Geoscience ›› 2017, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (05): 1069-1078.
• Oil-gas Exploration and Development • Previous Articles Next Articles
CHEN Chen1,2(), LU Shuangfang1(
), LI Junqian1, ZHANG Pengfei1,2, ZHANG Ping1,2
Received:
2016-12-20
Revised:
2017-04-10
Online:
2017-10-10
Published:
2017-11-06
CLC Number:
CHEN Chen, LU Shuangfang, LI Junqian, ZHANG Pengfei, ZHANG Ping. Digital Core Modeling Construction of Different Lithofacies Shale: A Case Study of Dongying Depression[J]. Geoscience, 2017, 31(05): 1069-1078.
样品 编号 | 岩相 | 矿物组成/% | TOC/ % | 孔隙度/ % | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
石英 | 钾长石 | 斜长石 | 方解石 | 白云石 | 菱铁矿 | 黄铁矿 | 黏土矿物 | ||||
L752-1 | 富钙质页岩 | 8 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 13 | 2.5 | 4 |
F41-2 | 富长英质泥岩 | 38.7 | 5.8 | 18.5 | 11.2 | 6.6 | 3.7 | 0.5 | 14 | 0.27 | 6.366 |
L76-1 | 富长英质泥岩 | 37.7 | 4.8 | 10.5 | 2.3 | 8.3 | 1.8 | 32.1 | 0.13 | 2.135 | |
L76-2 | 富长英质泥岩 | 40 | 2.8 | 14.2 | 1.8 | 8.9 | 1.5 | 28.9 | 0.16 | 7.206 | |
N5-3 | 富长英质泥岩 | 43 | 5.1 | 16.8 | 14.7 | 14 | 2.6 | 0.12 | 5.949 | ||
H88-1 | 富泥质泥岩 | 30.8 | 2.1 | 7.9 | 3.6 | 1 | 1 | 55.5 | 2.66 | 0.978 | |
F41-1 | 钙质泥岩 | 17.5 | 0.9 | 3.1 | 26.5 | 1.8 | 5.1 | 4.5 | 40.7 | 1.1 | 0.469 |
Y556-2 | 钙质泥岩 | 19.8 | 1.8 | 3 | 25.6 | 6.9 | 5.3 | 4.6 | 32.8 | 2.58 | 8.743 |
LX884-1 | 钙质页岩 | 26 | 0.2 | 2.7 | 18.7 | 17.5 | 0.4 | 3.7 | 30 | 1.74 | 5.926 |
Y556-1 | 钙质页岩 | 20 | 1.7 | 2.5 | 31.6 | 2.6 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 37 | 2.86 | 9.572 |
Y556-3 | 钙质页岩 | 22.3 | 1.7 | 5.7 | 19.9 | 15.7 | 2.4 | 4.7 | 27.6 | 2.39 | 1.598 |
Y556-4 | 钙质页岩 | 19.8 | 1.6 | 2.2 | 26.6 | 6.8 | 4.5 | 38.5 | 2.87 | 5.885 | |
F169-2 | 长英质泥岩 | 24.1 | 1.5 | 10.1 | 16.7 | 5.9 | 5.1 | 36.7 | 0.25 | 0.336 | |
F169-1 | 长英质页岩 | 30.8 | 1.8 | 11.1 | 6.1 | 10.3 | 39.8 | 0.37 | 0.874 |
Table 1 Material compositions and porosities of shale samples
样品 编号 | 岩相 | 矿物组成/% | TOC/ % | 孔隙度/ % | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
石英 | 钾长石 | 斜长石 | 方解石 | 白云石 | 菱铁矿 | 黄铁矿 | 黏土矿物 | ||||
L752-1 | 富钙质页岩 | 8 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 13 | 2.5 | 4 |
F41-2 | 富长英质泥岩 | 38.7 | 5.8 | 18.5 | 11.2 | 6.6 | 3.7 | 0.5 | 14 | 0.27 | 6.366 |
L76-1 | 富长英质泥岩 | 37.7 | 4.8 | 10.5 | 2.3 | 8.3 | 1.8 | 32.1 | 0.13 | 2.135 | |
L76-2 | 富长英质泥岩 | 40 | 2.8 | 14.2 | 1.8 | 8.9 | 1.5 | 28.9 | 0.16 | 7.206 | |
N5-3 | 富长英质泥岩 | 43 | 5.1 | 16.8 | 14.7 | 14 | 2.6 | 0.12 | 5.949 | ||
H88-1 | 富泥质泥岩 | 30.8 | 2.1 | 7.9 | 3.6 | 1 | 1 | 55.5 | 2.66 | 0.978 | |
F41-1 | 钙质泥岩 | 17.5 | 0.9 | 3.1 | 26.5 | 1.8 | 5.1 | 4.5 | 40.7 | 1.1 | 0.469 |
Y556-2 | 钙质泥岩 | 19.8 | 1.8 | 3 | 25.6 | 6.9 | 5.3 | 4.6 | 32.8 | 2.58 | 8.743 |
LX884-1 | 钙质页岩 | 26 | 0.2 | 2.7 | 18.7 | 17.5 | 0.4 | 3.7 | 30 | 1.74 | 5.926 |
Y556-1 | 钙质页岩 | 20 | 1.7 | 2.5 | 31.6 | 2.6 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 37 | 2.86 | 9.572 |
Y556-3 | 钙质页岩 | 22.3 | 1.7 | 5.7 | 19.9 | 15.7 | 2.4 | 4.7 | 27.6 | 2.39 | 1.598 |
Y556-4 | 钙质页岩 | 19.8 | 1.6 | 2.2 | 26.6 | 6.8 | 4.5 | 38.5 | 2.87 | 5.885 | |
F169-2 | 长英质泥岩 | 24.1 | 1.5 | 10.1 | 16.7 | 5.9 | 5.1 | 36.7 | 0.25 | 0.336 | |
F169-1 | 长英质页岩 | 30.8 | 1.8 | 11.1 | 6.1 | 10.3 | 39.8 | 0.37 | 0.874 |
岩相 | 矿物组成/% | TOC/ % | 孔隙度/ % | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
石英 | 钾长石 | 斜长石 | 方解石 | 白云石 | 菱铁矿 | 黄铁矿 | 黏土矿物 | |||
富长英质泥页岩 | 39.85 | 4.63 | 15.00 | 7.50 | 9.45 | 2.33 | 0.50 | 19.40 | 0.17 | 5.41 |
富泥质泥页岩 | 30.80 | 2.10 | 7.90 | 3.60 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 55.50 | 2.66 | 0.98 | |
富钙质泥页岩 | 8.00 | 2.00 | 5.00 | 50.00 | 15.00 | 3.00 | 4.00 | 13.00 | 2.50 | 4.00 |
长英质泥页岩 | 27.45 | 1.65 | 10.60 | 11.40 | 8.10 | 5.10 | 38.25 | 0.31 | 0.61 | |
钙质泥页岩 | 20.90 | 1.32 | 3.20 | 24.82 | 8.25 | 3.12 | 4.03 | 34.43 | 2.26 | 5.37 |
Table 2 Material composition and porosities of different lithofacies shales in Dongying depression
岩相 | 矿物组成/% | TOC/ % | 孔隙度/ % | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
石英 | 钾长石 | 斜长石 | 方解石 | 白云石 | 菱铁矿 | 黄铁矿 | 黏土矿物 | |||
富长英质泥页岩 | 39.85 | 4.63 | 15.00 | 7.50 | 9.45 | 2.33 | 0.50 | 19.40 | 0.17 | 5.41 |
富泥质泥页岩 | 30.80 | 2.10 | 7.90 | 3.60 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 55.50 | 2.66 | 0.98 | |
富钙质泥页岩 | 8.00 | 2.00 | 5.00 | 50.00 | 15.00 | 3.00 | 4.00 | 13.00 | 2.50 | 4.00 |
长英质泥页岩 | 27.45 | 1.65 | 10.60 | 11.40 | 8.10 | 5.10 | 38.25 | 0.31 | 0.61 | |
钙质泥页岩 | 20.90 | 1.32 | 3.20 | 24.82 | 8.25 | 3.12 | 4.03 | 34.43 | 2.26 | 5.37 |
岩相 | 矿物组成/% | TOC/ % | 孔隙度/ % | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
石英 | 钾长石 | 斜长石 | 方解石 | 白云石 | 菱铁矿 | 黄铁矿 | 黏土矿物 | |||
富长英质泥页岩 | 38.54 | 4.56 | 14.62 | 7.09 | 8.50 | 1.51 | 0.26 | 19.12 | 0.39 | 5.41 |
富泥质泥页岩 | 28.04 | 1.95 | 7.25 | 3.20 | 0.00 | 0.61 | 0.48 | 51.49 | 6.01 | 0.98 |
富钙质泥页岩 | 7.58 | 1.93 | 4.77 | 46.30 | 13.21 | 1.90 | 2.01 | 12.55 | 5.76 | 4.00 |
长英质泥页岩 | 27.03 | 1.66 | 10.52 | 10.98 | 7.42 | 0.00 | 2.66 | 38.39 | 0.74 | 0.61 |
钙质泥页岩 | 19.30 | 1.24 | 2.98 | 22.41 | 7.34 | 1.93 | 1.97 | 32.40 | 5.07 | 5.37 |
Table 3 Normalized composition results of different lithofacies shales in Dongying depression
岩相 | 矿物组成/% | TOC/ % | 孔隙度/ % | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
石英 | 钾长石 | 斜长石 | 方解石 | 白云石 | 菱铁矿 | 黄铁矿 | 黏土矿物 | |||
富长英质泥页岩 | 38.54 | 4.56 | 14.62 | 7.09 | 8.50 | 1.51 | 0.26 | 19.12 | 0.39 | 5.41 |
富泥质泥页岩 | 28.04 | 1.95 | 7.25 | 3.20 | 0.00 | 0.61 | 0.48 | 51.49 | 6.01 | 0.98 |
富钙质泥页岩 | 7.58 | 1.93 | 4.77 | 46.30 | 13.21 | 1.90 | 2.01 | 12.55 | 5.76 | 4.00 |
长英质泥页岩 | 27.03 | 1.66 | 10.52 | 10.98 | 7.42 | 0.00 | 2.66 | 38.39 | 0.74 | 0.61 |
钙质泥页岩 | 19.30 | 1.24 | 2.98 | 22.41 | 7.34 | 1.93 | 1.97 | 32.40 | 5.07 | 5.37 |
岩相 | 孔裂隙/% | 有机质/% | 黏土矿物/% |
---|---|---|---|
富长英质泥页岩 | 5.41 | 0.39 | 19.12 |
富泥质泥页岩 | 0.98 | 6.01 | 51.49 |
富钙质泥页岩 | 4.00 | 5.76 | 12.55 |
长英质泥页岩 | 0.61 | 0.74 | 38.39 |
钙质泥页岩 | 5.37 | 5.07 | 32.40 |
岩相 | 长英质矿物/% | 钙质矿物/% | 铁质矿物/% |
富长英质泥页岩 | 57.72 | 15.59 | 1.77 |
富泥质泥页岩 | 37.23 | 3.20 | 1.09 |
富钙质泥页岩 | 14.28 | 59.51 | 3.91 |
长英质泥页岩 | 39.20 | 18.39 | 2.66 |
钙质泥页岩 | 23.51 | 29.75 | 3.90 |
Table 4 Composition contents of different lithofacies shale in Dongying depression
岩相 | 孔裂隙/% | 有机质/% | 黏土矿物/% |
---|---|---|---|
富长英质泥页岩 | 5.41 | 0.39 | 19.12 |
富泥质泥页岩 | 0.98 | 6.01 | 51.49 |
富钙质泥页岩 | 4.00 | 5.76 | 12.55 |
长英质泥页岩 | 0.61 | 0.74 | 38.39 |
钙质泥页岩 | 5.37 | 5.07 | 32.40 |
岩相 | 长英质矿物/% | 钙质矿物/% | 铁质矿物/% |
富长英质泥页岩 | 57.72 | 15.59 | 1.77 |
富泥质泥页岩 | 37.23 | 3.20 | 1.09 |
富钙质泥页岩 | 14.28 | 59.51 | 3.91 |
长英质泥页岩 | 39.20 | 18.39 | 2.66 |
钙质泥页岩 | 23.51 | 29.75 | 3.90 |
岩相 | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | 岩相 | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
块状富长英质泥岩 | 10 773 | 10 788 | 11 187 | 12 088 | 13 130 | 纹层状富长英质页岩 | 17 203 | 17 222 | 17 719 | 18 739 | 19 675 |
块状长英质泥岩 | 10 343 | 10 497 | 11 384 | 11 991 | 12 952 | 纹层状长英质页岩 | 16 717 | 16 876 | 17 960 | 18 640 | 19 527 |
块状富钙质泥岩 | 22 514 | 22 805 | 23 147 | 23 416 | 24 859 | 纹层状富钙质页岩 | 17 126 | 17 375 | 17 672 | 17 913 | 19 384 |
块状钙质泥岩 | 22 604 | 22 830 | 23 521 | 23 914 | 24 860 | 纹层状钙质页岩 | 17 201 | 17 394 | 18 007 | 18 381 | 19 383 |
块状富泥质泥岩 | 19 447 | 19 990 | 21 073 | 22 111 | 22 617 | 纹层状富泥质页岩 | 16 810 | 17 274 | 18 249 | 19 252 | 19 844 |
Table 5 Threshold of each component group of different lithofacies shales in Dongying depression
岩相 | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | 岩相 | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
块状富长英质泥岩 | 10 773 | 10 788 | 11 187 | 12 088 | 13 130 | 纹层状富长英质页岩 | 17 203 | 17 222 | 17 719 | 18 739 | 19 675 |
块状长英质泥岩 | 10 343 | 10 497 | 11 384 | 11 991 | 12 952 | 纹层状长英质页岩 | 16 717 | 16 876 | 17 960 | 18 640 | 19 527 |
块状富钙质泥岩 | 22 514 | 22 805 | 23 147 | 23 416 | 24 859 | 纹层状富钙质页岩 | 17 126 | 17 375 | 17 672 | 17 913 | 19 384 |
块状钙质泥岩 | 22 604 | 22 830 | 23 521 | 23 914 | 24 860 | 纹层状钙质页岩 | 17 201 | 17 394 | 18 007 | 18 381 | 19 383 |
块状富泥质泥岩 | 19 447 | 19 990 | 21 073 | 22 111 | 22 617 | 纹层状富泥质页岩 | 16 810 | 17 274 | 18 249 | 19 252 | 19 844 |
[1] |
邹才能, 朱如凯, 吴松涛, 等. 常规与非常规油气聚集类型、特征、机理及展望——以中国致密油和致密气为例[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(2):173-187.
DOI |
[2] | 邹孟飞, 隋微波, 王旭东, 等. 基于非常快速模拟退火法的页岩岩心双重区域重构方法[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2015, 22(5):117-122. |
[3] | 孟江辉, 潘仁芳, 陈浩, 等. 滇黔桂盆地泥盆系页岩气成藏条件及资源潜力分析[J]. 现代地质, 2016, 30(1):181-191. |
[4] | 徐祖新. 基于CT扫描图像的页岩储层非均质性研究[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014, 26(6):46-49. |
[5] | 王崇孝, 罗群, 宋岩, 等. 纳米石油地质学——非常规油气地质理论与研究方法探讨[J]. 石油实验地质, 2014, 36(6):659-667. |
[6] | 张琴, 刘畅, 梅啸寒, 等. 页岩气储层微观储集空间研究现状及展望[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2015, 36(4):666-674. |
[7] | 张萍, 李俊乾, 薛海涛, 等. 泥页岩储集空间微观非均质性定量评价[J]. 河南科学, 2017, 35(1):128-133. |
[8] | 刘学锋, 张伟伟, 孙建孟. 三维数字岩心建模方法综述[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2013, 28(6):3066-3072. |
[9] | 焦堃, 姚素平, 吴浩, 等. 页岩气储层孔隙系统表征方法研究进展[J]. 高校地质学报, 2014, 20(1):151-161. |
[10] | 吴运强, 吕道平, 韩雪, 等. 数字岩心物性数值模拟[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2016, 16(29):89-95. |
[11] | 屈乐, 孙卫, 杜环虹, 等. 基于CT扫描的三维数字岩心孔隙结构表征方法及应用——以莫北油田116井区三工河组为例[J]. 现代地质, 2014, 28(1):190-196. |
[12] | TOMUTSA L, SILIN D, RADMILOVIC V. Analysis of chalk petrophysical properties by means of submicron-scale pore imaging and modeling[J]. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2007, 10(3): 285-293. |
[13] | 屈乐. 基于低渗透储层的三维数字岩心建模及应用[D]. 西安: 西北大学, 2014. |
[14] |
LEVITZ P. Off-lattice reconstruction of porous media: critical evaluation, geometrical confinement and molecular transport[J]. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 1998, 76/77(2):71-106.
DOI URL |
[15] |
YAO J, WANG C C, YANG Y F, et al. The construction of carbonate digital rock with hybrid superposition method[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2013, 110(5):263-267.
DOI URL |
[16] |
YANG Y F, YAO J, WANG C C, et al. New pore space characterization method of shale matrix formation by considering organic and inorganic pores[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2015, 27(2): 496-503.
DOI URL |
[17] | 邹友龙, 谢然红, 郭江峰, 等. 致密储层数字岩心重构及核磁共振响应模拟[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39(6):63-71. |
[18] | 郭江峰, 谢然红, 丁业娇. 马尔可夫链-蒙特卡洛法重构三维数字岩心及岩石核磁共振响应数值模拟[J]. 中国科技论文, 2016, 11(3):280-285. |
[19] | 张强. 基于模拟退火法的数字岩心重构技术及导电性数值模拟研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2016. |
[20] | 卢双舫, 薛海涛, 王民, 等. 页岩油评价中的若干关键问题及研究趋势[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(5):1309-1322. |
[21] |
张博, 何彬彬. 改进的分水岭变换算法在高分辨率遥感影像多尺度分割中的应用[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2014, 16(1):142-150.
DOI |
[22] |
ANDREW M, BIJELJIC B, BLUNT M J. Pore-scale contact angle measurements at reservoir conditions using X-ray microtomography[J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2014, 68(2):24-31.
DOI URL |
[23] |
OTSU N. Threshold selection method from gray-level histograms[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 1979, 9(1):62-66.
DOI URL |
[24] | DESBOIS G, URAI J L, HEMES S, et al. Multi-scale analysis of porosity in diagenetically altered reservoir sandstone from the Permian Rotliegend (Germany)[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science & Engineering, 2016, 140:128-148. |
[25] | 洪浩, 霍春宝. 基于最大类间方差法与GA相结合的图像分割算法研究[J]. 辽宁工业大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 36(2):99-102. |
[26] | 谢凯, 王新生. 基于灰度迭代阈值的高分辨率影像分割研究[J]. 湖北大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 35(2):252-257. |
[27] | 陈世悦. 矿物岩石学[M]. 东营: 中国石油大学出版社, 2002:20-70. |
[28] | ZHANG P, LU S, LI J, et al. Multi-component segmentation of X-ray computed tomography (CT) image using multi-Otsu thresholding algorithm and scanning electron microscopy[J]. Energy Exploration & Exploitation, 2017, 35(3):281-294. |
[29] | 曹建农, 孙承志. 图像分割中区域灰度重叠问题研究[J]. 计算机应用, 2006(9):2077-2080. |
[1] | LIU Wangwei, LI Yifan, GAO Zhiqian, FAN Tailiang, ZHANG Tan, KUANG Mingzhi. Lithofacies Characteristics and Sedimentary Model of the Lower Cambrian Shale in the Northeastern Margin of Tarim Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(05): 1155-1168. |
[2] | SHI Liang, FAN Bojiang, WANG Xia, LI Yating, HUANG Feifei, DAI Xinyang. Element Composition and Sedimentary Environment of Chang 9 Shale Source Rocks in the Ordos Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(05): 1254-1263. |
[3] | JIN Xiao, FENG Yanfang, LUO Xiaoling, WEN Xinyu, ZHANG Suowen, ZHANG Zhihuan. Kinetic and Hydrocarbon Generation of Middle Permian Black Shale Around the Bogda Mountain, Southern Junggar Basin: Implications for Petroleum Exploration [J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(05): 1321-1335. |
[4] | LI Zhipeng, YU Qiling, ZAN Lin, YU Wenduan, ZHANG Zhihuan. Geochemical Characteristics and Hydrocarbon Generation Potential of Different Lithologic Source Rocks in the Second Member of Funing Formation in Qintong Sag, Subei Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(05): 1345-1357. |
[5] | WANG Xuxue, ZHANG Xiangyu, LI Shoujun, ZHANG Jiahao, ZHANG Zhenyu. Redox Sensitive Trace Element Compositions of the Shuinan Formation Black Shale in the Laiyang Sag: Controlling Factors of Organic Matter Enrichment [J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(03): 733-744. |
[6] | ZHANG Jinqing, LI Xianqing, ZHANG Boxiang, ZHANG Xueqing, YANG Jingwei, YU Zhenfeng. Pore Characteristics and Pore Structure of the Upper Paleozoic Coal-bearing Shale Gas Reservoir in the Wuxiang Block, Qinshui Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(06): 1551-1562. |
[7] | LI Qing, LI Jiangshan, LU Hao, QI Fengqiang, HE Yu, AN Keqin, LI Longyu, ZHANG Houmin, WU Yue. Characteristics and Control Factors of the Chang 73 Shale Reservoirs in the Southern Ordos Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(05): 1254-1270. |
[8] | CUI Shuhui, WU Peng, ZHAO Fei, NIU Yanwei, CAI Wenzhe, WANG Bo. Shale Gas Accumulation Factors and Enrichment Area Prediction in Linxing Block, Eastern Margin of the Ordos Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(05): 1271-1280. |
[9] | LIU Siyi, GAO Ping, XIAO Xianming, LIU Ruobing, QIN Jing, YUAN Tao, WANG Xu. Study on Organic Petrology Characteristics of the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation Black Shale, Sichuan Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(05): 1281-1291. |
[10] | WANG Zhihao, ZHAO Jianhua, PU Xiugang, LIU Keyu, LI Junqian, CHENG Bin. Comparison of Washing Oil Experiment of Core Samples from Shale Oil Reservoir [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(05): 1304-1312. |
[11] | JIANG Bingren, DENG Ende, HAN Minghui, MA Zijie. Microscopic Pore Structure and Fractal Characteristics From the Carboniferous Xiangbai Formation Shale in Northwestern Guizhou [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(04): 1065-1073. |
[12] | ZHENG Qinghua, LIU Xingjun, ZHANG Xiaolong, WANG Hongjun, LIAO Yongle, AN Erliang, LIU Tao, ZHANG Jianna, ZUO Qin. Review of the High Natural Gamma Sandstones Associated With Source Rocks in the Chang 73 Submember of the Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(04): 1087-1094. |
[13] | ZHANG Hongyu, SU Li, QIN Hong. Element Geochemistry and Vanadium Occurrence of the Dagoujing Black Shales, Inner Mongolia [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(01): 321-332. |
[14] | JIANG Shengling, ZHOU Qinghua, JIANG Lihong, JI Anzhao, YANG Rili, ZHU Xiulan, LI Yanju. Fracability Evaluation of Shale Reservoir in the Lower Cambrian Niutitang Formation of Well HY1, Northwestern Hunan [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(04): 1024-1032. |
[15] | LI Yangyang, LI Xianqing, ZHANG Xueqing, YANG Jingwei, ZHANG Boxiang, XIAO Xianming, YU Zhenfeng. Pore Structure Characteristics of Taiyuan Formation Coal Measures Shale in the Yangquan Block of the Qinshui Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(04): 1033-1042. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||