Geoscience ›› 2024, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (06): 1571-1584.DOI: 10.19657/j.geoscience.1000-8527.2024.074
• Energy Geology • Previous Articles Next Articles
WU Chenbingjie1,2(), LUO Lu1,2(
), GAO Nan’an1,2, WANG Xinwei1,2, CUI Zixian1,2
Online:
2024-12-10
Published:
2024-12-09
Contact:
LUO Lu
CLC Number:
WU Chenbingjie, LUO Lu, GAO Nan’an, WANG Xinwei, CUI Zixian. Study on Characteristics of Neogene Sandstone Geothermal Reservoir in Xi’an Sag,Guanzhong Basin[J]. Geoscience, 2024, 38(06): 1571-1584.
地区 | 井号 | 张家坡 | 蓝田—灞河组 | 高陵群(未钻穿) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
地层厚度 (m) | 砂体厚度 (m) | 砂地比 (%) | 地层厚度 (m) | 砂体厚度 (m) | 砂地比 (%) | 地层厚度 (m) | 砂体厚度 (m) | 砂地比 (%) | ||||
周至 | JH | 712.5 | 195.9 | 27.49 | 927.3 | 384.9 | 41.51 | 272.7 | 67.6 | 24.79 | ||
ZZ | 880.0 | 162.3 | 18.44 | 836.0 | 185.0 | 22.13 | 704.0 | 172.3 | 24.47 | |||
武功 | HJ | 676.9 | 174.0 | 25.71 | 1162.0 | 318.5 | 27.41 | 236.0 | 70.2 | 29.75 | ||
兴平 | XJ | 741.0 | 126.1 | 17.02 | 1123.7 | 193.0 | 17.18 | 313.4 | 59.6 | 19.02 | ||
咸阳 | AX | 1099.1 | 95.2 | 8.66 | 1007.8 | 228.4 | 22.66 | 538.0 | 163.4 | 30.37 | ||
ZY | 1206.0 | 167.7 | 13.91 | 1035.0 | 387.6 | 37.45 | 421.0 | 135.0 | 32.07 | |||
SN | 873.0 | 167.3 | 19.16 | 1156.0 | 308.2 | 26.66 | 259.0 | 67.1 | 25.91 | |||
XSB | 841.0 | 79.4 | 9.44 | 1054.7 | 151.6 | 14.37 | 464.3 | 182 | 39.20 | |||
西安 | HXY | 987.0 | 166.2 | 16.84 | 915.0 | 158.5 | 17.32 | 538.0 | 176.2 | 32.75 | ||
BS | 644.0 | 68.6 | 10.65 | 944.5 | 350.1 | 37.07 | 557.5 | 162.7 | 29.18 | |||
WS | 474.0 | 163.9 | 34.58 | 531.5 | 185.3 | 34.86 | 291.0 | 91.1 | 31.31 | |||
平均值 | 830.41 | 142.42 | 18.35 | 972.14 | 259.19 | 27.15 | 417.72 | 122.47 | 28.98 |
Table 1 Statistics on the development of Neogene geothermal reservoir sands in typical geothermal wells of Xi’an Sag
地区 | 井号 | 张家坡 | 蓝田—灞河组 | 高陵群(未钻穿) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
地层厚度 (m) | 砂体厚度 (m) | 砂地比 (%) | 地层厚度 (m) | 砂体厚度 (m) | 砂地比 (%) | 地层厚度 (m) | 砂体厚度 (m) | 砂地比 (%) | ||||
周至 | JH | 712.5 | 195.9 | 27.49 | 927.3 | 384.9 | 41.51 | 272.7 | 67.6 | 24.79 | ||
ZZ | 880.0 | 162.3 | 18.44 | 836.0 | 185.0 | 22.13 | 704.0 | 172.3 | 24.47 | |||
武功 | HJ | 676.9 | 174.0 | 25.71 | 1162.0 | 318.5 | 27.41 | 236.0 | 70.2 | 29.75 | ||
兴平 | XJ | 741.0 | 126.1 | 17.02 | 1123.7 | 193.0 | 17.18 | 313.4 | 59.6 | 19.02 | ||
咸阳 | AX | 1099.1 | 95.2 | 8.66 | 1007.8 | 228.4 | 22.66 | 538.0 | 163.4 | 30.37 | ||
ZY | 1206.0 | 167.7 | 13.91 | 1035.0 | 387.6 | 37.45 | 421.0 | 135.0 | 32.07 | |||
SN | 873.0 | 167.3 | 19.16 | 1156.0 | 308.2 | 26.66 | 259.0 | 67.1 | 25.91 | |||
XSB | 841.0 | 79.4 | 9.44 | 1054.7 | 151.6 | 14.37 | 464.3 | 182 | 39.20 | |||
西安 | HXY | 987.0 | 166.2 | 16.84 | 915.0 | 158.5 | 17.32 | 538.0 | 176.2 | 32.75 | ||
BS | 644.0 | 68.6 | 10.65 | 944.5 | 350.1 | 37.07 | 557.5 | 162.7 | 29.18 | |||
WS | 474.0 | 163.9 | 34.58 | 531.5 | 185.3 | 34.86 | 291.0 | 91.1 | 31.31 | |||
平均值 | 830.41 | 142.42 | 18.35 | 972.14 | 259.19 | 27.15 | 417.72 | 122.47 | 28.98 |
序号 | 地层 | 起始深度 (m) | 终止深度 (m) | 有效厚度 (m) | 泥质含量 (%) | 孔隙度 (%) | 渗透率 (10-3μm2) | 绝对出水量 (m3/h) | 每米砂体出水量 (m3·h-1·m-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | N2l+b | 2009.3 | 2013.2 | 3.9 | 31.51 | 33.46 | 123.42 | 1.3 | 0.33 |
2 | N2l+b | 2018.6 | 2023.6 | 5.0 | 25.99 | 31.00 | 64.56 | 0.9 | 0.18 |
3 | N2l+b | 2036.5 | 2038.1 | 1.6 | 31.87 | 31.52 | 111.61 | 2.8 | 1.75 |
4 | N2l+b | 2045.8 | 2049.4 | 3.6 | 19.55 | 28.97 | 223.82 | 1.7 | 0.47 |
5 | N2l+b | 2062.9 | 2064.3 | 1.4 | 27.84 | 33.61 | 130.24 | 3.2 | 2.29 |
6 | N2l+b | 2069.4 | 2071.2 | 1.8 | 20.06 | 28.69 | 63.75 | 0.8 | 0.44 |
7 | N2l+b | 2083.9 | 2084.9 | 1.0 | 22.76 | 32.97 | 218.73 | 1.9 | 1.90 |
8 | N2l+b | 2098.6 | 2099.7 | 1.1 | 25.57 | 27.28 | 34.08 | 2.6 | 2.36 |
9 | N2l+b | 2101.3 | 2102.6 | 1.3 | 28.26 | 42.79 | 955.38 | 3.1 | 2.38 |
10 | N2l+b | 2152.8 | 2159.8 | 7.0 | 12.81 | 31.54 | 437.56 | 5.4 | 0.77 |
11 | N2l+b | 2172.0 | 2173.8 | 1.8 | 15.01 | 35.36 | 545.79 | 1.2 | 0.67 |
12 | N2l+b | 2183.1 | 2184.9 | 1.8 | 11.50 | 35.06 | 1653.77 | 3.5 | 1.94 |
13 | N2l+b | 2196.1 | 2197.4 | 1.3 | 27.30 | 34.31 | 543.34 | 1.9 | 1.46 |
14 | N2l+b | 2209.5 | 2217.0 | 7.5 | 15.53 | 33.03 | 386.65 | 2.6 | 0.35 |
15 | N2l+b | 2232.6 | 2233.9 | 1.3 | 18.52 | 32.30 | 146.40 | 4.3 | 3.31 |
16 | N2l+b | 2244.5 | 2258.6 | 14.1 | 15.04 | 33.71 | 402.69 | 1.5 | 0.11 |
17 | N2l+b | 2307.3 | 2309.9 | 2.6 | 12.63 | 33.75 | 626.61 | 3.2 | 1.23 |
18 | N2l+b | 2329.8 | 2330.7 | 0.9 | 23.36 | 30.93 | 201.10 | 1.8 | 2.00 |
19 | N2l+b | 2332.3 | 2334.6 | 2.3 | 17.51 | 28.49 | 139.04 | 2.3 | 1.00 |
20 | N2l+b | 2360.4 | 2365.4 | 5.0 | 13.36 | 30.28 | 212.80 | 0.9 | 0.18 |
21 | N2l+b | 2379.4 | 2381.0 | 1.6 | 12.47 | 30.41 | 347.29 | 1.7 | 1.06 |
22 | N2l+b | 2440.9 | 2441.9 | 1.0 | 21.38 | 28.28 | 65.12 | 1.3 | 1.30 |
23 | N2l+b | 2481.6 | 2483.2 | 1.6 | 24.34 | 25.51 | 34.55 | 2.6 | 1.63 |
24 | N2l+b | 2529.8 | 2531.2 | 1.4 | 17.07 | 23.36 | 30.37 | 3.8 | 2.71 |
25 | N2l+b | 2662.1 | 2663.1 | 1.0 | 17.69 | 28.52 | 81.37 | 4.1 | 4.10 |
26 | N2l+b | 2697.6 | 2699.5 | 1.9 | 16.58 | 25.35 | 44.67 | 1.5 | 0.79 |
27 | N2l+b | 2709.8 | 2712.3 | 2.5 | 15.53 | 26.75 | 80.02 | 0.8 | 0.32 |
28 | N2l+b | 2713.1 | 2714.5 | 1.4 | 16.35 | 24.14 | 40.32 | 2.9 | 2.07 |
29 | N1Gl | 2768.4 | 2769.9 | 1.5 | 15.51 | 30.52 | 169.61 | 1.6 | 1.07 |
30 | N1Gl | 2786.0 | 2793.1 | 7.1 | 12.20 | 23.17 | 92.25 | 3.4 | 0.48 |
31 | N1Gl | 2803.0 | 2804.9 | 1.9 | 16.01 | 25.30 | 64.80 | 1.9 | 1.00 |
32 | N1Gl | 2815.1 | 2819.6 | 4.5 | 11.76 | 21.52 | 59.50 | 2.1 | 0.47 |
33 | N1Gl | 2872.9 | 2875.5 | 2.6 | 10.49 | 21.95 | 53.53 | 3.2 | 1.23 |
34 | N1Gl | 2884.6 | 2885.9 | 1.3 | 14.99 | 27.71 | 95.90 | 16.4 | 12.62 |
Table 2 Well logging interpretation and production profile test results of major aquifers in well JY
序号 | 地层 | 起始深度 (m) | 终止深度 (m) | 有效厚度 (m) | 泥质含量 (%) | 孔隙度 (%) | 渗透率 (10-3μm2) | 绝对出水量 (m3/h) | 每米砂体出水量 (m3·h-1·m-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | N2l+b | 2009.3 | 2013.2 | 3.9 | 31.51 | 33.46 | 123.42 | 1.3 | 0.33 |
2 | N2l+b | 2018.6 | 2023.6 | 5.0 | 25.99 | 31.00 | 64.56 | 0.9 | 0.18 |
3 | N2l+b | 2036.5 | 2038.1 | 1.6 | 31.87 | 31.52 | 111.61 | 2.8 | 1.75 |
4 | N2l+b | 2045.8 | 2049.4 | 3.6 | 19.55 | 28.97 | 223.82 | 1.7 | 0.47 |
5 | N2l+b | 2062.9 | 2064.3 | 1.4 | 27.84 | 33.61 | 130.24 | 3.2 | 2.29 |
6 | N2l+b | 2069.4 | 2071.2 | 1.8 | 20.06 | 28.69 | 63.75 | 0.8 | 0.44 |
7 | N2l+b | 2083.9 | 2084.9 | 1.0 | 22.76 | 32.97 | 218.73 | 1.9 | 1.90 |
8 | N2l+b | 2098.6 | 2099.7 | 1.1 | 25.57 | 27.28 | 34.08 | 2.6 | 2.36 |
9 | N2l+b | 2101.3 | 2102.6 | 1.3 | 28.26 | 42.79 | 955.38 | 3.1 | 2.38 |
10 | N2l+b | 2152.8 | 2159.8 | 7.0 | 12.81 | 31.54 | 437.56 | 5.4 | 0.77 |
11 | N2l+b | 2172.0 | 2173.8 | 1.8 | 15.01 | 35.36 | 545.79 | 1.2 | 0.67 |
12 | N2l+b | 2183.1 | 2184.9 | 1.8 | 11.50 | 35.06 | 1653.77 | 3.5 | 1.94 |
13 | N2l+b | 2196.1 | 2197.4 | 1.3 | 27.30 | 34.31 | 543.34 | 1.9 | 1.46 |
14 | N2l+b | 2209.5 | 2217.0 | 7.5 | 15.53 | 33.03 | 386.65 | 2.6 | 0.35 |
15 | N2l+b | 2232.6 | 2233.9 | 1.3 | 18.52 | 32.30 | 146.40 | 4.3 | 3.31 |
16 | N2l+b | 2244.5 | 2258.6 | 14.1 | 15.04 | 33.71 | 402.69 | 1.5 | 0.11 |
17 | N2l+b | 2307.3 | 2309.9 | 2.6 | 12.63 | 33.75 | 626.61 | 3.2 | 1.23 |
18 | N2l+b | 2329.8 | 2330.7 | 0.9 | 23.36 | 30.93 | 201.10 | 1.8 | 2.00 |
19 | N2l+b | 2332.3 | 2334.6 | 2.3 | 17.51 | 28.49 | 139.04 | 2.3 | 1.00 |
20 | N2l+b | 2360.4 | 2365.4 | 5.0 | 13.36 | 30.28 | 212.80 | 0.9 | 0.18 |
21 | N2l+b | 2379.4 | 2381.0 | 1.6 | 12.47 | 30.41 | 347.29 | 1.7 | 1.06 |
22 | N2l+b | 2440.9 | 2441.9 | 1.0 | 21.38 | 28.28 | 65.12 | 1.3 | 1.30 |
23 | N2l+b | 2481.6 | 2483.2 | 1.6 | 24.34 | 25.51 | 34.55 | 2.6 | 1.63 |
24 | N2l+b | 2529.8 | 2531.2 | 1.4 | 17.07 | 23.36 | 30.37 | 3.8 | 2.71 |
25 | N2l+b | 2662.1 | 2663.1 | 1.0 | 17.69 | 28.52 | 81.37 | 4.1 | 4.10 |
26 | N2l+b | 2697.6 | 2699.5 | 1.9 | 16.58 | 25.35 | 44.67 | 1.5 | 0.79 |
27 | N2l+b | 2709.8 | 2712.3 | 2.5 | 15.53 | 26.75 | 80.02 | 0.8 | 0.32 |
28 | N2l+b | 2713.1 | 2714.5 | 1.4 | 16.35 | 24.14 | 40.32 | 2.9 | 2.07 |
29 | N1Gl | 2768.4 | 2769.9 | 1.5 | 15.51 | 30.52 | 169.61 | 1.6 | 1.07 |
30 | N1Gl | 2786.0 | 2793.1 | 7.1 | 12.20 | 23.17 | 92.25 | 3.4 | 0.48 |
31 | N1Gl | 2803.0 | 2804.9 | 1.9 | 16.01 | 25.30 | 64.80 | 1.9 | 1.00 |
32 | N1Gl | 2815.1 | 2819.6 | 4.5 | 11.76 | 21.52 | 59.50 | 2.1 | 0.47 |
33 | N1Gl | 2872.9 | 2875.5 | 2.6 | 10.49 | 21.95 | 53.53 | 3.2 | 1.23 |
34 | N1Gl | 2884.6 | 2885.9 | 1.3 | 14.99 | 27.71 | 95.90 | 16.4 | 12.62 |
类别 | 层数 | 孔隙度(%) | 渗透率(10-3μm2) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
最小值 | 最大值 | 平均值 | 最小值 | 最大值 | 平均值 | |||
产水贡献层 | 34 | 21.52 | 42.79 | 29.75 | 30.37 | 1653.77 | 249.43 | |
非产水贡献层 | 48 | 10.72 | 31.86 | 21.72 | 4.30 | 212.00 | 49.16 |
Table 3 Statistics of reservoir physical parameters in well JY
类别 | 层数 | 孔隙度(%) | 渗透率(10-3μm2) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
最小值 | 最大值 | 平均值 | 最小值 | 最大值 | 平均值 | |||
产水贡献层 | 34 | 21.52 | 42.79 | 29.75 | 30.37 | 1653.77 | 249.43 | |
非产水贡献层 | 48 | 10.72 | 31.86 | 21.72 | 4.30 | 212.00 | 49.16 |
[1] | ADELE M, ELISA C, MARTINA R G, et al. Geothermal heating and cooling production, 2023 worldwide review[M]//Proceedings World Geothermal Congress, 2023. Beijing: China Petrochemical Corporation, 2023. |
[2] |
孙焕泉, 毛翔, 吴陈冰洁, 等. 地热资源勘探开发技术与发展方向[J]. 地学前缘, 2024, 31(1): 400-411
DOI |
[3] | 陈墨香. 华北地热[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1988. |
[4] | 陈墨香, 汪集旸. 中国地热资源——形成特点和潜力评估[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1994. |
[5] | 蔺文静, 刘志明, 王婉丽, 等. 中国地热资源及其潜力评估[J]. 中国地质, 2013, 40(1): 312-321. |
[6] |
周总瑛, 刘世良, 刘金侠. 中国地热资源特点与发展对策[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(7): 1210-1221.
DOI |
[7] | 王贵玲, 张薇, 梁继运, 等. 中国地热资源潜力评价[J]. 地球学报, 2017, 38(4): 449-459. |
[8] | 王兴. 渭河盆地地热资源赋存与开发[M]. 西安: 陕西科学技术出版社, 2005. |
[9] | 张薇, 王贵玲, 刘峰, 等. 中国沉积盆地型地热资源特征[J]. 中国地质, 2019, 46(2): 255-268. |
[10] | WANG P, HUANG Z C, MI N, et al. Crustal structure beneath the Weihe Graben in central China: Evidence for the tectonic regime transformation in the Cenozoic[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2014, 81: 105-114. |
[11] | TANG Y C, ZHOU S Y, CHEN Y J, et al. Crustal structures across the western Weihe Graben, North China: Implications for extrusion tectonics at the northeast margin of Tibetan Plateau[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research(Solid Earth), 2015, 120(7): 5070-5081. |
[12] | 刘护军. 渭河盆地的形成演化与东秦岭的隆升[D]. 西安: 西北大学, 2004. |
[13] | 李玉宏, 张文, 袁炳强, 等. 渭河新生代盆地基底组成及其油气地质意义[J]. 西安科技大学学报, 2018, 38(6): 966-974. |
[14] | 王兴. 渭河盆地地温场特征与地热系统[J]. 陕西煤炭技术, 1997, 16(2): 43-50. |
[15] |
饶松, 姜光政, 高雅洁, 等. 渭河盆地岩石圈热结构与地热田热源机理[J]. 地球物理学报, 2016, 59(6): 2176-2190.
DOI |
[16] | 孙红丽. 关中盆地地热资源赋存特征及成因模式研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2015. |
[17] | 周阳, 穆根胥, 张卉, 等. 关中盆地地温场划分及其地质影响因素[J]. 中国地质, 2017, 44(5): 1017-1026. |
[18] | 任文波. 渭河盆地中深层地热资源特征及开发利用[D]. 西安: 西北大学, 2019. |
[19] | 洪增林, 张银龙, 周阳. 关中盆地南部山前中深层地热资源赋存特征及应用[J]. 中国地质, 2019, 46(5): 1224-1235. |
[20] | 任战利, 刘润川, 任文波, 等. 渭河盆地地温场分布规律及其控制因素[J]. 地质学报, 2020, 94(7): 1938-1949. |
[21] |
何治亮, 冯建赟, 张英, 等. 试论中国地热单元分级分类评价体系[J]. 地学前缘, 2017, 24(3): 168-179.
DOI |
[22] | 夏勇. 渭河盆地新生代沉积特征及与构造的关系[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2007. |
[23] | 李智超, 李文厚, 李永项, 等. 渭河盆地新生代沉积相研究[J]. 古地理学报, 2015, 17(4): 529-540. |
[24] | 李智超. 渭河盆地新生代岩相古地理及环境演化[D]. 西安: 西北大学, 2017. |
[25] | 张莹, 任战利, 邢光远, 等. 渭河盆地新近系热储层特征[J]. 地质通报, 2023, 42(11): 1993-2005. |
[26] | 刘润川, 任战利, 任文波, 等. 渭河盆地西安凹陷地热田热储特征及开发方式[J]. 地质学报, 2023, 97(10): 3456-3474. |
[27] | 瞿伟, 王运生, 徐超, 等. 渭河盆地构造应力场有限元数值模拟[J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2017, 42(12): 1749-1755. |
[28] | 郭西锋, 韩斌虎. 关中盆地新近系灞河组—蓝田组沉积相研究[J]. 内蒙古石油化工, 2008, 34(18): 96-98. |
[29] | 刘方, 陈金国, 穆根胥, 等. 陕西省关中盆地地热资源调查评价报告[R]. 西安: 陕西省地质环境检测总站, 2009. |
[30] |
姜光政, 高堋, 饶松, 等. 中国大陆地区大地热流数据汇编(第四版)[J]. 地球物理学报, 2016, 59(8): 2892-2910.
DOI |
[31] | 国家能源局. 地热储层评价方法: NB/T 10263—2019[S]. 北京: 中国石化出版社, 2019. |
[32] | 王贵玲, 蔺文静. 我国主要水热型地热系统形成机制与成因模式[J]. 地质学报, 2020, 94(7): 1923-1937. |
[33] |
张英, 冯建赟, 何治亮, 等. 地热系统类型划分与主控因素分析[J]. 地学前缘, 2017, 24(3): 190-198.
DOI |
[1] | HE Tingting, DU Li, TAN Xin, LIU Junrong, LUO Lu, ZHANG Hui, LI Hao. Genetic Model and Development Potential of the Guantao Formation Sandstone Geothermal System in the Zhongmu Sag, Kaifeng Depression [J]. Geoscience, 2024, 38(06): 1557-1570. |
[2] | DENG Yi, GAO Chonglong, WANG Jian, LIU Ming, MENG Yuanlin, REN Ying, LIU Ke, WANG Ke. Deep Reservoir Characteristics and Control of Physical Properties of Qigu Formation in the Western Section of the Southern Margin of Junggar Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2024, 38(02): 335-349. |
[3] | CHANG Hailiang, DU Chunyan, ZHANG Hongwei, WANG Hongwei, ZHU Chaohui, CHEN Jingyi. Sandstone Reservoir Characteristics of the Upper Paleozoic Coal-bearing Strata in Luyi Sag, Southern North China Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2024, 38(02): 373-384. |
[4] | YANG Lumei, KUANG Rongxi, GUO Hui, ZUO Liqiong, GOU Fugang, XU Shugang, ZHANG Shuo. Current Geothermal Field of the South Jiangsu Modernization Demonstrative Area and Its Influencing Factors [J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(04): 954-962. |
[5] | TANG Xianglu, JIANG Zhenxue, SHAO Zeyu, LONG Guohui, HE Shijie, LIU Xiaoxue, WANG Yuchao. Reservoir Characteristics and Dynamic Accumulation Process of the Quaternary Mudstone Biogas [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(02): 682-694. |
[6] | YANG Fengtian, SHI Yujia, LI Wenqing. Genesis Model of Geothermal Water in Dandong Area of Liaoning Province Based on Hydrogeochemical Characteristics [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(02): 474-483. |
[7] | CUI Gaixia, WEI Qinlian, XIAO Ling, WANG Song, HU Rong, WANG Chonghuan. Reservoir Characteristics of Permian Lower He 8 Member in Longdong Area, Ordos Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(04): 1088-1097. |
[8] | HUANG Xu, SHEN Chuanbo, DU Li, WEI Guangren, LUO Lu, TANG Guo. Geothermal Geological Characteristics of the Xianxian High and Fucheng Sag in the Middle Cangxian Uplift, Bohai Bay Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(04): 997-1008. |
[9] | SHEN Hua, LIU Zhen, SHI Yuanpeng, XU Zeyang, LI Yongjun, CHEN Shuguang, WANG Huilai, WANG Zhicheng, WANG Biao, LIU Chang. Hydrocarbon Accumulation Process and Exploration Potential in Linhe Depression, Hetao Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(03): 871-882. |
[10] | ZHAO Zhihong, XU Haoran, LIU Feng, WEI Shuaichao, ZHANG Wei, WANG Guiling. Preliminary Prediction of Temperature Field and Thermal Damage in Zheduoshan Region Along Sichuan-Tibet Railway [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(01): 180-187. |
[11] | WANG Tinghao, WANG Xinwei, ZHANG Xuan, MAO Xiang, WANG Di, WU Minghui. Geothermal Resources Evaluation of Karst Thermal Reservoir in Taiyuan Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2020, 34(02): 297-308. |
[12] | YAO Zongquan, YU Xinghe, YUE Hongxing, , ZHOU Lihua, WANG Jin, GAO Yang. Reservoir Characteristics and Influence Factors of Gravel Sandstone:Case Study of Upper Triassic Karamay Formation in Hongshanzhui Area [J]. Geoscience, 2019, 33(06): 1188-1198. |
[13] | LIU Zongming, ZHANG Jinping, WANG Xinjuan, LIU Kai, LIU Yingchao. An Analysis of Geothermal Geological Conditions of the Southern Dongba Sag in the Tianzhu Geothermal Field of Beijing [J]. Geoscience, 2017, 31(04): 832-842. |
[14] | YUAN Jianfei, DENG Guoshi, XU Fen, TANG Yeqi, LI Pengyue. Hydrogeochemical Characteristics of Groundwater in the Xide Geothermal Field, Southwest Sichuan, China [J]. Geoscience, 2017, 31(01): 200-208. |
[15] | . Shallow Super Heavy Oil Reservoir Accumulation Process and Model in LX Oilfield, Liaodong Bay Depression [J]. Geoscience, 2016, 30(3): 663-671. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||