欢迎访问现代地质!

现代地质 ›› 2014, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (2): 438-442.

• 工程地质 • 上一篇    下一篇

泥石流堆积物的粒度特征及分形结构:以金沙江上游干热河谷区瓦卡泥石流沟为例

陈剑1,陈松1,慎乃齐1,刘丽娜1,崔之久2   

  1. 1中国地质大学(北京)工程技术学院,北京100083;2北京大学城市与环境学院,北京100871
  • 出版日期:2014-04-21 发布日期:2014-04-26
  • 作者简介:陈剑,男,副教授,1975年出生,地质工程专业,主要从事灾害地貌学、工程地质、地质灾害演化与防治方面的教学与科研工作。Email: jianchen@cugb.edu.cn。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(40901005)。

Grain Size Characteristics and Fractal Structure of the Debris-flow Deposits: An Example from the Waka Debris-flow Gully in the Dryhot Valley of the Upper Jinsha River

CHEN Jian1, CHEN Song1, SHEN Nai-qi1, LIU Li-na1, CUI Zhi-jiu2   

  1. 1School of Engineering and Technology,China University of Geosciences,Beijing100083, China; 2College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing100871, China
  • Online:2014-04-21 Published:2014-04-26

摘要:

以金沙江上游干热河谷区瓦卡泥石流沟为例,引入沉积相的概念,按沉积相特征对泥石流沉积剖面进行地层单元划分。把沉积亚相划为A相粗砾泥石流层、A1相细砾泥石流层和B相表泥层。每层采集3~4个样品,共采集61个样品,并对其粒度特征及分形结构进行分析。结果表明:(1)3种沉积亚相的粒度分布曲线均呈多峰型,反映出泥石流堆积物颗粒组成分选性差的特点。(2)A、A1相为粗、细混杂砾石层堆积,颗粒分布较不均匀,而B相为不含或极少含砾石的亚黏土层沉积,各组分颗粒百分含量分布较均匀。(3)多砾石的A、A1相分形特征较好,分维值区间为2.692 1~2.697 1,相关系数为0.868 2~0.832 2,体现出混杂堆积结构特点;B相分维值为2.900 7,其相关系数为0.43。B相表泥层与A相粗砾泥石流层、A1相细砾泥石流层的粒度分布与分形结构特征很好地反映了泥石流沉积亚相不同类型的沉积环境差异。

关键词: 泥石流, 沉积亚相, 粒度分布, 分形结构

Abstract:

Taking the Waka debris-flow gully in the dry-hot river valley area of the upper Jinsha River as an example, the concept of sedimentary facies was introduced and the debris-flow sedimentary types were divided according to the characteristics of the sedimentary facies. The debris-flow sedimentary facies of Waka profile were divided into three types, Facies A (coarse-gravel layer), Facies A1 (fine-gravel layer) and Facies B (surface mud layer), i.e. Three or four samples were collected from each unit and 61 samples were collected in all and their grain sizes were analyzed. The characteristics of grain-size distribution and fractal structure of these samples were analyzed based on grain-size data. The results show the following aspects: (1)The curves of the grain-size distribution of the three sedimentary facies are all of bimodal type, reflecting bad sorting of sedimentary materials for debris-flow deposits. (2)Facies A and Facies A1 are of coarse-fine mixed gravel layers, and the grain-size distribution is not uniform. However, Facies B is of clay layers which include few or no gravel, and the grain-size distribution is more homogeneous. (3)The fractal features of Facies A and Facies A1 are more apparent than that of Facies B, and the grain-size fractal dimensions of Facies A and Facies A1 are 2.692,1 and 2.697,1 with relative coefficient of 0.868,2 and 0.832,2, while the grain-size fractal dimension of Facies B is 2.9007 with relative coefficient of 0.43.The differences of grain-size distribution and fractal feature among Facies A, Facies A1 and Facies B reveal that these three debris-flow sedimentary facies formed in different sedimental environments.

Key words: debris flow, sedimentary sub-facies, grain size distribution, fractal structure

中图分类号: