中深层套管换热器短期无干扰名义取热量计算解析方法

doi:10.19657/j.geoscience.1000-8527.2022.053

现代地质 ›› 2022, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (05): 1440-1446.DOI: 10.19657/j.geoscience.1000-8527.2022.053

• 碳储科学与地热开发 • 上一篇

中深层套管换热器短期无干扰名义取热量计算解析方法

汤昌福¹^,²(), 罗万静³(), 黄骏玮³

1.安徽省煤田地质局勘查研究院,安徽合肥 230088
2.中国科学技术大学热科学和能源工程系,安徽合肥 230026
3.中国地质大学(北京) 能源学院,北京 100083

收稿日期:2022-03-02 修回日期:2022-06-23 出版日期:2022-10-10 发布日期:2022-11-03
通讯作者: 罗万静
作者简介:罗万静,男,教授,博士生导师,1980年出生,油气田开发专业,主要从事复杂裂缝系统渗流、油气藏开发、地热能开发利用方面的科研工作。Email: luowanjing@cugb.edu.cn。
汤昌福,男,高级工程师,1982年出生,油气田开发专业,主要从事油气、地热能开发利用方面的研究工作。Email: cftang@mail.ustc.edu.cn。
基金资助:
安徽省重点研究与开发计划项目(201904a07020105)

Method for Calculating Short-term Non-interference Nominal Heat Rate of Deep Coaxial Heat Exchangers

TANG Changfu¹^,²(), LUO Wanjing³(), HUANG Junwei³

1. Exploration Research Institute, Anhui Provincial Bureau of Coal Geology, Hefei, Anhui 230088, China
2. Department of Thermal Science and Energy Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China
3. School of Energy Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2022-03-02 Revised:2022-06-23 Online:2022-10-10 Published:2022-11-03
Contact: LUO Wanjing

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

从地下传热基本原理出发,考虑地温梯度影响,建立了中深层套管换热器进出口流体平均温度解析解和长时间近似解,推导了中深层套管换热器短期无干扰名义取热量计算解析公式,并通过与文献中结果对比进行了验证。研究结果表明,中深层套管换热器短期无干扰名义取热量是地温梯度的线性函数。短期无干扰名义取热量计算解析公式简单实用,可以实现中深层套管换热器短期换热性能快速评价。

关键词: 套管换热器, 地温梯度, 名义取热量, 解析解

Abstract:

Based on basic underground heat transfer mechanism, an analytical solution of the mean inlet and outlet fluid temperature, accounting for the geothermal gradient effect is formulated for deep coaxial heat exchanger. An approximate solution is also derived. Furthermore, a method for calculating short-term non-interference nominal heat rate of deep coaxial heat exchangers is developed and validated by comparison with published results. It is revealed that the nominal heat rate is a linear function of geothermal gradient. The analytical method proposed here is very practical and requires less computation cost, which enables rapid evaluation of short-term thermal capacity of deep coaxial heat exchangers.

Key words: coaxial heat exchanger, geothermal gradient, nominal heat rate, analytical solution

中图分类号:

P618.1
TE34

汤昌福, 罗万静, 黄骏玮. 中深层套管换热器短期无干扰名义取热量计算解析方法[J]. 现代地质, 2022, 36(05): 1440-1446.

TANG Changfu, LUO Wanjing, HUANG Junwei. Method for Calculating Short-term Non-interference Nominal Heat Rate of Deep Coaxial Heat Exchangers[J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(05): 1440-1446.

图/表 3

图1 套管换热器示意图

Fig.1 Schematic diagram of casing heat exchanger

图2 短期无干扰名义取热量计算结果对比

Fig.2 Comparison results of short-term non-interference nominal heat rates calculated with different methods

图3 短期无干扰名义取热量近似解计算结果

Fig.3 Calculation results of approximate solution of short-term non-interference nominal heat rates

参考文献 15

[1]	孔彦龙, 陈超凡, 邵亥冰, 等. 深井换热技术原理及其换热量评估[J]. 地球物理学报, 2017, 60(12): 4741-4752.
[2]	FANG Liang, DIAO Nairen Diao, SHAO Zhukun, et al. A computationally efficient numerical model for heat transfer simulation of deep borehole heat exchangers[J]. Energy and Buil-dings, 2018, 167(15): 79-88.
[3]	方亮. 地源热泵系统中深层地埋管换热器的传热分析及其应用[D]. 济南: 山东建筑大学, 2018.
[4]	WANG Z, WANG F, LIU J, et al. Field test and numerical investigation on the heat transfer characteristics and optimal design of the heat exchangers of a deep borehole ground source heat pump system[J]. Energy Conversion and Management, 2017, 153(12): 603-615. DOI URL
[5]	RYBACH L, HOPKIRK R. Shallow and deep borehole heat exchangers-achievements and prospects[M]//Proceedings of World Geothermal Congress. Florence: International Geothermal Association, 1995: 2133-2138.
[6]	BEIERRICHARD A, ACUNA J, MOGENSEN P, et al. Borehole resistance and vertical temperature profiles in coaxial borehole heat exchangers[J]. Applied Energy, 2013, 102: 665-675. DOI URL
[7]	BEIERRICHARD A, ACUNA J, MOGENSEN P, et al. Transient heat transfer in a coaxial borehole heat exchanger[J]. Geothermics, 2014, 51: 470-482. DOI URL
[8]	GORDON David, BOLISETTI Tirupati, TING David, et al. A physical and semi-analytical comparison between coaxial BHE designs considering various piping materials[J]. Energy, 2017, 141: 1610-1621. DOI URL
[9]	ZANCHINI E, LAZZARI S, PRIARONE A. Improving the thermal performance of coaxial borehole heat exchangers[J]. Energy, 2009, 35(2): 657-666. DOI URL
[10]	MORGAN Le Lous, FRANCOIS Larroque, ALAIN Dupuy, et al. Thermal performance of a deep borehole heat exchanger:Insights from a synthetic coupled heat and flow model[J]. Geothermics, 2015, 57: 157-172. DOI URL
[11]	HOLMBERG Henrik, ACUNA Jose, NESS Erling, et al. Thermal evaluation of coaxial deep borehole heat exchangers[J]. Renewable Energy, 2016, 97: 65-76. DOI URL
[12]	张兵兵, 刁乃仁, 方亮. 套管式地埋管换热器温度分布及换热性能计算[J]. 煤气与热力, 2019, 39(4): 21-27.
[13]	王硕, 黄可钦, 王胜蓝, 等. 同轴套管式深埋管换热器换热性能研究[J]. 制冷与空调, 2019, 19(4): 23-28.
[14]	刁乃仁, 方肇洪. 地埋管地源热泵技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2005.
[15]	《数学手册》编写组. 数学手册[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 1979.

中深层套管换热器短期无干扰名义取热量计算解析方法

Method for Calculating Short-term Non-interference Nominal Heat Rate of Deep Coaxial Heat Exchangers

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 3

参考文献 15

相关文章 9

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨露梅, 邝荣禧, 郭慧, 左丽琼, 苟富刚, 许书刚, 张硕. 苏南现代化建设示范区现今地温场特征及影响因素[J]. 现代地质, 2023, 37(04): 954-962.
[2]	黄玉平, 龙祖烈, 朱俊章, 石创, 张博, 张小龙, 陈聪. 珠江口盆地白云凹陷地温场特征及烃源岩热演化[J]. 现代地质, 2022, 36(01): 130-139.
[3]	宿宇驰, 毛小平, 张飞, 毛珂, 卢鹏羽. 沧县隆起北部地温场特征及其主控因素分析[J]. 现代地质, 2021, 35(02): 403-411.
[4]	刘宗明, 张进平, 王新娟, 刘凯, 刘颖超. 北京天竺地热田东坝凹陷南部地区地下热水富集的地热地质条件分析[J]. 现代地质, 2017, 31(04): 832-842.
[5]	王超群, 丁莹莹, 胡道功, 戚帮申, 张耀玲, 陶涛, 吴环环. 祁连山冻土区DK-9孔温度监测及天然气水合物稳定带厚度[J]. 现代地质, 2017, 31(01): 158-166.
[6]	崔军平, 任战利. 内蒙古海拉尔盆地乌尔逊凹陷热演化史[J]. 现代地质, 2011, 25(4): 668-674.
[7]	崔军平, 任战利. 内蒙古海拉尔盆地乌尔逊凹陷现今地温场特征[J]. 现代地质, 2011, 25(3): 589-593.
[8]	李亚军, 李儒峰. 苏北盆地高邮凹陷现今地温场特征[J]. 现代地质, 2010, 24(6): 1042-1047.
[9]	承金, 汪新文, 王小牛. 山西沁水盆地热史演化特征[J]. 现代地质, 2009, 23(6): 1093-1099.