Geoscience ›› 2022, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (05): 1351-1359.DOI: 10.19657/j.geoscience.1000-8527.2022.056
• Coalbed Methane Geology and Development • Previous Articles Next Articles
LI Jinlong1(), LI Qian2, CAI Yidong2(
), CHEN Wei3, CHEN Zhizhu1, WANG Jian1, XUE Xiaohui4
Received:
2021-06-21
Revised:
2022-01-22
Online:
2022-10-10
Published:
2022-11-03
Contact:
CAI Yidong
CLC Number:
LI Jinlong, LI Qian, CAI Yidong, CHEN Wei, CHEN Zhizhu, WANG Jian, XUE Xiaohui. Geological Conditions and Resource Potential of Coalbed Methane Reservoirs in Laochang Mining Area, Yunnan Province[J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(05): 1351-1359.
煤层 编号 | 煤岩 | 工业分析成分/% | 发热量 / (MJ/kg) | 全水分 (Mar) /% | 全硫 (St,d) /% | 真密度TRD /(t/m3) | 视密度ARD /(t/m3) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
水分 (Mad) | 灰分 (Ad) | 挥发分 (Vdaf) | 固定碳 (FC,d) | Qgr,ad | Qnet,ar | |||||||
C2 | 原煤 | | | | | | | | | | | |
C3 | 原煤 | | | | | | | | | | | |
C4 | 原煤 | | | | | | | | | | | |
C7+8 | 原煤 | | | | | | | | | | | |
C9 | 原煤 | | | | | | | | | | | |
C13 | 原煤 | | | | | | | | | | | |
C14 | 原煤 | | | | | | | | | | | |
C15 | 原煤 | | | | | | | | | | | |
C16 | 原煤 | | | | | | | | | | | |
C17 | 原煤 | | | | | | | | | | | |
C18 | 原煤 | | | | | | | | | | | |
C18+1 | 原煤 | | | | | | | | | | | |
C19 | 原煤 | | | | | | | | | | | |
合计 | 原煤 | | | | | | | | | | |
Table 1 Statistics of main coal quality indexes of minable coal seam in Laochang block
煤层 编号 | 煤岩 | 工业分析成分/% | 发热量 / (MJ/kg) | 全水分 (Mar) /% | 全硫 (St,d) /% | 真密度TRD /(t/m3) | 视密度ARD /(t/m3) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
水分 (Mad) | 灰分 (Ad) | 挥发分 (Vdaf) | 固定碳 (FC,d) | Qgr,ad | Qnet,ar | |||||||
C2 | 原煤 | | | | | | | | | | | |
C3 | 原煤 | | | | | | | | | | | |
C4 | 原煤 | | | | | | | | | | | |
C7+8 | 原煤 | | | | | | | | | | | |
C9 | 原煤 | | | | | | | | | | | |
C13 | 原煤 | | | | | | | | | | | |
C14 | 原煤 | | | | | | | | | | | |
C15 | 原煤 | | | | | | | | | | | |
C16 | 原煤 | | | | | | | | | | | |
C17 | 原煤 | | | | | | | | | | | |
C18 | 原煤 | | | | | | | | | | | |
C18+1 | 原煤 | | | | | | | | | | | |
C19 | 原煤 | | | | | | | | | | | |
合计 | 原煤 | | | | | | | | | | |
煤层 编号 | 采样深度/m | 煤岩 类型 | 主裂隙 | 次裂隙 | 连 通 性 | 裂隙 发育 程度 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
长度/cm | 高度/cm | 宽度 /μm | 密度/ (条/cm) | 长度/cm | 高度/cm | 宽度 /μm | 密度/ (条/cm) | |||||||||||
C7+8 | 721.80~722.10 | 半亮 | 0.002~0.800 | 0.006~2.000 | 5~48 | 6.8 | 0.002~0.600 | 0.005~0.100 | 5~18 | 7.6 | 中 | 发育 | ||||||
C9 | 745.70~746.00 | 半亮 | 0.020~0.200 | 0.001~0.500 | 8~28 | 3.0 | 0.002~0.028 | 0.001~0.260 | 5~18 | 2.2 | 中 | 发育 | ||||||
C13 | 665.80~666.00 | 半亮 | 0.025~3.500 | 0.002~3.500 | 5~36 | 5.4 | 0.020~0.080 | 0.002~0.280 | 5~56 | 7.8 | 好 | 发育 | ||||||
C14 | 777.50~777.80 | 半亮 | 0.020~1.500 | 0.002~1.200 | 5~34 | 0.2 | 0.020~0.070 | 0.002~0.240 | 5~48 | 1.8 | 差 | 不发育 | ||||||
C19 | 830.80~831.20 | 半亮-半暗 | 0.020~0.200 | 0.001~0.200 | 6~16 | 2.0 | 0.002~0.040 | 0.001~0.200 | 5~10 | 3.8 | 中 | 发育 |
Table 2 Statistics of micro-fracture development characteristics of each coal seam in Laochang block
煤层 编号 | 采样深度/m | 煤岩 类型 | 主裂隙 | 次裂隙 | 连 通 性 | 裂隙 发育 程度 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
长度/cm | 高度/cm | 宽度 /μm | 密度/ (条/cm) | 长度/cm | 高度/cm | 宽度 /μm | 密度/ (条/cm) | |||||||||||
C7+8 | 721.80~722.10 | 半亮 | 0.002~0.800 | 0.006~2.000 | 5~48 | 6.8 | 0.002~0.600 | 0.005~0.100 | 5~18 | 7.6 | 中 | 发育 | ||||||
C9 | 745.70~746.00 | 半亮 | 0.020~0.200 | 0.001~0.500 | 8~28 | 3.0 | 0.002~0.028 | 0.001~0.260 | 5~18 | 2.2 | 中 | 发育 | ||||||
C13 | 665.80~666.00 | 半亮 | 0.025~3.500 | 0.002~3.500 | 5~36 | 5.4 | 0.020~0.080 | 0.002~0.280 | 5~56 | 7.8 | 好 | 发育 | ||||||
C14 | 777.50~777.80 | 半亮 | 0.020~1.500 | 0.002~1.200 | 5~34 | 0.2 | 0.020~0.070 | 0.002~0.240 | 5~48 | 1.8 | 差 | 不发育 | ||||||
C19 | 830.80~831.20 | 半亮-半暗 | 0.020~0.200 | 0.001~0.200 | 6~16 | 2.0 | 0.002~0.040 | 0.001~0.200 | 5~10 | 3.8 | 中 | 发育 |
井号 | 煤层 编号 | 煤层中点 埋深/m | 渗透率 /mD | 储层压力/MPa | 破裂压力/MPa | 闭合压力/MPa | 储层温度/℃ | 井区 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F1- LC1 | C7 | 886.28 | 0.036 0 | 7.30 | 16.10 | 16.02 | 20.55 | 道班房区块 | ||||||
C13 | 996.43 | 0.016 0 | 11.27 | 22.31 | 21.44 | 22.29 | ||||||||
F1- LC2 | C7+8 | 680.95 | 0.005 6 | 5.72 | 19.00 | 18.54 | 27.74 | 雨汪区块 | ||||||
C9 | 701.55 | 0.005 8 | 6.31 | 20.06 | 19.70 | 28.95 | ||||||||
C13 | 727.30 | 0.023 0 | 6.13 | 20.12 | 19.59 | 30.02 | ||||||||
C19 | 787.95 | 0.025 0 | 5.87 | 18.86 | 18.42 | 32.70 | ||||||||
L1 | C14 | 776.85 | 0.200 0 | 7.33 | 13.51 | 13.13 | 31.40 | |||||||
C19 | 830.05 | 0.080 0 | 8.07 | 16.10 | 15.70 | 33.90 | ||||||||
L2 | C7+8 | 616.05 | 0.136 0 | 6.09 | 13.86 | 13.39 | 28.40 | |||||||
C9 | 637.30 | 0.052 0 | 6.57 | 15.55 | 15.17 | 29.20 | ||||||||
ZK-2 | C16 | 167.77 | 0.780 0 | 2.04 | 4.71 | 28.40 | 老蚂蚁煤矿 | |||||||
ZK-3 | C16 | 1 134.64 | 0.200 0 | 11.73 | 24.26 | 23.34 | 31.10 | 大为化工-煤矿 |
Table 3 Statistics of coalbed methane well test parameters in Laochang block
井号 | 煤层 编号 | 煤层中点 埋深/m | 渗透率 /mD | 储层压力/MPa | 破裂压力/MPa | 闭合压力/MPa | 储层温度/℃ | 井区 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F1- LC1 | C7 | 886.28 | 0.036 0 | 7.30 | 16.10 | 16.02 | 20.55 | 道班房区块 | ||||||
C13 | 996.43 | 0.016 0 | 11.27 | 22.31 | 21.44 | 22.29 | ||||||||
F1- LC2 | C7+8 | 680.95 | 0.005 6 | 5.72 | 19.00 | 18.54 | 27.74 | 雨汪区块 | ||||||
C9 | 701.55 | 0.005 8 | 6.31 | 20.06 | 19.70 | 28.95 | ||||||||
C13 | 727.30 | 0.023 0 | 6.13 | 20.12 | 19.59 | 30.02 | ||||||||
C19 | 787.95 | 0.025 0 | 5.87 | 18.86 | 18.42 | 32.70 | ||||||||
L1 | C14 | 776.85 | 0.200 0 | 7.33 | 13.51 | 13.13 | 31.40 | |||||||
C19 | 830.05 | 0.080 0 | 8.07 | 16.10 | 15.70 | 33.90 | ||||||||
L2 | C7+8 | 616.05 | 0.136 0 | 6.09 | 13.86 | 13.39 | 28.40 | |||||||
C9 | 637.30 | 0.052 0 | 6.57 | 15.55 | 15.17 | 29.20 | ||||||||
ZK-2 | C16 | 167.77 | 0.780 0 | 2.04 | 4.71 | 28.40 | 老蚂蚁煤矿 | |||||||
ZK-3 | C16 | 1 134.64 | 0.200 0 | 11.73 | 24.26 | 23.34 | 31.10 | 大为化工-煤矿 |
评价单元 | 含煤 面积 /km2 | 煤层气地 质资源量 /亿m3 | 资源 丰度/ (亿m3/km2) | <1 000 m | 1 000~1 500 m | 1 500~2 000 m | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
资源量 /亿m3 | 资源丰度/ (亿m3/km2) | 比例 /% | 资源量 /亿m3 | 资源丰度/ (亿m3/km2) | 比例 /% | 资源量 /亿m3 | 资源丰度/ (亿m3/km2) | 比例 /% | ||||||
雨汪区块 | 84.67 | 270.93 | 3.20 | 270.93 | 3.20 | 100.00 | / | / | / | / | / | / | ||
道班房区块 德黑向斜 | 169.30 | 702.25 | 4.15 | 107.39 | 2.55 | 15.29 | 224.20 | 4.32 | 31.93 | 370.65 | 4.92 | 52.78 | ||
道班房区块 箐口向斜 | 5.96 | 25.30 | 4.25 | 0.85 | 2.25 | 3.37 | 11.40 | 4.02 | 45.06 | 13.05 | 4.82 | 51.57 | ||
道班房 区块南部 | 75.33 | 396.62 | 5.27 | 43.65 | 3.45 | 11.00 | 107.75 | 4.52 | 27.17 | 245.22 | 6.32 | 61.83 | ||
合 计 | 335.25 | 1 395.10 | 4.16 | 422.82 | 3.02 | 30.31 | 343.36 | 4.37 | 24.61 | 628.91 | 5.38 | 45.08 |
Table 4 Statistics of coalbed methane geological resources in Laochang block
评价单元 | 含煤 面积 /km2 | 煤层气地 质资源量 /亿m3 | 资源 丰度/ (亿m3/km2) | <1 000 m | 1 000~1 500 m | 1 500~2 000 m | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
资源量 /亿m3 | 资源丰度/ (亿m3/km2) | 比例 /% | 资源量 /亿m3 | 资源丰度/ (亿m3/km2) | 比例 /% | 资源量 /亿m3 | 资源丰度/ (亿m3/km2) | 比例 /% | ||||||
雨汪区块 | 84.67 | 270.93 | 3.20 | 270.93 | 3.20 | 100.00 | / | / | / | / | / | / | ||
道班房区块 德黑向斜 | 169.30 | 702.25 | 4.15 | 107.39 | 2.55 | 15.29 | 224.20 | 4.32 | 31.93 | 370.65 | 4.92 | 52.78 | ||
道班房区块 箐口向斜 | 5.96 | 25.30 | 4.25 | 0.85 | 2.25 | 3.37 | 11.40 | 4.02 | 45.06 | 13.05 | 4.82 | 51.57 | ||
道班房 区块南部 | 75.33 | 396.62 | 5.27 | 43.65 | 3.45 | 11.00 | 107.75 | 4.52 | 27.17 | 245.22 | 6.32 | 61.83 | ||
合 计 | 335.25 | 1 395.10 | 4.16 | 422.82 | 3.02 | 30.31 | 343.36 | 4.37 | 24.61 | 628.91 | 5.38 | 45.08 |
评价单元 | 地质资源量 /亿m3 | 地质资源丰度 /(亿m3/km2) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C13 | C19 | 小计 | C13 | C19 | 小计 | ||
雨汪区块 | 31.33 | 16.09 | 47.42 | 0.37 | 0.19 | 0.56 | |
道班房区块德黑向斜 | 98.19 | 84.65 | 182.84 | 0.58 | 0.50 | 1.08 | |
道班房区块箐口向斜 | 3.05 | 3.05 | 6.09 | 0.65 | 0.55 | 1.20 | |
道班房区块南部 | 42.18 | 32.39 | 74.58 | 0.56 | 0.43 | 0.99 | |
合 计 | 174.75 | 136.18 | 310.93 | 0.53 | 0.44 | 0.97 |
Table 5 Statistics of coalbed methane geological resources of main coal seams in Laochang block
评价单元 | 地质资源量 /亿m3 | 地质资源丰度 /(亿m3/km2) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C13 | C19 | 小计 | C13 | C19 | 小计 | ||
雨汪区块 | 31.33 | 16.09 | 47.42 | 0.37 | 0.19 | 0.56 | |
道班房区块德黑向斜 | 98.19 | 84.65 | 182.84 | 0.58 | 0.50 | 1.08 | |
道班房区块箐口向斜 | 3.05 | 3.05 | 6.09 | 0.65 | 0.55 | 1.20 | |
道班房区块南部 | 42.18 | 32.39 | 74.58 | 0.56 | 0.43 | 0.99 | |
合 计 | 174.75 | 136.18 | 310.93 | 0.53 | 0.44 | 0.97 |
[1] | 张道勇, 朱杰, 赵先良, 等. 全国煤层气资源动态评价与可利用性分析[J]. 煤炭学报, 2018, 43(6): 1598-1604. |
[2] | 刘大锰, 贾奇锋, 蔡益栋. 中国煤层气储层地质与表征技术研究进展[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2022, 50(1): 196-203. |
[3] | 邹才能, 杨智, 黄士鹏, 等. 煤系天然气的资源类型、形成分布与发展前景[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(3): 433-442. |
[4] |
秦勇, 申建, 沈玉林, 等. 苏拉特盆地煤系气高产地质原因及启示[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(10): 1147-1157.
DOI |
[5] | 刘大锰, 刘正帅, 蔡益栋. 煤层气成藏机理及形成地质条件研究进展[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2020, 48(10): 1-16. |
[6] | 陈召英, 陈孝峰. 老厂矿区煤层气赋存条件与资源潜力分析[J]. 能源技术与管理, 2014, 39(5): 136-138. |
[7] | 蒋天国, 马樱燕, 刘胜彪. 云南老厂矿区煤层气地质条件[J]. 黑龙江科技大学学报, 2015, 25(1): 26-45. |
[8] | 李松, 汤达祯, 许浩, 等. 云南恩洪和老厂地区煤储层孔隙-裂隙系统对比分析[J]. 高校地质学报, 2012, 18(3): 516-521. |
[9] | 郭秀钦, 张德荣, 桂宝林, 等. 老厂矿区煤层及煤层气藏水文地质特征[J]. 云南地质, 2004, 23(4): 487-495. |
[10] | 桂宝林. 恩洪-老厂地区煤层气成藏条件研究[J]. 云南地质, 2004, 23(4): 421-433. |
[11] | 郭明强. 云南老厂多煤层渗透率和等温吸附特征对开发层系优选[J]. 石化技术, 2020, 40(4): 118-120. |
[12] | 康永尚, 李喆, 刘娜, 等. 滇东恩洪和老厂煤层气可动性及对产气动态的影响[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2018, 46(9): 217-226. |
[13] | 翟佳宇, 张松航, 唐书恒, 等. 云南老厂雨汪煤层气矿区气水成因及产能响应[J/OL]. 现代地质, 2022, 36(5). |
[14] | 吴财芳, 王肖, 刘小磊, 等. 滇东老厂矿区多煤层条件下地应力特征及其影响研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2019, 47(1): 118-124. |
[15] | 李伍, 朱炎铭, 陈尚斌, 等. 滇东老厂矿区多层叠置独立含煤层气系统[J]. 中国煤炭地质, 2010, 22(7): 18-21. |
[16] | 袁月琴, 陈万明, 曹运祥. 南省富源县老厂矿区龙潭组第三段沉积环境及聚煤作用探讨[J]. 贵州地质, 2008, 25(3): 171-176. |
[17] | 刘大锰, 姚艳斌, 蔡益栋, 等. 华北石炭-二叠系煤的孔渗特征及主控因素[J]. 现代地质, 2010, 24(6): 1198-1203. |
[18] | 秦勇, 叶建平, 林大扬, 等. 煤储层厚度与其渗透性及含气性关系初步探讨[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2000, 28(1): 24-27. |
[19] | 周三栋, 刘大锰, 孙邵华, 等. 准噶尔盆地南缘硫磺沟煤层气富集主控地质因素及有利区优选[J]. 现代地质, 2015, 29(1): 179-189. |
[20] | 吴金水, 刘景, 谢卫东, 等. 开滦矿区14煤煤厚特征及沉积环境分析[J]. 煤炭工程, 2019, 51(7): 129-133. |
[21] |
LI L J, LIU D M, CAI Y D, et al. Coal structure and its implications for coalbed methane exploitation: A review[J]. Energy Fuels, 2021, 35(1): 86-110.
DOI URL |
[22] | 杨起, 汤达祯. 华北煤变质作用对煤含气量和渗透率的影响[J]. 地球科学, 2000, 25(3): 273-277. |
[23] | 刘大锰, 李俊乾. 我国煤层气分布赋存主控地质因素与富集模式[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2014, 42(6): 19-24. |
[24] | 刘大锰, 王颖晋, 蔡益栋. 低阶煤层气富集主控地质因素与成藏模式分析[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2018, 46(6): 1-8. |
[25] |
Li Q, Liu D M, Cai Y D, et al. Effects of natural micro-fracture morphology, temperature and pressure on fluid flow in coals through fractal theory combined with lattice Boltzmann method[J]. Fuel, 2021, 286: 119468.
DOI URL |
[26] | 樊祺章, 蔡益栋, 贝金翰, 等. 煤岩演化程度对煤储层孔裂隙结构的控制作用[J]. 现代地质, 2020, 34(2): 273-280. |
[27] |
LIU Z S, LIU D M, CAI Y D, et al. Experimental study of the effective stress coefficient for coal anisotropic permeability[J]. Energy Fuels, 2020, 34(5): 5856-5867.
DOI URL |
[28] |
LI Q, LIU D M, CAI Y D, et al. Scale-span pore structure heterogeneity of high volatile bituminous coal and anthracite by FIB-SEM and X-ray μ-CT[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2020, 81: 103443.
DOI URL |
[29] | 吴永平, 李仲东, 王允诚. 煤层气储层异常压力的成因机理及受控因素[J]. 煤炭学报, 2006, 31(4): 475-479. |
[30] | 李仲东, 周文, 吴永平. 我国煤层气储层异常压力的成因分析[J]. 矿物岩石, 2004, 24(4): 87-92. |
[31] |
LI Q, LIU D M, CAI Y D, et al. Investigation on the methane adsorption capacity in coals: considerations from nanopores by multifractal analysis[J]. Energy Fuels, 2021, 35(8): 6633-6643.
DOI URL |
[32] |
YIN T T, LIU D M, CAI Y D, et al. A new constructed macromolecule-pore structure of anthracite and its related gas adsorption: A molecular simulation study[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2020, 220: 103415.
DOI URL |
[1] | CHENG Zhiyu, LIU Rui, ZHANG Jinfeng, MA Haichun, WANG Jingping. Study on Seepage Mechanism Characteristics of A Single Fracture Based on Fracture Deformation Under Different Confining Pressures [J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(04): 972-976. |
[2] | WEI Yongheng, GE Yanyan, WANG Gang, WANG Wenfeng, TIAN Jijun, LI Xin, WU Bin, ZHANG Xiao. In-situ Stress Distribution and Its Influence on Coalbed Methane Development in Tielieke Mining Area, Kubai Coalfield, Xinjiang [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(05): 1324-1332. |
[3] | ZHAI Jiayu, ZHANG Songhang, TANG Shuheng, GUO Huiqiu, LIU Bing, JI Chaoqi. Origin and Productivity Response of Gas and Water in Coalbed Methane Field of Yuwang Block at Laochang, Yunnan Province [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(05): 1341-1350. |
[4] | YAN Taotao, GUO Yilin, MENG Yanjun, CHANG Suoliang, JIN Shangwen, KANG Lifang, FU Xinyu, WANG Qingqing, ZHAO Yuan, ZHANG Yu. Coal Reservoir Gas Content Correction Based on Coalbed Methane Well Production Data [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(05): 1360-1370. |
[5] | LIU Yilin, LI Canping, GOU Limin, WANG Hongtao, ZENG Xianjun, CHEN Fengying, GUO Zihao, TIAN Xinyu. Study on the Relationship Between Spectral Characteristics of Seismic Wave Field and Gas Content of Plume in Cold Seepage [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(01): 172-181. |
[6] | LIU Xiaotong, XUAN Lingling, ZHU Chunyan, ZHAO Ying, GUO Chang, LI Song, ZHANG Hao, SHI Zhenyun, LUO Wanjing. Dynamic Evaluation of High-capacity Channel in Heavy Oil Reservoirs with Medium-high Permeability [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(02): 388-395. |
[7] | GUO Qi, LI Zhen, LI Ping. Horizontal Well Potential Digging Technology of Point-bar Sandbody in Ultra-high Water Cut Stage: Evaluation of Flow Field Intensity [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(02): 396-402. |
[8] | WANG Meng, LIU Zhijie, YANG Yuqing, ZHANG Zhiqiang, LIU Haibo, DONG Yu. Comprehensive Classification Scheme of Huagang Reservoir in Xihu Depression [J]. Geoscience, 2020, 34(06): 1214-1220. |
[9] | GAO Beidou, WANG Haichao, TIAN Jijun, HAN Xu, FENG Shuo, WANG Di, ZHANG Zhendong. Syncline-confined-water Model of Coalbed Methane Enrichment Area in Liuhuanggou Mining Area, Southern Junggar Coalfield [J]. Geoscience, 2020, 34(02): 281-288. |
[10] | MA Fengchun, LIU Jincheng, WU Yanxiong, LIANG Xiaoyu, JIANG Yinghai, WANG Lin, ZHOU Yan, XIANG Yiwei. Calculation and Evaluation Method of Reservoir Parameters in Multiple Oil Reservoirs Based on Flow Unit [J]. Geoscience, 2020, 34(02): 370-377. |
[11] | LI Ming, ZHU Yushuang, LI Wenhong, YUAN Guowei, DU Chaofeng. Feasibility Study on Applying CO2-flooding Micro-visualization Technology in Ultra-low Permeability Reservoirs: A Case Study in Ordos Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2019, 33(04): 911-918. |
[12] | LI Shanshan, PENG Song, CHEN Lin, LI Shengyong, LI Lianyi, LIU Xiaoyan. A Review on the Complex Reservoir Sedimentary Characteristics and Low Permeability Formation of the Upper Eocene to Lower Oligocene in the Wenchang B Sag, Pearl River Estuary Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2019, 33(02): 357-369. |
[13] | LIU Na, KANG Yongshang, LI Zhe, WANG Jin, SUN Liangzhong, JIANG Shanyu. Geological Controlling Factors of Coal Pore System and Its Significance in CBM Development [J]. Geoscience, 2018, 32(05): 963-974. |
[14] | WANG Fushun, LIU Pengcheng, WANG Wenhuan, HAO Mingqiang, ZHUANG Yongtao. Optimization Study of Fracturing Length for Rhombus Inverse Nine-spot Diamond Reverse Well Pattern in Anisotropy Reservoirs [J]. Geoscience, 2018, 32(03): 547-553. |
[15] | TIAN Naxin, JIANG Xiangqiang, GUO Jinrui, ZENG Yuxin. Petroleum Geology and Exploration Potential of Key Basins in Bolivia [J]. Geoscience, 2018, 32(02): 374-384. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||