四川盆地及其邻区中上寒武统洗象池群沉积相与沉积模式特征研究

doi:10.19657/j.geoscience.1000-8527.2021.026

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

近年来,我国海相碳酸盐岩油气勘探正处于大发现期,其中四川盆地龙王庙组气藏的突破,使得寒武系碳酸盐岩储层越来越获得研究者的重视。洗象池群作为寒武系有利储集层段目前还处于勘探初期,地质研究程度相对滞后。为此,基于前人的研究成果,通过综合分析露头、钻井、地震和测井等资料,研究了四川盆地及邻区洗象池群沉积相、沉积体系模式,编制岩相古地理图,建立洗象池群“三滩夹两凹”沉积模式,指出了该区下一步天然气勘探的方向。研究结果表明:(1)四川盆地洗象池群呈现碳酸盐岩镶边台地的古地理格局,发育蒸发台地、局限台地、半局限台地、台地边缘、斜坡盆地等5种沉积相;(2)建立了洗象池群“三滩夹两凹”沉积模式,其中一条为台地边缘颗粒滩,分布于该盆地东缘,另外两条为台内颗粒滩,分布于局限台地相的东西两侧,分属局限台地相和半局限台地相;(3)台内颗粒滩发育主要受古地貌及高频海平面升降变化所控;台地边缘颗粒滩主要分布于盆地的东缘,发育受沉积古地貌坡折控制。结论认为:台内颗粒滩和台地边缘滩储层质量好,是天然气勘探的重要领域;洗象池群“三滩夹两凹”沉积模式和颗粒滩带分布的新认识,对古老地层的沉积体系研究具有重要的理论意义。

关键词: 四川盆地, 洗象池群, 沉积相, 沉积模式

Abstract:

In recent years, marine carbonate oil and gas exploration in China has made important discoveries. With the exploration breakthrough of gas reservoirs in the Longwangmiao Formation in Sichuan basin, increasingly more researchers are paying attention to the Cambrian carbonate reservoirs. The Cambrian Xixiangchi Group, as a favorable reservoir, is still in the initial exploration stage, with geological research degree development still lagging. Based on previous research results, the sedimentary facies and sedimentary system mode of Xixiangchi Formation in/around the Sichuan basin were studied, and lithofacies paleogeographic maps were produced. Besides, the “three shoal belts with two sags” sedimentary model of the Xixiangchi Formation was established, and the directions and fields of natural gas exploration were proposed. We discovered that: (1) the Sichuan Basin paleogeography in the Xixiangchi period was a carbonate rimmed platform, and the sedimentary facies of (semi-)restricted platform, evaporation platform, platform margin and slope basin were developed; (2) the “three-shoal belts with two sags” sedimentary model of Xixiangchi Formation is established. One of them is the platform-margin grain shoal, which is distributed along the eastern basinal margin. The other two are intra-platform grain shoals, which are distributed on the eastern and western side of the restricted platform facies, respectively, belonging to the restricted and semi-restricted platform facies; (3) the grain shoal of restricted platform facies is controlled by sea-level fluctuation and paleo-uplift. The platform-margin grain shoal is mainly distributed along the eastern basinal margin, with its development controlled by the slope break of sedimentary paleogeomorphology. To conclude, the grain shoal of restricted platform facies and of platform margin facies are good reservoirs and important targets of natural gas exploration. The new understanding of “three shoal belts with two sags” sedimentary model and grain shoal distribution of Xixiangchi Formation is of great theoretical significance to ancient sedimentary system studies.

Key words: Sichuan Basin, Xixiangchi Group, sedimentary facies, sedimentary model

中图分类号:

TE122.2

贾鹏, 黄福喜, 林世国, 宋涛, 高阳, 吕维宁, 汪少勇, 刘策, 范晶晶, 欧阳靖琳. 四川盆地及其邻区中上寒武统洗象池群沉积相与沉积模式特征研究[J]. 现代地质, 2021, 35(03): 807-818.

JIA Peng, HUANG Fuxi, LIN Shiguo, SONG Tao, GAO Yang, LÜ Weining, WANG Shaoyong, LIU Ce, FAN Jingjing, OUYANG Jinglin. Sedimentary Facies and Model Characteristics of Middle Upper Cambrian Xixiangchi Group in Sichuan Basin and Its Adjacent Areas[J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(03): 807-818.

图/表 14

图1 四川盆地构造位置图

Fig.1 Structural map of the Sichuan Basin

图2 四川盆地洗象池群宝龙1井综合柱状图 A.浅灰色颗粒白云岩夹泥晶云岩、泥粉晶云岩(4 625 m);B.泥粉晶云岩、夹泥质条带的泥晶云岩(4 632 m);C.泥粉晶白云岩(4 653 m)

Fig.2 Comprehensive histogram of Baolong 1 well in Xixiangchi Group, Sichuan Basin

图3 四川盆地寒武系洗象池群潮坪相发育特征

Fig.3 Development characteristics of tidal flat facies in Xixiangchi Group, Sichuan Basin

图4 四川盆地洗象池群广探2井综合柱状图 A.泥粉晶云岩(5 290 m); B.灰黑色颗粒白云岩夹泥粉晶云岩(5 310 m);C.浅灰色颗粒白云岩可见溶蚀孔洞(5 355 m)

Fig.4 Comprehensive histogram of Guangtan-2 well in Xixiangchi Group, Sichuan Basin

图5 四川盆地寒武系洗象池群台内滩相发育特征

Fig.5 Development characteristics of beach facies in the platform of Xixiangchi Group, Sichuan Basin

图6 四川盆地寒武系洗象池群潟湖相发育特征

Fig.6 Development characteristics of lagoon facies in Xixiangchi Group, Sichuan Basin

图7 四川盆地金沙岩孔寒武系洗象池群膏质白云岩镜下薄片

Fig.7 Microscopic thin-section photo of evaporite in Jinshakong section (Xixiangchi Group), Sichuan Basin

图8 金沙岩孔洗象池群野外露头

Fig.8 Outcrop photos of the Jinshayankong section (Xixiangchi Group), Sichuan Basin

图9 焦石坝剖面洗象池群潟湖发育特征

Fig.9 Development characteristics of lagoon in the Jiaoshiba section (Xixiangchi Group), Sichuan Basin

图10 乐山范店剖面洗象池群混积潮坪发育特征

Fig.10 Development characteristics of mixed tidal flat in the Leshanfandian section (Xixiangchi Group), Sichuan Basin

图11 永顺下福剖面洗象池群台地边缘发育特征

Fig.11 Development characteristics of platform margin in Yongshunxiafu section (Xixiangchi Group), Sichuan Basin

图12 永顺剖面洗象池群斜坡相发育特征

Fig.12 Development characteristics of slope facies in the Yongshun section (Xixiangchi Group), Sichuan Basin

图13 怀化花桥剖面洗象池群盆地相发育特征

Fig.13 Development characteristics of basinal facies in the Huaqiao section (Xixiangchi Group), Haihua area

图14 四川盆地及其邻区洗象池群沉积模式图

Fig.14 Schematic sedimentary model for the Xixiangchi Group in Sichuan Basin and its adjacent areas

参考文献 15

[1]	马永生, 陈洪德, 王国力. 中国南方层序地层与古地理[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009:1-603.
[2]	汪泽成. 四川盆地构造层序与天然气勘探[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2002:1-287.
[3]	李伟, 余华琪, 邓鸿斌. 四川盆地中南部寒武系地层划分对比与沉积演化特征[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(6): 681-690.
[4]	李伟, 樊茹, 贾鹏, 等. 四川盆地及周缘地区中上寒武统洗象池群层序地层与岩相古地理演化特征[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(2): 226-240.
[5]	贾鹏, 李伟, 卢远征, 等. 四川盆地中南部地区洗象池群沉积旋回的碳氧同位素特征及地质意义[J]. 现代地质, 2016, 30(6): 1329-1338.
[6]	贾鹏, 李明, 卢远征, 等. 四川盆地寒武系洗象池群层序地层划分及层序地层格架的建立[J]. 地质科技情报, 2017, 36(2): 119-127.
[7]	贾鹏, 李伟, 李明, 等. 四川盆地东部地区寒武系洗象池群碳酸盐岩碳、氧同位素特征及其意义[J]. 古地理学报, 2017, 19(3): 503-512.
[5]	李伟, 贾鹏, 樊茹, 等. 四川盆地及邻区中上寒武统洗象池群碳同位素特征与芙蓉统底界标志[J]. 天然气工业, 2017, 37(10): 1-10.
[6]	李文正, 张建勇, 郝毅, 等. 川东南地区洗象池组碳氧同位素特征、古海洋环境及其与储集层的关系[J]. 地质学报, 2019, 93(2): 487-500.
[10]	梁薇, 牟传龙, 周恳恳, 等. 湘中-湘南地区寒武纪岩相古地理[J]. 古地理学报, 2014, 16(1): 41-54.
[11]	余宽宏, 金振奎, 苏奎, 等. 中、上扬子地台北缘寒武纪沉积特征及油气勘探意义[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2013, 43(9): 1418-1435.
[12]	徐世奇. 加里东古隆起震旦-寒武系成藏条件[J]. 天然气工业, 1999, 19(6): 7-10.
[13]	丁熊, 陈景山, 谭秀成, 等. 川中-川南过渡带雷口坡组台内滩组合特征[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(4): 444-45.
[14]	沈志达, 梅冥相. 贵州太康运动的地层学效应:兼论“黔中古陆”的形成[J]. 贵州地质, 1990, 7(2): 91-98.
[15]	余家仁, 雷怀玉, 刘趁花. 试论海相碳酸盐岩储层发育的影响因素:以任丘油田雾迷山组为例[J]. 海相油气地质, 1998, 3(1): 39-48.

[1]	孙自明, 卞昌蓉, 刘光祥. 峨眉山地幔柱主要研究进展及四川盆地二叠纪成盆动力学机制[J]. 现代地质, 2023, 37(05): 1089-1099.
[2]	刘旺威, 李一凡, 高志前, 樊太亮, 张坦, 匡明志. 塔里木盆地东北缘下寒武统页岩岩相特征与沉积模式[J]. 现代地质, 2023, 37(05): 1155-1168.
[3]	陈格格, 高志前, 焦存礼, 胡宗全, 袁钰轩, 卫端, 翟昕箐, 畅哲. 塔里木盆地北部下寒武统肖尔布拉克组海进-海退转换背景下的微生物礁滩发育模式[J]. 现代地质, 2023, 37(05): 1169-1181.
[4]	倪敏婕, 祝贺暄, 何文军, 杨森, 邹阳, 张元元. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷风城组沉积环境与沉积模式分析[J]. 现代地质, 2023, 37(05): 1194-1207.
[5]	胡力文, 邹华耀, 杨伟强, 黎霆, 邓成昆, 程忠贞, 诸丹诚, 陈星岳. 川北寒武系碳酸盐岩压溶作用的影响因素[J]. 现代地质, 2023, 37(05): 1221-1231.
[6]	束青林, 赵辉, 姜在兴, 赵国光. 渤海湾盆地惠民凹陷商河地区古近系沙四上亚段滩坝沉积特征[J]. 现代地质, 2023, 37(05): 1232-1242.
[7]	李东升, 高平, 盖海峰, 刘若冰, 蔡益栋, 李刚, 周秦, 肖贤明. 川东南地区龙马溪组页岩有机质纳米孔隙结构表征[J]. 现代地质, 2023, 37(05): 1293-1305.
[8]	孙自明, 卞昌蓉, 张荣强, 孙炜, 武重阳, 林娟华. 四川盆地东南部震旦系灯影组四段台缘带天然气勘探前景[J]. 现代地质, 2022, 36(04): 979-987.
[9]	李燕, 邓运华, 李友川. 河流-三角洲体系微相控烃及机理研究:以珠江口盆地恩平组煤系烃源岩为例[J]. 现代地质, 2021, 35(04): 1065-1077.
[10]	孙自明, 张荣强, 孙炜, 郝运轻, 卞昌蓉. 四川盆地东部海相下组合油气勘探领域与有利勘探方向[J]. 现代地质, 2021, 35(03): 798-806.
[11]	王旭影, 姜在兴. 苏北盆地古近系阜三段沉积体系特征与模式[J]. 现代地质, 2020, 34(06): 1132-1143.
[12]	鞠鹏程, 王训练, 王振涛, 刘喜方, 仲佳爱, 张在明. 渝北温泉镇地区三叠系“绿豆岩”特征及其地质意义[J]. 现代地质, 2020, 34(03): 431-449.
[13]	袁坤, 金振奎, 彭飚, 朱小二, 田甜, 黎瑞. 青海湖东南岸现代滩坝沉积模式与识别标志[J]. 现代地质, 2020, 34(02): 309-320.
[14]	杨有星, 高永进, 张君峰, 周新桂, 张金虎, 白忠凯, 韩淼. 歧口和泌阳凹陷两种类型湖相碳酸盐岩沉积特点[J]. 现代地质, 2019, 33(04): 831-840.
[15]	王子轶, 高志前, 石文睿, 王兴志, 赵红燕. 四川盆地五峰组—龙马溪组笔石与页岩气关系探讨[J]. 现代地质, 2019, 33(02): 379-388.