泥质薄夹层不同参数对油砂SAGD 开发效果的影响

doi:10.19657/j.geoscience.1000-8527.2018.03.11

现代地质 ›› 2018, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (03): 537-546.DOI: 10.19657/j.geoscience.1000-8527.2018.03.11

泥质薄夹层不同参数对油砂SAGD 开发效果的影响

孔令晓¹(), 齐梅¹, 张帅超¹, 刘鹏程²()

1.中国石油勘探开发研究院,北京 100083
2.中国地质大学(北京) 能源学院,北京 100083

收稿日期:2017-04-07 修回日期:2017-10-20 出版日期:2018-06-10 发布日期:2023-09-22
通讯作者: 刘鹏程
作者简介:刘鹏程,男,教授,博士生导师,1969年出生,油气田开发工程专业,主要从事油气田开发理论与方法研究。Email:lpc@cugb.edu.cn。
孔令晓,女,硕士研究生,1993年出生,油气田开发工程专业,主要从事海外油气藏工程研究。Email:konglx@petrochina.com.cn。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目“潮控河口湾油砂储层构型及盖层完整性评价研究”(41472119);国家科技重大专项“全球油气资源评价与选区选带研究”(2016ZX05029-003);国家科技重大专项“稠油、碳酸盐岩和致密油藏开发主体技术与应用潜力”(2016ZX05016-006)

Effects of Different Parameters in Thin Muddy Interlayer on SAGD Production in Oil Sands

KONG Lingxiao¹(), QI Mei¹, ZHANG Shuaichao¹, LIU Pengcheng²()

1. Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, CNPC,Beijing 100083, China
2. School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2017-04-07 Revised:2017-10-20 Online:2018-06-10 Published:2023-09-22
Contact: LIU Pengcheng

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

泥质夹层对油砂SAGD的开发效果具有一定影响。以加拿大麦凯河某区块为研究对象,利用数值模拟手段,对位于注入井上方和注采井间的泥质薄夹层进行表征,模拟对比了泥质薄夹层的位置、延展长度、渗透率、厚度以及条数对SAGD开发效果的影响,得到了油砂SAGD开发的泥质薄夹层的临界参数。研究表明,泥质薄夹层位于注入井上方时对SAGD开发效果影响较小,位于注采井间时有不利影响,且越靠近生产井,蒸汽腔发育越晚,累产油量越低。注采井间泥质薄夹层超过7条、延展长度超过20 m时蒸汽腔几乎不发育,而渗透率与厚度对SAGD开发效果影响不明显。因此油砂SAGD布井时注采井间应尽量避开泥质薄夹层,从而有效降低泥质薄夹层对SAGD的影响。该研究结果,对于指导油砂SAGD部署、规避地质风险、实现SAGD高效开发具有重要指导意义。

关键词: 泥质薄夹层, 油砂, 蒸汽辅助重力泄油, 蒸汽腔, 热力采油

Abstract:

Thin muddy interlayers are widely developed in Mackay River oil sands. The centimeter-scale interlayers have a great impact on the steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) performance. Based on the actual parameters in the Mackay River oil sands block, a numerical simulation model with the thin muddy interlayers located between or above injector-producer was established, and the thin muddy interlayers with different locations, length, permeability, thickness and numbers were simulated to investigate their impacts on the SAGD performance, and the threshold parameters were obtained. The results show that the thin muddy interlayers above the injector have minor impact on the SAGD performance, while those located between the injector-producer have significant adverse impacts. The closer the thin muddy interlayers from to the producer, the later would the steam chamber develop, and the lower is the cumulative oil production. When the length of thin muddy interlayer exceeds 20 meters and the number of thin muddy interlayer exceeds seven, the steam chamber can hardly be developed, and the permeability and thickness have little impact on the SAGD performance. Therefore, SAGD deployment should avoid the thin muddy interlayers between injector-producers. The findings have substantial guiding significance in conducting SAGD development planning in minimizing geology risks and improving SAGD efficiency.

Key words: thin muddy interlayer, oil sand, steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD), steam chamber, thermal recovery

中图分类号:

TE345

孔令晓, 齐梅, 张帅超, 刘鹏程. 泥质薄夹层不同参数对油砂SAGD 开发效果的影响[J]. 现代地质, 2018, 32(03): 537-546.

KONG Lingxiao, QI Mei, ZHANG Shuaichao, LIU Pengcheng. Effects of Different Parameters in Thin Muddy Interlayer on SAGD Production in Oil Sands[J]. Geoscience, 2018, 32(03): 537-546.

图/表 8

图1 模拟的井组(左侧:全井;右侧:模拟用的半井)

Fig.1 Well pattern used for simulation

表1 麦凯河油藏模型参数

Table 1 Parameters of Mackay River reservoir for simulation

油藏压力 /MPa	油藏温度 /℃	孔隙度	水平渗透率 /10^-3μm²	垂向渗透率 /10^-3μm²	含油饱和度	甲烷摩尔分数	水平井长/m	井组间距/m	注采井距/m	基底距离/m
0.80	10.0	0.32	3 500	2 800	0.85	0.01	850	120	5	2

图2 不同位置下泥质薄夹层生产指标对比

Fig.2 Comparison of production performance among different locations

图3 不同位置的泥质薄夹层的不同时间温度场分布对比

Fig.3 Comparison of temperature distributions for different locations at the different time

图4 不同延展长度下的泥质薄夹层生产指标对比

Fig.4 Comparison of production performance among different lengths

图5 不同渗透率下生产指标对比图

Fig.5 Comparison of production performance among different permeabilities

图6 不同厚度下生产指标对比图

Fig.6 Comparison of production performance among different thickness

图7 不同条数下生产指标对比图

Fig.7 Comparison of production performance among different numbers

参考文献 22

[1]	BUTLER R M, STEPHENS D J. The gravity drainage of steam-heated heavy oil to parallel horizontal wells[J]. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 1981, 20(2):36-36.
[2]	罗杰M·巴特勒. 重油和沥青的热力开采工艺[M]. 王秉璋, 许建华, 李静,译. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1994:214-275.
[3]	赵鹏飞, 王勇, 李志明, 等. 加拿大阿尔伯达盆地油砂开发状况和评价实践[J]. 地质科技情报, 2003, 32(1):155-162.
[4]	ZHOU You, XI Chengfeng, WU Jian,. Effect of Barriers on the SAGD Performance Result[P/OL]. IPTC, 2013.https://www/researchgate.net/publication/301912402_Effect_of_Barriers_on_the_SAGD_Performance_Result.
[5]	唐帅, 刘鹏程, 潘莉莉, 等. 稠油油藏井间泥岩夹层对双水平井SAGD开发效果的影响[J]. 现代地质, 2016, 30(2):388-393.
[6]	鹿腾, 李兆敏, 韩继超, 等. 页岩夹层及压裂裂缝对蒸汽辅助重力泄油蒸汽腔扩展的影响[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2012, 34(1):95-99.
[7]	WU Y, JIANG Y, HE W, et al. Shale barrier failure strategies in heterogeneous SAGD reservoirs: A case study[R]. Calgary: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2013.
[8]	RAVALEC M L, MORLOT C, MARMIER R, et al. Heterogeneity impact on SAGD process performance in mobile heavy oil reservoirs[J]. Oil & Gas Science & Technology, 2009, 64(4):469-476.
[9]	NASR T N, LAW D, BEAULIEU G, et al. SAGD application in gas cap and top water oil reservoirs[J]. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 2003, 42(1):32-38.
[10]	郑贺梅, 刘鹏程, 郑舰. 特超稠油油藏水平井蒸汽驱油物理模拟实验[J]. 现代地质, 2015, 29(6):1467-1474.
[11]	石兰香, 李秀峦, 刘荣军, 等. 夹层对SAGD开发效果影响研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2015(5):133-136.
[12]	桑林翔, 杨万立, 杨浩哲, 等. 重18井区J3q3层夹层分布对SAGD开发效果的影响[J]. 特种油气藏, 2015(3):81-84.
[13]	LI W, MAMORA D D, LI Y, et al. Numerical investigation of potential injection strategies to reduce shale barrier impacts on SAGD process[J]. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 2011, 50(3): 57-64. DOI URL
[14]	POOLADI-DARVISH M, MATTAR L. SAGD operations in the presence of overlying gas cap and water layer-effect of shale layers[J]. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 2002, 41(6):40-51.
[15]	李春梅, 李素梅, 李雪, 等. 山东东营凹陷八面河油田稠油成因分析[J]. 现代地质, 2005, 19(2): 280-286.
[16]	JOSHI S D. A laboratory study of thermal oil recovery using horizontal wells[J]. SPE 14916, 1986.
[17]	YANG G, BUTLER R M. Effects of reservoir heterogeneities on heavy oil recovery by steam-assisted gravity drainage[J]. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 1992, 31(8):37-43.
[18]	魏绍蕾, 程林松, 张辉登, 等. 夹层对加拿大麦凯河油砂区块双水平井蒸汽辅助重力泄油开发的影响[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2016 (2): 62-69.
[19]	SHIN H, CHOE J. Shale barrier effects on the SAGD performance[R]. Abu Dhabi: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2009.
[20]	IPEK G, FRAUENFELD T, YUAN J Y. Numerical study of shale issues in SAGD[R]. Calgary: Petroleum Sociaty of Canada, 2008.
[21]	CHEN Q, GERRITSEN M G, KOVSCEK A R. Effects of reservoir heterogeneities on the steam-assisted gravity-drainage process[J]. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2008, 11(5): 921-932.
[22]	DANG C T Q, NGUYEN N T B, BAE W, et al. Investigation of SAGD recovery process in complex reservoir[R]. Brisbane: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2010.

泥质薄夹层不同参数对油砂SAGD 开发效果的影响

Effects of Different Parameters in Thin Muddy Interlayer on SAGD Production in Oil Sands

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 22

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王连刚, 石兰香, 袁哲, 李秀峦, 刘鹏程. 超稠油油藏溶剂辅助蒸汽重力泄油室内实验研究[J]. 现代地质, 2018, 32(06): 1203-1211.
[2]	唐帅，刘鹏程，潘莉莉，吴永彬，张金川. 稠油油藏井间泥岩夹层对双水平井SAGD开发效果的影响[J]. 现代地质, 2016, 30(2): 388-393.
[3]	陈程　居春荣　邓宏文　郑宽兵　. 江苏黄珏油田戴南组储层结构及合理注采井距[J]. 现代地质, 2004, 18(3): 366-371.