Geoscience ›› 2019, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (04): 863-871.DOI: 10.19657/j.geoscience.1000-8527.2019.04.17
• Petroleum Geology • Previous Articles Next Articles
QI Yulin1(), ZHANG Zhihuan1(
), XIA Dongling2, ZHANG Huimin1, HUANG Caixia3, ZHENG Duo1, JIN Xiao1, CAO Yongle1, ZHU Lei1
Received:
2018-06-07
Revised:
2018-09-20
Online:
2019-08-20
Published:
2019-09-05
Contact:
ZHANG Zhihuan
CLC Number:
QI Yulin, ZHANG Zhihuan, XIA Dongling, ZHANG Huimin, HUANG Caixia, ZHENG Duo, JIN Xiao, CAO Yongle, ZHU Lei. Comparative Analysis of Hydrocarbon Generation Kinetics of Dark Shale and Black Shale of Chang 7 in Southern Ordos Basin[J]. Geoscience, 2019, 33(04): 863-871.
编号 | 井号 | 层位 | 岩性 | TOC/% | S1/(mg/g) | S2/(mg/g) | Tmax/℃ | HI/(mg/g) | 有机质类型 | Ro/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 泾河4 | 长7油层组 | 黑色页岩 | 19.37 | 0.66 | 81.78 | 440 | 422.2 | Ⅱ1 | 0.76 |
2 | 泾河6 | 长7油层组 | 黑色页岩 | 24.68 | 8.17 | 110.1 | 440 | 446.11 | Ⅱ1 | 0.79 |
3 | 泾河9 | 长7油层组 | 暗色泥岩 | 0.96 | 0.42 | 2.61 | 435 | 272.58 | Ⅱ2 | 0.67 |
4 | 洛河3 | 长7油层组 | 暗色泥岩 | 1.49 | 0.38 | 3.09 | 447 | 207.1 | Ⅱ2 | 0.85 |
5 | 洛河2 | 长7油层组 | 暗色泥岩 | 4.58 | 3.67 | 10.49 | 453 | 228.94 | Ⅱ2 | 0.73 |
6 | 正2 | 长7油层组 | 黑色页岩 | 13.38 | 5.53 | 90.32 | 435 | 675.04 | Ⅱ1 | 0.6 |
Table 1 Geochemical information of the analyzed samples
编号 | 井号 | 层位 | 岩性 | TOC/% | S1/(mg/g) | S2/(mg/g) | Tmax/℃ | HI/(mg/g) | 有机质类型 | Ro/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 泾河4 | 长7油层组 | 黑色页岩 | 19.37 | 0.66 | 81.78 | 440 | 422.2 | Ⅱ1 | 0.76 |
2 | 泾河6 | 长7油层组 | 黑色页岩 | 24.68 | 8.17 | 110.1 | 440 | 446.11 | Ⅱ1 | 0.79 |
3 | 泾河9 | 长7油层组 | 暗色泥岩 | 0.96 | 0.42 | 2.61 | 435 | 272.58 | Ⅱ2 | 0.67 |
4 | 洛河3 | 长7油层组 | 暗色泥岩 | 1.49 | 0.38 | 3.09 | 447 | 207.1 | Ⅱ2 | 0.85 |
5 | 洛河2 | 长7油层组 | 暗色泥岩 | 4.58 | 3.67 | 10.49 | 453 | 228.94 | Ⅱ2 | 0.73 |
6 | 正2 | 长7油层组 | 黑色页岩 | 13.38 | 5.53 | 90.32 | 435 | 675.04 | Ⅱ1 | 0.6 |
编号 | 温度点 ℃ | 可溶烃 | 热解烃 | 最高峰温 | 产油潜率 | 残余碳 | 产率指数 | 氢指数 | 有效碳 | 降解率 | 总有机碳含量 | 镜质体反射率 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1/ (mg/g) | S2/ (mg/g) | Tmax/ ℃ | (S1+S2)/ (mg/g) | S4/ (mg/g) | PI | HI/ (mg/g) | PC/% | D/% | TOC/% | Ro/% | ||
5 | 原始 | 3.67 | 10.49 | 453 | 14.16 | 34.9 | 0.26 | 225 | 1.18 | 25.17 | 5.98 | 0.73 |
5-1 | 280 | 2.1 | 9.15 | 447 | 11.25 | 44.35 | 0.19 | 170 | 0.93 | 17.39 | 5.70 | 0.92 |
5-2 | 300 | 2.02 | 8.16 | 446 | 10.18 | 49.38 | 0.2 | 141 | 0.84 | 14.62 | 5.48 | 1.03 |
5-3 | 320 | 1.91 | 6.69 | 449 | 8.6 | 53.97 | 0.22 | 109 | 0.71 | 11.68 | 4.28 | 1.18 |
5-4 | 340 | 1.75 | 4.43 | 447 | 6.18 | 42.35 | 0.28 | 93 | 0.51 | 10.8 | 4.62 | 1.22 |
5-5 | 360 | 1.68 | 1.96 | 445 | 3.64 | 51.07 | 0.46 | 36 | 0.3 | 5.58 | 5.27 | 1.41 |
5-6 | 380 | 1.87 | 0.85 | 557 | 2.72 | 39.88 | 0.69 | 20 | 0.23 | 5.36 | 5.23 | 1.49 |
6 | 原始 | 5.53 | 90.32 | 435 | 95.85 | 83.98 | 0.06 | 552 | 7.96 | 48.66 | 13.38 | 0.60 |
6-1 | 280 | 0.31 | 12.89 | 443 | 13.2 | 25.75 | 0.02 | 351 | 1.1 | 29.85 | 2.77 | 0.71 |
6-2 | 300 | 0.3 | 11.38 | 444 | 11.68 | 25 | 0.03 | 328 | 0.97 | 27.94 | 2.58 | 0.84 |
6-3 | 320 | 0.85 | 11.41 | 442 | 12.26 | 24.58 | 0.07 | 328 | 1.02 | 29.24 | 2.56 | 1.04 |
6-4 | 340 | 0.96 | 9.53 | 443 | 10.49 | 25.05 | 0.09 | 282 | 0.87 | 25.76 | 2.48 | 1.11 |
6-5 | 360 | 1.6 | 3.82 | 444 | 5.42 | 23.71 | 0.3 | 135 | 0.45 | 15.95 | 2.30 | 1.17 |
6-6 | 380 | 0.51 | 0.93 | 453 | 1.44 | 24.7 | 0.35 | 36 | 0.12 | 4.61 | 1.80 | 1.25 |
Table 2 Pyrolysis parameters and thermal evolution degree of solid residues in closed simulation experiments (not extracted samples)
编号 | 温度点 ℃ | 可溶烃 | 热解烃 | 最高峰温 | 产油潜率 | 残余碳 | 产率指数 | 氢指数 | 有效碳 | 降解率 | 总有机碳含量 | 镜质体反射率 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1/ (mg/g) | S2/ (mg/g) | Tmax/ ℃ | (S1+S2)/ (mg/g) | S4/ (mg/g) | PI | HI/ (mg/g) | PC/% | D/% | TOC/% | Ro/% | ||
5 | 原始 | 3.67 | 10.49 | 453 | 14.16 | 34.9 | 0.26 | 225 | 1.18 | 25.17 | 5.98 | 0.73 |
5-1 | 280 | 2.1 | 9.15 | 447 | 11.25 | 44.35 | 0.19 | 170 | 0.93 | 17.39 | 5.70 | 0.92 |
5-2 | 300 | 2.02 | 8.16 | 446 | 10.18 | 49.38 | 0.2 | 141 | 0.84 | 14.62 | 5.48 | 1.03 |
5-3 | 320 | 1.91 | 6.69 | 449 | 8.6 | 53.97 | 0.22 | 109 | 0.71 | 11.68 | 4.28 | 1.18 |
5-4 | 340 | 1.75 | 4.43 | 447 | 6.18 | 42.35 | 0.28 | 93 | 0.51 | 10.8 | 4.62 | 1.22 |
5-5 | 360 | 1.68 | 1.96 | 445 | 3.64 | 51.07 | 0.46 | 36 | 0.3 | 5.58 | 5.27 | 1.41 |
5-6 | 380 | 1.87 | 0.85 | 557 | 2.72 | 39.88 | 0.69 | 20 | 0.23 | 5.36 | 5.23 | 1.49 |
6 | 原始 | 5.53 | 90.32 | 435 | 95.85 | 83.98 | 0.06 | 552 | 7.96 | 48.66 | 13.38 | 0.60 |
6-1 | 280 | 0.31 | 12.89 | 443 | 13.2 | 25.75 | 0.02 | 351 | 1.1 | 29.85 | 2.77 | 0.71 |
6-2 | 300 | 0.3 | 11.38 | 444 | 11.68 | 25 | 0.03 | 328 | 0.97 | 27.94 | 2.58 | 0.84 |
6-3 | 320 | 0.85 | 11.41 | 442 | 12.26 | 24.58 | 0.07 | 328 | 1.02 | 29.24 | 2.56 | 1.04 |
6-4 | 340 | 0.96 | 9.53 | 443 | 10.49 | 25.05 | 0.09 | 282 | 0.87 | 25.76 | 2.48 | 1.11 |
6-5 | 360 | 1.6 | 3.82 | 444 | 5.42 | 23.71 | 0.3 | 135 | 0.45 | 15.95 | 2.30 | 1.17 |
6-6 | 380 | 0.51 | 0.93 | 453 | 1.44 | 24.7 | 0.35 | 36 | 0.12 | 4.61 | 1.80 | 1.25 |
[1] |
BRAU R L, BURHNAM A K. Analysis of chemical reaction kinetics using a distribution of activation energy and simpler models[J]. Energy and Fuels, 1987,1(2):153-161.
DOI URL |
[2] |
TANG Y, JENDEN P D, NIGRINI A, et al. Modeling early methane generation in coal[J]. Energy and Fuels, 1996,10(3):659-671.
DOI URL |
[3] |
BOREHAM C J, HORSFEILD B, SCHENK H J. Predicting the quantities of oil and gas generated from Australian Permian coal,Bowen basin using pyrolytic methods[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 1999,16(2):165-188.
DOI URL |
[4] | 解启来, 周中毅. 利用干酪根热解动力学模拟实验研究塔里木盆地下古生界古地温[J]. 地球科学——中国地质大学学报, 2002,27(6):767-769. |
[5] | 熊永强, 耿安松, 刘金钟, 等. 生烃动力学模拟实验结合GC-IRMS测定在有效气源岩判识中的应用[J]. 地球化学, 2002,31(1):22-25. |
[6] | 汤庆艳, 张铭杰, 张同伟, 等. 生烃热模拟实验方法述评[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2013,35(1):52-62. |
[7] | 饶松, 胡圣标, 汪集旸. 有机质生烃动力学参数研究进展:回顾和展望[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2010,25(4):1424-1432. |
[8] | 刘立峰, 姜振学, 钟宁宁, 等. 辽河西部凹陷古近系烃源岩生烃动力学特征[J]. 地球科学——中国地质大学学报, 2009,34(5):799-805. |
[9] | 蒋启贵, 王延斌, 秦建中, 等. 中国南方海相烃源岩生烃动力学研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2005,30(6):74-78. |
[10] |
LEHNE E, DIECKMANN V. Bulk kinetic parameters and structural moieties of asphaltenes and kerogens from a Sulphur-rich source rock sequence and related petroleums[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 2007,38(10):1657-1679.
DOI URL |
[11] | 付少英. 鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界煤的生烃动力学及其分子特征研究[D]. 广州:中国科学院研究生院(广州地球化学研究所), 2002. |
[12] | 卢进才, 李玉宏, 魏仙样, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组长7油层组油页岩沉积环境与资源潜力研究[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2006,36(6):928-932. |
[13] | 张文正, 杨华, 杨奕华, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地长7优质烃源岩的岩石学、元素地球化学特征及发育环境[J]. 地球化学, 2008,37(1):59-64. |
[14] | 张文正, 杨华, 候林慧, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组不同烃源岩17α(H)-重排藿烷的分布及其地质意义[J]. 中国科学(D辑:地球科学), 2009,39(10):1438-1445. |
[15] | 杨华, 张文正. 论鄂尔多斯盆地长7段优质油源岩在低渗透油气成藏富集中的主导作用:地质地球化学特征[J]. 地球化学, 2005,34(2):147-154. |
[16] | 张妮妮, 刘洛夫, 苏天喜, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长7段与威利斯顿盆地Bakken组致密油形成条件的对比及其意义[J]. 现代地质, 2013,27(5):1120-1130. |
[17] | 张云霞, 陈纯芳, 宋艳波, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部中生界烃源岩特征及油源对比[J]. 石油实验地质, 2012,34(2):173-177. |
[18] | 王保战. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部延长组长7段生烃潜力研究[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2015,29(4):27-30+154. |
[19] | 邓南涛, 张枝焕, 鲍志东, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部延长组有效烃源岩地球化学特征及其识别标志[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2013,37(2):135-145. |
[20] | 方艳梅, 奥洋洋, 王辉. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部延长组烃源岩有机质丰度评价[J]. 辽宁化工, 2015,44(8):1005-1007. |
[21] | 邓南涛, 张枝焕, 任来义, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部延长组烃源岩生物标志物特征及生烃潜力分析[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2014,33(3):317-325. |
[22] | 郭凯. 鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区长7段有效烃源岩及生排烃研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2017,39(1):15-23. |
[23] | 黄彩霞, 张枝焕, 李宇翔, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部地区延长组烃源岩生烃动力学研究及模拟结果分析[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2013,35(8):21-27. |
[24] | 廖玲玲. 基于全岩的不同类型烃源岩生—留—排烃的实验模拟与应用研究[D]. 广州.中国科学院研究生院(广州地球化学研究所), 2016. |
[25] | 王香增, 高潮. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部长7陆相泥页岩生烃过程研究[J]. 非常规油气, 2014,1(1):2-11. |
[26] | 钱门辉, 蒋启贵, 李志, 等. 开放体系下页岩生烃组分动力学研究:以渤南洼陷为例[J]. 地球化学, 2017,46(2):149-157. |
[27] | TISSOT B P, PELET R, UNGERER P. Thermal history of sedimentary basins, maturation indices,and kinetics of oil and gas generation[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1987,71(12):1445-1466. |
[28] | 黄第藩, 李晋超, 周翥红, 等. 陆相有机质的演化与成烃机理[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1984: 171-179. |
[29] | 傅家谟, 史继扬. 石油演化理论与实践(Ⅰ)——石油演化的机理与石油演化的阶段[J]. 地球化学, 1975,4(2):87-110. |
[30] | 傅家漠, 秦匡宗. 干酪根地球化学[M]. 广州: 广东科技出版社, 1995: 375-376. |
[31] | 张辉, 彭平安. 开放体系下干酪根生烃动力学研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2008,30(6):18-21+202-203. |
[32] | SWEENEY J J, BURNHAM A K. Evaluation of a simple model of vitrinite reflectance based on Chemical kinetics[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1990,74(10):1559-1570. |
[33] | 秦艳, 彭平安, 于赤灵, 等. 硫在干酪根裂解生烃中的作用[J].科学通报, 2004(增刊):9-16. |
[34] | 马中豪, 陈清石, 史忠汪, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地南缘延长组长7油页岩地球化学特征及其地质意义[J]. 地质通报, 2016,35(9):1550-1558. |
[1] | SHI Liang, FAN Bojiang, WANG Xia, LI Yating, HUANG Feifei, DAI Xinyang. Element Composition and Sedimentary Environment of Chang 9 Shale Source Rocks in the Ordos Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(05): 1254-1263. |
[2] | CHEN Xi, XIAO Ling, WANG Mingyu, HAO Chenxi, WANG Feng, TANG Hongnan. Reconstruction of Provenance and Paleo-sedimentary Environment of the Chang 8 Oil Layer in the Southwestern Margin of the Ordos Basin: Evidence from Petrogeochemistry [J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(05): 1264-1281. |
[3] | CUI Shuhui, WU Peng, ZHAO Fei, NIU Yanwei, CAI Wenzhe, WANG Bo. Shale Gas Accumulation Factors and Enrichment Area Prediction in Linxing Block, Eastern Margin of the Ordos Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(05): 1271-1280. |
[4] | ZHENG Qinghua, LIU Xingjun, ZHANG Xiaolong, WANG Hongjun, LIAO Yongle, AN Erliang, LIU Tao, ZHANG Jianna, ZUO Qin. Review of the High Natural Gamma Sandstones Associated With Source Rocks in the Chang 73 Submember of the Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(04): 1087-1094. |
[5] | ZHU Biqing, CHEN Shijia, BAI Yanjun, LEI Junjie, YIN Xiangdong. Geochemical Characteristics and Source of Crude Oil in Chang 8 Member of Yanchang Formation, Ganquan Area, Ordos Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(02): 742-754. |
[6] | SHI Liang, ZHAO Tongtong, ZHA Hui, WANG Yanyan, HUO Pingping, FAN Bojiang. Geochemical Characteristics and Shale Oil Potential of Shale in the Yan’an Area [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(04): 1043-1053. |
[7] | CUI Gaixia, WEI Qinlian, XIAO Ling, WANG Song, HU Rong, WANG Chonghuan. Reservoir Characteristics of Permian Lower He 8 Member in Longdong Area, Ordos Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(04): 1088-1097. |
[8] | SHEN Hua, LIU Zhen, SHI Yuanpeng, XU Zeyang, LI Yongjun, CHEN Shuguang, WANG Huilai, WANG Zhicheng, WANG Biao, LIU Chang. Hydrocarbon Accumulation Process and Exploration Potential in Linhe Depression, Hetao Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(03): 871-882. |
[9] | JIANG Wei, GAO Zhiqian, HU Zongquan, ZHAO Yongqiang, CHU Chenglin. Sedimentary Filling Evolution and Hydrocarbon Control of High Frequency Sequence in Yurtus Formation, Tarim Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(02): 349-364. |
[10] | LEI Han, HUANG Wenhui, SUN Qilong, CHE Qingsong. Dedolomitization Origin and Model for the Ordovician Majiagou Formation (5th Member) in the Southern Ordos Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(02): 378-387. |
[11] | HU Yan, HU Yongxing, ZHANG Xiang, YANG Tao, OU Yangjian. Geochemical Features and Geological Significance of Sandstone-type Uranium Deposit in Zhenyuan Area, Southwestern Ordos Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2020, 34(06): 1153-1165. |
[12] | TAN Cong, YU Bingsong, YUAN Xuanjun, LIU Ce, WANG Tongshan, ZHU Xi. Color Origin of the Lower Triassic Liujiagou and Heshanggou Formations Red Beds in the Ordos Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2020, 34(04): 769-783. |
[13] | LI Yijia, RUAN Zhuang, LIU Shuai, CHANG Qiuhong, LAI Wei, YANG Zhihui. Provenance and Tectonic Setting of Chang 10-Chang 8 Member in the Southern Ordos Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2020, 34(04): 784-799. |
[14] | ZHAO Yande, DENG Xiuqing, QI Yalin, SHAO Xiaozhou, YANG Bin, LU Xinchuan, LUO Anxian, XIE Xiankui. Geochemical Characteristics of Source Rocks of M53 Well and Chang-8 Member Oil-source in Pingliangbei Exploration Area, Ordos Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2020, 34(04): 800-811. |
[15] | JIANG Suyang, HUANG Wenhui, ZHANG Yongsheng. Geochemical Characteristics of Middle Ordovician in Western Margin of Ordos Basin and Its Implication on Paleoenvironment [J]. Geoscience, 2020, 34(03): 545-553. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||