Geoscience ›› 2021, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (02): 338-348.DOI: 10.19657/j.geoscience.1000-8527.2020.099
• Petroleum Geology • Previous Articles Next Articles
JIANG Bingren1,2(), YANG Tongbao2, SHI Fulun3, HAN Minghui1,2, FU Wei1,2
Received:
2020-08-20
Revised:
2020-10-20
Online:
2021-04-25
Published:
2021-05-25
CLC Number:
JIANG Bingren, YANG Tongbao, SHI Fulun, HAN Minghui, FU Wei. Shale Gas Accumulation Conditions and Gas-bearing Properties of the Lower Carboniferous Jiusi Formation in Western Guizhou[J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(02): 338-348.
地区 | 页岩层系 | 地层 年代 | 厚度/m | 有机质 类型 | TOC/% | Ro/% | 石英 /% | 孔隙度/% | 含气量/ (m3·t-1) | 地层压力 系数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
福特沃斯 | Barnett | 石炭纪 | 61~300 | Ⅱ | 1.0~13.0 | 1.0~2.1 | 35.0~50.0 | 1.0~6.0 | 8.49~9.91 | 0.99~1.02 |
阿巴拉契亚 | Ohio | 泥盆纪 | 91~610 | Ⅱ | 0.5~23.0 | 0.4~4.0 | 45.0~60.0 | 2.0~11.0 | 1.70~2.83 | 0.35~0.92 |
密歇根 | Antrim | 泥盆纪 | 49 | Ⅰ | 0.3~24.0 | 0.4~0.6 | 20.0~41.0 | 2.0~10.0 | 1.13~3.50 | 0.81 |
涪陵 | 龙马溪组 | 志留纪 | 200~300 | Ⅰ、Ⅱ | 0.5~7.1 | 2.4~2.8 | 18.8~70.6 | 1.2~8.6 | 0.63~9.63 | 1.00~1.55 |
昭通 | 龙马溪组 | 志留纪 | 200~300 | Ⅰ、Ⅱ | 2.1~6.7 | 2.5~3.2 | 35.0~50.0 | 1.6~4.8 | 1.00~5.50 | 1.00~2.05 |
黔西地区 | 旧司组 | 石炭纪 | 30~100 | Ⅱ | 0.6~4.5 | 1.7~3.2 | 36.9~67.0 | 0.7~4.0 | 0.90~3.00 | 0.84~0.90 |
Table 1 Comparison of major development parameters of shale gas series between western Guizhou, North America and Sichuan basins [1,23-24]
地区 | 页岩层系 | 地层 年代 | 厚度/m | 有机质 类型 | TOC/% | Ro/% | 石英 /% | 孔隙度/% | 含气量/ (m3·t-1) | 地层压力 系数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
福特沃斯 | Barnett | 石炭纪 | 61~300 | Ⅱ | 1.0~13.0 | 1.0~2.1 | 35.0~50.0 | 1.0~6.0 | 8.49~9.91 | 0.99~1.02 |
阿巴拉契亚 | Ohio | 泥盆纪 | 91~610 | Ⅱ | 0.5~23.0 | 0.4~4.0 | 45.0~60.0 | 2.0~11.0 | 1.70~2.83 | 0.35~0.92 |
密歇根 | Antrim | 泥盆纪 | 49 | Ⅰ | 0.3~24.0 | 0.4~0.6 | 20.0~41.0 | 2.0~10.0 | 1.13~3.50 | 0.81 |
涪陵 | 龙马溪组 | 志留纪 | 200~300 | Ⅰ、Ⅱ | 0.5~7.1 | 2.4~2.8 | 18.8~70.6 | 1.2~8.6 | 0.63~9.63 | 1.00~1.55 |
昭通 | 龙马溪组 | 志留纪 | 200~300 | Ⅰ、Ⅱ | 2.1~6.7 | 2.5~3.2 | 35.0~50.0 | 1.6~4.8 | 1.00~5.50 | 1.00~2.05 |
黔西地区 | 旧司组 | 石炭纪 | 30~100 | Ⅱ | 0.6~4.5 | 1.7~3.2 | 36.9~67.0 | 0.7~4.0 | 0.90~3.00 | 0.84~0.90 |
样品 编号 | 比表面积 /(m2·g-1) | 孔体积 /(m3·g-1) | 平均孔径 /nm | D1 | D2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
JS-1 | 10.853 | 0.021 4 | 7.68 | 2.684 1 | 2.717 2 |
JS-5 | 19.016 | 0.019 1 | 4.86 | 2.735 3 | 2.813 5 |
JS-7 | 9.366 | 0.007 8 | 4.42 | 2.767 4 | 2.835 6 |
JS-12 | 16.841 | 0.019 6 | 5.59 | 2.752 1 | 2.774 0 |
JS-13 | 15.245 | 0.015 5 | 5.20 | 2.735 6 | 2.784 5 |
JS-15 | 30.287 | 0.011 3 | 3.15 | 2.848 3 | 2.899 6 |
Table 2 Pore structure parameters and fractal dimension of the Jiusi Fm. shale by nitrogen adsorption
样品 编号 | 比表面积 /(m2·g-1) | 孔体积 /(m3·g-1) | 平均孔径 /nm | D1 | D2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
JS-1 | 10.853 | 0.021 4 | 7.68 | 2.684 1 | 2.717 2 |
JS-5 | 19.016 | 0.019 1 | 4.86 | 2.735 3 | 2.813 5 |
JS-7 | 9.366 | 0.007 8 | 4.42 | 2.767 4 | 2.835 6 |
JS-12 | 16.841 | 0.019 6 | 5.59 | 2.752 1 | 2.774 0 |
JS-13 | 15.245 | 0.015 5 | 5.20 | 2.735 6 | 2.784 5 |
JS-15 | 30.287 | 0.011 3 | 3.15 | 2.848 3 | 2.899 6 |
[1] | 张金川, 薛会, 张德明, 等. 页岩气及其成藏机理[J]. 现代地质, 2003,17(4):466. |
[2] | 聂海宽, 唐玄, 边瑞康. 页岩气成藏控制因素及中国南方页岩气发育有利区预测[J]. 石油学报, 2009,30(4):484-491. |
[3] |
JARVIE D M, HILL R J, RUBLE T E, et al. Unconventional shale-gas systems:the Mississippian Barnett Shale of north-central Texas as one model for thermogenic shale-gas assessment[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2007,91(4):475-499.
DOI URL |
[4] |
LITTKE R, KROOSS BM, UFFMANN AK, et al. Unconventional gas resources in the Proterozoic and Paleozoic of Central Europe[J]. Oil Gas Science and Technology, 2011,66:953-977.
DOI URL |
[5] |
GHANIZADEH A, GASPARIK M, AMANN-HIDENBRAND A, et al. Experimental study of fluid transport processes in the matrix system of the European organic-rich shales:I. Scandinavian Alum Shale[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2014,51:79-99.
DOI URL |
[6] | 马永生, 蔡勋育, 赵培荣. 中国页岩气勘探开发理论认识与实践[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018,45(4):561-574. |
[7] | 张金川, 金之钧, 袁明生. 页岩气成藏机理和分布[J]. 天然气工业, 2004(7):15-18. |
[8] | 张大伟, 李玉喜, 张金川. 全国页岩气资源潜力调查评价[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2012. |
[9] | 聂海宽, 何治亮, 刘光祥, 等. 中国页岩气勘探开发现状与优选方向[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2020,49(1):13-35. |
[10] | 邹才能, 潘松圻, 荆振华, 等. 页岩油气革命及影响[J]. 石油学报, 2020,41(1):1-12. |
[11] | 王子轶, 高志前, 石文睿, 等. 四川盆地五峰组—龙马溪组笔石与页岩气关系探讨[J]. 现代地质, 2019,33(2):379-388. |
[12] | 郭旭升. 南方海相页岩气“二元富集”规律——四川盆地及周缘龙马溪组页岩气勘探实践认识[J]. 地质学报, 2014,88(7):1209-1218. |
[13] | 王香增, 任来义. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长探区油气勘探理论与实践进展[J]. 石油学报, 2016,37(增刊):79-86. |
[14] | 齐玉林, 张枝焕, 夏东领, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部长7暗色泥岩与黑色页岩生烃动力学特征对比分析[J]. 现代地质, 2019,33(4):863-871. |
[15] | 邓恩德, 易同生, 颜智华, 等. 海陆过渡相页岩气聚集条件及勘探潜力研究:以黔北地区金沙参1井龙潭组为例[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2020,49(6):1266-1281. |
[16] | 唐玄, 张金川, 丁文龙, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东南部上古生界海陆过渡相页岩储集性与含气性[J]. 地学前缘, 2016,23(2):147-157. |
[17] | 秦文, 唐显贵, 秦琴, 等. 黔西南区旧司组黑色页岩地球化学及储层特征分析[J]. 断块油气田, 2014,21(2):181-186. |
[18] | 唐显贵, 刘太琴, 肖鸿, 等. 威宁地区下石炭统旧司组页岩气勘查前景探讨[J]. 天然气技术与经济, 2016,10(5):23-27+82. |
[19] | 贵州省地质矿产局. 贵州省区域地质志[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1987: 156-182. |
[20] | 邵龙义, 高彩霞, 张超, 等. 西南地区晚二叠世层序:古地理及聚煤特征[J]. 沉积学报, 2013,31(5):856-866. |
[21] | 辛云路, 王劲铸, 金春爽. 南盘江盆地石炭系沉积体系及页岩气有利区带[J]. 现代地质, 2018,32(4):774-785. |
[22] | 聂海宽, 张金川. 页岩气储层类型和特征研究——以四川盆地及其周缘下古生界为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2011,33(3):219-225+232. |
[23] | 郭彤楼. 涪陵页岩气田发现的启示与思考[J]. 地学前缘, 2016,23(1):29-43. |
[24] | 陈志鹏, 梁兴, 张介辉, 等. 昭通国家级示范区龙马溪组页岩气储层超压成因浅析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2016,27(3):442-448. |
[25] | 侯读杰, 冯子辉. 油气地球化学[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2011: 125-131 |
[26] | 郭旭升. 涪陵页岩气田焦石坝区块富集机理与勘探技术[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2014: 72-106 |
[27] | 国家能源局. 油气储层评价方法:SY/T 6285-2011[S]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2011: 2-4. |
[28] | 王朋飞, 姜振学, 金璨, 等. 渝东南下志留统龙马溪组页岩有机质孔隙发育特征:基于聚焦离子束氦离子显微镜(FIB-HIM)技术[J]. 现代地质, 2019,33(4):902-910. |
[29] | 邓恩德, 颜智华, 姜秉仁, 等. 黔西地区上二叠统龙潭组海陆交互相页岩气储层特征[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020,42(3):467-476 |
[30] | 聂海宽, 边瑞康, 张培先, 等. 川东南地区下古生界页岩储层微观类型与特征及其对含气量的影响[J]. 地学前缘, 2014,21(4):331-343. |
[31] | 黄宇琪, 张鹏, 张金川, 等湖北来凤LD-1井龙马溪组页岩孔隙结构特征分析[J]. 现代地质, 2020,34(4):828-836. |
[32] | 俞凌杰, 范明, 陈红宇, 等. 富有机质页岩高温高压重量法等温吸附实验[J]. 石油学报, 2015,36(5):557-563. |
[1] | LI Dongsheng, GAO Ping, GAI Haifeng, LIU Ruobing, CAI Yidong, LI Gang, ZHOU Qin, XIAO Xianming. Organic Nano-pore Textural Characteristics of the Longmaxi Formation Shale in the Southeastern Sichuan Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(05): 1293-1305. |
[2] | ZHANG Jinqing, LI Xianqing, ZHANG Boxiang, ZHANG Xueqing, YANG Jingwei, YU Zhenfeng. Pore Characteristics and Pore Structure of the Upper Paleozoic Coal-bearing Shale Gas Reservoir in the Wuxiang Block, Qinshui Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(06): 1551-1562. |
[3] | LI Qing, LI Jiangshan, LU Hao, QI Fengqiang, HE Yu, AN Keqin, LI Longyu, ZHANG Houmin, WU Yue. Characteristics and Control Factors of the Chang 73 Shale Reservoirs in the Southern Ordos Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(05): 1254-1270. |
[4] | CUI Shuhui, WU Peng, ZHAO Fei, NIU Yanwei, CAI Wenzhe, WANG Bo. Shale Gas Accumulation Factors and Enrichment Area Prediction in Linxing Block, Eastern Margin of the Ordos Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(05): 1271-1280. |
[5] | LIU Siyi, GAO Ping, XIAO Xianming, LIU Ruobing, QIN Jing, YUAN Tao, WANG Xu. Study on Organic Petrology Characteristics of the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation Black Shale, Sichuan Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(05): 1281-1291. |
[6] | QI Yang, LÜ Chunyan, WANG Yuhui, TANG Shuheng, XI Zhaodong. Pore Structural Characteristics of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formations Under Biostratigraphic Framework in Northwestern Hunan [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(05): 1292-1303. |
[7] | JIANG Bingren, DENG Ende, HAN Minghui, MA Zijie. Microscopic Pore Structure and Fractal Characteristics From the Carboniferous Xiangbai Formation Shale in Northwestern Guizhou [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(04): 1065-1073. |
[8] | CUI Weiping, YANG Yuqing, LIU Jianxin. Logging Identification Method of Low Porosity and Low Permeability Reservoir Effectiveness Based on Lithofacies Units and Pore Structures: An Example from NB1 Structure in Xihu Depression [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(01): 140-148. |
[9] | YANG Yi, ZHANG Hengrong, YUAN Wei, YANG Dong, HU Desheng. Fractal Characteristics Comparison and Genesis of Conventional Sandstone and Glutenite [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(01): 149-158. |
[10] | LIU Wenfeng, ZHANG Xiaoshuan, LIU Jinming, AILIMAN·Daoerji , YANG Yuanfeng, ZHANG Xiwen, QI Liqi, YU Jingwei. Evaluation and Characteristics of Pore Structures in Sand and Conglomerate Reservoirs of Badaowan Formation in the AH5 Well Block [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(06): 1844-1853. |
[11] | LI Yangyang, LI Xianqing, ZHANG Xueqing, YANG Jingwei, ZHANG Boxiang, XIAO Xianming, YU Zhenfeng. Pore Structure Characteristics of Taiyuan Formation Coal Measures Shale in the Yangquan Block of the Qinshui Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(04): 1033-1042. |
[12] | RAO Quan, KANG Yongshang, HUANG Yi, ZHAO Qun, WANG Hongyan. Cutoff of Free Gas and Porosity in Shale Gas Industrial Production Area of Longmaxi Formation in Southern Sichuan Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(04): 1054-1064. |
[13] | YU Jingwei, NIU Zhijie, QI Liqi, SUN Xinming, LIU Ni, ZHANG Jin, CAO Song. Comprehensive Study on Reservoir Heterogeneity of Toutunhe Formation in the Slope Area, North of Fukang Sag, Junggar Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(03): 819-831. |
[14] | ZHAO Jianpeng, CUI Likai, CHEN Hui, LI Ning, WANG Ziliang, MA Yao, DU Guichao. Quantitative Characterization of Rock Microstructure of Digital Core Based on CT Scanning [J]. Geoscience, 2020, 34(06): 1205-1213. |
[15] | HUANG Yuqi, ZHANG Peng, ZHANG Jinchuan, YANG Junwei. Pore Structure Characteristics of Longmaxi Formation Shale of Well LD-1 in Laifeng, Hubei [J]. Geoscience, 2020, 34(04): 828-836. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||