Geoscience ›› 2020, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (04): 837-848.DOI: 10.19657/j.geoscience.1000-8527.2020.04.19
• Petroleum Geology • Previous Articles Next Articles
LI Hao1(), LU Jianlin1, WANG Baohua1, SONG Zhenxiang1, LI Zheng2
Received:
2019-06-07
Revised:
2019-08-20
Online:
2020-08-31
Published:
2020-09-03
CLC Number:
LI Hao, LU Jianlin, WANG Baohua, SONG Zhenxiang, LI Zheng. Critical Controlling Factors of Enrichment and High-yield of Land Shale Oil[J]. Geoscience, 2020, 34(04): 837-848.
地区 | 生油条件 | 储集条件 | 可动条件 (异常压力) /MPa | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TOC/% | (S1/TOC)/ (mg/g) | Ro/% | 页岩 厚度/m | 有利岩相 | 与断裂 距离/m | 孔隙度 /% | 脆性矿物 含量/% | 黏土矿物 含量/% | ||||||||
济阳坳陷 | >2.0 | >100 | >0.7 | >30 | 纹层泥质灰岩纹层灰质泥岩 | <1 200 | / | / | / | >1.2 | ||||||
东濮凹陷 | >2.0 | / | >0.7 | / | 纹层灰质/云质泥岩 | / | >10.0 | >40 | / | / | ||||||
泌阳凹陷 | >2.0 | >70 | 0.5~1.1 | >10 | 纹层灰质/粉砂质泥页岩 | / | >4.0 | >55 | <35 | >1.0 | ||||||
苏北盆地 | >2.0 | >10 | >0.8 | / | 钙质页岩、层状钙质泥岩 | / | >5.0 | >55 | <35 | >1.0 | ||||||
潜江凹陷 | >2.0 | >300 | >0.7 | >8 | 白云岩、泥质白云岩 | / | >12.0 | >40 | / | >1.2 | ||||||
长岭凹陷 | >2.0 | / | >0.5 | / | / | / | >1.0 | >40 | / | / |
Table 1 Major evaluation parameters of continental-facies shale oil and its standards in Eastern China
地区 | 生油条件 | 储集条件 | 可动条件 (异常压力) /MPa | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TOC/% | (S1/TOC)/ (mg/g) | Ro/% | 页岩 厚度/m | 有利岩相 | 与断裂 距离/m | 孔隙度 /% | 脆性矿物 含量/% | 黏土矿物 含量/% | ||||||||
济阳坳陷 | >2.0 | >100 | >0.7 | >30 | 纹层泥质灰岩纹层灰质泥岩 | <1 200 | / | / | / | >1.2 | ||||||
东濮凹陷 | >2.0 | / | >0.7 | / | 纹层灰质/云质泥岩 | / | >10.0 | >40 | / | / | ||||||
泌阳凹陷 | >2.0 | >70 | 0.5~1.1 | >10 | 纹层灰质/粉砂质泥页岩 | / | >4.0 | >55 | <35 | >1.0 | ||||||
苏北盆地 | >2.0 | >10 | >0.8 | / | 钙质页岩、层状钙质泥岩 | / | >5.0 | >55 | <35 | >1.0 | ||||||
潜江凹陷 | >2.0 | >300 | >0.7 | >8 | 白云岩、泥质白云岩 | / | >12.0 | >40 | / | >1.2 | ||||||
长岭凹陷 | >2.0 | / | >0.5 | / | / | / | >1.0 | >40 | / | / |
渗透率赋值 范围/10-3μm2 | 构造缝 | 层理缝 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
地应力分布 | 与断层距离/m | 岩相 | 夹层指数STI(0~1) | 脆性矿物含量/% | ||
0.75~1 | 集中发育区 | 600~1 000 | 纹层状页岩 | 0.5~0.8 | >60 | |
0.5~0.75 | 较大 | 60~100,800~1 200 | 层状页岩 | 0.3~0.5,0.8~1.0 | 40~60 | |
0.25~0.5 | 一般 | >1 200 | 块状页岩 | 0.2~0.3 | 20~40 | |
0~0.25 | 较小 | 0~100 | 泥岩 | 0~0.2 | <20 |
Table 2 Standard of permeability values assignment of shale formation
渗透率赋值 范围/10-3μm2 | 构造缝 | 层理缝 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
地应力分布 | 与断层距离/m | 岩相 | 夹层指数STI(0~1) | 脆性矿物含量/% | ||
0.75~1 | 集中发育区 | 600~1 000 | 纹层状页岩 | 0.5~0.8 | >60 | |
0.5~0.75 | 较大 | 60~100,800~1 200 | 层状页岩 | 0.3~0.5,0.8~1.0 | 40~60 | |
0.25~0.5 | 一般 | >1 200 | 块状页岩 | 0.2~0.3 | 20~40 | |
0~0.25 | 较小 | 0~100 | 泥岩 | 0~0.2 | <20 |
[1] | 邹才能, 杨智, 崔景伟, 等. 页岩油形成机制、地质特征及发展对策[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2013,40(1):14-26. |
[2] | 王勇, 宋国奇, 刘惠民, 等. 济阳坳陷页岩油富集主控因素[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2015,22(4):20-25. |
[3] | BOWKER K A. Barnett shale gas production, Fort Worth Basin: Issues and discussion[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2007,91(4):523-533. |
[4] | 盛湘, 陈祥, 章新文, 等. 中国陆相页岩油开发前景与挑战[J]. 石油实验地质, 2015,37(3):267-271. |
[5] | 王永诗, 李政, 巩建强, 等. 济阳坳陷页岩油气评价方法——以沾化凹陷罗家地区为例[J]. 石油学报, 2013,34(1):83-91. |
[6] | 李志明, 苪晓庆, 黎茂稳, 等. 北美典型混合页岩油系统特征及其启示[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2015,45(4):1060-1072. |
[7] | 邹才能, 朱如凯, 白斌, 等. 致密油与页岩油内涵、特征、潜力及挑战[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2015,34(1):3-17. |
[8] | 柳波, 郭小波, 黄志龙, 等. 页岩油资源潜力预测方法探讨:以三塘湖盆地马朗凹陷芦草沟组页岩油为例[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2013,44(4):1472-1478. |
[9] | 宋国奇, 徐兴友, 李政, 等. 济阳坳陷古近系陆相页岩油产量的影响因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2015,36(3):463-471. |
[10] | 姜在兴, 张文昭, 梁超, 等. 页岩油储层基本特征及评价要素[J]. 石油学报, 2014,35(1):184-196. |
[11] | 张林晔, 包友书, 李钜源, 等. 湖相页岩油可动性——以渤海湾盆地济阳坳陷东营凹陷为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2014,41(6):641-649. |
[12] | 王优先. 陆相页岩油成藏地质条件及富集高产主控因素——以泌阳凹陷为例[J]. 断块油气田, 2015,22(5):588-593. |
[13] | 黎茂稳. 陆相断陷盆地页岩油地质评价中的地球化学问题[R]. 青岛: 第15届全国有机地球化学会议, 2015. |
[14] | 葛家理. 现代油藏渗流力学原理[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2003: 10-70. |
[15] | GILES M R, INDRELID S L, JAMES D M D. Compaction the great unknown in basin modelling[J]. Geological Society,London,Special Publications, 1998,141:15-43. |
[16] | 郭秋麟, 陈晓明, 宋焕琪. 泥页岩埋藏过程孔隙度演化与预测模型探讨[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2013,24(3):439-449. |
[17] | LOUCKS R G, REED R M, RUPPEL S C, et al. Spectrum of pore types and networks in mudrocks and a descriptive classification for matrix-related mudrock pores[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2012,96(6):1071-1098. |
[18] | 于炳松. 页岩气储层孔隙分类与表征[J]. 地学前缘, 2013,20(4):211-220. |
[19] | 吴松涛, 朱如凯, 崔京钢, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地长7湖相泥页岩孔隙演化特征[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2015,42(2):167-176. |
[20] | 李钜源. 渤海湾盆地东营凹陷古近系泥页岩孔隙特征及孔隙度演化规律[J]. 石油实验地质, 2015,37(5):566-574. |
[21] | SCHIEBER J. Common themes in the formation and preservation of porosity in shales and mudstones-illustrated with examples across the Phanerozoic[R]. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: SPE Unconventional Gas Conference, 2010. |
[22] | LOUCKS R G, REED R M, RUPPEL S C, et al. Morphology, genesis, and distribution of nanometer-scale pores in siliceous mudstones of the Mississippian Barnett shale[J]. J Sediment Res, 2009,79:848-861. |
[23] | 曹涛涛, 宋之光, 王思波, 等. 不同页岩及干酪根比表面积和孔隙结构的比较研究[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2015,45(2):139-151. |
[24] | 胡海燕. 富有机质Woodford页岩孔隙演化的热模拟实验[J]. 石油学报, 2013,34(5):820-825. |
[25] | 薛莲花, 杨巍, 仲佳爱, 等. 富有机质页岩生烃阶段孔隙演化——来自鄂尔多斯延长组地质条件约束下的热模拟实验证据[J]. 地质学报, 2015,89(5):970-978. |
[26] | CHALMERS G R L, BUSTIN R M. Lower Cretaceous gas shales in northeastern British Columbia, Part I: Geological controls on methane sorption capacity[J]. B Can Petrol Geol, 2008,56:1-21. |
[27] | 关德范, 徐旭辉, 李志明, 等. 烃源岩有限空间生烃理论与应用[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2004: 7-70. |
[28] | 蒋玉川, 张建海, 李章政. 弹性力学与有限单元法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2006: 17-90. |
[29] | 郭来源, 刘峥君, 解习农. 南襄盆地泌阳凹陷核桃园组三段纹层状泥页岩地球化学特征及其成因解释[J]. 现代地质, 2018,32(1):133-144. |
[30] | 吕奇奇, 罗顺社, 付金华, 等. 湖泊细粒沉积特征精细研究:以鄂尔多斯盆地延河剖面长7油层组为例[J]. 现代地质, 2018,32(2):364-373. |
[31] | 柳波, 吕延防, 孟元林, 等. 湖相纹层状细粒岩特征、成因模式及其页岩油意义——以三塘湖盆地马朗凹陷二叠系芦草沟组为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2015,42(5):598-607. |
[32] | PROZOROVICH G E, SOKOLOVSKIY A P. Regenerated Minerals in Volgian Oil-bearing Clay of the Salym field, Western Siberia[M]. Moscow, Russia: Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR, 1973: 1-120. |
[33] | 李吉君, 史颖琳, 黄振凯, 等. 松辽盆地北部陆相泥页岩孔隙特征及其对页岩油赋存的影响[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2015,39(4):27-33. |
[34] | SULLIVAN K B, MCBRIDE E F. Diagenesis of sandstones at shale contacts and diagenetic heterogeneity,Frio Formation,Texas[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1991,75(1 ) : 121-138. |
[35] | 罗蛰潭. 油层物理[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1985: 20-90. |
[36] | 周立宏, 刘国芳. 利用泥岩声波时差估算地层压力[J]. 石油实验地质, 1996,18(2):195-199. |
[37] | 孙武亮, 孙开峰. 地震地层压力预测综述[J]. 勘探地球物理进展, 2007,30(6):428-432. |
[1] | NI Minjie, ZHU Hexuan, HE Wenjun, YANG Sen, ZOU Yang, ZHANG Yuanyuan. Depositional Environment and Sedimentary Model of the Fengcheng Formation in Mahu sag, Junggar Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(05): 1194-1207. |
[2] | LI Dongsheng, GAO Ping, GAI Haifeng, LIU Ruobing, CAI Yidong, LI Gang, ZHOU Qin, XIAO Xianming. Organic Nano-pore Textural Characteristics of the Longmaxi Formation Shale in the Southeastern Sichuan Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(05): 1293-1305. |
[3] | WANG Kai, LIU Huichuan, REN Weiwei, LI Wenqi, YU Zhiqi. Influence of Cenozoic Diabase Intrusion on Reservoir Properties of Mudstone Wallrocks in the Yangxin Sub-depression, Subei Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(06): 1563-1573. |
[4] | LI Qing, LI Jiangshan, LU Hao, QI Fengqiang, HE Yu, AN Keqin, LI Longyu, ZHANG Houmin, WU Yue. Characteristics and Control Factors of the Chang 73 Shale Reservoirs in the Southern Ordos Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(05): 1254-1270. |
[5] | LIU Siyi, GAO Ping, XIAO Xianming, LIU Ruobing, QIN Jing, YUAN Tao, WANG Xu. Study on Organic Petrology Characteristics of the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation Black Shale, Sichuan Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(05): 1281-1291. |
[6] | QI Yang, LÜ Chunyan, WANG Yuhui, TANG Shuheng, XI Zhaodong. Pore Structural Characteristics of Wufeng-Longmaxi Formations Under Biostratigraphic Framework in Northwestern Hunan [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(05): 1292-1303. |
[7] | LIU Qian, FAN Tailiang, GAO Zhiqian, ZHANG Tonghui, MA Xiaoxuan, WEI Duan, LU Xinbian. Characteristics and Development Pattern of Pre-Mesoproterozoic Carbonate Subduction Reservoirs in the Qiaogu Area of the Tabei Uplift [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(05): 1391-1402. |
[8] | ZHENG Qinghua, LIU Xingjun, ZHANG Xiaolong, WANG Hongjun, LIAO Yongle, AN Erliang, LIU Tao, ZHANG Jianna, ZUO Qin. Review of the High Natural Gamma Sandstones Associated With Source Rocks in the Chang 73 Submember of the Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(04): 1087-1094. |
[9] | LU Junhui, ZHANG Xiaoli, YANG Zhen, LI Yajun, WANG Xiaolin, ZHAO Xi. Saturation Calculation Model With Variable Rock-Electrical Parameters for Tight Sandstone Reservoirs: A Case Study of the Shihezi Formation (8th Member) in Western Sulige Gas Field [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(04): 1131-1137. |
[10] | CHEN Huaxing, KANG Zhihong, KANG Zhijiang. Stratified Structure and Formation Mechanism of Paleokarst Cave in Carbonate Reservoir of Tahe Oilfield [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(02): 695-708. |
[11] | YANG Yi, ZHANG Hengrong, YUAN Wei, YANG Dong, HU Desheng. Fractal Characteristics Comparison and Genesis of Conventional Sandstone and Glutenite [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(01): 149-158. |
[12] | LI Xinhua, KANG Zhihong, LIU Jie, YANG Debin, WANG Yan, CHEN Huaxin, HE Yu. Characteristics Identification and Formation of Ordovician Karst Collapse Reservoir Structure in Tahe Oilfield [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(06): 1830-1843. |
[13] | LIU Wenfeng, ZHANG Xiaoshuan, LIU Jinming, AILIMAN·Daoerji , YANG Yuanfeng, ZHANG Xiwen, QI Liqi, YU Jingwei. Evaluation and Characteristics of Pore Structures in Sand and Conglomerate Reservoirs of Badaowan Formation in the AH5 Well Block [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(06): 1844-1853. |
[14] | LI Yuhang, XIE Ruijie, CHEN Kongquan, ZHUO Junchi, WANG Bin. Characteristics and Main Controlling Factors of High Quality Tight Sandstone Reservoir Source: Take the Xujiahe Formation (5th Member) in Western Sichuan Depression as An Example [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(06): 1864-1870. |
[15] | CUI Gaixia, WEI Qinlian, XIAO Ling, WANG Song, HU Rong, WANG Chonghuan. Reservoir Characteristics of Permian Lower He 8 Member in Longdong Area, Ordos Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(04): 1088-1097. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||