Geoscience ›› 2024, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (06): 1484-1497.DOI: 10.19657/j.geoscience.1000-8527.2024.071
• Energy Geology • Previous Articles Next Articles
LIU Bei1(), GAO Xianzhi2, LI Feng3(
), GONG Zhiyu1, LUO Fan1, DU Xiaofeng1
Online:
2024-12-10
Published:
2024-12-09
Contact:
LI Feng
CLC Number:
LIU Bei, GAO Xianzhi, LI Feng, GONG Zhiyu, LUO Fan, DU Xiaofeng. Paleoenvironmental Reconstruction and Organic Matter Enrichment of Middle Permian Black Shale: Insights From the Gufeng Formation, Enshi Area, Western Hubei[J]. Geoscience, 2024, 38(06): 1484-1497.
样品编号 | TOC(%) | SiO2(%) | Al2O3(%) | Fe2O3(%) | CaO(%) | MgO(%) | Na2O(%) | K2O(%) | TiO2(%) | P2O5(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T-7 | 11.53 | 73.11 | 2.23 | 9.17 | 0.07 | 0.14 | 0.08 | 0.36 | 0.16 | 0.62 |
T-6 | 19.55 | 80.25 | 1.60 | 1.38 | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.06 | 0.26 | 0.07 | 0.12 |
T-5 | 24.66 | 75.41 | 3.63 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.35 | 0.08 | 0.79 | 0.18 | 0.07 |
T-4 | 13.64 | 74.58 | 8.03 | 0.38 | 0.11 | 0.69 | 0.10 | 1.80 | 0.42 | 0.06 |
T-3 | 5.79 | 90.18 | 2.32 | 0.55 | 0.09 | 0.16 | 0.07 | 0.31 | 0.08 | 0.12 |
T-2 | 10.65 | 87.58 | 3.07 | 0.37 | 0.12 | 0.26 | 0.08 | 0.51 | 0.13 | 0.16 |
T-1 | 6.34 | 87.72 | 2.79 | 0.43 | 0.38 | 0.29 | 0.09 | 0.49 | 0.11 | 0.18 |
Y-6 | 10.63 | 84.69 | 2.42 | 0.13 | 0.10 | 0.18 | 0.04 | 0.38 | 0.14 | 0.16 |
Y-5 | 7.49 | 80.66 | 2.70 | 0.07 | 0.12 | 0.32 | 0.03 | 0.48 | 0.14 | 0.03 |
Y-4 | 41.59 | 78.03 | 1.59 | 0.11 | 0.07 | 0.24 | 0.02 | 0.27 | 0.05 | 0.08 |
Y-3 | 31.09 | 76.88 | 3.15 | 0.14 | 0.58 | 0.40 | 0.05 | 0.62 | 0.12 | 0.55 |
Y-2 | 6.07 | 87.00 | 1.80 | 0.14 | 0.38 | 0.13 | 0.04 | 0.34 | 0.06 | 0.46 |
Y-1 | 9.36 | 85.37 | 2.55 | 0.08 | 0.26 | 0.29 | 0.05 | 0.43 | 0.09 | 0.25 |
Table 1 Main element components of the Gufeng Formation shale in the Enshi area, Western Hubei
样品编号 | TOC(%) | SiO2(%) | Al2O3(%) | Fe2O3(%) | CaO(%) | MgO(%) | Na2O(%) | K2O(%) | TiO2(%) | P2O5(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T-7 | 11.53 | 73.11 | 2.23 | 9.17 | 0.07 | 0.14 | 0.08 | 0.36 | 0.16 | 0.62 |
T-6 | 19.55 | 80.25 | 1.60 | 1.38 | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.06 | 0.26 | 0.07 | 0.12 |
T-5 | 24.66 | 75.41 | 3.63 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.35 | 0.08 | 0.79 | 0.18 | 0.07 |
T-4 | 13.64 | 74.58 | 8.03 | 0.38 | 0.11 | 0.69 | 0.10 | 1.80 | 0.42 | 0.06 |
T-3 | 5.79 | 90.18 | 2.32 | 0.55 | 0.09 | 0.16 | 0.07 | 0.31 | 0.08 | 0.12 |
T-2 | 10.65 | 87.58 | 3.07 | 0.37 | 0.12 | 0.26 | 0.08 | 0.51 | 0.13 | 0.16 |
T-1 | 6.34 | 87.72 | 2.79 | 0.43 | 0.38 | 0.29 | 0.09 | 0.49 | 0.11 | 0.18 |
Y-6 | 10.63 | 84.69 | 2.42 | 0.13 | 0.10 | 0.18 | 0.04 | 0.38 | 0.14 | 0.16 |
Y-5 | 7.49 | 80.66 | 2.70 | 0.07 | 0.12 | 0.32 | 0.03 | 0.48 | 0.14 | 0.03 |
Y-4 | 41.59 | 78.03 | 1.59 | 0.11 | 0.07 | 0.24 | 0.02 | 0.27 | 0.05 | 0.08 |
Y-3 | 31.09 | 76.88 | 3.15 | 0.14 | 0.58 | 0.40 | 0.05 | 0.62 | 0.12 | 0.55 |
Y-2 | 6.07 | 87.00 | 1.80 | 0.14 | 0.38 | 0.13 | 0.04 | 0.34 | 0.06 | 0.46 |
Y-1 | 9.36 | 85.37 | 2.55 | 0.08 | 0.26 | 0.29 | 0.05 | 0.43 | 0.09 | 0.25 |
Fig.4 Scheme for shale facies classification of the Gufeng Formation in the Enshi area, Western Hubei (modified from Li et al.[21] and Xia et al.[22])
样品 编号 | Cr (10-6) | Sr (10-6) | V (10-6) | Ni (10-6) | Co (10-6) | Ba (10-6) | Cu (10-6) | U (10-6) | Mo (10-6) | Mn (10-6) | Rb (10-6) | Th (10-6) | Ga (10-6) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T-1 | 574 | 60 | 204 | 31 | 0.65 | 62 | 19 | 13.6 | 13 | 18.11 | 16.31 | 1.51 | 2.95 |
T-2 | 874 | 127 | 1194 | 32 | 0.74 | 64 | 68 | 19.6 | 76 | 27.86 | 17.73 | 1.70 | 3.42 |
T-3 | 607 | 165 | 1506 | 38 | 0.52 | 50 | 42 | 11.7 | 120 | 18.28 | 11.01 | 0.85 | 2.57 |
T-4 | 1334 | 114 | 2157 | 64 | 0.93 | 161 | 16 | 18.2 | 52 | 20.72 | 62.56 | 5.32 | 10.90 |
T-5 | 1192 | 217 | 1546 | 173 | 0.65 | 106 | 21 | 9.94 | 21 | 23.22 | 27.30 | 2.05 | 5.67 |
T-6 | 519 | 45 | 1487 | 108 | 0.59 | 37 | 52 | 8.7 | 23 | 32.68 | 9.472 | 0.75 | 3.15 |
T-7 | 433 | 156 | 1283 | 40 | 1.18 | 90 | 74 | 11.3 | 108 | 43.70 | 12.86 | 1.65 | 4.05 |
Y-1 | 413 | 70 | 413 | 98 | 0.74 | 39 | 68 | 18.2 | 106 | 16.69 | 12.60 | 2.43 | 2.68 |
Y-2 | 366 | 75 | 366 | 126 | 0.66 | 40 | 14 | 16.4 | 48 | 22.39 | 10.37 | 0.68 | 2.00 |
Y-3 | 684 | 133 | 684 | 306 | 1.33 | 53 | 88 | 98.6 | 219 | 26.6 | 22.03 | 1.57 | 3.89 |
Y-4 | 271 | 25 | 271 | 240 | 0.19 | 41 | 310 | 17.8 | 376 | 16.69 | 11.28 | 1.13 | 2.55 |
Y-5 | 146 | 48 | 146 | 128 | 0.25 | 80 | 30 | 18.9 | 472 | 18.70 | 19.74 | 1.96 | 3.81 |
Y-6 | 474 | 125 | 474 | 225 | 0.56 | 66 | 57 | 14.1 | 283 | 26.6 | 15.34 | 1.54 | 4.53 |
Table 2 Trace element analysis results for the Gufeng Formation shale in the Enshi area, Western Hubei
样品 编号 | Cr (10-6) | Sr (10-6) | V (10-6) | Ni (10-6) | Co (10-6) | Ba (10-6) | Cu (10-6) | U (10-6) | Mo (10-6) | Mn (10-6) | Rb (10-6) | Th (10-6) | Ga (10-6) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T-1 | 574 | 60 | 204 | 31 | 0.65 | 62 | 19 | 13.6 | 13 | 18.11 | 16.31 | 1.51 | 2.95 |
T-2 | 874 | 127 | 1194 | 32 | 0.74 | 64 | 68 | 19.6 | 76 | 27.86 | 17.73 | 1.70 | 3.42 |
T-3 | 607 | 165 | 1506 | 38 | 0.52 | 50 | 42 | 11.7 | 120 | 18.28 | 11.01 | 0.85 | 2.57 |
T-4 | 1334 | 114 | 2157 | 64 | 0.93 | 161 | 16 | 18.2 | 52 | 20.72 | 62.56 | 5.32 | 10.90 |
T-5 | 1192 | 217 | 1546 | 173 | 0.65 | 106 | 21 | 9.94 | 21 | 23.22 | 27.30 | 2.05 | 5.67 |
T-6 | 519 | 45 | 1487 | 108 | 0.59 | 37 | 52 | 8.7 | 23 | 32.68 | 9.472 | 0.75 | 3.15 |
T-7 | 433 | 156 | 1283 | 40 | 1.18 | 90 | 74 | 11.3 | 108 | 43.70 | 12.86 | 1.65 | 4.05 |
Y-1 | 413 | 70 | 413 | 98 | 0.74 | 39 | 68 | 18.2 | 106 | 16.69 | 12.60 | 2.43 | 2.68 |
Y-2 | 366 | 75 | 366 | 126 | 0.66 | 40 | 14 | 16.4 | 48 | 22.39 | 10.37 | 0.68 | 2.00 |
Y-3 | 684 | 133 | 684 | 306 | 1.33 | 53 | 88 | 98.6 | 219 | 26.6 | 22.03 | 1.57 | 3.89 |
Y-4 | 271 | 25 | 271 | 240 | 0.19 | 41 | 310 | 17.8 | 376 | 16.69 | 11.28 | 1.13 | 2.55 |
Y-5 | 146 | 48 | 146 | 128 | 0.25 | 80 | 30 | 18.9 | 472 | 18.70 | 19.74 | 1.96 | 3.81 |
Y-6 | 474 | 125 | 474 | 225 | 0.56 | 66 | 57 | 14.1 | 283 | 26.6 | 15.34 | 1.54 | 4.53 |
样品 编号 | V/ (V+Ni) | U/ Th | Cref | Sref | Vef | Nief | Baef | Cuef | Moef | Uef | Rbef | Thef | Gaef | Cu/Al (10-4) | Ni/Al (10-4) | Co×Mn (10-4) | Sibio (%) | Al (%) | Ti/ Al | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T-1 | 0.869 | 8.97 | 19.96 | 0.49 | 5.5 | 2.03 | 0.33 | 2.19 | 38.17 | 22.85 | 0.42 | 0.41 | 0.50 | 13.01 | 20.79 | 0.12 | 36.37 | 1.47 | 0.046 | ||||||||||
T-2 | 0.974 | 11.54 | 27.62 | 0.95 | 29.25 | 1.91 | 0.31 | 7.13 | 197.2 | 30.04 | 0.41 | 0.42 | 0.53 | 41.91 | 19.39 | 0.21 | 35.84 | 1.62 | 0.046 | ||||||||||
T-3 | 0.975 | 13.7 | 19.18 | 1.64 | 48.83 | 3.00 | 0.32 | 5.83 | 414.3 | 23.65 | 0.34 | 0.28 | 0.52 | 34.01 | 31.19 | 0.10 | 38.28 | 1.23 | 0.041 | ||||||||||
T-4 | 0.971 | 3.43 | 16.09 | 0.33 | 20.18 | 1.46 | 0.29 | 0.64 | 52.01 | 10.65 | 0.56 | 0.50 | 0.64 | 3.69 | 15.09 | 0.19 | 21.62 | 4.25 | 0.059 | ||||||||||
T-5 | 0.975 | 4.85 | 31.83 | 1.37 | 32.04 | 8.72 | 0.43 | 1.86 | 46.92 | 12.87 | 0.54 | 0.42 | 0.74 | 10.85 | 90.32 | 0.15 | 29.24 | 1.92 | 0.055 | ||||||||||
T-6 | 0.974 | 11.56 | 31.48 | 0.65 | 69.96 | 12.36 | 0.34 | 10.47 | 117 | 25.59 | 0.43 | 0.35 | 0.93 | 61.83 | 127.30 | 0.19 | 34.83 | 0.85 | 0.051 | ||||||||||
T-7 | 0.869 | 6.85 | 18.78 | 1.60 | 43.15 | 3.27 | 0.59 | 10.65 | 387.7 | 23.73 | 0.41 | 0.55 | 0.86 | 62.78 | 33.66 | 0.51 | 30.45 | 1.18 | 0.079 | ||||||||||
Y-1 | 0.823 | 7.49 | 15.69 | 0.63 | 12.17 | 7.02 | 0.22 | 8.58 | 282.4 | 48.34 | 0.35 | 0.72 | 0.50 | 42.00 | 72.60 | 0.12 | 35.65 | 1.35 | 0.038 | ||||||||||
Y-2 | 0.799 | 23.90 | 19.73 | 0.96 | 15.31 | 12.82 | 0.33 | 2.51 | 214.3 | 42.74 | 0.41 | 0.28 | 0.53 | 31.95 | 132.60 | 0.15 | 37.65 | 0.95 | 0.040 | ||||||||||
Y-3 | 0.896 | 62.70 | 21.07 | 0.97 | 16.34 | 17.77 | 0.25 | 9.00 | 557.7 | 147.20 | 0.50 | 0.37 | 0.58 | 186.00 | 183.40 | 0.35 | 30.71 | 1.67 | 0.042 | ||||||||||
Y-4 | 0.921 | 15.76 | 16.53 | 0.36 | 12.85 | 27.66 | 0.38 | 62.89 | 1898 | 52.76 | 0.51 | 0.54 | 0.76 | 104.20 | 285.60 | 0.03 | 33.81 | 0.84 | 0.037 | ||||||||||
Y-5 | 0.925 | 9.65 | 5.24 | 0.41 | 4.06 | 8.66 | 0.43 | 3.57 | 1399 | 32.81 | 0.52 | 0.55 | 0.67 | 10.07 | 89.27 | 0.05 | 33.21 | 1.43 | 0.057 | ||||||||||
Y-6 | 0.865 | 9.16 | 18.97 | 1.19 | 14.72 | 16.99 | 0.40 | 7.57 | 326.5 | 62.45 | 0.46 | 0.48 | 0.89 | 53.39 | 175.60 | 0.15 | 35.55 | 1.28 | 0.064 |
Table 3 Analysis and calculation results of major and trace elements in the Gufeng Formation shale from the Enshi area, Western Hubei
样品 编号 | V/ (V+Ni) | U/ Th | Cref | Sref | Vef | Nief | Baef | Cuef | Moef | Uef | Rbef | Thef | Gaef | Cu/Al (10-4) | Ni/Al (10-4) | Co×Mn (10-4) | Sibio (%) | Al (%) | Ti/ Al | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T-1 | 0.869 | 8.97 | 19.96 | 0.49 | 5.5 | 2.03 | 0.33 | 2.19 | 38.17 | 22.85 | 0.42 | 0.41 | 0.50 | 13.01 | 20.79 | 0.12 | 36.37 | 1.47 | 0.046 | ||||||||||
T-2 | 0.974 | 11.54 | 27.62 | 0.95 | 29.25 | 1.91 | 0.31 | 7.13 | 197.2 | 30.04 | 0.41 | 0.42 | 0.53 | 41.91 | 19.39 | 0.21 | 35.84 | 1.62 | 0.046 | ||||||||||
T-3 | 0.975 | 13.7 | 19.18 | 1.64 | 48.83 | 3.00 | 0.32 | 5.83 | 414.3 | 23.65 | 0.34 | 0.28 | 0.52 | 34.01 | 31.19 | 0.10 | 38.28 | 1.23 | 0.041 | ||||||||||
T-4 | 0.971 | 3.43 | 16.09 | 0.33 | 20.18 | 1.46 | 0.29 | 0.64 | 52.01 | 10.65 | 0.56 | 0.50 | 0.64 | 3.69 | 15.09 | 0.19 | 21.62 | 4.25 | 0.059 | ||||||||||
T-5 | 0.975 | 4.85 | 31.83 | 1.37 | 32.04 | 8.72 | 0.43 | 1.86 | 46.92 | 12.87 | 0.54 | 0.42 | 0.74 | 10.85 | 90.32 | 0.15 | 29.24 | 1.92 | 0.055 | ||||||||||
T-6 | 0.974 | 11.56 | 31.48 | 0.65 | 69.96 | 12.36 | 0.34 | 10.47 | 117 | 25.59 | 0.43 | 0.35 | 0.93 | 61.83 | 127.30 | 0.19 | 34.83 | 0.85 | 0.051 | ||||||||||
T-7 | 0.869 | 6.85 | 18.78 | 1.60 | 43.15 | 3.27 | 0.59 | 10.65 | 387.7 | 23.73 | 0.41 | 0.55 | 0.86 | 62.78 | 33.66 | 0.51 | 30.45 | 1.18 | 0.079 | ||||||||||
Y-1 | 0.823 | 7.49 | 15.69 | 0.63 | 12.17 | 7.02 | 0.22 | 8.58 | 282.4 | 48.34 | 0.35 | 0.72 | 0.50 | 42.00 | 72.60 | 0.12 | 35.65 | 1.35 | 0.038 | ||||||||||
Y-2 | 0.799 | 23.90 | 19.73 | 0.96 | 15.31 | 12.82 | 0.33 | 2.51 | 214.3 | 42.74 | 0.41 | 0.28 | 0.53 | 31.95 | 132.60 | 0.15 | 37.65 | 0.95 | 0.040 | ||||||||||
Y-3 | 0.896 | 62.70 | 21.07 | 0.97 | 16.34 | 17.77 | 0.25 | 9.00 | 557.7 | 147.20 | 0.50 | 0.37 | 0.58 | 186.00 | 183.40 | 0.35 | 30.71 | 1.67 | 0.042 | ||||||||||
Y-4 | 0.921 | 15.76 | 16.53 | 0.36 | 12.85 | 27.66 | 0.38 | 62.89 | 1898 | 52.76 | 0.51 | 0.54 | 0.76 | 104.20 | 285.60 | 0.03 | 33.81 | 0.84 | 0.037 | ||||||||||
Y-5 | 0.925 | 9.65 | 5.24 | 0.41 | 4.06 | 8.66 | 0.43 | 3.57 | 1399 | 32.81 | 0.52 | 0.55 | 0.67 | 10.07 | 89.27 | 0.05 | 33.21 | 1.43 | 0.057 | ||||||||||
Y-6 | 0.865 | 9.16 | 18.97 | 1.19 | 14.72 | 16.99 | 0.40 | 7.57 | 326.5 | 62.45 | 0.46 | 0.48 | 0.89 | 53.39 | 175.60 | 0.15 | 35.55 | 1.28 | 0.064 |
Fig.7 Vertical variations in TOC content, redox condition indicators (V/V+Ni, U/Th), paleo-productivity proxies (Cu/Al, Ni/Al), and detrital flux proxies (Al, Ti/Al) in the Gufeng Formation shales from the Tianfengping section
Fig.8 Vertical variations in TOC content, redox condition indicators (V/V+Ni, U/Th), paleo-productivity proxies (Cu/Al, Ni/Al), and detrital flux proxies (Al, Ti/Al) in the Gufeng Formation shales from the Yutangba section
Fig.10 Correlation between the redox condition index (U/Th), paleo-productivity index (Ni/Al), detrital flux proxies (Al, Ti/Al), and TOC content in the Gufeng Formation shale from the Enshi area, Western Hubei
[1] | ARTHUR M. Marine shales: Depositional mechanisms and environments of ancient deposits[J]. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 1994, 22: 499-551. |
[2] | 高阳东, 林鹤鸣, 汪旭东, 等. 珠江口盆地陆丰凹陷文昌组沉积地球化学特征及古环境意义[J]. 现代地质, 2022, 36(1): 118-129. |
[3] | 王鹏万, 陈子炓, 李娴静, 等. 黔南坳陷上震旦统灯影组地球化学特征及沉积环境意义[J]. 现代地质, 2011, 25(6): 1059-1065. |
[4] | RIMMER S M. Geochemical paleoredox indicators in Devonian-Mississippian black shales, Central Appalachian Basin (USA)[J]. Chemical Geology, 2004, 206(3/4): 373-391. |
[5] |
李艳芳, 邵德勇, 吕海刚, 等. 四川盆地五峰组—龙马溪组海相页岩元素地球化学特征与有机质富集的关系[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(12): 1470-1483.
DOI |
[6] | PEDERSEN T F, CALVERT S E. Anoxia vs. productivity: what controls the formation of organic-carbon-rich sediments and sedimentary rocks?[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1990, 74(4):454-466. |
[7] | ALGEO T J, MAYNARD J B. Trace-element behavior and redox facies in core shales of Upper Pennsylvanian Kansas-type cyclothems[J]. Chemical Geology, 2004, 206(3/4): 289-318. |
[8] | 许露露, 张焱林, 陈程, 等. 鄂西地区黄陵背斜周缘五峰组—龙马溪组页岩气储层及含气性特征[J]. 特种油气藏, 2019, 26(5): 26-32. |
[9] |
许露露, 刘早学, 温雅茹, 等. 中扬子鄂西地区牛蹄塘组页岩储层特征及含气性研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2020, 27(4): 1-9.
DOI |
[10] | 许露露, 温雅茹, 张焱林, 等. 鄂西地区上奥陶统五峰组—下志留统龙马溪组页岩含气性特征及保存条件[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(3): 395-405. |
[11] | 遇昊, 陈代钊, 韦恒叶, 等. 鄂西地区上二叠乐平统大隆组硅质岩成因及有机质富集机理[J]. 岩石学报, 2012, 28(3): 1017-1027. |
[12] | 何庆, 高键, 董田, 等. 鄂西地区下寒武统牛蹄塘组页岩元素地球化学特征及沉积古环境恢复[J]. 沉积学报, 2021, 39(3): 686-703. |
[13] | 吴勘. 扬子北缘中二叠统孤峰组地球生物学构成及页岩气地质特征[D]. 武汉: 中国地质大学, 2013. |
[14] | 陈鸿鹏. 鄂西地区二叠系孤峰组与大隆组页岩沉积与储层特征[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2020. |
[15] | 王登, 周豹, 冷双梁, 等. 鄂西咸丰地区五峰组—龙马溪组硅质岩地球化学特征及地质意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2022, 34(1): 52-62. |
[16] |
张君峰, 许浩, 周志, 等. 鄂西宜昌地区页岩气成藏地质特征[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(8): 887-899.
DOI |
[17] | 翟常博, 牟传龙, 梁薇, 等. 鄂西地区二叠系孤峰组—大隆组沉积演化及其页岩气地质意义[J]. 矿物岩石, 2021, 41(4): 114-124. |
[18] | JIANG Z X, DUAN H J, LIANG C, et al. Classification of hydrocarbon-bearing fine-grained sedimentary rocks[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2017, 28(6): 693-976. |
[19] | LAZAR O R, BOHACS K M, MACQUAKER J H S, et al. Capturing key attributes of fine-grained sedimentary rocks in outcrops, cores, and thin sections: Nomenclature and description guidelines[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 2015, 85(3): 230-246. |
[20] | TIAN X, GAO Y, LI Z Y, et al. Fine-grained gravity flow deposits and their depositional processes: A case study from the Cretaceous Nenjiang Formation, Songliao Basin, NE China[J]. Geological Journal, 2021, 56(3): 1496-1509. |
[21] | 李卓, 姜振学, 唐相路, 等. 渝东南下志留统龙马溪组页岩岩相特征及其对孔隙结构的控制[J]. 地球科学, 2017, 42(7): 1116-1123. |
[22] | 夏鹏, 付勇, 杨镇, 等. 黔北镇远牛蹄塘组黑色页岩沉积环境与有机质富集关系[J]. 地质学报, 2020, 94(3): 947-956. |
[23] | 刘惟庆. 鄂西地区上二叠统大隆组富有机质页岩岩相与储层特征研究[D]. 武汉: 中国地质大学, 2019. |
[24] | MCLENNAN S M. Weathering and global denudation[J]. The Journal of Geology, 1993, 101(2): 295-303. |
[25] |
崔晨光, 张辉, 刘文香, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地东部本溪组一段泥页岩元素地球化学特征——以山西临县招贤剖面和M115井为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2022, 33(6): 1001-1012.
DOI |
[26] | NESBITT H W, YOUNG G M. Petrogenesis of sediments in the absence of chemical weathering: Effects of abrasion and sorting on bulk composition and mineralogy[J]. Sedimentology, 1996, 43(2): 341-358. |
[27] | 师良, 范柏江, 王霞, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地长9页岩烃源岩的元素组成及其古沉积环境[J]. 现代地质, 2023, 37(5): 1254-1263. |
[28] | 谭聪, 袁选俊, 于炳松, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地南缘上二叠统—中下三叠统地球化学特征及其古气候、古环境指示意义[J]. 现代地质, 2019, 33(3): 615-628. |
[29] |
何龙, 王云鹏, 陈多福, 等. 重庆南川地区五峰组—龙马溪组黑色页岩沉积环境与有机质富集关系[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(2): 203-218.
DOI |
[30] | TRIBOVILLARD N, ALGEO T J, LYONS T, et al. Trace metals as paleoredox and paleoproductivity proxies: An update[J]. Chemical Geology, 2006, 232(1/2): 12-32. |
[31] |
李丹龙, 伏美燕, 邓虎成, 等. 上扬子地区下寒武统牛蹄塘组富有机质页岩岩相及沉积环境分析: 以贵州温水村剖面为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2023, 34(3): 445-459.
DOI |
[32] | SCOTT C, LYONS T W. Contrasting molybdenum cycling and isotopic properties in euxinic versus non-euxinic sediments and sedimentary rocks: Refining the paleoproxies[J]. Chemical Geology, 2012, 324/325: 19-27. |
[33] | HATCH J R, LEVENTHAL J S. Relationship between inferred redox potential of the depositional environment and geochemistry of the Upper Pennsylvanian (Missourian) Stark Shale Member of the Dennis Limestone, Wabaunsee County, Kansas, USA[J]. Chemical Geology, 1992, 99(1/2/3): 65-82. |
[34] | ALGEO T J, TRIBOVILLARD N. Environmental analysis of paleoceanographic systems based on molybdenum-uranium covariation[J]. Chemical Geology, 2009, 268(3/4): 211-225. |
[35] | 沈俊, 施张燕, 冯庆来. 古海洋生产力地球化学指标的研究[J]. 地质科技情报, 2011, 30(2): 69-77. |
[36] | LIU W Q, YAO J X, TONG J N, et al. Organic matter accumulation on the Dalong Formation (Upper Permian) in western Hubei, South China: Constraints from multiple geochemical proxies and pyrite morphology[J]. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 2019, 514: 677-689. |
[37] | DONG T, HARRIS N B, AYRANCI K. Relative sea-level cycles and organic matter accumulation in shales of the Middle and Upper Devonian Horn River Group, northeastern British Columbia, Canada: Insights into sediment flux, redox conditions, and bioproductivity[J]. GSA Bulletin, 2018, 130(5/6): 859-880. |
[38] | SHI L, FENG Q L, SHEN J, et al. Proliferation of shallow-water radiolarians coinciding with enhanced oceanic productivity in reducing conditions during the Middle Permian, South China: Evidence from the Gufeng Formation of western Hubei Province[J]. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 2016, 444: 1-14. |
[39] | PARRISH J T. Upwelling and petroleum source beds, with reference to Paleozoic[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1982, 66: 1679. |
[40] | SCHOEPFER S D, HENDERSON C M, GARRISON G H, et al. Cessation of a productive coastal upwelling system in the Panthalassic Ocean at the Permian-Triassic Boundary[J]. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 2012, 313/314: 181-188. |
[41] | SWEERE T, VAN DEN BOORN S, DICKSON A J, et al. Definition of new trace-metal proxies for the controls on organic matter enrichment in marine sediments based on Mn, Co, Mo and Cd concentrations[J]. Chemical Geology, 2016, 441: 235-245. |
[42] |
CANFIELD D E. Factors influencing organic carbon preservation in marine sediments[J]. Chemical Geology, 1994, 114: 315-329.
PMID |
[43] | ALGEO T J, KUWAHARA K, SANO H, et al. Spatial variation in sediment fluxes, redox conditions, and productivity in the Permian-Triassic Panthalassic Ocean[J]. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 2011, 308(1/2): 65-83. |
[44] |
赵振洋, 李双建, 王根厚. 中下扬子北缘中二叠统孤峰组层状硅质岩沉积环境、成因及硅质来源探讨[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35(2): 137-153.
DOI |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||