Characteristics of Pore Structure of Xinganling Pay Zone in Suderte Oilfield

Abstract

Abstract:

Research on characteristics of pore structure of Xing anling pay zone in Suderte oilfield is made, in view of the problems of poor effect of waterflooding and the low productivity. The reasonable classification criteria of throat is determined. Classification limit between fine throat and absorbing throat is 0.1μm. The research is based on pore distribution feature, throat size, throat distribution range and its form, permeability contribution, storage space and fluid flowing channel, flowing throat limit, Jamin effect, movable fluid saturation. There are big differences in the throat size and the distribution. Throat distribution takes on dual peak, and microheterogeneity is very serious. Formation permeability is controlled by throat. Permeability contribution takes on single peak and peak value locates right site. Large scale throat contribute much to permeability. The fundamental reason of waterflooding and the low productivity in Xing anling pay zone is that throat is small, flowing throat limit is low, storage space does not match flowing space, Jamin effect is large, and movable fluid saturation is small. Infilling oil well, method in the center of square well pattern is proposed and the better development result is obtained.

Key words: Suderte oilfield, Xinganling pay zone, pore structure, pore, throat

MAO Wei, DU Peng-Ju. Characteristics of Pore Structure of Xinganling Pay Zone in Suderte Oilfield[J]. Geoscience, 2012, 26(3): 575-580.

References

［1]姜洪福，陈发景，张云春，等．松辽盆地三肇地区扶杨油层储集层孔隙结构及评价［J］．现代地质，2006，20(3)：465-472．
［2]张创，孙卫，解伟．苏北盆地沙埝油田阜三段储层微观特征及其与驱油效率的关系［J］．现代地质，2011，25(1)：70-77．
［3]胡志明，把智波，熊伟，等．低渗透油藏微观孔隙结构分析［J］．大庆石油学院学报，2006，30(3)：51-53．
［4]Soeder D J，Randolph P L．Porosity, permeability, and pore structure of the tight Mesaverde sandstone, Piceance basin, Colorado ［J］．SPE Formation Evaluation，1987，2（2）：129-136．
［5]Shen P P，Li K V，Jia F S．Quantitative description for the heterogeneity of pore structure by using mercury capillary pressure curves ［R］． Beijing： International Meeting on Petroleum Engineering，SPE，1995．［6]Arns C H，Melean A P，Sheppard M A．A comparison of pore structure analysis by NMR and XrayCT techniques［R］． Austin, Texas： 49th Annual Logging Symposium，SPWLA，2008．［7]李道品．低渗透油田高效开发决策论［M］．北京：石油工业出版社，2003：63-64．［8]李海波．岩心核磁共振可动流体T2截止值实验研究［D］．北京：中国科学院渗流流体力学研究所，2008．［9]Saidi A M．Discussion of valid capillary pressure data at low wetting phase saturation ［J］．SPE Reservoir Engineering，1991，6(3)：397-399．［10]Churaiev N V．On the force of hydrophobic attraction in wetting films of aqueous solutions［J］．Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects，1993，79（25）：25-31．［11]刘德新，岳湘安，侯吉瑞．孔隙介质中边界流体动态特性实验研究［J］．大庆石油地质与开发，2008，27(5)：58-61．［12]向阳，向丹，羊裔常，等．致密砂岩气藏水驱动态采收率及水膜厚度研究［J］．成都理工学院学报，1999，26(4)：389-391．
［13]何更生．油层物理［M］．北京：石油工业出版社，1994：219-220．
［14]时宇，杨正明，黄延章．储层流动孔喉下限研究［J］．西南石油大学学报，2009，31(6)：41-44．
［15]刘爱武，李学文．低渗油藏的两相渗流特征及其影响因素［J］．石油天然气学报，2006，28(3)：325-327．
［16]李劲峰，曲志浩，孔令荣．贾敏效应对低渗透油层有不可忽视的影响［J］．石油勘探与开发，1999，26(2)：93-94．
［17]高辉，宋广寿，高静乐，等．西峰油田微观孔隙结构对注水开发效果的影响［J］．西北大学学报，2008，38(1)：121-125．
［18]杨正明，苗盛，刘先贵，等．特低渗透油藏可动流体百分数参数及其应用［J］．西安石油大学学报，2007，22(2)：96-99．

[1]	LI Dongsheng, GAO Ping, GAI Haifeng, LIU Ruobing, CAI Yidong, LI Gang, ZHOU Qin, XIAO Xianming. Organic Nano-pore Textural Characteristics of the Longmaxi Formation Shale in the Southeastern Sichuan Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(05): 1293-1305.
[2]	ZHANG Jinqing, LI Xianqing, ZHANG Boxiang, ZHANG Xueqing, YANG Jingwei, YU Zhenfeng. Pore Characteristics and Pore Structure of the Upper Paleozoic Coal-bearing Shale Gas Reservoir in the Wuxiang Block, Qinshui Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(06): 1551-1562.
[3]	LI Qing, LI Jiangshan, LU Hao, QI Fengqiang, HE Yu, AN Keqin, LI Longyu, ZHANG Houmin, WU Yue. Characteristics and Control Factors of the Chang 7₃ Shale Reservoirs in the Southern Ordos Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(05): 1254-1270.
[4]	QI Yang, LÜ Chunyan, WANG Yuhui, TANG Shuheng, XI Zhaodong. Pore Structural Characteristics of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formations Under Biostratigraphic Framework in Northwestern Hunan [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(05): 1292-1303.
[5]	WANG Zhihao, ZHAO Jianhua, PU Xiugang, LIU Keyu, LI Junqian, CHENG Bin. Comparison of Washing Oil Experiment of Core Samples from Shale Oil Reservoir [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(05): 1304-1312.
[6]	JIANG Bingren, DENG Ende, HAN Minghui, MA Zijie. Microscopic Pore Structure and Fractal Characteristics From the Carboniferous Xiangbai Formation Shale in Northwestern Guizhou [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(04): 1065-1073.
[7]	HAN Hongwei, LIU Zhen, MA Xinruo, LI Hongmei, HE Yangyang, XU Zeyang. Distribution Prediction of High Overpressure in Jurassic Moxizhuang-Yongjin Area, Central Junggar Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(04): 1074-1086.
[8]	CUI Weiping, YANG Yuqing, LIU Jianxin. Logging Identification Method of Low Porosity and Low Permeability Reservoir Effectiveness Based on Lithofacies Units and Pore Structures: An Example from NB1 Structure in Xihu Depression [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(01): 140-148.
[9]	YANG Yi, ZHANG Hengrong, YUAN Wei, YANG Dong, HU Desheng. Fractal Characteristics Comparison and Genesis of Conventional Sandstone and Glutenite [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(01): 149-158.
[10]	XIE Yingfeng, LU Jing’an, KUANG Zenggui, KANG Dongju, WANG Tong, CAI Huimin. Well Logging Evaluation for Three-Phase Zone with Gas Hydrate in the Shenhu Area, South China Sea [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(01): 182-192.
[11]	LIU Wenfeng, ZHANG Xiaoshuan, LIU Jinming, AILIMAN·Daoerji , YANG Yuanfeng, ZHANG Xiwen, QI Liqi, YU Jingwei. Evaluation and Characteristics of Pore Structures in Sand and Conglomerate Reservoirs of Badaowan Formation in the AH5 Well Block [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(06): 1844-1853.
[12]	LI Yangyang, LI Xianqing, ZHANG Xueqing, YANG Jingwei, ZHANG Boxiang, XIAO Xianming, YU Zhenfeng. Pore Structure Characteristics of Taiyuan Formation Coal Measures Shale in the Yangquan Block of the Qinshui Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(04): 1033-1042.
[13]	YU Jingwei, NIU Zhijie, QI Liqi, SUN Xinming, LIU Ni, ZHANG Jin, CAO Song. Comprehensive Study on Reservoir Heterogeneity of Toutunhe Formation in the Slope Area, North of Fukang Sag, Junggar Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(03): 819-831.
[14]	JIANG Bingren, YANG Tongbao, SHI Fulun, HAN Minghui, FU Wei. Shale Gas Accumulation Conditions and Gas-bearing Properties of the Lower Carboniferous Jiusi Formation in Western Guizhou [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(02): 338-348.
[15]	ZHANG Haihua, LI Xiaohai, ZHANG Jian, ZHENG Yuejuan, CHEN Shuwang, ZHANG Dejun, SU Fei, BIAN Xiongfei, SUN Lei. Paleochronology, Geochemical Characteristics, and Geological Significance of the Upper Permian Linxi Formation in the Northern Songliao Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(02): 568-578.