具备生烃能力，因此对该层段原油成因的研究具有重要意义。在系统分析17个油砂和5个原油样品的生物标志物组合特征的基础上，将该区原油划分为4种成因类型。Ⅰ类原油分布于平方王地区和博兴洼陷，Pr/Ph>0.8，Ph/nC18<0.6，伽马蜡烷含量极低，4-甲基甾烷、重排甾烷含量相对高，Ts/Tm、藿烷/甾烷值相对高，可能来源于一套淡水湖相环境下形成的、富含粘土矿物的泥岩。Ⅱ类原油分布于纯化—乐安构造带、陈官庄构造带，Pr/Ph<0.6，Ph/nC18>2，伽马蜡烷含量高，4-甲基甾烷、重排甾烷含量低，Ts/Tm和藿烷/甾烷值低，可能与一套盐湖相泥岩或灰质泥岩有成因关系。Ⅲ类原油分布于青城北缓坡构造带，检测出25-降藿烷系列，伽马蜡烷含量介于Ⅰ类和Ⅱ类之间，可能为早期充注的Ⅱ类原油遭受生物降解后和晚期充注的Ⅰ类原油形成的混源油，且以晚期充注为主。Ⅳ类原油分布于王家岗地区孔店组，具有C₂₉甾烷绝对优势和高含量的伽马蜡烷，推断为Ⅱ类原油和一种来源于浅湖—沼泽相的原油形成的混源油。

关键词: 地球化学特征, 原油成因类型, 沙四下亚段, 孔店组, 红层, 东营凹陷

Abstract:

The lower section of the 4th member of Shahejie Formation and Kongdian Formation is a suite of purplish red and red clastic sediments in the southern slope of Dongying Depression which can not generate mass hydrocarbons. Therefore, it is significant to discuss the oil origin of the layers. Based on the biomarker characteristics analyses of the 17 oil sands and 5 crude oils, the origin of oils found in the study area was classified into four classes. Class-Ⅰ oil distributes in Pingfangwang area and Boxing subsag, being characterized by Pr/Ph>0.8, Ph/nC18<0.6, an extremely low content of gammacerane, a relatively high content of 4-methyl steranes and diasteranes and relatively high ratios of Ts/Tm and hopanes/steranes, which reflects the oil may come from a suite of mudstone rich in clay minerals deposited in the fresh water lacustrine environment. Class-Ⅱ oil distributes in Chunhua-Lean and Chenguanzhuang structural belt, characterized by Pr/Ph<0.6, Ph/nC18>2, a high content of gammacerane, a low content of 4-methyl steranes and diasteranes and relatively low ratios of Ts/Tm and hopanes/steranes, which indicates the oil sourced from a suite of mudstone or lime mudstone deposited in salt lacustrine environment. ClassⅢ oil distributes in the northern gentle slope structural belt of Qingcheng, characterized by the detection of 25-norhopanes and a middle content of gammacerane, which shows it is mixture of few biodegradated Class-Ⅱ oil charged in early stage and mass Class-Ⅰ oil charged in late stages. Class-Ⅳ oil distributes in Kongdian Formation of Wangjiagang area, characterized by an absolute predominant content of C₂9 steranes and a high content of gammacerane, which reveals the oil is mixture of Class-Ⅱ oil and the oil generated by shallow lake-swamp facies source rock.

中图分类号:

TE122

孟江辉,刘洛夫,姜振学,高永进. 东营凹陷南斜坡沙四下亚段—孔店组原油地球化学特征及成因分类[J]. 现代地质, 2010, 24(6): 1085-1092.

MENG Jiang-hui,LIU Luo-fu,JIANG Zhen-xue,GAO Yong-jin. Characteristics and Origin Classification of the Oils from the Lower Section of the 4th Member of Shahejie Formation and Kongdian Formation in the Southern Slope of Dongying Depression, Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Geoscience, 2010, 24(6): 1085-1092.

参考文献

[1]王居峰.山东东营凹陷沙四段盐下层油气成藏条件分析[J].现代地质，2009，23（2）：313-318.
[2]王启军, 陈建渝.油气地球化学[M].武汉：中国地质大学出版社，1988: 99-101.
[3]Mckirgy D M, Aldrige A K, Ypma P J M.A geochemical comparison of some crude oils from PreOrdovician carbonate rocks[M]//Bjory M.Advances in Organic Geochemistry 1981. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1983: 99-107.
[4]Price P L, OSullivan T, Alexander R.The nature and occurrence of oil in Seram, Indonesia[M]// Indonesian Petroleum Association. Proceedings of the Indonesian Petroleum Association.Sixteenth Annual Convention.Jakarta: Indonesian Petroleum Association, 1987, 1: 141-173.
[5]Mann A L, Goodwin N S, Lowe S.Geochemical characteristics of lacustrine source rocks: A combined palynological/molecular study of a Tertiary sequence from offshore China [M]Indonesian Petroleum Association. Proceedings of the Indonesian Petroleum Association.Sixteenth Annual Convention. Jakarta: Indonesian Petroleum Association, 1987, 1: 241-258.
[6]Fu Jiamo, Sheng Guoying, Peng Pingan, et al.Peculiarities of salt lake sediments as potential source rocks in China[J].Organic Geochemistry, 1986, 10: 119-126.
[7]Reed W E.Molecular compositions of weathered petroleum and comparison with its possible source[J].Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1977, 41: 237-247.
[8]Seifert W K, Moldowan J M.The effect of biodegradation on steranes and terpanes in crude oils[J].Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1979, 43: 111-126.
[9]Seifert W K, Moldowan J M, Demaison G J.Source correlation of biodegraded oils[J].Organic Geochemistry, 1984, 6: 633-643.
[10]Peters K E, Walters C C, Moldowan J M.The Biomarker Guide Volume 2: Biomakers and Isotopes in Petroleum Exploration and Earth History[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2005: 65-202.
[11] Volkman J K, Alexander R, Kagi R I, et al.Demethylated hopanes in crude oils and their applications in petroleum geochemistry[J].Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1983, 47: 785-794.
[12]李素梅，郭栋.东营凹陷原油单体烃碳同位素特征及其在油源识别中的应用[J].现代地质，2010，24（2）：252-258.
[13]朱扬明，张春明，张敏, 等.沉积环境的氧化还原性对重排甾烷形成的作用[J].沉积学报，1997，15（4）：103-108.
[14]Brassell S C, Eglinton G, Mao F J.Biological marker compounds as indicators of the depositional history of the Maoming oil shale[J].Organic Geochemistry, 1986, 10: 927-941.

[1]	罗海怡, 罗先熔, 刘攀峰, 马明亮, 陆显盛, 蒋小明, 鲍官桂, 蒋羽雄. 广西崇左市那渠地区土壤地球化学特征及找矿前景[J]. 现代地质, 2023, 37(06): 1553-1566.
[2]	郭福生, 凌媛媛, 陈留勤, 周万蓬, 李宏卫, 程亮开, 吴志春, 黎广荣, 国振, 李斌. 丹霞山世界地质公园地貌景观控制因素与景观类型研究[J]. 现代地质, 2023, 37(06): 1665-1679.
[3]	李志鹏, 余麒麟, 昝灵, 余文端, 张枝焕. 苏北盆地溱潼凹陷阜二段不同岩性烃源岩的地球化学特征及生烃潜力对比[J]. 现代地质, 2023, 37(05): 1345-1357.
[4]	梁东, 华北, 赵德怀, 吴浩, 万生楠, 谭朝欣, 赵晓健, 杨志鹏. 喀喇昆仑麦拉山地区水系沉积物地球化学特征与找矿预测[J]. 现代地质, 2023, 37(03): 708-721.
[5]	娄元林, 成明, 唐侥, 张潮明, 蓝景周, 袁永盛, 杨桃. 藏南古堆地区岩浆岩岩石地球化学特征、构造环境分析及成矿响应[J]. 现代地质, 2023, 37(02): 353-374.
[6]	邓科, 王金贵, 董玉杰, 何林武, 袁仁华, 张泽国, 陈守关, 辛堂. 西藏桑耶地区晚白垩世中性侵入岩的成因及对新特提斯板块北向俯冲的指示意义[J]. 现代地质, 2023, 37(02): 375-389.
[7]	夏锦胜, 孙莉, 张鹏, 陈昌阔, 汪君珠, 司江福. 四川坪河晶质石墨矿床地球化学特征及成因分析[J]. 现代地质, 2022, 36(06): 1486-1496.
[8]	陈世明, 杨镇熙, 雷自强, 康维良, 张晶, 赵青虎. 甘肃北山前红泉地区水系沉积物地球化学特征及找矿方向[J]. 现代地质, 2022, 36(06): 1513-1524.
[9]	刘同, 刘传朋, 康鹏宇, 赵秀芳, 邓俊, 王凯凯. 山东省沂南县东部土壤重金属地球化学特征及源解析[J]. 现代地质, 2022, 36(04): 1173-1182.
[10]	刘洋, 李贤庆, 赵光杰, 刘满仓, 董才源, 李谨, 肖中尧. 库车坳陷东部吐格尔明地区天然气地球化学特征及油气充注史[J]. 现代地质, 2022, 36(04): 988-997.
[11]	王斌, 任涛, 宋伊圩, 杨可, 王占彬, 孙亚柯. 西秦岭常家山地区水系沉积物地球化学特征及其地质意义[J]. 现代地质, 2022, 36(03): 911-922.
[12]	刘阳, 姜冰, 张海瑞, 孙增兵, 王松涛. 山东省青州市表层土壤硒元素地球化学特征[J]. 现代地质, 2022, 36(03): 933-940.
[13]	王美华. 浙西典型石煤矿山周边耕地富硒土壤地球化学特征及影响因素[J]. 现代地质, 2022, 36(03): 941-952.
[14]	朱必清, 陈世加, 白艳军, 雷俊杰, 尹相东. 鄂尔多斯盆地甘泉地区延长组长8段原油地球化学特征及来源[J]. 现代地质, 2022, 36(02): 742-754.
[15]	高银虎, 尹刚, 龚泽强, 郭明春. 甘肃两当湘潭子金矿床地质特征及成因[J]. 现代地质, 2021, 35(06): 1523-1535.