Geoscience ›› 2019, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (04): 794-801.DOI: 10.19657/j.geoscience.1000-8527.2019.04.10
• Geochemistry • Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Shikuan1(), WANG He2, WANG Zhe1, HOU Tuo1, LI Xiaowei1, FENG Haiyan1(
)
Received:
2018-12-24
Revised:
2019-04-13
Online:
2019-08-20
Published:
2019-09-05
Contact:
FENG Haiyan
CLC Number:
WANG Shikuan, WANG He, WANG Zhe, HOU Tuo, LI Xiaowei, FENG Haiyan. Geochemical Characteristics of Nutrient Elements in Soils of the Wohushan Farm in the Wudalianchi Area, Heilongjiang Province[J]. Geoscience, 2019, 33(04): 794-801.
测试指标 | 分析方法 | 检出限 | 准确度 | 精密度 |
---|---|---|---|---|
N | VOL | 20 | 0.032 | 2.50 |
P | XRF | 10 | 0.036 | 0.78 |
K2O | ICP-AES | 0.05* | 0.036 | 3.84 |
CaO | ICP-AES | 0.05* | 0.015 | 4.17 |
MgO | ICP-AES | 0.05* | 0.011 | 3.60 |
S | XRF | 30 | 0.039 | 0.78 |
TFe2O3 | ICP-AES | 0.05* | 0.013 | 0.46 |
Mn | ICP-AES | 10 | 0.011 | 3.92 |
Cu | ICP-AES | 1 | 0.022 | 6.06 |
Zn | XRF | 4 | 0.007 | 1.39 |
B | ES | 1 | 0.013 | 11.91 |
Mo | ICP-MS | 0.3 | 0.016 | 4.86 |
Cl | XRF | 20 | 0.018 | 5.51 |
Corg | VOL | 0.1* | 0.035 | 3.32 |
pH | ISE | 0.10** | 0.040 | 0.04 |
Table 1 Detection limit and results of geochemical indicators in soil
测试指标 | 分析方法 | 检出限 | 准确度 | 精密度 |
---|---|---|---|---|
N | VOL | 20 | 0.032 | 2.50 |
P | XRF | 10 | 0.036 | 0.78 |
K2O | ICP-AES | 0.05* | 0.036 | 3.84 |
CaO | ICP-AES | 0.05* | 0.015 | 4.17 |
MgO | ICP-AES | 0.05* | 0.011 | 3.60 |
S | XRF | 30 | 0.039 | 0.78 |
TFe2O3 | ICP-AES | 0.05* | 0.013 | 0.46 |
Mn | ICP-AES | 10 | 0.011 | 3.92 |
Cu | ICP-AES | 1 | 0.022 | 6.06 |
Zn | XRF | 4 | 0.007 | 1.39 |
B | ES | 1 | 0.013 | 11.91 |
Mo | ICP-MS | 0.3 | 0.016 | 4.86 |
Cl | XRF | 20 | 0.018 | 5.51 |
Corg | VOL | 0.1* | 0.035 | 3.32 |
pH | ISE | 0.10** | 0.040 | 0.04 |
指标 | 一级 | 二级 | 三级 | 四级 | 五级 | 上限值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
很丰富 | 丰 | 适中 | 稍缺 | 缺 | ||
全氮/(g/kg) | >2 | 1.5~2 | 1~1.5 | 0.75~1 | ≤0.75 | |
全磷/(g/kg) | >1 | 0.8~1 | 0.6~0.8 | 0.4~0.6 | ≤0.4 | |
全钾/(g/kg) | >25 | 20~25 | 5~20 | 10~15 | ≤10 | |
氧化钙/% | >5.54 | 2.68~5.54 | 1.16~2.68 | 0.42~1.16 | ≤0.42 | |
氧化镁/% | >2.15 | 1.70~2.15 | 1.20~1.70 | 0.70~1.20 | ≤0.70 | |
硫/(mg/kg) | >343 | 270~343 | 219~270 | 172~219 | ≤172 | ≥2 000 |
钼/(mg/kg) | >0.85 | 0.65~0.85 | 0.55~0.65 | 0.45~0.55 | ≤0.45 | ≥4 |
锰/(mg/kg) | >700 | 600~700 | 500~600 | 375~500 | ≤375 | ≥1 500 |
铜/(mg/kg) | >29 | 24~29 | 21~24 | 16~21 | ≤16 | ≥50 |
锌/(mg/kg) | >84 | 71~84 | 62~71 | 50~62 | ≤50 | ≥200 |
氧化铁/% | >5.30 | 4.60~5.30 | 4.15~4.60 | 3.40~4.15 | ≤3.40 | |
硼/(mg/kg) | >65 | 55~65 | 45~55 | 30~45 | ≤30 | ≥3 000 |
有机质/(g/kg) | >40 | 30~40 | 20~30 | 10~20 | ≤10 |
Table 2 Classification standard of soil nutrient elements
指标 | 一级 | 二级 | 三级 | 四级 | 五级 | 上限值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
很丰富 | 丰 | 适中 | 稍缺 | 缺 | ||
全氮/(g/kg) | >2 | 1.5~2 | 1~1.5 | 0.75~1 | ≤0.75 | |
全磷/(g/kg) | >1 | 0.8~1 | 0.6~0.8 | 0.4~0.6 | ≤0.4 | |
全钾/(g/kg) | >25 | 20~25 | 5~20 | 10~15 | ≤10 | |
氧化钙/% | >5.54 | 2.68~5.54 | 1.16~2.68 | 0.42~1.16 | ≤0.42 | |
氧化镁/% | >2.15 | 1.70~2.15 | 1.20~1.70 | 0.70~1.20 | ≤0.70 | |
硫/(mg/kg) | >343 | 270~343 | 219~270 | 172~219 | ≤172 | ≥2 000 |
钼/(mg/kg) | >0.85 | 0.65~0.85 | 0.55~0.65 | 0.45~0.55 | ≤0.45 | ≥4 |
锰/(mg/kg) | >700 | 600~700 | 500~600 | 375~500 | ≤375 | ≥1 500 |
铜/(mg/kg) | >29 | 24~29 | 21~24 | 16~21 | ≤16 | ≥50 |
锌/(mg/kg) | >84 | 71~84 | 62~71 | 50~62 | ≤50 | ≥200 |
氧化铁/% | >5.30 | 4.60~5.30 | 4.15~4.60 | 3.40~4.15 | ≤3.40 | |
硼/(mg/kg) | >65 | 55~65 | 45~55 | 30~45 | ≤30 | ≥3 000 |
有机质/(g/kg) | >40 | 30~40 | 20~30 | 10~20 | ≤10 |
[1] | 魏勇强. 用地预审工作中永久基本农田的重要性分析[J]. 城市地理, 2016(24):94. |
[2] | 陆文祥, 李明东, 魏学铭. 黑龙江省五大连池农场大豆优质高产掠影[J]. 农场经济管理, 2016(11):70-71. |
[3] | 赵其国. 中国的火山灰土[J]. 土壤学报, 1988,22(4):323-329. |
[4] | 黑龙江省土地管理局. 黑龙江土壤[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1992: 326-334. |
[5] | 崔玉军, 时永明, 刘国栋, 等. 黑龙江省松嫩平原南部黑土的元素含量特征[J]. 现代地质, 2008,22(6):929-933. |
[6] | 雷国平, 代路, 宋戈. 黑龙江省典型黑土区土壤生态环境质量评价[J]. 农业工程学报, 2009,25(7):243-248. |
[7] | 隋跃宇, 张兴义, 张少良, 等. 黑龙江典型县域农田黑土土壤有机质现状分析[J]. 土壤通报, 2008,39(1):186-188. |
[8] | 辛刚, 颜丽, 汪景宽, 等. 不同开垦年限黑土有机质变化的研究[J]. 土壤通报, 2002,33(5):332-335. |
[9] | 付嵩, 丁玉进, 张新远, 等. 青海省民和县新民—李二堡地区土壤养分地球化学特征分析[J]. 现代地质, 2018,32(5):1103-1108. |
[10] | 张文华. 五大连池火山地貌世界地质公园[J]. 生物学教学, 2005,30(5):19-20. |
[11] | 黑龙江省黑河地区科学技术委员会, 黑龙江省德都县科学技术委员会. 黑龙江省德都五大连池火山地质和矿产资源的综合利用[M]. 黑河: 黑龙江省黑河地区科学技术委员会, 1974: 9-21. |
[12] |
周志强, 徐丽娇, 张玉红, 等. 黑龙江五大连池的生态价值分析[J]. 生物多样性, 2011,19(1):63-70.
DOI PMID |
[13] | 杨忠芳, 余涛, 李敏, 等. DZ/T0295—2016. 土地质量地球化学评价规范[S]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2016: 1-52. |
[14] | 刘忠, 尚义. 植物必需营养元素的来源[J]. 现代农业, 2011(11):28-29. |
[15] | 王忠. 植物生理学[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2000: 80-89. |
[16] | 唐将, 李勇, 邓富银, 等. 三峡库区土壤营养元素分布特征研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2005,42(3):473-478. |
[17] | 顾清, 庞海云, 丁险峰, 等. 中量营养元素在农业生产上的应用[J]. 现代化农业, 2006(11):16-18. |
[18] | 吕选忠. 元素生物学[M]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学出版社, 2011: 238-312. |
[19] | 马扶林, 宋理明, 王建民. 土壤微量元素的研究概述[J]. 青海科技, 2009,16(3):32-36. |
[20] | 马扶林. 微量元素对农作物品质影响概述[J]. 青海草业, 2009,18(2):32-35. |
[21] | 汤璐, 汤英. 中、微量元素对主要农产品品质的影响综述[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2008,14(19):61-63. |
[22] | 李德军, 莫江明, 方运霆, 等. 鼎湖山自然保护区不同演替阶段森林土壤中有效微量元素状况研究[J]. 广西植物, 2004,24(6):529-534. |
[23] | 窦森. 土壤有机质[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010: 14-15. |
[24] | 方小满, 施雯, 李非里, 等. 溶解性有机质对水中重金属生物有效性的影响研究[J]. 环境科技, 2016,29(2):59-63. |
[25] | 宋刚, 胡腾胜. 剑河县土壤微量元素与有机质、pH值的关系研究[J]. 耕作与栽培, 2014(3):20-21. |
[26] | 于君宝, 王金达, 刘景双, 等. 典型黑土pH值变化对微量元素有效态含量的影响研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2002,16(2):93-95. |
[27] | 刘颖, 魏丹, 李玉影. 黑龙江省主要类型土壤剖面养分分布研究[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2015(11):31-34. |
[28] | 王雅琴, 冯君, 尹秀英, 等. 吉林省大豆种植区土壤的机械组成、pH值及营养元素与产量的关系[J]. 吉林农业大学学报, 2004,26(6):653-658. |
[29] | 宋淑娥, 金竹. 辽河平原表层土壤养分性状和分布特征[J]. 建筑工程技术与设计, 2015(33):1591. |
[30] |
REIMANN C, KASHULINA G, CARITAT P D, et al. Multi-element, multi-medium regional geochemistry in the European Arctic: Element concentration, variation and correlation[J]. Applied Geochemistry, 2001,16(7):759-780.
DOI URL |
[31] |
NESBITT H W, YOUNG G M. Early Proterozoic climates and plate motions inferred from major element chemistry of lutites[J]. Nature, 1982,299:715-717.
DOI URL |
[32] | 林万树. 古田县果园土壤氮磷钾状况及其与有机质和pH的相关性[J]. 上海农业学报, 2015,31(1):44-48. |
[33] | 章程, 谢运球, 吕勇, 等. 广西弄拉峰丛山区土壤有机质与微量营养元素有效态[J]. 中国岩溶, 2006,25(1):63-66. |
[34] | 邓邦良, 袁知洋, 李真真, 等. 武功山草甸土壤有效态微量元素与有机质和pH的关系[J]. 西南农业学报, 2016,29(3):647-650. |
[1] | LUO Haiyi, LUO Xianrong, LIU Panfeng, MA Mingliang, LU Xiansheng, JIANG Xiaoming, BAO Guangui, JIANG Yuxiong. Soil Geochemical Characteristics in the Naqu Area,Chongzuo City, Guangxi,and Their Mineral Prospecting Applications [J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(06): 1553-1566. |
[2] | CHEN Shiming, YANG Zhenxi, LEI Ziqiang, KANG Weiliang, ZHANG Jing, ZHAO Qinghu. Geochemical Characteristics and Prospecting on Stream Sediment Survey in Qianhongquan Area of Beishan in Gansu Province, China [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(06): 1513-1524. |
[3] | LIU Tong, LIU Chuanpeng, KANG Pengyu, ZHAO Xiufang, DENG Jun, WANG Kaikai. Geochemical Characteristics and Source Analysis of Heavy Metals in Soils of Eastern Yinan, Shandong Province [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(04): 1173-1182. |
[4] | LIU Yang, LI Xianqing, ZHAO Guangjie, LIU Mancang, DONG Caiyuan, LI Jin, XIAO Zhongyao. Geochemical Characteristics of Natural Gas and Hydrocarbon Charging History of the Tugeerming Area in the Eastern Kuqa Depression [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(04): 988-997. |
[5] | LIU Yang, JIANG Bing, ZHANG Hairui, SUN Zengbing, WANG Songtao. Geochemical Characteristics of Selenium in Surface Soil of Qingzhou, Shandong [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(03): 933-940. |
[6] | WANG Meihua. Geochemical Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Selenium-enriched Soils in Cultivated Land Around Typical Stone Coal Mines in Western Zhejiang [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(03): 941-952. |
[7] | ZHU Biqing, CHEN Shijia, BAI Yanjun, LEI Junjie, YIN Xiangdong. Geochemical Characteristics and Source of Crude Oil in Chang 8 Member of Yanchang Formation, Ganquan Area, Ordos Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(02): 742-754. |
[8] | LI Chao, LUO Xianrong, QIU Wei, WANG Yuhui, ZHAO Xinyi, ZHENG Chaojie, LIU Panfeng. Geochemical Anomalies Characteristics of Stream Sediments and Ore-Search Prospect in Jinshuikou Area of Dulan County, Qinghai Province [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(05): 1397-1410. |
[9] | SHI Liang, ZHAO Tongtong, ZHA Hui, WANG Yanyan, HUO Pingping, FAN Bojiang. Geochemical Characteristics and Shale Oil Potential of Shale in the Yan’an Area [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(04): 1043-1053. |
[10] | DUAN Wei, TANG Wenchun, LI Longchang, RAN Qiang, ZHANG Fei, LI Xiaosong, XU Yongsheng. Geochemical Characteristics and Genesis Analysis of Daheba Epimetamorphic Graphite Deposit in Wangcang, Sichuan Province [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(03): 599-607. |
[11] | LI Jiehao, HOU Dujie, CAO Lanzhu, WU Piao, ZHAO Zhe, MA Xiaoxiao. Geochemical Characteristics and Source Correlation of Low-mature Oil from the Tengeer Formation (2nd Member) in the Saihantala Sag, Erlian Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(02): 315-325. |
[12] | CHEN Bingjin, ZHENG Cuiyong, ZHAO Liangliang, YUAN Bo, WANG Zhaofei, ZHANG Yi, GUO Bin, YU Hongbo. Application of Soil Geochemical Survey in the Exploration of Lead-Zinc Polymetallic Ore in Waziping,Mianxian County,Shaanxi Province [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(02): 455-465. |
[13] | ZONG Qingxia, XIAO Gaoqiang, XIANG Longzhou, XU Yongqiang. Geochemical Characteristics and Risk Assessment of Lead in the Soils of Jiucheng—Jiemao District in Yingjiang, Yunnan [J]. Geoscience, 2020, 34(05): 979-986. |
[14] | ZHAO Yande, DENG Xiuqing, QI Yalin, SHAO Xiaozhou, YANG Bin, LU Xinchuan, LUO Anxian, XIE Xiankui. Geochemical Characteristics of Source Rocks of M53 Well and Chang-8 Member Oil-source in Pingliangbei Exploration Area, Ordos Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2020, 34(04): 800-811. |
[15] | LI Ting, ZHU Dancheng, LI Haiping, YANG Minglei, LI Tao, LI Pingping, ZOU Huayao. Genetic Mechanism of Dolomite in Middle Permian Maokou Formation:Case Study of Central and Eastern Sichuan Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2020, 34(02): 345-355. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||