Geoscience ›› 2020, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (04): 828-836.DOI: 10.19657/j.geoscience.1000-8527.2020.04.035
• Petroleum Geology • Previous Articles Next Articles
HUANG Yuqi1(), ZHANG Peng1, ZHANG Jinchuan2, YANG Junwei1
Received:
2019-05-20
Revised:
2019-09-21
Online:
2020-08-31
Published:
2020-09-03
CLC Number:
HUANG Yuqi, ZHANG Peng, ZHANG Jinchuan, YANG Junwei. Pore Structure Characteristics of Longmaxi Formation Shale of Well LD-1 in Laifeng, Hubei[J]. Geoscience, 2020, 34(04): 828-836.
样品号 | 深度/m | TOC/% | Ro/% | 矿物组成/% | 黏土矿物组成/% | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
黏土矿物 | 石英 | 长石 | 方解石 | 白云石 | 黄铁矿 | 伊/蒙混层 | 伊利石 | 绿泥石 | |||||
1 | 903.38 | 1.95 | 3.28 | 49.6 | 32.7 | 11.4 | 0.6 | 2.1 | 3.6 | 24 | 56 | 20 | |
2 | 911.26 | 0.41 | 3.31 | 17.8 | 49.3 | 21.9 | 2.8 | 6.2 | 2.0 | 29 | 62 | 9 | |
3 | 920.10 | 0.33 | 3.09 | 28.8 | 44.7 | 19.1 | 3.2 | 2.5 | 1.7 | 38 | 51 | 11 | |
4 | 927.89 | 1.32 | 3.40 | 34.9 | 35.9 | 18.7 | 3.0 | 4.4 | 3.1 | 29 | 57 | 14 | |
5 | 935.44 | 1.33 | 3.42 | 25.3 | 42.6 | 17.8 | 7.3 | 3.6 | 3.4 | 24 | 65 | 11 | |
6 | 942.79 | 2.35 | 3.37 | 45.8 | 29.9 | 13.4 | 3.9 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 31 | 58 | 11 |
Table 1 Shale minerals and geochemical characteristics
样品号 | 深度/m | TOC/% | Ro/% | 矿物组成/% | 黏土矿物组成/% | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
黏土矿物 | 石英 | 长石 | 方解石 | 白云石 | 黄铁矿 | 伊/蒙混层 | 伊利石 | 绿泥石 | |||||
1 | 903.38 | 1.95 | 3.28 | 49.6 | 32.7 | 11.4 | 0.6 | 2.1 | 3.6 | 24 | 56 | 20 | |
2 | 911.26 | 0.41 | 3.31 | 17.8 | 49.3 | 21.9 | 2.8 | 6.2 | 2.0 | 29 | 62 | 9 | |
3 | 920.10 | 0.33 | 3.09 | 28.8 | 44.7 | 19.1 | 3.2 | 2.5 | 1.7 | 38 | 51 | 11 | |
4 | 927.89 | 1.32 | 3.40 | 34.9 | 35.9 | 18.7 | 3.0 | 4.4 | 3.1 | 29 | 57 | 14 | |
5 | 935.44 | 1.33 | 3.42 | 25.3 | 42.6 | 17.8 | 7.3 | 3.6 | 3.4 | 24 | 65 | 11 | |
6 | 942.79 | 2.35 | 3.37 | 45.8 | 29.9 | 13.4 | 3.9 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 31 | 58 | 11 |
样品号 | 深度/m | D1 | R2(D1) | D2 | R2(D2) | BET比表面/ (m2/g) | BET平均孔 直径/nm | BJH微孔 比例/% | BJH介孔 比例/% | 有效孔隙度 /% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 903.38 | 2.743 7 | 0.988 6 | 2.885 0 | 0.985 7 | 15.20 | 3.48 | 31.8 | 57.2 | / |
2 | 911.26 | 2.751 7 | 0.988 8 | 2.834 3 | 0.997 1 | 7.26 | 4.41 | 22.0 | 61.3 | 0.732 |
3 | 920.1 | 2.728 4 | 0.994 3 | 2.798 4 | 0.999 1 | 5.35 | 5.14 | 20.3 | 62.2 | 0.637 |
4 | 927.89 | 2.740 0 | 0.991 9 | 2.862 7 | 0.986 9 | 10.70 | 3.94 | 26.6 | 60.3 | 0.12 |
5 | 935.44 | 2.739 2 | 0.992 5 | 2.831 5 | 0.997 7 | 9.09 | 4.31 | 23.6 | 62.3 | 0.963 |
6 | 942.79 | 2.756 2 | 0.990 2 | 2.861 1 | 0.997 0 | 14.70 | 3.69 | 28.7 | 60.2 | 0.273 |
Table 2 Fractal dimensions of the Longmaxi Formation shale from nitrogen adsorption and reservoir characteristic parameters
样品号 | 深度/m | D1 | R2(D1) | D2 | R2(D2) | BET比表面/ (m2/g) | BET平均孔 直径/nm | BJH微孔 比例/% | BJH介孔 比例/% | 有效孔隙度 /% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 903.38 | 2.743 7 | 0.988 6 | 2.885 0 | 0.985 7 | 15.20 | 3.48 | 31.8 | 57.2 | / |
2 | 911.26 | 2.751 7 | 0.988 8 | 2.834 3 | 0.997 1 | 7.26 | 4.41 | 22.0 | 61.3 | 0.732 |
3 | 920.1 | 2.728 4 | 0.994 3 | 2.798 4 | 0.999 1 | 5.35 | 5.14 | 20.3 | 62.2 | 0.637 |
4 | 927.89 | 2.740 0 | 0.991 9 | 2.862 7 | 0.986 9 | 10.70 | 3.94 | 26.6 | 60.3 | 0.12 |
5 | 935.44 | 2.739 2 | 0.992 5 | 2.831 5 | 0.997 7 | 9.09 | 4.31 | 23.6 | 62.3 | 0.963 |
6 | 942.79 | 2.756 2 | 0.990 2 | 2.861 1 | 0.997 0 | 14.70 | 3.69 | 28.7 | 60.2 | 0.273 |
[1] | 杨峰, 宁正福, 王庆, 等. 页岩纳米孔隙分形特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014,25(4):618-623. |
[2] | 肖贤明, 宋之光, 朱炎铭, 等. 北美页岩气研究及对我国下古生界页岩气开发的启示[J]. 煤炭学报, 2013,38(5):721-727. |
[3] | 陈尚斌, 朱炎铭, 王红岩, 等. 川南龙马溪组页岩气储层纳米孔隙结构特征及其成藏意义[J]. 煤炭学报, 2012,37(3):439-444. |
[4] | 杨侃, 陆现彩, 徐金覃, 等. 气体吸附等温线法表征页岩孔隙结构的模型适用性初探[J]. 煤炭学报, 2013,38(5):817-821. |
[5] | 王飞宇, 贺志勇, 孟晓辉, 等. 页岩气赋存形式和初始原地气量(OGIP)预测技术[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2011,22(3):501-510. |
[6] | 田华, 张水昌, 柳少波, 等. 压汞法和气体吸附法研究富有机质页岩孔隙特征[J]. 石油学报, 2012,33(3):419-427. |
[7] | 侯宇光, 何生, 易积正, 等. 页岩孔隙结构对甲烷吸附能力的影响[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2014,41(2):248-256. |
[8] | 郗兆栋, 唐书恒, 李俊, 等. 沁水盆地中东部海陆过渡相页岩孔隙结构及分形特征[J]. 天然气地球化学, 2017,28(3):366-376. |
[9] | 李振, 邵龙义, 侯海海, 等. 高煤阶煤孔隙结构及分形特征[J]. 现代地质, 2017,31(3):595-605. |
[10] | 郭旭升, 李宇平, 刘若冰, 等. 四川盆地焦石坝地区龙马溪组页岩微观孔隙结构特征及其控制因素[J]. 天然气工业, 2014,34(6):9-16. |
[11] | 马风华, 潘进礼, 张勇, 等. 六盘山盆地固页1井白垩系马东山组泥页岩储层特征[J]. 现代地质, 2012,33(3):662-671. |
[12] | 唐相路, 姜振学, 李卓, 等. 渝东南地区龙马溪组高演化页岩微纳米孔隙非均质性及主控因素[J]. 现代地质, 2016,30(1):163-171. |
[13] | 张鹏, 黄宇琪, 张金川, 等. 黔西北地区龙潭组海陆过渡相泥页岩孔隙分形特征[J]. 煤炭学报, 2018,43(6):1580-1588. |
[14] | GREGG S J, SING K S W. Adsorption, Surface Area and Porosity[M]. 2nd Edition. London: Academic Press, 1982: 1-15. |
[15] | 黄宇琪, 张金川, 张鹏, 等. 东濮凹陷北部沙三段泥页岩微观储集空间特征及其主控因素[J]. 山东科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2016,35(3):8-16. |
[16] | 梁超, 姜在兴, 杨镱婷, 等. 四川盆地五峰组-龙马溪组页岩岩相及储集空间特征[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012,39(6):691-698. |
[17] | 喻建, 马捷, 路俊刚, 等. 压汞—恒速压汞在致密储层微观孔喉结构定量表征中的应用——以鄂尔多斯盆地华池—合水地区长7储层为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2015,37(6):789-795. |
[18] | 解德录, 郭英海, 赵迪斐. 基于低温氮实验的页岩吸附孔分形特征[J]. 煤炭学报, 2014,39(12):2466-2472. |
[19] | 邵龙义, 高彩霞, 张超, 等. 西南地区晚二叠世层序:古地理及聚煤特征[J]. 沉积学报, 2013,31(5):856-866. |
[20] | 王子轶, 高志前, 石文睿, 等. 四川盆地五峰组—龙马溪组笔石与页岩气关系探讨[J]. 现代地质, 2019,33(2):379-388. |
[21] | 陈建平, 赵文智, 王招明, 等. 海相干酪根天然气生成成熟度上线与生气潜力极限探讨——以塔里木盆地研究为例[J]. 科学通报, 2007,52(增刊1):95-100. |
[22] | 王玉满, 董大忠, 程相志, 等. 海相页岩有机质碳化的电性证据及其地质意义——以四川盆地南部地区下寒武统筇竹寺组页岩为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2014,34(8):1-7. |
[23] | 何映颉. 纳米孔隙对页岩气吸附扩散的分子模拟研究[D]. 成都:西南石油大学, 2017. |
[24] | 李丹, 欧成华, 马中高, 等. 黄铁矿与页岩的相互作用及其对页岩气富集与开发的意义[J]. 石油物探, 2018,57(3):332-343. |
[25] | 曹涛涛, 邓膜, 宋之光, 等. 黄铁矿对页岩油气富集成藏的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2018,29(3):404-414. |
[1] | LI Dongsheng, GAO Ping, GAI Haifeng, LIU Ruobing, CAI Yidong, LI Gang, ZHOU Qin, XIAO Xianming. Organic Nano-pore Textural Characteristics of the Longmaxi Formation Shale in the Southeastern Sichuan Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(05): 1293-1305. |
[2] | ZHANG Jinqing, LI Xianqing, ZHANG Boxiang, ZHANG Xueqing, YANG Jingwei, YU Zhenfeng. Pore Characteristics and Pore Structure of the Upper Paleozoic Coal-bearing Shale Gas Reservoir in the Wuxiang Block, Qinshui Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(06): 1551-1562. |
[3] | LI Qing, LI Jiangshan, LU Hao, QI Fengqiang, HE Yu, AN Keqin, LI Longyu, ZHANG Houmin, WU Yue. Characteristics and Control Factors of the Chang 73 Shale Reservoirs in the Southern Ordos Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(05): 1254-1270. |
[4] | QI Yang, LÜ Chunyan, WANG Yuhui, TANG Shuheng, XI Zhaodong. Pore Structural Characteristics of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formations Under Biostratigraphic Framework in Northwestern Hunan [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(05): 1292-1303. |
[5] | JIANG Bingren, DENG Ende, HAN Minghui, MA Zijie. Microscopic Pore Structure and Fractal Characteristics From the Carboniferous Xiangbai Formation Shale in Northwestern Guizhou [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(04): 1065-1073. |
[6] | CUI Weiping, YANG Yuqing, LIU Jianxin. Logging Identification Method of Low Porosity and Low Permeability Reservoir Effectiveness Based on Lithofacies Units and Pore Structures: An Example from NB1 Structure in Xihu Depression [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(01): 140-148. |
[7] | YANG Yi, ZHANG Hengrong, YUAN Wei, YANG Dong, HU Desheng. Fractal Characteristics Comparison and Genesis of Conventional Sandstone and Glutenite [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(01): 149-158. |
[8] | LIU Wenfeng, ZHANG Xiaoshuan, LIU Jinming, AILIMAN·Daoerji , YANG Yuanfeng, ZHANG Xiwen, QI Liqi, YU Jingwei. Evaluation and Characteristics of Pore Structures in Sand and Conglomerate Reservoirs of Badaowan Formation in the AH5 Well Block [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(06): 1844-1853. |
[9] | LI Yangyang, LI Xianqing, ZHANG Xueqing, YANG Jingwei, ZHANG Boxiang, XIAO Xianming, YU Zhenfeng. Pore Structure Characteristics of Taiyuan Formation Coal Measures Shale in the Yangquan Block of the Qinshui Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(04): 1033-1042. |
[10] | YU Jingwei, NIU Zhijie, QI Liqi, SUN Xinming, LIU Ni, ZHANG Jin, CAO Song. Comprehensive Study on Reservoir Heterogeneity of Toutunhe Formation in the Slope Area, North of Fukang Sag, Junggar Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(03): 819-831. |
[11] | JIANG Bingren, YANG Tongbao, SHI Fulun, HAN Minghui, FU Wei. Shale Gas Accumulation Conditions and Gas-bearing Properties of the Lower Carboniferous Jiusi Formation in Western Guizhou [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(02): 338-348. |
[12] | ZHAO Jianpeng, CUI Likai, CHEN Hui, LI Ning, WANG Ziliang, MA Yao, DU Guichao. Quantitative Characterization of Rock Microstructure of Digital Core Based on CT Scanning [J]. Geoscience, 2020, 34(06): 1205-1213. |
[13] | HU Xiangyang, LIANG Yunan, WU Feng, LIAO Mingguang, ZHANG Hengrong, YANG Dong, YANG Yi, DAI Jin, ZHONG Huaming, WU Yixiong. Genetic Mechanism of Low-Resistivity Neogene Zhujiang Formation in Wenchang X-2 Oilfield of Pearl River Estuary Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2020, 34(02): 390-398. |
[14] | XIE Shuyun, LEI Lei, JIAO Cunli, HE Zhiliang, BAO Zhengyu, MA Jiayi, ZHANG Dianwei, PENG Shoutao. Internal Dissolution and Pore Structural Evolution of Oolitic Dolomite [J]. Geoscience, 2019, 33(06): 1174-1187. |
[15] | WANG Hongmin, DAN Mengqian, WANG Chunping, ZANG Xinxin, CHEN Jinghua, GUO Delong. Reservoir Pore Structure and Property Characteristics of Lulehe Formation in the Q6 Area, Kunbei Oilfield [J]. Geoscience, 2019, 33(06): 1199-1207. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||