现代地质 ›› 2019, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (06): 1151-1162.DOI: 10.19657/j.geoscience.1000-8527.2019.06.02
收稿日期:
2018-12-05
修回日期:
2019-03-10
出版日期:
2019-12-26
发布日期:
2019-12-27
作者简介:
王宏语,男,副教授,1973年出生,矿产普查与勘探专业,主要从事含油气盆地沉积学、层序地层学、地震地质解释等方面科研与教学工作。Email: wanghy@cugb.edu.cn。
基金资助:
WANG Hongyu1(), LI Ruilei2, ZHU Jianfeng2, XU Wen2
Received:
2018-12-05
Revised:
2019-03-10
Online:
2019-12-26
Published:
2019-12-27
摘要:
构造沉积学不仅强调大地构造背景条件对盆地演化的控制作用,同时还注重盆地内部的构造特征与沉积充填特征之间的控制及响应关系研究。陆相裂谷盆地发育过程中,构造作用强烈,盆地沉积充填过程复杂,进行构造沉积学研究对揭示盆地构造沉积演化过程具有重要意义。以大量地震、钻测井资料为基础,结合大地构造背景资料,研究松辽盆地伏龙泉断陷发育过程中的构造、沉积演化特征,分析构造活动与沉积作用之间的响应及控制关系,并由此讨论半地堑陆相湖盆的沉积充填演化规律及其控制因素。研究表明,在伏龙泉断陷盆地演化过程中,早期的火山岩隆起对盆地初始裂陷期形态具有明显的影响作用;边界断层的分布及其生长速率特征则对盆地结构演化过程起着首要的控制作用。盆地裂陷期,研究区古气候环境比较稳定,构造因素是控制该陆相裂谷盆地地层序列与沉积特征的首要因素;断裂发育特征决定了盆地的古地貌特征,而盆地的古地貌特征直接影响着盆地内部的沉积充填类型与沉积体系展布格局;区域构造抬升与断块掀斜是该半地堑盆地内部发育不整合面的主要因素。在陆相裂陷盆地的构造沉积特征研究中,构造沉积学显示出了其必要性与适用性,有利于在揭示构造沉积现象的同时,合理解释其地质成因。
中图分类号:
王宏语, 李瑞磊, 朱建峰, 徐文. 陆相裂谷盆地构造沉积学特征:以松辽盆地伏龙泉断陷为例[J]. 现代地质, 2019, 33(06): 1151-1162.
WANG Hongyu, LI Ruilei, ZHU Jianfeng, XU Wen. Tectonic Sedimentology Characteristics of Continental Rift Basin: Case Study from Fulongquan Fault Depression of Songliao Basin[J]. Geoscience, 2019, 33(06): 1151-1162.
图1 研究区位置、剖面特征与资料分布情况
Fig.1 Index map showing the location and cross-section features of the study area, as well as the seismic data and major well distributions
图8 地震相剖面特征与测井响应特征(地震剖面对应于图3)
Fig.8 Seismic facies, sedimentary facies interpretation profile and well log response (seismic profile corresponds to Fig.3)
[1] | 柯保嘉. 构造沉积学[J]. 地球科学进展, 1992(2):82-83. |
[2] | 王东坡, 刘立, 薛林福, 等. 大陆构造沉积学[J]. 地球科学进展, 1995(6):612-614. |
[3] | 曾允孚, 覃建雄. 沉积学发展现状与前瞻[J]. 成都理工学院学报, 1999(1):4-10. |
[4] | 刘宝珺, 韩作振, 杨仁超. 当代沉积学研究进展、前瞻与思考[J]. 特种油气藏, 2006,13(5):1-3. |
[5] |
LEEDER M R. Tectonic sedimentology: sediment systems deciphering global to local tectonics[J]. Sedimentology, 2011,58:2-56.
DOI URL |
[6] |
GUERRERA F, MARTIN M M, MARTIN-PEREZ JM A. Tectonic control on the sedimentary record of the central Moldavidian Basin (Eastern Carpathians, Romania)[J]. Geologica Carpathica, 2012,63(6):463-479.
DOI URL |
[7] |
ROBERTS A M, YIELDING G, BADLEY M E. Tectonic and bathymetric controls on stratigraphic sequences within evolving half-graben[J]. Geological Society London:Special Publications, 1993,71:87-121.
DOI URL |
[8] |
GAWTHORPE R L, LEEDER M R. Tectono-sedimentary evolution of active extensional basins[J]. Basin Research, 2000,12:195-218.
DOI URL |
[9] |
PAOLA C. Quantitative models of sedimentary basin filling[J]. Sedimentology, 2000,47(S1):121-178.
DOI URL |
[10] | BRYAN D, JASON J. Tectonostratigraphy of the Nieuwerkerk Formation (Delfland subgroup), West Netherlands Basin[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2002,86(10):1679-1707. |
[11] |
WANG Hongyu, FAN Tailiang, WU Yue. The subsurface structure and stratigraphic architecture of rifting related units in the Lishu Depression of the Songliao Basin, China[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2015,99:13-29.
DOI URL |
[12] |
BOSWORTH W. Geometry of propagating continental rifts[J]. Letters to Nature, 1985,316:625-627.
DOI URL |
[13] |
MARCELO A, MARTINS-NETO. Tectonics and sedimentation in a Paleo/Mesoproterozoic rift-sag basin (Espinhaco basin, southeastern Brazil)[J]. Precambrian Research, 2000,103:147-173.
DOI URL |
[14] |
KYRKJEBO R, GABRIELSEN R H, FALEIDE J I. Unconformities related to the Jurassic-Cretaceous synrift-post-rift transition of the northern North Sea[J]. Journal of the Geological Society, 2004,161:1-17.
DOI URL |
[15] | 黄清华, 吴怀春, 万晓樵, 等. 松辽盆地白垩系综合年代地层学研究新进展[J]. 地层学杂志, 2011,35(3):250-257. |
[16] | 李瑞磊, 朱建峰, 刘玮, 等. 松辽盆地长岭断陷火山岩锆石U-Pb测年及其地质意义[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2015,36(5):736-744. |
[17] | 高瑞祺, 蔡希源. 松辽盆地油气田形成条件与分布规律[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1997: 70-80. |
[18] | 李娟, 舒良树. 松辽盆地中、新生代构造特征及其演化[J]. 南京大学学报(自然科学版), 2002,38(4):525-531. |
[19] |
FENG Z Q, JIA C Z, XIE X N, et al. Tectonostratigraphic units and stratigraphic sequences of the nonmarine Songliao basin, northeast China[J]. Basin Research, 2010,22:79-95.
DOI URL |
[20] |
WEI Honghong, LIU Junlai, MENG Qingren. Structural and sedimentary evolution of the southern Songliao Basin, northeast China, and implications for hydrocarbon prospectivity[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2010,94(4):533-566.
DOI URL |
[21] |
WATSON M P, HAYWARD A B, PARKINSON D N. Plate tectonic history, basin development and petroleum source rock deposition onshore China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 1987,4:205-225.
DOI URL |
[22] |
REN J Y, KENSAKU T, LI S T, et al. Late Mesozoic and Cenozoic rifting and its dynamic setting in Eastern China and adjacent areas[J]. Tectonophysics, 2002,344:175-205.
DOI URL |
[23] |
JOHNSON C L. Polyphase evolution of the East Gobibasin: sedimentary and structural records of Mesozoic-Cenozoic intraplate deformation in Mongolia[J]. Basin Research, 2004 , 16:79-99.
DOI URL |
[24] |
STEPASHKO A A. The Cretaceous dynamics of the pacific plate and stages of magmatic activity in Northeasern Asia[J]. Geotectonics, 2006,40:225-235.
DOI URL |
[25] | 葛荣峰, 张庆龙, 王良书, 等. 松辽盆地构造演化与中国东部构造体制转换[J]. 地质评论, 2010,56(2):180-194. |
[26] | 刘志宏, 孙理难, 王超, 等. 松辽盆地伏龙泉断陷构造特征及演化[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015,45(3):663-673. |
[27] | 余和中, 李玉文, 韩守华, 等. 松辽盆地古生代构造演化[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2001,25(4):389-396. |
[28] | 云金表, 殷进垠, 金之钧. 松辽盆地深部地质特征及其盆地动力学演化[J]. 地震地质, 2003,25(4):595-598. |
[29] | 陈昭年, 陈发景. 松辽盆地反转构造运动学特征[J], 现代地质, 1996,10(3):390-396. |
[30] |
SONG T G. Inversion styles in the Songliao Basin (northeast China) and estimation of the degree of inversion[J]. Tectonophysics, 1997,283:173-188.
DOI URL |
[31] | 方立敏, 李玉喜, 殷进垠, 等. 松辽盆地断陷末期反转构造特征与形成机制[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2003,38(2):190-193. |
[32] | 胡望水, 吕炳全, 张文军, 等. 松辽盆地构造演化及成盆动力学探讨[J]. 地质科学, 2005,40(1):16-31 |
[33] | SUN Yonghe, CHEN Yibo, SUN Jigang, et al. Evolutionary sequence of faults and the formation of inversion structural belts in the Northern Songliao Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2013,40(3):275-283. |
[34] |
PROSSER S. Rift-related linked depositional systems and their seismic expression[J]. Geological Society London: Special Publications, 1993,71:35-66.
DOI URL |
[35] |
LAMBIASE J J, BOSWORTH W. Structural controls on sedimentation in continental rifts[J]. Geological Society London: Special Publications, 1995,80:117-144.
DOI URL |
[36] |
GUPTA S, COWIE P A, DAWERS N H, et al. A mechanism to explain rift-basin subsidence and stratigraphic patterns through fault-array evolution[J]. Geology, 1998,26(7):595-598.
DOI URL |
[37] |
RICHARDSON N J, UNDERHILL J R. Controls on the structural architecture and sedimentary character of syn-rift sequences, North Falkland Basin, South Atlantic[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2002,19:417-443.
DOI URL |
[38] |
RENATO P D A, LILIANE J, ANTONIO R S, et al. Evolution of a rift basin dominated by subaerial deposits: The Guaritas Rift, Early Cambrian, Southern Brazil[J]. Sedimentary Geology, 2009,217:30-51.
DOI URL |
[39] | 韩秋星, 伏龙泉断陷断坳转换期层序地层与沉积特征[D]. 北京:中国地质大学(北京)硕士论文, 2017. |
[40] | HOU Yunchao, WANG Hongyu, FAN Tailiang, et al. Late syn-rift sequence architecture and sedimentary evolution of a continental rift basin: A case study from Fulongquan Depression of the Songliao Basin, northeast China. Marine and Petroleum Geology[J/OL]. 2018, https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo. 2018. 11. 029. |
[41] | 张立平, 王东坡. 松辽盆地白垩纪古气候特征及其变化机制[J]. 岩相古地理, 1994,14(1):11-16. |
[42] | 黄清华, 郑玉龙, 杨明杰, 等. 松辽盆地白垩纪古气候研究[J]. 微体古生物学报, 1999,16(1):95-103. |
[43] | 李杰, 茅绍智, 徐钰林, 等. 松辽盆地北部晚白垩世陆相沟鞭藻及疑源类特征与沉积环境研究[J]. 现代地质, 2000,14(3):267-272. |
[1] | 张一范, 高远, 陈积权, 黄帅, 海伦, 毋正轩, 杨柳, 董甜. 松辽盆地晚白垩世湖相白云岩碳氧同位素特征及其古环境意义[J]. 现代地质, 2023, 37(05): 1243-1253. |
[2] | 朱珍君, 李琦, 李剑, 陈贺贺, 胡俊杰, 耿慧, 丁晓军, 白金莲. 准噶尔盆地莫西庄—永进地区白垩系清水河组地貌演化及沉积响应[J]. 现代地质, 2022, 36(01): 105-117. |
[3] | 黄清华, 席党鹏, 王辉, 张文婧, 王建伟, 曹维福, 贾卧, 王丽静. 松辽盆地北部中二叠统碳酸盐岩元素和稳定同位素地球化学特征与古环境[J]. 现代地质, 2021, 35(05): 1282-1295. |
[4] | 张海华, 李晓海, 张健, 郑月娟, 陈树旺, 张德军, 苏飞, 卞雄飞, 孙雷. 松辽盆地北部上二叠统林西组古生物年代学、地球化学特征及地质意义[J]. 现代地质, 2021, 35(02): 568-578. |
[5] | 王旭影, 姜在兴. 苏北盆地古近系阜三段沉积体系特征与模式[J]. 现代地质, 2020, 34(06): 1132-1143. |
[6] | 蒋一鸣, 邵龙义, 李帅, 赵洪, 康世龙, 沈文超, 易琦. 西湖凹陷平湖构造带平湖组沉积体系及层序地层研究[J]. 现代地质, 2020, 34(01): 141-153. |
[7] | 何卫军, 徐万兴, 刘娟, 刘芳, 焦祥燕. 乌石凹陷南陡坡带流二段源-汇系统及物性差异性分析[J]. 现代地质, 2018, 32(06): 1161-1172. |
[8] | 辛云路, 王劲铸, 金春爽. 南盘江盆地石炭系沉积体系及页岩气有利区带[J]. 现代地质, 2018, 32(04): 774-785. |
[9] | 刘鑫, 陈留勤, 李馨敏, 李余亮. 江西象山地质公园丹霞地貌成景地层沉积环境分析[J]. 现代地质, 2018, 32(02): 260-269. |
[10] | 王晨杰, 黄晓波, 郭涛, 谢京, 郭瑞, 姚城. 精度古地貌恢复技术及应用——以辽西凸起南段东营组二段下段为例[J]. 现代地质, 2017, 31(06): 1214-1221. |
[11] | 刘洋,何坤,李贤庆,徐红卫,张吉振,扈松林,王刚,樊志伟. 湖相烃源岩生烃动力学及排油效率—以松辽盆地青山口组为例[J]. 现代地质, 2016, 30(3): 627-634. |
[12] | 康海亮,林畅松,刘晓,高平. 南堡凹陷北部东营组同沉积断裂对沉积体系及岩性圈闭的控制作用[J]. 现代地质, 2016, 30(2): 286-293. |
[13] | 刘朋远,柳成志,辛仁臣. 松辽盆地东南缘籍家岭泉头组沉积微相特征及演化:由冲积扇演化为曲流河的典型露头剖面[J]. 现代地质, 2015, 29(6): 1338-1347. |
[14] | 秦爱华,崔玉军,周亚龙,张舜尧. 松辽盆地中部土壤碘的战略性油气勘查[J]. 现代地质, 2015, 29(1): 14-19. |
[15] | 董艳蕾,朱筱敏,赵东娜. 准噶尔盆地车排子地区下白垩统沉积体系分布及油气成藏模式[J]. 现代地质, 2015, 29(1): 71-79. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||