Geoscience ›› 2020, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (05): 945-956.DOI: 10.19657/j.geoscience.1000-8527.2020.062
• Geochemistry • Previous Articles Next Articles
YAO Ning(), GONG Qingjie(
), WANG Xuyang, CHAO Yuede, PENG Cheng, WU Yuan, LIU Ningqiang
Received:
2020-05-20
Revised:
2020-08-20
Online:
2020-10-28
Published:
2020-10-29
Contact:
GONG Qingjie
CLC Number:
YAO Ning, GONG Qingjie, WANG Xuyang, CHAO Yuede, PENG Cheng, WU Yuan, LIU Ningqiang. Bimodal Mixing Model on the Dolomite Alteration Geochemistry in the Yangshudixia Gold Deposit in Huairou, Beijing[J]. Geoscience, 2020, 34(05): 945-956.
样 号 | 岩 性 | SiO2 | Al2O3 | TFe2O3 | MgO | CaO | Na2O | K2O | 烧失量 | 总 量 | Ti | P | Mn |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D05 | 白云岩 | 0.72 | 0.07 | 0.15 | 24.30 | 29.00 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 45.60 | 99.91 | 38 | 114 | 104 |
D02 | 白云岩 | 2.08 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 24.20 | 28.60 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 44.90 | 99.93 | 44 | 96 | 54 |
D03 | 蚀变岩 | 30.00 | 0.06 | 0.16 | 16.10 | 20.70 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 32.80 | 99.89 | 66 | 76 | 286 |
D04 | 蚀变岩 | 42.30 | 0.16 | 0.13 | 12.70 | 17.60 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 27.00 | 99.99 | 45 | 105 | 94 |
D06 | 石英脉 | 96.70 | 1.69 | 0.29 | 0.20 | 0.14 | 0.07 | 0.44 | 0.37 | 99.90 | 316 | 216 | 86 |
D07 | 石英脉 | 96.10 | 1.91 | 0.30 | 0.40 | 0.16 | 0.52 | 0.20 | 0.26 | 99.85 | 785 | 116 | 92 |
最大值 | — | 96.70 | 1.91 | 0.30 | 24.30 | 29.00 | 0.52 | 0.44 | 45.60 | 99.99 | 785 | 216 | 286 |
最小值 | — | 0.72 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.20 | 0.14 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.26 | 99.85 | 38 | 76 | 54 |
检出限 | — | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.01 | — | 50 | 10 | 10 |
D25Avg | 白云岩 | 1.40 | 0.05 | 0.11 | 24.30 | 28.80 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 45.30 | 99.92 | 41 | 105 | 79 |
D67Avg | 石英脉 | 96.40 | 1.80 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.15 | 0.30 | 0.32 | 0.32 | 99.88 | 551 | 166 | 89 |
Table 1 Major element (oxide) contents of the samples
样 号 | 岩 性 | SiO2 | Al2O3 | TFe2O3 | MgO | CaO | Na2O | K2O | 烧失量 | 总 量 | Ti | P | Mn |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D05 | 白云岩 | 0.72 | 0.07 | 0.15 | 24.30 | 29.00 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 45.60 | 99.91 | 38 | 114 | 104 |
D02 | 白云岩 | 2.08 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 24.20 | 28.60 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 44.90 | 99.93 | 44 | 96 | 54 |
D03 | 蚀变岩 | 30.00 | 0.06 | 0.16 | 16.10 | 20.70 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 32.80 | 99.89 | 66 | 76 | 286 |
D04 | 蚀变岩 | 42.30 | 0.16 | 0.13 | 12.70 | 17.60 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 27.00 | 99.99 | 45 | 105 | 94 |
D06 | 石英脉 | 96.70 | 1.69 | 0.29 | 0.20 | 0.14 | 0.07 | 0.44 | 0.37 | 99.90 | 316 | 216 | 86 |
D07 | 石英脉 | 96.10 | 1.91 | 0.30 | 0.40 | 0.16 | 0.52 | 0.20 | 0.26 | 99.85 | 785 | 116 | 92 |
最大值 | — | 96.70 | 1.91 | 0.30 | 24.30 | 29.00 | 0.52 | 0.44 | 45.60 | 99.99 | 785 | 216 | 286 |
最小值 | — | 0.72 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.20 | 0.14 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.26 | 99.85 | 38 | 76 | 54 |
检出限 | — | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.01 | — | 50 | 10 | 10 |
D25Avg | 白云岩 | 1.40 | 0.05 | 0.11 | 24.30 | 28.80 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 45.30 | 99.92 | 41 | 105 | 79 |
D67Avg | 石英脉 | 96.40 | 1.80 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.15 | 0.30 | 0.32 | 0.32 | 99.88 | 551 | 166 | 89 |
样号 | 岩性 | Mo | W | Cu | Ag | Au | Zn | Cd | Hg | Sn | Pb | As | Sb | Bi |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D05 | 白云岩 | 0.30 | 0.2 | 2.5 | 243 | 1.35 | 29.5 | 4 151 | 51.7 | 1.9 | 18.1 | 0.10 | 0.04 | 0.52 |
D02 | 白云岩 | 0.60 | 0.2 | 3.0 | 154 | 1.66 | 11.5 | 2 918 | 3.3 | 1.1 | 11.5 | 0.10 | 0.04 | 0.56 |
D03 | 蚀变岩 | 0.35 | 0.2 | 2.8 | 478 | 0.95 | 54.6 | 1 476 | 15.0 | 0.7 | 12.2 | 0.45 | 0.03 | 0.60 |
D04 | 蚀变岩 | 0.35 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 175 | 1.07 | 6.9 | 1 643 | 52.5 | 0.8 | 6.2 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.24 |
D06 | 石英脉 | 0.18 | 0.9 | 2.6 | 210 | 0.74 | 19.7 | 99 | 68.3 | 1.3 | 14.2 | 4.85 | 0.03 | 0.08 |
D07 | 石英脉 | 0.34 | 3.7 | 8.4 | 326 | 1.50 | 9.3 | 75 | 43.3 | 0.9 | 20.3 | 1.11 | 0.01 | 0.55 |
最大值 | - | 0.60 | 3.7 | 8.4 | 478 | 1.66 | 54.6 | 4 151 | 68.3 | 1.9 | 20.3 | 4.6 | 0.05 | 0.60 |
最小值 | - | 0.18 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 154 | 0.74 | 6.9 | 75 | 3.3 | 0.7 | 6.2 | 0.1 | 0.01 | 0.08 |
检出限 | - | 0.02 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 20 | 0.20 | 5.0 | 20 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.2 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
D25Avg | 白云岩 | 0.45 | 0.2 | 2.7 | 199 | 1.50 | 20.5 | 3 535 | 27.5 | 1.5 | 14.8 | 0.09 | 0.22 | 0.54 |
D67Avg | 石英脉 | 0.26 | 2.3 | 5.5 | 268 | 1.12 | 14.5 | 87 | 55.8 | 1.1 | 17.2 | 2.98 | 0.02 | 0.31 |
样号 | 岩性 | Li | Be | Sr | Ba | Rb | Cs | Sc | V | Cr | Co | Ni | La | Y |
D05 | 白云岩 | 13.7 | 0.30 | 28.2 | 56 | 8.7 | 3.33 | 36.3 | 2.9 | 2.4 | 1.89 | 9.49 | 1.3 | 2.0 |
D02 | 白云岩 | 10.6 | 0.20 | 32.2 | 86 | 6.5 | 2.22 | 29.5 | 1.0 | 2.4 | 1.63 | 9.18 | 1.2 | 1.2 |
D03 | 蚀变岩 | 7.4 | 0.21 | 25.6 | 93 | 4.5 | 1.27 | 21.4 | 4.3 | 5.2 | 2.46 | 9.71 | 1.0 | 3.2 |
D04 | 蚀变岩 | 5.7 | 0.18 | 22.9 | 73 | 4.5 | 1.33 | 14.4 | 1.3 | 3.5 | 0.86 | 5.93 | 0.8 | 0.7 |
D06 | 石英脉 | 15.9 | 0.18 | 3.7 | 331 | 20.9 | 1.29 | 0.71 | 5.7 | 7.0 | 0.23 | 0.82 | 4.1 | 2.2 |
D07 | 石英脉 | 2.9 | 0.30 | 3.7 | 126 | 12.3 | 0.62 | 0.77 | 8.7 | 7.3 | 0.40 | 0.98 | 4.9 | 4.6 |
最大值 | - | 15.9 | 0.30 | 32.0 | 331 | 21.0 | 3.33 | 36.3 | 9.0 | 7.0 | 2.46 | 10.00 | 4.9 | 4.6 |
最小值 | - | 2.9 | 0.18 | 3.7 | 56 | 4.5 | 0.62 | 0.71 | 1.0 | 2.4 | 0.23 | 0.82 | 0.8 | 0.7 |
检出限 | - | 1.0 | 0.20 | 0.4 | 5 | 1.0 | 0.20 | 0.60 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
D25Avg | 白云岩 | 12.1 | 0.25 | 30.2 | 71 | 7.6 | 2.77 | 32.9 | 1.9 | 2.4 | 1.76 | 9.33 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
D67Avg | 石英脉 | 9.4 | 0.24 | 3.7 | 228 | 16.6 | 0.96 | 0.74 | 7.2 | 7.1 | 0.32 | 0.90 | 4.5 | 3.4 |
样号 | 岩性 | Zr | Hf | Nb | Ta | Th | U | B | F | Ga | In | Tl | Ge | Se |
D05 | 白云岩 | 12.0 | 0.36 | 0.5 | 0.53 | 0.2 | 0.32 | 38 | 55 | 0.4 | 0.09 | 0.62 | 0.09 | 0.10 |
D02 | 白云岩 | 9.4 | 0.29 | 0.5 | 2.02 | 0.2 | 0.16 | 30 | 384 | 0.4 | 0.07 | 0.52 | 0.11 | 0.03 |
D03 | 蚀变岩 | 7.4 | 0.22 | 0.5 | 0.37 | 0.3 | 0.34 | 35 | 124 | 0.4 | 0.03 | 0.24 | 0.30 | 0.15 |
D04 | 蚀变岩 | 5.5 | 0.16 | 0.5 | 0.40 | 0.2 | 0.15 | 40 | 107 | 0.2 | 0.04 | 0.30 | 1.02 | 0.10 |
D06 | 石英脉 | 18.4 | 0.58 | 1.9 | 0.15 | 1.9 | 1.01 | 146 | 218 | 2.4 | 0.01 | 0.43 | 0.97 | 0.17 |
D07 | 石英脉 | 19.9 | 0.61 | 5.3 | 0.08 | 0.5 | 1.14 | 319 | 132 | 3.5 | 0.01 | 0.16 | 0.47 | 0.12 |
最大值 | — | 20.0 | 0.61 | 5.3 | 2.02 | 1.9 | 1.14 | 319 | 384 | 3.5 | 0.09 | 0.62 | 1.02 | 0.17 |
最小值 | — | 5.5 | 0.16 | 0.5 | 0.08 | 0.2 | 0.15 | 30 | 55 | 0.2 | 0.01 | 0.16 | 0.09 | 0.03 |
检出限 | — | 5.0 | 0.20 | 2.0 | 0.10 | 0.2 | 0.10 | 1 | 100 | 2.0 | 0.01 | 0.1 | 0.10 | 0.01 |
D25Avg | 白云岩 | 10.7 | 0.33 | 0.5 | 1.27 | 0.2 | 0.24 | 34 | 219 | 0.4 | 0.08 | 0.57 | 0.10 | 0.07 |
D67Avg | 石英脉 | 19.2 | 0.59 | 3.6 | 0.12 | 1.2 | 1.07 | 233 | 175 | 3.0 | 0.01 | 0.29 | 0.72 | 0.14 |
Table 2 Trace element contents of the samples
样号 | 岩性 | Mo | W | Cu | Ag | Au | Zn | Cd | Hg | Sn | Pb | As | Sb | Bi |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D05 | 白云岩 | 0.30 | 0.2 | 2.5 | 243 | 1.35 | 29.5 | 4 151 | 51.7 | 1.9 | 18.1 | 0.10 | 0.04 | 0.52 |
D02 | 白云岩 | 0.60 | 0.2 | 3.0 | 154 | 1.66 | 11.5 | 2 918 | 3.3 | 1.1 | 11.5 | 0.10 | 0.04 | 0.56 |
D03 | 蚀变岩 | 0.35 | 0.2 | 2.8 | 478 | 0.95 | 54.6 | 1 476 | 15.0 | 0.7 | 12.2 | 0.45 | 0.03 | 0.60 |
D04 | 蚀变岩 | 0.35 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 175 | 1.07 | 6.9 | 1 643 | 52.5 | 0.8 | 6.2 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.24 |
D06 | 石英脉 | 0.18 | 0.9 | 2.6 | 210 | 0.74 | 19.7 | 99 | 68.3 | 1.3 | 14.2 | 4.85 | 0.03 | 0.08 |
D07 | 石英脉 | 0.34 | 3.7 | 8.4 | 326 | 1.50 | 9.3 | 75 | 43.3 | 0.9 | 20.3 | 1.11 | 0.01 | 0.55 |
最大值 | - | 0.60 | 3.7 | 8.4 | 478 | 1.66 | 54.6 | 4 151 | 68.3 | 1.9 | 20.3 | 4.6 | 0.05 | 0.60 |
最小值 | - | 0.18 | 0.2 | 1.5 | 154 | 0.74 | 6.9 | 75 | 3.3 | 0.7 | 6.2 | 0.1 | 0.01 | 0.08 |
检出限 | - | 0.02 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 20 | 0.20 | 5.0 | 20 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 0.2 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
D25Avg | 白云岩 | 0.45 | 0.2 | 2.7 | 199 | 1.50 | 20.5 | 3 535 | 27.5 | 1.5 | 14.8 | 0.09 | 0.22 | 0.54 |
D67Avg | 石英脉 | 0.26 | 2.3 | 5.5 | 268 | 1.12 | 14.5 | 87 | 55.8 | 1.1 | 17.2 | 2.98 | 0.02 | 0.31 |
样号 | 岩性 | Li | Be | Sr | Ba | Rb | Cs | Sc | V | Cr | Co | Ni | La | Y |
D05 | 白云岩 | 13.7 | 0.30 | 28.2 | 56 | 8.7 | 3.33 | 36.3 | 2.9 | 2.4 | 1.89 | 9.49 | 1.3 | 2.0 |
D02 | 白云岩 | 10.6 | 0.20 | 32.2 | 86 | 6.5 | 2.22 | 29.5 | 1.0 | 2.4 | 1.63 | 9.18 | 1.2 | 1.2 |
D03 | 蚀变岩 | 7.4 | 0.21 | 25.6 | 93 | 4.5 | 1.27 | 21.4 | 4.3 | 5.2 | 2.46 | 9.71 | 1.0 | 3.2 |
D04 | 蚀变岩 | 5.7 | 0.18 | 22.9 | 73 | 4.5 | 1.33 | 14.4 | 1.3 | 3.5 | 0.86 | 5.93 | 0.8 | 0.7 |
D06 | 石英脉 | 15.9 | 0.18 | 3.7 | 331 | 20.9 | 1.29 | 0.71 | 5.7 | 7.0 | 0.23 | 0.82 | 4.1 | 2.2 |
D07 | 石英脉 | 2.9 | 0.30 | 3.7 | 126 | 12.3 | 0.62 | 0.77 | 8.7 | 7.3 | 0.40 | 0.98 | 4.9 | 4.6 |
最大值 | - | 15.9 | 0.30 | 32.0 | 331 | 21.0 | 3.33 | 36.3 | 9.0 | 7.0 | 2.46 | 10.00 | 4.9 | 4.6 |
最小值 | - | 2.9 | 0.18 | 3.7 | 56 | 4.5 | 0.62 | 0.71 | 1.0 | 2.4 | 0.23 | 0.82 | 0.8 | 0.7 |
检出限 | - | 1.0 | 0.20 | 0.4 | 5 | 1.0 | 0.20 | 0.60 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
D25Avg | 白云岩 | 12.1 | 0.25 | 30.2 | 71 | 7.6 | 2.77 | 32.9 | 1.9 | 2.4 | 1.76 | 9.33 | 1.2 | 1.6 |
D67Avg | 石英脉 | 9.4 | 0.24 | 3.7 | 228 | 16.6 | 0.96 | 0.74 | 7.2 | 7.1 | 0.32 | 0.90 | 4.5 | 3.4 |
样号 | 岩性 | Zr | Hf | Nb | Ta | Th | U | B | F | Ga | In | Tl | Ge | Se |
D05 | 白云岩 | 12.0 | 0.36 | 0.5 | 0.53 | 0.2 | 0.32 | 38 | 55 | 0.4 | 0.09 | 0.62 | 0.09 | 0.10 |
D02 | 白云岩 | 9.4 | 0.29 | 0.5 | 2.02 | 0.2 | 0.16 | 30 | 384 | 0.4 | 0.07 | 0.52 | 0.11 | 0.03 |
D03 | 蚀变岩 | 7.4 | 0.22 | 0.5 | 0.37 | 0.3 | 0.34 | 35 | 124 | 0.4 | 0.03 | 0.24 | 0.30 | 0.15 |
D04 | 蚀变岩 | 5.5 | 0.16 | 0.5 | 0.40 | 0.2 | 0.15 | 40 | 107 | 0.2 | 0.04 | 0.30 | 1.02 | 0.10 |
D06 | 石英脉 | 18.4 | 0.58 | 1.9 | 0.15 | 1.9 | 1.01 | 146 | 218 | 2.4 | 0.01 | 0.43 | 0.97 | 0.17 |
D07 | 石英脉 | 19.9 | 0.61 | 5.3 | 0.08 | 0.5 | 1.14 | 319 | 132 | 3.5 | 0.01 | 0.16 | 0.47 | 0.12 |
最大值 | — | 20.0 | 0.61 | 5.3 | 2.02 | 1.9 | 1.14 | 319 | 384 | 3.5 | 0.09 | 0.62 | 1.02 | 0.17 |
最小值 | — | 5.5 | 0.16 | 0.5 | 0.08 | 0.2 | 0.15 | 30 | 55 | 0.2 | 0.01 | 0.16 | 0.09 | 0.03 |
检出限 | — | 5.0 | 0.20 | 2.0 | 0.10 | 0.2 | 0.10 | 1 | 100 | 2.0 | 0.01 | 0.1 | 0.10 | 0.01 |
D25Avg | 白云岩 | 10.7 | 0.33 | 0.5 | 1.27 | 0.2 | 0.24 | 34 | 219 | 0.4 | 0.08 | 0.57 | 0.10 | 0.07 |
D67Avg | 石英脉 | 19.2 | 0.59 | 3.6 | 0.12 | 1.2 | 1.07 | 233 | 175 | 3.0 | 0.01 | 0.29 | 0.72 | 0.14 |
[1] | 陈淳福, 梁有彬. 内生金矿床围岩蚀变及其找矿意义[J]. 地质找矿论丛, 1990,5(3):63-70. |
[2] | 荆勇河, 田艳丽, 张瀚夫, 等. 围岩蚀变对内生金属矿床勘查的意义[J]. 西部资源, 2014(5):92-94. |
[3] | 高斌, 马东升. 围岩蚀变过程中地球化学组份质量迁移计算——以湖南沃溪Au-Sb-W矿床为例[J]. 地质找矿论丛, 1999,14(2):25-31. |
[4] | 张志超, 李楠, 戢兴忠, 等. 西秦岭阳山金矿带安坝矿床热液蚀变作用[J]. 岩石学报, 2015,31(11):3405-3419. |
[5] |
GRANT J A. The Isocon diagram—A simple solution to Gresens’ equation for metasomatic alteration[J]. Economic Geology, 1986,81:1-5.
DOI URL |
[6] | 邓海琳, 涂光炽, 李朝阳, 等. 地球化学开放系统的质量平衡:1.理论[J]. 矿物学报, 1999,19(2):121-131. |
[7] | 凌其聪, 刘丛强. 层控夕卡岩型矿床成矿系统的元素活动性及质量迁移——以铜陵冬瓜山铜矿床为例[J]. 矿物学报, 2003,23(1):37-44. |
[8] |
VOLLMER R. Rb-Sr and U-Th-Pb systematics of alkaline rocks: the alkaline rocks from Italy[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1976,40(3):283-295.
DOI URL |
[9] | LANGMUIR C H, VOCKE R D, HANSON G N, et al. A general mixing equation with applications to Icelandic basalts[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1978,37(3):390-392. |
[10] |
SULLIVAN M D, HASZELDINE R S, FALLICK A E. Linear coupling of carbon and strontium isotopes in Rotliegend Sandstone,North Sea: Evidence for cross-formational fluid flow[J]. Geology, 1990,18(12):1215-1218.
DOI URL |
[11] |
SPERA F J. Energy-constrained open-system magmatic processes I: general model and energy-constrained assimilation and fractional crystallization (EC-AFC) Formulation[J]. Journal of Petrology, 2001,42(5):999-1018.
DOI URL |
[12] |
BOHRSON W A. Energy-constrained open-system magmatic processes II: application of energy-constrained assimilation-fractional crystallization (EC-AFC) model to magmatic systems[J]. Journal of Petrology, 2001,42(5):1019-1041.
DOI URL |
[13] |
GRESENS R L . Composition-volume relationships of metasomatism[J]. Chemical Geology, 1967,2:47-65.
DOI URL |
[14] |
GONG Q J, DENG J, YANG L, et al. Behavior of major and trace elements during weathering of sericite-quartz schist[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2011,42(1/2):1-13.
DOI URL |
[15] | 龚庆杰, 周连壮, 胡杨, 等. 胶东玲珑金矿田煌斑岩蚀变过程元素迁移行为及其意义[J]. 现代地质, 2012,26(5):1065-1077. |
[16] | 周连壮. 胶东玲珑金矿田西山矿段元素迁移行为及其意义[D]. 北京:中国地质大学(北京), 2013. |
[17] | 牛会良. 北京怀柔杨树底下金矿床地质特征[J]. 科学时代, 2012(12):195. |
[18] |
PASSCHIER C W, ZHANG J S, KONOPASEK J. Geometric aspects of synkinematic granite intrusion into a ductile shear zone—an example from the Yunmengshan core complex, northern China[J]. Geological Society,London,Special Publications, 2005,245(1):65-80.
DOI URL |
[19] |
WANG T, GUO L, ZHENG Y, et al. Timing and processes of Late Mesozoic mid-lower-crustal extension in continental NE Asia and implications for the tectonic setting of the destruction of the North China Craton: Mainly constrained by zircon U-Pb ages from metamorphic core complexes[J]. Lithos, 2012,154(6):315-345.
DOI URL |
[20] |
ZHU Guang, CHEN Yin, JIANG Dazhi, et al. Rapid change from compression to extension in the North China Craton during the Early Cretaceous: Evidence from the Yunmengshan metamorphic core complex[J]. Tectonophysics, 2015,656:91-110.
DOI URL |
[21] | 北京市地质矿产局. 北京市区域地质志[J]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1991. |
[22] | 陈贤, 张传恒, 刘家军, 等. 蓟县常州沟组沉积特征及其地质意义[J]. 地层学杂志, 2014,38(2):236-244. |
[23] | 李怀永, 郝河, 马学利, 等. 北京市怀柔县崎峰茶金矿区普查地质报告 [R]. 北京:北京市地质矿产局101队, 1996: 11-12. |
[24] | 任国选, 孟祥化, 葛铭, 等. 蓟县地区雾迷山组硅质岩成因研究[J]. 沉积学报, 2008,26(1):70-76. |
[25] | 吕金波, 卢耀如, 郑桂森, 等. 北京西山岩溶洞系的形成及其与新构造运动的关系[J]. 地质通报, 2010,29(4):502-509. |
[26] | 李中坚, 陈柏林, 董法先, 等. 北京怀柔崎峰茶—得田沟金矿田断裂构造及其控矿作用[J]. 地质力学学报, 1998,( 2):23-31. |
[27] | 崔艳合, 彭明生. 北京市得田沟金矿床矿物特征和金的赋存状态[J]. 矿床地质, 1994,13(3):260-270. |
[28] |
XIE X J, CHENG H X. Sixty years of exploration geochemistry in China[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 2014,139:4-8.
DOI URL |
[29] |
LI M, XI X H, XIAO G Y, et al. National multi-purpose regional geochemical survey in China[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 2014,139:21-30.
DOI URL |
[30] |
BAUMGARTNER L P, OLSEN S N. A least-squares approach to mass transport calculations using the isocon method[J]. Economic Geology, 1995,90(5):1261-1270.
DOI URL |
[1] | HE Yunlong, ZHANG Guobin, YANG Yanchen, FENG Yue, KONG Jingui, CHEN Xingkai. Genesis and Tectonics of the Sipingshan Gold Deposit in Nadanhada Terrane, Sikhote-Alin Orogen: Constraints from Zircon U-Pb Chronology, Petrological and Fluid Geochemistry [J]. Geoscience, 2024, 38(01): 128-153. |
[2] | RAN Xiaoyu, MA Yao, LIANG Yayun, LIU Xuefei. Trace Elements Composition of Pyrites in the Cangshang Gold Deposit,Jiaodong: Implications for Source of Ore-forming Fluid and Material [J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(06): 1495-1508. |
[3] | NIE Qiong, NIE Zhibao, CHEN Jian, DING Shijun, WU Saier, LI Duo, GE Runze, CHEN Ruichen. Development Characteristics and Risk Assessment of the Damogou Debris Flow in Mentougou District, Beijing [J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(04): 1013-1022. |
[4] | XUE Zhongkai, FAN Baocheng, HUANG Haoqing, TANG Weidong, GE Zhanlin, LI Pengwei, HU Jianhui, YANG Xiaoqi, GUO Yongchao, LI Kong. Geochronology and Geochemistry of the Intermediate-basic Dikes in the Beishan Area, Inner Mongolia: Implications for Tectonic Evolution of the Northern Margin of the Tarim Plate [J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(03): 627-644. |
[5] | LI Chenglu, FU Anzong, XU Wenxi, YUAN Maowen, LIU Baoshan, YANG Wenpeng, ZHAO Ruijun, ZHAO Zhonghai. Characteristics of Structural Superimposed Halo and Deep Prospecting Prediction of Yongxin Gold Deposit, Duobaoshan Area,Heilongjiang Province [J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(03): 674-689. |
[6] | HU Qinghai, WANG Xueqiu, HAN Zhixuan, CHENG Xiaomeng, WU Hui, TIAN Mi, LIU Futian, SUN Binbin, CHEN Weiming, DU Xuemiao, LIU Bin, CUI Xingtao. Geochemical Characteristics of Heavy Metals in Soils and Soil Quality Evaluation of Green Food Production in the Yongqing County of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region [J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(03): 778-789. |
[7] | ZHANG Gaixia, SUN Jinjiajie, GONG Qingjie, JIANG Biao, YAN Taotao. Geochemical Genes for the Weathering of Dolomite at the Shangmanggang Gold Deposit Area in Luxi, Yunnan, SW China [J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(03): 801-812. |
[8] | LIU Yongbiao, LI Shengye, ZHAO Jichang, FAN Xinxiang, YANG Zhenxi, CHEN Haiyun. Ore Prospecting Effect of Cuttage Survey in Weak Anomaly Area of Stream Sediment Survey in Beishan, Gansu Province:Taking the Discovery of Heishannan Gold Mine in Yanchi as An Example [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(06): 1525-1537. |
[9] | LIAN Chenqin, YAO Fojun, FENG Zhiming, YANG Jianmin, JIA Xiangxiang. Mineral Resources Prospecting by Synthetic Application of Multi-Source Data in the Shanyangba Area, Gansu, China [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(06): 1605-1612. |
[10] | FU Song, LI Shehong, MA Wenen, JIANG Chao, XIE Zhuolin, WU Jinming, HU Xuhan, ZHANG Zitong. Age-dating of Sulfide Re-Os in Quartz Vein-type Copper Deposits in Longwei Area, Guangxi and Its Significance [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(04): 1146-1154. |
[11] | ZHU Dequan, TANG Mingying, DING Zhengjiang, ZHU Haibo, WANG Weixiao, ZHANG Yu, HE Zongwei, WU Hongbin. Petrogenesis and Geodynamic Setting of Granite Porphyry Dike in Saibagou Gold Deposit,Northern Margin of Qaidam: Evidence from Geochronology and Geochemistry [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(03): 898-910. |
[12] | BAI Xiangyu, MA Junwei, XIA Qingping, TAN Xianfeng, LI Kaikai. Geochemistry of Carbonates Near the Cambrian Series 3-Furongian Boundary and Its Paleoenvironmental Constraints [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(02): 729-741. |
[13] | LIU Ji, YANG Ke, ZHANG Xiaoxing, KOU Shaolei, YANG Wei, WANG Zhanbin, TIAN Yuan. Geological Characteristics and Genesis of the Xinjiazui Gold Deposit in Back-Longmenshan Orogenic Belt [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(01): 378-388. |
[14] | WANG Bin, SONG Yiwei, SUN Biao, YANG Ke, MA Zhenyu, KANG Chengxin, ZHANG Wang, JIANG Dongxiang, TANG Yuanhe, YANG Yang, JI Shengjun, NIU Qiusheng. Structural Superimposing Halo Practical Modeling and Deep Prospecting Prediction of Zhaishang Gold Deposit in the Gansu Province [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(06): 1504-1514. |
[15] | GAO Yinhu, YIN Gang, GONG Zeqiang, GUO Mingchun. Geological Characteristics and Genesis of the Xiangtanzi Gold Deposit in Liangdang County, Gansu Province [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(06): 1523-1535. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||