基于成藏过程重建研究渤中凹陷西北缘陡坡带油气差异聚集机理

doi:10.19657/j.geoscience.1000-8527.2021.029

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

渤海湾盆地渤中凹陷西北缘陡坡带油气分布“西贫东富”,成藏条件复杂。利用储层定量荧光技术、傅立叶红外光谱技术、原油地球化学参数、流体包裹体岩相学,结合埋藏史、热史及构造演化,从古流体和现代流体特征角度进行系统定时定量化成藏过程恢复,研究差异成藏原因。研究表明,陡坡带经历了两期油气充注过程,第一期开始于明化镇组沉积早期(距今7 Ma),来自东南部沙河街组烃源岩的低熟油经历短距离运移在东区古近系成藏,该期原油充注量较少。第二期发生在明化镇组沉积中期(距今5.3 Ma),较高成熟度的烃类由东向西,由深向浅运移,在东、西区古近系形成大规模古油藏。明化镇组沉积晚期(距今3.7 Ma),边界断层活动性增强,西区断层活动速率强于东区,断层作用由封闭作用转为输导作用,西区古近系古油藏大规模破坏,东区东三段古油藏油水界面向上迁移,油气向浅层聚集成藏。第四纪沉积期(距今2.2 Ma),断层活动性减弱,逐步形成现今油藏。距离供烃源岩的远近、经历成藏期次的不同以及控藏断裂活动的强弱差异共同导致了渤中凹陷西北缘陡坡带油气差异分布的格局。

关键词: 流体包裹体, 储层定量荧光, 古油藏, 断层活动速率, 成藏过程, 陡坡带, 渤中凹陷

Abstract:

Hydrocarbon distribution is low in the western part but high in the eastern part of the steep-slope zone in the northwestern margin of Bozhong sag (Bohai Bay Basin), and the reservoir-forming conditions are complex. Based on fluid inclusions petrographic observation, quantitative grain fluorescence technology, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and crude oil geochemical properties, and combined with the thermal, and burial history and tectonic evolution, the hydrocarbon accumulation process was unraveled from the paleo- and modern fluid characteristics. Besides, the reason of differential oil-gas distribution was also discussed. Our results define two hydrocarbon charging stages in the study area: stage one started at the early deposition of the Minghuazhen Formation (7 Ma), when the lowly-mature oil was sourced from the Shahejie Formation in the southeast. It has experienced short-range migration and formed reservoirs in the Paleogene sequences in the eastern part of the area. The charging scale is low at this stage. Stage two occurred in the middle deposition stage of the Minghuazhen Formation (5.3 Ma). The highly-mature hydrocarbons may have ascended from east to west, and formed large-scale paleo-oil reservoirs in the Paleogene sequences. During the late deposition stage of the Minghuazhen Formation (3.7 Ma), the activity of boundary faults was strengthened, and the activity rate in the western part of the area was higher than that in the eastern part. The faults may have changed from being hydrocarbon seal to fluid conduits. The Paleogene paleo-oil reservoirs in the western part of the area were largely destroyed, and the oil-water interface of the paleo-oil reservoir in the Dongying Formation (3^rd member) moved upward, with the hydrocarbon ascending to shallow formation. During the Quaternary sedimentation (2.2 Ma), the fault activity weakened and the current reservoirs were gradually formed. The hydrocarbon distribution pattern in the steep-slope zone of the northwestern margin of Bozhong sag are likely controlled by the distance from the source rock, the different reservoir formation stages, and the deformation intensity difference of the boundary faults.

Key words: fluid inclusions, quantitative grain fluorescence, paleo-oil reservoir, fault activity rate, accumulation process, steep-slope zone, Bozhong sag

中图分类号:

TE122.3

郝鹏, 杨纪磊, 张旭东, 臧春艳, 陈容涛, 王波, 税蕾蕾, 王思惠, 蔡涛. 基于成藏过程重建研究渤中凹陷西北缘陡坡带油气差异聚集机理[J]. 现代地质, 2021, 35(04): 1124-1135.

HAO Peng, YANG Jilei, ZHANG Xudong, ZANG Chunyan, CHEN Rongtao, WANG Bo, SHUI Leilei, WANG Sihui, CAI Tao. Mechanism of Differential Oil-gas Distribution in the Steep-slope Zone (Northwestern Margin of Bozhong Sag): Evidence from Reconstruction of Hydrocarbon Accumulation[J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(04): 1124-1135.

图/表 12

图1 渤中凹陷西北缘陡坡带构造位置图

Fig.1 Location of the steep-slope zone, northwestern margin of Bozhong sag

图2 渤中凹陷西北缘陡坡带油藏分布剖面图

Fig.2 Oil reservoir profile of the steep-slope zone, northwestern margin of Bozhong sag

图3 渤中凹陷西北缘陡坡带热演化史、埋藏史和成藏时间

Fig.3 Thermal evolution history, burial history, and hydrocarbon accumulation timing of the steep-slope zone, northwestern margin of Bozhong sag

图4 渤中凹陷西北部烃源岩与陡坡带原油饱和烃质量色谱图

Fig.4 Quality chromatogram of saturated hydrocarbon in source rocks and crude oil from the northwestern margin of Bozhong sag

图5 渤中凹陷西北缘陡坡带原油运移方向

Fig.5 Oil migration direction in the steep-slope zone, northwestern margin of Bozhong sag

图6 渤中凹陷西北缘陡坡带储层流体包裹体照片 (a)C1井,3 020 m,Ed3,单偏光照片,环石英颗粒加大边内侧成带分布的呈深褐色、灰褐色的重质油包裹体,第I期;(b)C1井,2 955 m,Ed3,单偏光照片,沿切穿石英颗粒的微裂隙分布的轻质油包裹体,第II期;(c)C1井,2 955 m,Ed3,UV激发荧光照片,显示黄绿色荧光,第II期;(d)C7井,2 079.5 m,Ed2,单偏光照片,沿切穿石英颗粒的微裂隙成带分布的,呈黄色—灰色的中轻质油气包裹体,第II期;(e)C7井,2 079.5 m,Ed2,UV激发荧光照片,显示黄绿色荧光,第II期;(f)C9井,2 085 m,Ed2,单偏光照片,轻质油包裹体内含褐色沥青斑块

Fig.6 Photomicrograph of fluid inclusions from the steep-slope zone, northwestern margin of Bozhong sag

图7 渤中凹陷西北缘陡坡带C2井储层定量荧光剖面图

Fig.7 Quantitative fluorescence integrated profile of C2 well in the steep-slope zone, northwestern margin of Bozhong sag

图8 渤中凹陷西北缘陡坡带原油C29甾烷异构化成熟度参数图

Fig.8 Maturity parameter diagram of C29 sterane isomerization of crude oil from the steep-slope zone, northwestern margin of Bozhong sag

图9 C1井古近系储层烃包裹体及原油傅立叶红外光谱图

Fig.9 FTIR spectra of hydrocarbon inclusions and crude oil in the Paleogene reservoir of well C1

表1 渤中凹陷西北缘陡坡带西区东二段油气包裹体特征

Table 1 Characteristics of fluid inclusions in the Ed2 of the western region, of the steep-slope zone, northwestern margin of Bozhong sag

井名	深度/m	产状	荧光颜色	包裹体期次	GOI/%	QGF指数	λ_max/nm	古油水层解释	现今油水层测井解释
C4	2 071.5	/	/	第Ⅱ期	/	5.2	420.9	古油层	含油水层
	2 139.0	沿切穿砂颗粒的微裂隙成线状或颗粒内点状分布	黄绿色	第Ⅱ期	8.0	/	/	古油层	含油水层
	2 171.5	/	/	第Ⅱ期	/	4.1	461.3	古油层	含油水层
	2 218.0	/	/	第Ⅱ期	/	1.8	388.9	古水层	水层
	2 287.0	/	/	第Ⅱ期	/	4.8	447.5	古油层	含油水层
	2 361.0	/	/	第Ⅱ期	/	2.7	457.5	古水层	含油水层
	2 380.5	/	/	第Ⅱ期	/	1.5	457.2	古水层	含油水层
C7	2 016.5	/	/	第Ⅱ期	/	9.5	416.5	古油层	含油水层
	2 046.0	/	/	第Ⅱ期	/	8.7	413.9	古油层	含油水层
	2 079.5	沿切穿砂颗粒的微裂隙成线状或颗粒内点状分布	淡黄色、黄绿色	第Ⅱ期	5.0	14.6	405.6	古油层	含油水层
	2 160.5	/	/	第Ⅱ期	/	4.5	422.1	古油层	含油水层
C9	2 036.0	/	/	第Ⅱ期	/	7.0	420.1	古油层	含油水层
C9	2 085.0	沿切穿砂颗粒的微裂隙成线状或颗粒内群体状分布	淡绿色、黄绿色	第Ⅱ期	5.0	/	/	古油层	水层

图10 渤中凹陷西北缘陡坡带边界断层活动速率

Fig.10 Activity rate of boundary faults in the steep slope zone, northwestern margin of Bozhong sag

图11 渤中凹陷西北缘陡坡带油气差异成藏过程示意图

Fig.11 Schematic diagram of the differential hydrocarbon accumulation process in the steep-slope zone, northwestern margin of Bozhong sag

参考文献 31

[1]	WANG Z M, LONG H S. Different hydrocarbon accumulation histories in the Kelasu-Yiqikelike, structural belt of the Kuqa Foreland Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica-English Edition, 2010, 84(5):1195-1208. DOI URL
[2]	BODNAR R J. Systematics of stretching of fluid inclusions I : Fluorite and sphalerite at 1 atmosphere confining pressure[J]. Economic Geology, 1984, 79(1):141-161. DOI URL
[3]	GEORGE S C, VOLK H, AHMED M. Geochemical analysis techniques and geological applications of oil-bearing fluid inclusions, with some Australian case studies[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2007, 57(1):119-138. DOI URL
[4]	刘可禹, BOURDET J, 张宝收, 等. 应用流体包裹体研究油气成藏——以塔中奥陶系储集层为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2013(2):171-180.
[5]	杨程宇, 文龙, 王铁冠, 等. 川中隆起安岳气田古油藏成藏时间厘定[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(3):492-502.
[6]	罗冰, 文龙, 张亚, 等. 四川盆地西北部栖霞组天然气差异成藏过程[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2020, 41(2):393-406.
[7]	马玉杰, 卓勤功, 杨宪彰, 等. 库车坳陷克拉苏构造带油气动态成藏过程及其勘探启示[J]. 石油实验地质, 2013, 35(3):249-254.
[8]	顾忆, 黄继文, 贾存善, 等. 塔里木盆地海相油气成藏研究进展[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(1):1-12.
[9]	GOLDSTEIN R H. Fluid inclusions in sedimentary and diagenetic systems[J]. Lithos, 2001, 55(1):159-193. DOI URL
[10]	胡安文, 牛成民, 王德英, 等. 渤海湾盆地渤中凹陷渤中19-6构造凝析油气特征与形成机制[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(4):403-422.
[11]	郝鹏, 臧春艳, 贺银军, 等. 利用流体历史分析技术研究渤海海域黄河口凹陷北部陡坡带油气成藏过程[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2019, 19(18):164-170.
[12]	牛成民, 王冰洁, 王飞龙, 等. 辽西凹陷锦州20-2北油田沙二段油气成藏条件与成藏过程[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 46(6):667-677.
[13]	王波, 杨海风, 王孝辕, 等. 黄河口凹陷陡坡带B27构造古近系油气成藏期——基于流体包裹体的证据[J]. 断块油气田, 2016, 23(6):693-696.
[14]	陈磊, 徐长贵, 杨海风, 等. 黄河口凹陷南斜坡新生界流体包裹体特征及成藏期[J]. 断块油气田, 2017, 24(1):10-14.
[15]	徐长贵, 王冰洁, 王飞龙, 等. 辽东湾坳陷新近系特稠油成藏模式与成藏过程——以旅大5-2北油田为例[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(5):599-609.
[16]	桂丽黎, 刘可禹, 王喻雄, 等. 柴西南尕斯地区不同期次油气充注对现今油藏的贡献[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 40(2):43-51.
[17]	齐雯, 潘建国, 王国栋, 等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷斜坡区百口泉组储层流体包裹体特征及油气充注史[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(增刊1):64-71.
[18]	MARCHAND A M E, SMALLEYS P C, HAZELDINE R S, et al. Note on the importance of hydrocarbon fill for reservoir quality prediction in sandstones[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2002, 86(9):1561-1571.
[19]	刘可禹, 鲁雪松, 桂丽黎, 等. 储层定量荧光技术及其在油气成藏研究中的应用[J] 地球科学——中国地质大学学报, 2016, 41(3):373-384.
[20]	LIU K Y, PETER E. Quantitative fluorescence techniques for detecting residual oils and reconstructing hydrocarbon charge history[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 2005, 36(7):1023-1036. DOI URL
[21]	LIU K Y, GEORGE S C, LU X S, et al. Innovative fluorescence spectroscopic techniques for rapidly characterizing oil inclusions[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 2014, 72:34-45. DOI URL
[22]	JONK R, PARNELL J, WHITHAM A. Fluid inclusion evidence for a Cretaceous-Palaeogene petroleum system, Kangerlussuaq Basin, East Greenland[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2005, 22(3):319-330. DOI URL
[23]	桂丽黎, 刘可禹, 柳少波, 等. 柴达木盆地西部英东地区油气成藏过程[J]. 地球科学, 2015, 40(5):890-899.
[24]	徐长贵, 周心怀, 杨波, 等. 渤中凹陷石南陡坡带构造-岩性复合圈闭的形成及分布规律[J]. 现代地质, 2009, 23(5):887-893.
[25]	庞小军, 王清斌, 王飞龙, 等. 渤中凹陷西北缘边界断层面特征与油气成藏[J]. 特种油气藏, 2016, 23(5):43-47.
[26]	田德瑞, 吴奎, 张如才, 等. 渤海湾盆地辽西凸起北段锦州20油田原油地球化学特征及油源对比[J]. 石油实验地质, 2018, 40(3):410-417.
[27]	DAI J X, LI J, LUO X, et al. Stable carbon isotope compositions and source rock geochemistry of the giant gas accumulations in the Ordos Basin, China[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 2005, 36(12):1617-1635. DOI URL
[28]	杨永才, 李友川. 渤海湾盆地渤中凹陷烃源岩地球化学与分布特征[J]. 矿物岩石, 2012, 32(4):67-74.
[29]	庞小军, 王清斌, 崔海忠, 等. 渤中凹陷西部北缘生烃期边界断层活动对油气富集的影响[J]. 西安石油大学学报:自然科学版, 2016, 31(4):38-43.
[30]	LI M, LARTER S R, STODDART D, et al. Fractionation of pyrrolic nitrogen compounds in petroleum during migration: derivation of migration-related geochemical parameters[J]. Geological Society, 1995, 86(1):103-123. DOI URL
[31]	ROURE F, SWENNEN R, SCHNEIDER F, et al. Incidence and importance of tectonics and natural fluid migration on reservoir evolution in Foreland Fold-And-Thrust Belts[J]. Oil and Gas Science and Technology, 2005, 60(1):67-106. DOI URL