Geoscience ›› 2022, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (05): 1403-1413.DOI: 10.19657/j.geoscience.1000-8527.2022.223
• Hydrocarbon Geological Evaluation • Previous Articles Next Articles
SUN Yao1,2(), GUO Feng1(
), PENG Xiaoxia3, XIANG Jia1, ZHANG Lei1, YANG Xudong1
Received:
2021-09-02
Revised:
2022-09-27
Online:
2022-10-10
Published:
2022-11-03
Contact:
GUO Feng
CLC Number:
SUN Yao, GUO Feng, PENG Xiaoxia, XIANG Jia, ZHANG Lei, YANG Xudong. Reservoir Characteristics and Major Constraints of Meandering Rivers: A Case Study of Yan 9 in Hujianshan Oilfield, Ordos Basin[J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(05): 1403-1413.
井号 | 排驱压力/MPa | 中值半径/μm | 中值压力/MPa | 最大进汞饱和度/% | 退汞效率/% | 歪度系数 | 分选系数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A24 | 0.02 | 0.73 | 0.23 | 90.34 | 30.61 | 1.78 | 0.57 |
A45 | 0.01 | 2.42 | 0.16 | 88.21 | 31.36 | 2.61 | 1.71 |
A111 | 0.16 | 0.19 | 2.41 | 67.52 | 24.62 | -0.21 | 2.31 |
A145 | 0.02 | 0.86 | 0.29 | 90.13 | 30.25 | 1.96 | 1.62 |
A91 | 0.11 | 0.21 | 4.01 | 59.67 | 51.81 | -0.18 | 6.27 |
A159 | 0.02 | 1.28 | 0.27 | 83.36 | 30.75 | 2.63 | 2.12 |
A167 | 2.07 | 0.39 | 2.01 | 81.93 | 31.61 | -0.09 | 1.98 |
A180-57 | 0.04 | 2.37 | 0.11 | 90.18 | 31.92 | 2.64 | 1.86 |
A173 | 0.02 | 0.82 | 0.43 | 86.55 | 32.26 | 2.35 | 1.95 |
A223 | 0.01 | 1.01 | 1.32 | 88.71 | 38.35 | -0.11 | 1.79 |
A330 | 0.03 | 1.12 | 0.12 | 91.31 | 36.67 | 2.58 | 1.62 |
A42 | 0.05 | 0.92 | 0.36 | 87.23 | 33.89 | -0.26 | 2.06 |
平均 | 0.21 | 1.03 | 0.98 | 83.76 | 33.67 | 1.31 | 2.15 |
Table 1 Pore throat structure characteristic parameters of Yan 9 reservoir in the Hujianshan oilfield
井号 | 排驱压力/MPa | 中值半径/μm | 中值压力/MPa | 最大进汞饱和度/% | 退汞效率/% | 歪度系数 | 分选系数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A24 | 0.02 | 0.73 | 0.23 | 90.34 | 30.61 | 1.78 | 0.57 |
A45 | 0.01 | 2.42 | 0.16 | 88.21 | 31.36 | 2.61 | 1.71 |
A111 | 0.16 | 0.19 | 2.41 | 67.52 | 24.62 | -0.21 | 2.31 |
A145 | 0.02 | 0.86 | 0.29 | 90.13 | 30.25 | 1.96 | 1.62 |
A91 | 0.11 | 0.21 | 4.01 | 59.67 | 51.81 | -0.18 | 6.27 |
A159 | 0.02 | 1.28 | 0.27 | 83.36 | 30.75 | 2.63 | 2.12 |
A167 | 2.07 | 0.39 | 2.01 | 81.93 | 31.61 | -0.09 | 1.98 |
A180-57 | 0.04 | 2.37 | 0.11 | 90.18 | 31.92 | 2.64 | 1.86 |
A173 | 0.02 | 0.82 | 0.43 | 86.55 | 32.26 | 2.35 | 1.95 |
A223 | 0.01 | 1.01 | 1.32 | 88.71 | 38.35 | -0.11 | 1.79 |
A330 | 0.03 | 1.12 | 0.12 | 91.31 | 36.67 | 2.58 | 1.62 |
A42 | 0.05 | 0.92 | 0.36 | 87.23 | 33.89 | -0.26 | 2.06 |
平均 | 0.21 | 1.03 | 0.98 | 83.76 | 33.67 | 1.31 | 2.15 |
孔隙度演化参数 | 计算公式 | 计算(统计)结果 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
序号 | 公式 | 最小值/% | 最大值/% | 平均值/% | ||||||||
分选系数 | (1) | So=(Φ25+Φ75)/2 | 1.08 | 1.66 | 1.37 | |||||||
未固结砂岩原始孔隙度/% | (2) | Φo=20.91+(22.90/So) | 34.71 | 42.11 | 36.72 | |||||||
压实(溶) 作用孔隙度演化 | 压实(溶)作用后剩余孔隙度/% | (3) | Φ1=(Φpm+Φj)Φs/Φz+C | 16.83 | ||||||||
压实(溶)作用损失孔隙度/% | (4) | ΦL=Φo-Φ1 | 19.89 | |||||||||
胶结作用孔隙 度演化 | 胶结作用孔后剩余孔隙度/% | (5) | Φ2=(Φk+Φm)×Φs/Φz | 7.78 | ||||||||
胶结作用损失孔隙度/% | (6) | ΦC=Φ1-Φ2 | 9.05 | |||||||||
溶蚀作用贡献的孔隙度/% | (7) | Φ3=(Φr×Φs)/Φz×100% | 3.12 | 11.58 | 8.17 | |||||||
计算现今孔隙度/% | (8) | Φcv=Φo-ΦL-ΦC+Φ3 | 15.95 | |||||||||
样品实际测试孔隙度均值/% | Φs | 8.03 | 18.87 | 16.23 | ||||||||
误差分析/% | (9) | Ev=|Φs-Φcv|×100/Φs | 1.72 |
Table 2 Quantitative porosity calculation for Yan 9 reservoir in the Hujianshan oilfield
孔隙度演化参数 | 计算公式 | 计算(统计)结果 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
序号 | 公式 | 最小值/% | 最大值/% | 平均值/% | ||||||||
分选系数 | (1) | So=(Φ25+Φ75)/2 | 1.08 | 1.66 | 1.37 | |||||||
未固结砂岩原始孔隙度/% | (2) | Φo=20.91+(22.90/So) | 34.71 | 42.11 | 36.72 | |||||||
压实(溶) 作用孔隙度演化 | 压实(溶)作用后剩余孔隙度/% | (3) | Φ1=(Φpm+Φj)Φs/Φz+C | 16.83 | ||||||||
压实(溶)作用损失孔隙度/% | (4) | ΦL=Φo-Φ1 | 19.89 | |||||||||
胶结作用孔隙 度演化 | 胶结作用孔后剩余孔隙度/% | (5) | Φ2=(Φk+Φm)×Φs/Φz | 7.78 | ||||||||
胶结作用损失孔隙度/% | (6) | ΦC=Φ1-Φ2 | 9.05 | |||||||||
溶蚀作用贡献的孔隙度/% | (7) | Φ3=(Φr×Φs)/Φz×100% | 3.12 | 11.58 | 8.17 | |||||||
计算现今孔隙度/% | (8) | Φcv=Φo-ΦL-ΦC+Φ3 | 15.95 | |||||||||
样品实际测试孔隙度均值/% | Φs | 8.03 | 18.87 | 16.23 | ||||||||
误差分析/% | (9) | Ev=|Φs-Φcv|×100/Φs | 1.72 |
Fig.9 Relationship between physical properties and carbonate cement content, chlorite and feldspar dissolved pores of Yan 9 reservoir in the Hujianshan oilfield
[1] | 李军, 宋新民, 薛培华, 等. 扶余油田杨大城子组曲流河相油藏单砂体层次细分及成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2010, 31(1): 119-125. |
[2] | 岳大力, 王军, 王延忠, 等. 古河道储层构型层次分析法--孤岛油田馆陶组曲流河为例[J]. 地质科学, 2010, 45(3): 832-843. |
[3] | 付金华, 李士祥, 刘显阳. 鄂尔多斯盆地石油勘探地质理论与实践[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2013, 24(6): 1091-1101. |
[4] | 刘朋远, 柳成志, 辛仁臣. 松辽盆地东南缘籍家岭泉头组沉积微相特征及演化:由冲积扇演化为曲流河的典型露头剖面[J]. 现代地质, 2015, 29(6): 1338-1347. |
[5] | 樊晓伊, 薛国勤, 刘斌, 等. 准噶尔盆地春光油田稀井区曲流河储集层构型定量表征[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2020, 41(2): 147-157. |
[6] |
BRIDGE J S, DIEMER J A. Quantitative interpretation of an evolving ancient river system[J]. Sedimentology, 1983, 30: 599-623.
DOI URL |
[7] | SCHUMM S A, KHAN H R. Experimental study of channel patterns[J]. Geology Society of America Bulletin, 1972, 83(6): 1755-1770. |
[8] |
OLSEN N R B. 3D CFD modeling of a self-forming meandering channel[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2003, 129(5): 366-372.
DOI URL |
[9] |
CARTER D C. 3D seismic geomorphology:insights into fluvial reservoir deposition and performance, Widuri field,Java Sea[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2003, 87: 909-934.
DOI URL |
[10] | 程丽芳, 王晖, 尹艳树, 等. 基于浅层地震资料的曲流河点坝精细解剖--以加拿大某区块Mcmurray组储层为例[J]. 断块油气田, 2019, 26(4): 464-469. |
[11] |
白振强, 王清华, 杜庆龙, 等. 曲流河砂体三维构型地质建模及数值模拟研究[J]. 石油学报, 2009, 30(6): 898-902+907.
DOI |
[12] |
MARCIN S. Reconstructing migration phases of meandering channels by means of ground-penetrating radar (GPR): the case of the Obra River, Poland[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2011, 11: 1262-1278.
DOI URL |
[13] | 陈仕臻, 林承焰, 任丽华. 构型模式控制下的曲流河多尺度地质建模研究--以胜利油田史南区块为例[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2020, 49(3): 552-562. |
[14] | 陈薪凯, 刘景彦, 陈程, 等. 主要构型要素细分下的曲流河单砂体识别[J]. 沉积学报, 2020, 38(1): 205-217. |
[15] | 郭敬民, 马佳国, 孙恩慧, 等. 曲流河储层精细等效表征新方法及在开发中的应用--以渤海湾盆地C油田为例[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2021, 28(4): 55-62. |
[16] | 操应长, 杨田, 王艳忠, 等. 济阳坳陷特低渗透油藏地质多因素综合定量分类评价[J]. 现代地质, 2015, 29(1): 119-130. |
[17] | 黎盼, 孙卫, 杜堃, 等. 致密砂岩储层不同成岩作用对孔隙度定量演化的影响:以鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬油田长6储层为例[J]. 现代地质, 2018, 32(3): 527-536. |
[18] | 丁强, 成健, 杨博, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地胡154区块长4+5段孔隙结构定量表征及分类[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2021, 42(4): 410-417. |
[19] | 张忠良, 赵强, 樊喆, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地胡尖山油田延安组沉积体系及聚煤规律[J]. 陕西地质, 2013, 31(2): 37-43. |
[20] | 郭艳琴, 李文厚, 郭彬程, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地沉积体系与古地理演化[J]. 古地理学报, 2019, 21(2): 293-320. |
[21] | 张倩, 李文厚, 刘文汇, 等. 鄂尔多斯侏罗纪沉积体系及古地理演化[J]. 地质科学, 2021, 56(4): 1106-1119. |
[22] |
ZHANG Z M, LIU J G, COLEMAN R G. An outline of the plate tectonics of China[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 1984, 95: 295-312.
DOI URL |
[23] | WATSON M P, HAYWARD A B, PARKINSON D N, et al. Plate tectonic history, basin development and petroleum source rock deposition onshore China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 1987(4): 205-225. |
[24] |
YIN A, HARRISON T M. Geologic evolution of the Himalayan-Tibetan Orogen[J]. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 2000, 28: 211-280.
DOI URL |
[25] | 杨俊杰. 鄂尔多斯盆地构造演化与油气分布规律[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2002. |
[26] |
ZOU C N, ZHANG X, LUO P, et al. Shallow-lacustrine sand-rich deltaic depositional cycles and sequence stratigraphy of the Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin, China[J]. Basin Research, 2010, 22: 108-125.
DOI URL |
[27] | SCHERER M. Parameters influencing porosity in sandstones: A model for sandstone porosity prediction[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1987, 71(5): 485-91. |
[28] | 任大忠, 孙卫, 屈雪峰, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组长 6储层成岩作用特征及孔隙度致密演化[J]. 中南大学学报:自然科学版, 2016, 47(8): 2706-2714. |
[1] | ZHANG Baotao, MEI Zhenhua, LI Xiuzhang, JIANG Xiaoping, HU Zhaoguo, WANG Xiaoyu, ZHAO Xiaobo, HU Jiabin, LIU Sen. Key Ore-controlling Factors of the Skarn Type High-grade Iron Deposits in North China Craton: Constraints from Stratigraphy [J]. Geoscience, 2024, 38(01): 98-116. |
[2] | HU Liwen, ZOU Huayao, YANG Weiqiang, LI Ting, DENG Chengkun, CHENG Zhongzhen, ZHU Dancheng, CHEN Xingyue. Controlling Factors of Pressure Dissolution of Cambrian Carbonate in the Northern Sichuan [J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(05): 1221-1231. |
[3] | WANG Xuxue, ZHANG Xiangyu, LI Shoujun, ZHANG Jiahao, ZHANG Zhenyu. Redox Sensitive Trace Element Compositions of the Shuinan Formation Black Shale in the Laiyang Sag: Controlling Factors of Organic Matter Enrichment [J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(03): 733-744. |
[4] | LI Qing, LI Jiangshan, LU Hao, QI Fengqiang, HE Yu, AN Keqin, LI Longyu, ZHANG Houmin, WU Yue. Characteristics and Control Factors of the Chang 73 Shale Reservoirs in the Southern Ordos Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(05): 1254-1270. |
[5] | LIU Qian, FAN Tailiang, GAO Zhiqian, ZHANG Tonghui, MA Xiaoxuan, WEI Duan, LU Xinbian. Characteristics and Development Pattern of Pre-Mesoproterozoic Carbonate Subduction Reservoirs in the Qiaogu Area of the Tabei Uplift [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(05): 1391-1402. |
[6] | TANG Xianglu, JIANG Zhenxue, SHAO Zeyu, LONG Guohui, HE Shijie, LIU Xiaoxue, WANG Yuchao. Reservoir Characteristics and Dynamic Accumulation Process of the Quaternary Mudstone Biogas [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(02): 682-694. |
[7] | WEI Zede, LI Shengli, ZHANG Rongji, YAO Zongquan, YAN Yongchao, ZHANG Tong, LIU Yong, XU Wenqian. Sedimentary Microfacies Identification and Controlling Factors of the Toutunhe Formation (2nd Member) in the Eastern Fukang Slope, Junggar Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(02): 709-718. |
[8] | RAO Quan, KANG Yongshang, HUANG Yi, ZHAO Qun, WANG Hongyan. Cutoff of Free Gas and Porosity in Shale Gas Industrial Production Area of Longmaxi Formation in Southern Sichuan Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(04): 1054-1064. |
[9] | CUI Gaixia, WEI Qinlian, XIAO Ling, WANG Song, HU Rong, WANG Chonghuan. Reservoir Characteristics of Permian Lower He 8 Member in Longdong Area, Ordos Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(04): 1088-1097. |
[10] | ZHENG Dengyan, WANG Zhenliang, WANG Lianguo, HUANG Hao. Low-amplitude Structures and Its Control on Hydrocarbon Enrichment and Accumulation: An Example from Yan’an Formation in Pengyang Area, Ordos Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(04): 1114-1123. |
[11] | WANG Huilai, SUN Ruina, ZHANG Ruifeng, LIU Xiheng, LIU Jing, TIAN Sisi, XIAO Jinxia. Controlling Factors of Thick Glutenite Reservoir Accumulation in Hetao Basin: A Case Study of Jihua-2X Reservoir, Linhe Sag [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(03): 861-870. |
[12] | SHEN Hua, LIU Zhen, SHI Yuanpeng, XU Zeyang, LI Yongjun, CHEN Shuguang, WANG Huilai, WANG Zhicheng, WANG Biao, LIU Chang. Hydrocarbon Accumulation Process and Exploration Potential in Linhe Depression, Hetao Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(03): 871-882. |
[13] | YANG Zhizhong, ZHOU Wenlong, LUO Yongjun, PU Qinglong, LING Hudong, SONG Xiaojun. Distribution of Soil Selenium of the Cultivated Land and Its Controlling Factors in Zhenyuan of Guizhou Province [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(02): 434-442. |
[14] | LI Hao, LU Jianlin, WANG Baohua, SONG Zhenxiang, LI Zheng. Critical Controlling Factors of Enrichment and High-yield of Land Shale Oil [J]. Geoscience, 2020, 34(04): 837-848. |
[15] | YAO Zongquan, YU Xinghe, YUE Hongxing, , ZHOU Lihua, WANG Jin, GAO Yang. Reservoir Characteristics and Influence Factors of Gravel Sandstone:Case Study of Upper Triassic Karamay Formation in Hongshanzhui Area [J]. Geoscience, 2019, 33(06): 1188-1198. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||