Fractal Characteristics Comparison and Genesis of Conventional Sandstone and Glutenite

doi:10.19657/j.geoscience.1000-8527.2021.189

Abstract

Abstract:

Based on data from cast thin section, microscope, mercury-injection and conventional physical property analyses, we investigated the fractal characteristics of pore structure of glutenite reservoir developed in the Eocene Liushagang Formation of the Wushi Sag. The study includes the characteristics of fractal curves, fractal dimension and its relationship with reservoir physical properties and pore structure parameters, the effectiveness of fractal dimension in characterizing the storage and the permeability of different types of sandstones. The results show that compared with conventional sandstone, the high-pressure mercury fractal curve of glutenite presents has segmented features, indicating the development of three sets of pore-throat systems of different scales (macropores, small pores, and micropores). Segmented fractal characterization indicates that the fractal dimensions of large and small pores are greater than those of conventional sandstone. All the above analysis shows that the glutenite pore structure is the most complex. The fractal dimension of conventional sandstone has a good relationship with porosity and permeability, while the fractal dimension of glutenite samples has only a minor correlation with the storage capacity parameters. Hence, the glutenite has complex porosity-permeability relations, diverse types of pores and pore connectivity. The fractal dimension can characterize the reservoir capacity, but has certain limitation on seepage capacity characterization.

Key words: glutenite, pore structure, pore type, mercury-injection, fractal dimension

CLC Number:

TE122.2

YANG Yi, ZHANG Hengrong, YUAN Wei, YANG Dong, HU Desheng. Fractal Characteristics Comparison and Genesis of Conventional Sandstone and Glutenite[J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(01): 149-158.

Figures/Tables 10

References 27

[1]	MANDELBROT B B. The Fractal Geometry of Nature[M]. San Francisco: Freeman, 1982.
[2]	FALCONE K. Fractal Geometry Mathematical Foundations and Application[M]. London: John Wiley and Sons Press, 1996:171-174.
[3]	PFEIFER P. Fractal dimension as working tool for surface-roughness problems[J]. Applications of Surface Science, 1984, 8(1/2):146-164.
[4]	LAI Jin, WANG Guiwen. Fractal analysis of tight gas sandstones using high-pressure mercury intrusion techniques[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2015, 24:185-196. DOI URL
[5]	张全培, 吴文瑞, 刘丽萍, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地镇北地区延长组超低渗透储层孔隙结构及其分形特征[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2020, 27(3):20-31.
[6]	尹帅, 谢润成, 丁文龙, 等. 常规及非常规储层岩石分形特征对渗透率的影响[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017, 29(4):81-90.
[7]	赵楠, 王磊, 黄俊, 等. 不同岩性低渗储层分形特征对比及成因分析[J]. 中国海上油气, 2020, 32(1):87-94.
[8]	贾芬敏, 沈平平, 李克文. 砂岩孔隙结构的分形特征及应用研究[J]. 断块油气田, 1995, 2(1):16-21.
[9]	冯小哲, 祝海华. 鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格地区下石盒子组致密砂岩储层微观孔隙结构及分形特征[J]. 地质科技情报, 2019, 38(3):147-156.
[10]	彭军, 韩浩东, 夏青松, 等. 深埋藏致密砂岩储层微观孔隙结构的分形表征及成因机理--以塔里木盆地顺托果勒地区柯坪塔格组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(7):775-791.
[11]	张宪国, 张涛, 林承焰. 基于孔隙分形特征的低渗透储层孔隙结构评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(6):40-45.
[12]	吴浩, 刘锐娥, 纪友亮, 等. 致密气储层孔喉分形特征及其与渗流的关系--以鄂尔多斯盆地下石盒子组盒8段为例[J]. 沉积学报, 2017, 35(1):151-162.
[13]	YAN Jianping, HE Xu, GENG Bin, et al. Nuclear magnetic resonance T₂ spectrum:multifractal characteristics and pore structure evaluation[J]. Applied Geophysics, 2017, 14(2):205-215. DOI URL
[14]	齐丹, 邹洪岚, 丁云宏, 等. 基于Hausdroff分形维数的碳酸盐岩酸蚀蚓孔计算模型[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2019, 19(6):105-109.
[15]	王民, 焦晨雪, 李传明, 等. 东营凹陷沙河街组页岩微观孔隙多重分形特征[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2019, 26(1):72-79.
[16]	李振, 邵龙义, 侯海海, 等. 高煤阶煤孔隙结构及分形特征[J]. 现代地质, 2017, 31(3):595-605.
[17]	司马立强, 杨国栋, 吴丰, 等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷百口泉组致密砂砾岩孔隙分形特征及影响因素探讨[J]. 测井技术, 2016, 40(5):609-616.
[18]	胡德胜, 邓勇, 张建新, 等. 乌石凹陷东区古近系断裂系统与油气成藏[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 38(4):27-36.
[19]	杨海长, 梁建设, 胡望水. 乌石凹陷构造特征及其对油气成藏的影响[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 33(3):41-46.
[20]	孙伟, 樊太亮, 赵志刚, 等. 乌石凹陷古近系层序地层及沉积体系[J]. 天然气工业, 2008, 28(4):26-28.
[21]	曾小明, 张辉, 邹明生, 等. 北部湾盆地乌石凹陷东区流三段物源分析及其对储层物性的控制[J]. 地质科技情报, 2016, 35(6):63-69.
[22]	尤丽, 招湛杰, 李才, 等. 乌石凹陷流沙港组储层特征与有利储层分布[J]. 东北石油大学学报, 2015, 39(6):95-101.
[23]	贺承祖, 华明琪. 储层孔隙结构的分形几何描述[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 1998, 19(1):15-23.
[24]	贺伟, 钟孚勋, 贺承祖, 等. 储层岩石孔隙的分形结构研究和应用[J]. 天然气工业, 2000, 20(2):67-70.
[25]	王剑锋. 呼和诺仁油田A区块南二段砂砾岩储层孔隙结构特征[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(4):50-62.
[26]	闫建平, 何旭, 耿斌, 等. 基于分形理论的低渗透砂岩储层孔隙结构评价方法[J]. 测井技术, 2017, 41(3):345-352.
[27]	马新仿, 张士诚, 郎兆新. 用分段回归方法计算孔隙结构的分形维数[J]. 石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 28(6):54-60.

井名	样品编号	深度 /m	岩性	孔隙结构类型	孔隙度/%	渗透率/ 10^-3μm²	分形维数D_p
X-9	G1-3	2 131.1	中砂岩	Ⅰ	25.9	290.0	2.56
X-9	G1-7	2 178.7	中砂岩		22.5	176.2	2.65
X-9	G1-13	2 252.0	细砂岩		19.2	50.0	2.69
X-4	1-1	2 217.0	细砂岩		23.14	319.1	2.60
X-7	1-2	1 616.0	细砂岩		28.6	600.0	2.62
X-7	1-3	1 638.5	细砂岩		26.5	232.9	2.65
X-7	1-4	1 676.0	细砂岩		28.5	960.0	2.60
X-8	G1-3	2 255.0	粉砂岩	Ⅲ	12.4	2.5	2.79
X-9	G1-1	2 122.2	细砂岩		17.3	25.6	2.65
X-9	G1-12	2 236.9	泥质粉砂岩		13.0	1.0	2.82
X-9	G1-21	2 390.5	泥质粉砂岩		17.8	11.4	2.72
X-11	G1-1	2 513.0	泥质粉砂岩		13.5	0.4	2.72
X-14	G1-1	2 598.3	粉砂岩		13.6	1.3	2.71
X-14	G1-2	2 639.6	粉砂岩		16.5	12.0	2.69
X-14	G1-3	2 656.4	粉砂岩		18.7	37.6	2.64
X-9	1-1	2 773.4	含砾中-粗砂岩	Ⅱ	20.2	78.7	2.74
X-9	1-2	2 774.0	含砾粗砂岩		19.6	89.2	2.72
X-9	1-3	2 774.3	含砾中-粗砂岩		20.7	86.4	2.71
X-9	1-4	2 775.0	砂砾岩		14.4	44.5	2.80
X-9	1-7	2 776.6	含砾中-粗砂岩		19.6	31.0	2.68
X-9	1-9	2 777.2	含砾中-粗砂岩		19.6	56.0	2.76
X-9	1-10	2 778.2	含砾中-粗砂岩		15.7	50.9	2.80
X-9	1-11	2 778.6	含砾中-粗砂岩		18.5	70.8	2.67
X-9	1-12	2 779.0	含砾中-粗砂岩		16.6	72.9	2.74
X-9	1-13	2 779.4	含砾中-粗砂岩		19.5	226.0	2.68
X-9	G1-28	2 739.2	含砾粗砂岩		19.4	29.0	2.68

井名	样品编号	深度 /m	岩性	孔隙结构类型	孔隙度/%	渗透率/ 10^-3μm²	分形维数D_p
X-9	G1-3	2 131.1	中砂岩	Ⅰ	25.9	290.0	2.56
X-9	G1-7	2 178.7	中砂岩		22.5	176.2	2.65
X-9	G1-13	2 252.0	细砂岩		19.2	50.0	2.69
X-4	1-1	2 217.0	细砂岩		23.14	319.1	2.60
X-7	1-2	1 616.0	细砂岩		28.6	600.0	2.62
X-7	1-3	1 638.5	细砂岩		26.5	232.9	2.65
X-7	1-4	1 676.0	细砂岩		28.5	960.0	2.60
X-8	G1-3	2 255.0	粉砂岩	Ⅲ	12.4	2.5	2.79
X-9	G1-1	2 122.2	细砂岩		17.3	25.6	2.65
X-9	G1-12	2 236.9	泥质粉砂岩		13.0	1.0	2.82
X-9	G1-21	2 390.5	泥质粉砂岩		17.8	11.4	2.72
X-11	G1-1	2 513.0	泥质粉砂岩		13.5	0.4	2.72
X-14	G1-1	2 598.3	粉砂岩		13.6	1.3	2.71
X-14	G1-2	2 639.6	粉砂岩		16.5	12.0	2.69
X-14	G1-3	2 656.4	粉砂岩		18.7	37.6	2.64
X-9	1-1	2 773.4	含砾中-粗砂岩	Ⅱ	20.2	78.7	2.74
X-9	1-2	2 774.0	含砾粗砂岩		19.6	89.2	2.72
X-9	1-3	2 774.3	含砾中-粗砂岩		20.7	86.4	2.71
X-9	1-4	2 775.0	砂砾岩		14.4	44.5	2.80
X-9	1-7	2 776.6	含砾中-粗砂岩		19.6	31.0	2.68
X-9	1-9	2 777.2	含砾中-粗砂岩		19.6	56.0	2.76
X-9	1-10	2 778.2	含砾中-粗砂岩		15.7	50.9	2.80
X-9	1-11	2 778.6	含砾中-粗砂岩		18.5	70.8	2.67
X-9	1-12	2 779.0	含砾中-粗砂岩		16.6	72.9	2.74
X-9	1-13	2 779.4	含砾中-粗砂岩		19.5	226.0	2.68
X-9	G1-28	2 739.2	含砾粗砂岩		19.4	29.0	2.68

井名	样品标识	深度 /m	岩性	孔隙度 /%	渗透率 /10^-3μm²	分形维数
井名	样品标识	深度 /m	岩性	孔隙度 /%	渗透率 /10^-3μm²	D_p2-1	D_p2-2	D_p2-3
X-9	1-1	2 773.4	含砾中-粗砂岩	20.2	78.7	2.69	2.86	2.59
X-9	1-2	2 774.0	含砾粗砂岩	19.6	89.2	2.60	2.87	2.58
X-9	1-3	2 774.3	含砾中-粗砂岩	20.7	86.4	2.71	2.81	2.54
X-9	1-4	2 775.0	砂砾岩	14.4	44.5	2.83	2.90	2.62
X-9	1-7	2 776.6	含砾中-粗砂岩	19.6	31	2.69	2.87	2.46
X-9	1-9	2 777.2	含砾中-粗砂岩	19.6	56	2.80	2.89	2.57
X-9	1-10	2 778.2	含砾中-粗砂岩	15.7	50.9	2.82	2.91	2.67
X-9	1-11	2 778.6	含砾中-粗砂岩	18.5	70.8	2.74	2.89	2.39
X-9	1-12	2 779.0	含砾中-粗砂岩	16.6	72.9	2.76	2.93	2.48
X-9	1-13	2 779.4	含砾中-粗砂岩	19.5	226	2.77	2.90	2.35
X-9	G1-28	2 739.2	含砾粗砂岩	19.4	29.00	2.75	2.92	2.30

井名	样品标识	深度 /m	岩性	孔隙度 /%	渗透率 /10^-3μm²	分形维数
井名	样品标识	深度 /m	岩性	孔隙度 /%	渗透率 /10^-3μm²	D_p2-1	D_p2-2	D_p2-3
X-9	1-1	2 773.4	含砾中-粗砂岩	20.2	78.7	2.69	2.86	2.59
X-9	1-2	2 774.0	含砾粗砂岩	19.6	89.2	2.60	2.87	2.58
X-9	1-3	2 774.3	含砾中-粗砂岩	20.7	86.4	2.71	2.81	2.54
X-9	1-4	2 775.0	砂砾岩	14.4	44.5	2.83	2.90	2.62
X-9	1-7	2 776.6	含砾中-粗砂岩	19.6	31	2.69	2.87	2.46
X-9	1-9	2 777.2	含砾中-粗砂岩	19.6	56	2.80	2.89	2.57
X-9	1-10	2 778.2	含砾中-粗砂岩	15.7	50.9	2.82	2.91	2.67
X-9	1-11	2 778.6	含砾中-粗砂岩	18.5	70.8	2.74	2.89	2.39
X-9	1-12	2 779.0	含砾中-粗砂岩	16.6	72.9	2.76	2.93	2.48
X-9	1-13	2 779.4	含砾中-粗砂岩	19.5	226	2.77	2.90	2.35
X-9	G1-28	2 739.2	含砾粗砂岩	19.4	29.00	2.75	2.92	2.30