Mesozoic and Cenozoic Deformation Sequences and Their Dynamic Background in the Danyishan Area, Southern Hunan

doi:10.19657/j.geoscience.1000-8527.2024.063

Abstract

Abstract:

The Dayishan area is located at the junction of the Nanling tectonic belt and the Qinhang tectonic belt.It has developed multi-directional and different types of structural systems since the Early Mesozoic.Studying the deformation sequences is essential for better understanding of the tectonic evolution along and adjacent to South Hunan.However, detailed analysis of the deformation characteristics and evolution of the stress field remains unsolved.This study employs structural analysis to correlate structural elements such as shear fractures and folds in the bedrock of the Dayishan area.The paleo-stress field of shear fractures is reconstructed using the lower hemisphere stereographic projection method.Combining the regional tectonic evolution history of South China in the Mesozoic and Cenozoic, this study defines five deformation events based on their dynamic backgrounds.The first phase (D₁) of NEE-SWW compression, occurring during the early stages of the Indosinian Movement (late Middle Triassic), resulted from the oblique intraplate under-thrusting of the Yangtze Craton beneath the Cathaysia Block in a multi-plate confining setting.The difference in local and regional shortening directions may be related to the E-W compressional stress field derived from the NW-trending Shao-yang-Chenzhou fault and the sinistral drag caused by strike-slip motion.The second phase (D₂) of S-N compression formed during the late stage of the Indosinian Movement (Late Triassic to Early Jurassic).This phase may be related to the southward compression of the North China Craton and northward compression of the Simao-Indochina Block.The third phase (D₃) of NWW-SEE compression occurred during the Early Yanshanian Movement (latest Middle Jurassic).This phase was driven by the westward subduction of the Palaeo-Pacific Plate, or the Izanazaki Plate, beneath the South China Block.The fourth phase (D₄) of magmatism-related deformation includes folding, tectonic foliations, pinch-and-swell structures, and tension-shear fractures.These structures are possibly related to episodic upward invasion and lateral flow of Late Jurassic granitic magmas along variously orientated basement faults during the post-orogenic stage of the Early Yanshanian Movement.The fifth phase (D₅) of N(N)E-S(S)W compression occurred during the Middle and Late Paleogene.This phase may be related to the local compressive stress field derived from dextral strike-slip motion along previous NNE-trending fault zones.Its dynamic mechanism may be the eastward escape of the Tibetan Plateau caused by the collision between the Indian and Eurasian plates.Further analysis suggests that the strongest strike-slip motion of the Shaoyang-Chenzhou fault zone might have occurred in the early stage of the Indosinian Movement, thereby establishing the tectonic framework of the Mesozoic and Cenozoic in the surrounding area of this fault zone.

Key words: Mesozoic and Cenozoic, structural deformation, tectonic stress field, deformation sequence, tectonic evolution, Dayishan area

CLC Number:

CHEN Zhiyou, ZENG Guangqian, BAI Daoyuan, YAO Zeyu, WANG Lingjue, WEN Chunhua, CHEN Xu, WANG Yong, LI Bin, HUANG Leqing, CHEN Jianfeng, LIANG Enyun, XU Ruochao, MA Huiying, XIANG Ke. Mesozoic and Cenozoic Deformation Sequences and Their Dynamic Background in the Danyishan Area, Southern Hunan[J]. Geoscience, 2024, 38(04): 1092-1108.

Figures/Tables 10

References 111

[1]	DAN M. Active tectonics of the Mediterranean region[J]. Geo-physical Journal International, 1972, 30(2): 109-185.
[2]	REN J Y, TAMAKI K, LI S T, et al. Late Mesozoic and Cenozoic rifting and its dynamic setting in Eastern China and adjacent areas[J]. Tectonophysics, 2002, 344(3/4): 175-205.
[3]	LI J H, ZHANG Y Q, DONG S W, et al. Late Mesozoic-Early Cenozoic deformation history of the Yuanma Basin, central South China[J]. Tectonophysics, 2012, 570: 163-183.
[4]	曾广乾, 陈柏林, 申景辉, 等. 抚州盆地晚中生代—新生代构造变形特征、形成背景及地质意义[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2021, 45(6): 1094-1110.
[5]	LI Z X, LI X H. Formation of the 1300-km-wide intracontinental orogen and postorogenic magmatic province in Mesozoic South China: A flat-slab subduction model[J]. Geology, 2007, 35(2): 179.
[6]	LIN W, WANG Q C, CHEN K. Phanerozoic tectonics of South China Block: New insights from the polyphase deformation in the Yunkai massif[J]. Tectonics, 2008, 27(6): TC6004.
[7]	LI J H, ZHANG Y Q, DONG S W, et al. Cretaceous tectonic evolution of South China: A preliminary synthesis[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2014, 134: 98-136.
[8]	LI J H, MA Z L, ZHANG Y Q, et al. Tectonic evolution of Cretaceous extensional basins in Zhejiang Province, eastern South China:Structural and geochronological constraints[J]. International Geology Review, 2014, 56(13): 1602-1629.
[9]	柏道远, 姜文, 钟响, 等. 湘西沅麻盆地中新生代构造变形特征及区域地质背景[J]. 中国地质, 2015, 42(6): 1851-1875.
[10]	WEI W, FAURE M, CHEN Y, et al. Back-thrusting response of continental collision: Early Cretaceous NW-directed thrusting in the Changle-Nan’ao belt (Southeast China)[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2015, 100: 98-114.
[11]	NANNI U, PUBELLIER M, CHAN L S, et al. Rifting and reactivation of a Cretaceous structural belt at the northern margin of the South China Sea[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2017, 136: 110-123.
[12]	YE Q, MEI L F, SHI H S, et al. The Late Cretaceous tectonic evolution of the South China Sea Area: An overview, and new perspectives from 3D seismic reflection data[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2018, 187: 186-204.
[13]	曾广乾, 梁恩云, 熊苗, 等. 湘南江永地区多期褶皱的变形特征及叠加关系[J]. 地质科技情报, 2019, 38(4): 153-165.
[14]	曾广乾, 梁恩云, 刘庚寅, 等. 桂北丹池成矿带南段五圩矿田构造变形、控矿特征和找矿预测[J]. 地质论评, 2021, 67(6): 1727-1748.
[15]	曾广乾, 陈柏林, 申景辉, 等. 江西抚州盆地南西段白垩系构造变形特征及其动力学背景[J]. 地质通报, 2023, 42(11): 1938-1953.
[16]	XU X, ZUZA A V, CHEN L, et al. Late Cretaceous to Early Cenozoic extension in the Lower Yangtze Region (East China)driven by Izanagi-Pacific plate subduction[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2021, 221: 103790.
[17]	XU X B, LIANG C H, XU Y D. Kinematic analysis of fault-slip data in the Nanling Tectonic Belt and Cretaceous to Paleogene tectonic evolution of the Central South China Block[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2021, 221: 104951.
[18]	李四光. 地质力学概论[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1973.
[19]	彭和求, 伍光英. 湘南“大义山式构造” 的厘定及地质意义[J]. 湖南地质, 2000, 19(2): 87-89.
[20]	曾志方. 湖南大义山锡矿田构造控矿作用与成矿机理研究[D]. 武汉: 中国地质大学, 2013.
[21]	柏道远, 黄建中, 王先辉, 等. 湖南邵阳—郴州北西向断裂左旋走滑暨水口山—香花岭南北向构造成因[J]. 中国地质, 2006, 33(1): 56-63.
[22]	LI Y, DONG S W, ZHANG Y Q, et al. Episodic Mesozoic constructional events of central South China:Constraints from lines of evidence of superimposed folds, fault kinematic analysis, and magma geochronology[J]. International Geology Review, 2016, 58(9): 1076-1107.
[23]	杜远生, 徐亚军. 华南加里东运动初探[J]. 地质科技情报, 2012, 31(5): 43-49.
[24]	徐亚军, 杜远生. 从板缘碰撞到陆内造山: 华南东南缘早古生代造山作用演化[J]. 地球科学, 2018, 43(2): 333-353.
[25]	柏道远, 贾宝华, 钟响, 等. 湘中南晋宁期和加里东期构造线走向变化成因[J]. 地质力学学报, 2012, 18(2): 165-177.
[26]	王高. 湖南加里东期花岗质岩石地质地球化学特征及其地质意义:以白马山、雪花顶及宏厦桥岩体为例[D]. 长沙: 中南大学, 2013.
[27]	柏道远, 钟响, 贾朋远, 等. 南岭西段加里东期苗儿山岩体锆石SHRIMP U-Pb年龄、地球化学特征及其构造意义[J]. 岩石矿物学杂志, 2014, 33(3): 407-423.
[28]	陈迪, 马铁球, 刘伟, 等. 湘东南万洋山岩体的锆石SHRIMP U-Pb年龄、成因及构造意义[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2016, 40(4): 873-890.
[29]	于玉帅, 周云, 牛志军, 等. 湖南彭公庙岩体地球化学特征、时代及钨锡成矿潜力[J]. 岩石矿物学杂志, 2022, 41(4): 695-713.
[30]	张素梅, 汪洋, 任纪舜, 等. 华南诸广山一带桂东岩体加里东期花岗岩的成岩时代研究及其地质意义[J]. 地球学报, 2022, 43(5): 593-608.
[31]	柏道远, 贾宝华, 钟响, 等. 湘东南印支运动变形特征研究[J]. 地质论评, 2012, 58(1): 19-29.
[32]	马铁球, 李彬, 陈焰明, 等. 湖南南岳岩体LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb年龄及其地球化学特征[J]. 中国地质, 2013, 40(6): 1712-1724.
[33]	牛睿, 刘庆, 侯泉林, 等. 湖南锡田花岗岩锆石U-Pb年代学及钨锡成矿时代的探讨[J]. 岩石学报, 2015, 31(9): 2620-2632.
[34]	赵增霞, 徐兆文, 缪柏虎, 等. 湖南衡阳关帝庙花岗岩岩基形成时代及物质来源探讨[J]. 地质学报, 2015, 89(7): 1219-1230.
[35]	何苗, 刘庆, 侯泉林, 等. 湘东邓阜仙花岗岩成因及对成矿的制约: 锆石/锡石U-Pb年代学、锆石Hf-O同位素及全岩地球化学特征[J]. 岩石学报, 2018, 34(3): 637-655.
[36]	湖南省地质调查院. 中国区域地质志:湖南志[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2017.
[37]	柏道远, 熊雄, 杨俊, 等. 雪峰造山带中段地质构造特征[J]. 中国地质, 2014, 41(2): 399-418.
[38]	柏道远, 马铁球, 王先辉, 等. 南岭中段中生代构造-岩浆活动与成矿作用研究进展[J]. 中国地质, 2008, 35(3): 436-455.
[39]	LI J H, SHI W, ZHANG Y Q, et al. Thermal evolution of the Hengshan extensional dome in central South China and its tectonic implications:New insights into low-angle detachment formation[J]. Gondwana Research, 2016, 35: 425-441.
[40]	马丽艳, 刘树生, 付建明, 等. 湖南塔山、阳明山花岗岩的岩石成因: 来自锆石U-Pb年龄、地球化学及Sr-Nd同位素证据[J]. 地质学报, 2016, 90(2): 284-303.
[41]	杜云, 罗小亚, 黄革非, 等. 湖南塔山岩体岩石学、地球化学、U-Pb年代学特征及其形成构造背景[J]. 地质科技情报, 2017, 36(6): 50-61.
[42]	李剑锋, 卢友月, 张遵遵, 等. 南岭大义山岩体研究与找矿进展[J]. 地球科学, 2023, 48(10): 3707-3724.
[43]	张遵遵, 卢友月, 付建明, 等. 南岭大义山地区锂铷矿化特征、赋存状态及找矿评价[J]. 华南地质, 2023, 39(2): 333-348.
[44]	柏道远, 李彬, 曾广乾, 等. 湖南铲子坪—大坪金矿区变形序列及控矿构造[J]. 地质力学学报, 2023, 29(6): 801-823.
[45]	ANDERSON E M. The Dynamics of Faulting[M]. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd, 1951.
[46]	曾广乾, 柏道远, 王灵珏, 等. 湘南大义山锡多金属矿田构造控岩控矿机制及找矿勘查启示[J/OL]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2024:1-15[2024-06-17]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/51.1634.N.20240612.1114.002.html.
[47]	张晓军, 罗华, 吴志华, 等. 湖南大义山矿田白沙子岭锡矿床Rb-Sr同位素等时线年龄及其地质意义[J]. 地球科学, 2014, 39(10): 1422-1432.
[48]	SUN H R, ZHAO Z, YAN G S, et al. Geological and geochro-nological constraints on the formation of the Jurassic Maozaishan Sn deposit, Dayishan orefield, South China[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2018, 94: 212-224.
[49]	GUO J, LU Y Y, FU J M, et al. Geology and geochronology of the Maozaishan Sn deposit, Hunan Province: Constraints from zircon U-Pb and muscovite Ar-Ar dating[J]. Minerals, 2019, 9(12): 773.
[50]	ZHANG Z Z, NING Y Y, LU Y Y, et al. Geological characteristics and metallogenic age of Tengshan’ao Sn deposit in Dayishan of South Hunan and its prospecting significance[J]. Solid Earth Sciences, 2021, 6(1): 37-49.
[51]	LU Y Y, LI J F, CAO J Y, et al. Geochronology and geochemistry of the Late Jurassic Wujiaping Sn deposit, Dayishan ore field, South China: Implications to the petrogenesis and Sn mineralization[J]. Solid Earth Sciences, 2022, 7(1): 72-86.
[52]	SHU L S, FAURE M, WANG B, et al. Late Palaeozoic-Early Mesozoic geological features of South China: Response to the Indosinian collision events in Southeast Asia[J]. Comptes Rendus Geoscience, 2008, 340(2/3): 151-165.
[53]	SHU L S, ZHOU X M, DENG P, et al. Mesozoic tectonic evolution of the Southeast China Block: New insights from basin analysis[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2009, 34(3): 376-391.
[54]	徐先兵, 张岳桥, 贾东, 等. 华南早中生代大地构造过程[J]. 中国地质, 2009, 36(3): 573-593.
[55]	张岳桥, 董树文, 李建华, 等. 华南中生代大地构造研究新进展[J]. 地球学报, 2012, 33(3): 257-279.
[56]	LI J H, DONG S W, ZHANG Y Q, et al. New insights into Phanerozoic tectonics of South China: Part 1, polyphase deformation in the Jiuling and Lianyunshan domains of the central Jiangnan Orogen[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research (Solid Earth), 2016, 121(4): 3048-3080.
[57]	LI J H, ZHANG Y Q, ZHAO G C, et al. New insights into Phanerozoic tectonics of South China: Early Paleozoic sinistral and Triassic dextral transpression in the East Wuyishan and Chencai domains, NE Cathaysia[J]. Tectonics, 2017, 36(5): 819-853.
[58]	LI J H, ZHAO G C, JOHNSTON S T, et al. Permo-Triassic structural evolution of the Shiwandashan and Youjiang structural belts, South China[J]. Journal of Structural Geology, 2017, 100: 24-44.
[59]	LEPVRIER C, MALUSKI H, VAN VUONG N, et al. Indosinian NW-trending shear zones within the Truong Son belt (Vietnam) ⁴⁰Ar-³⁹Ar Triassic ages and Cretaceous to Cenozoic overprints[J]. Tectonophysics, 1997, 283(1/2/3/4): 105-127.
[60]	LEPVRIER C, MALUSKI H, VAN TICH V, et al. The Early Triassic Indosinian orogeny in Vietnam (Truong Son Belt and Kontum Massif): implications for the geodynamic evolution of Indochina[J]. Tectonophysics, 2004, 393(1/2/3/4): 87-118.
[61]	LEPVRIER C, FAURE M, VAN V N, et al. North-directed Triassic nappes in northeastern Vietnam (east Bac Bo)[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2011, 41(1): 56-68.
[62]	林伟, MICHEL Faure, CLAUDE Lepvrier, 等. 华南板块南缘早中生代的逆冲推覆构造及其相关的动力学背景[J]. 地质科学, 2011, 46(1): 134-145.
[63]	LI C L, WANG Z X, TAN Y L, et al. Differential fold inter-ference patterns in an intracontinental orogen: Insights from superposed buckle folding in southern Jiangxi Province, South China Block[J]. Journal of Structural Geology, 2023, 167: 104801.
[64]	张国伟, 郭安林, 董云鹏, 等. 大陆地质与大陆构造和大陆动力学[J]. 地学前缘, 2011, 18(3): 1-12.
[65]	ZHANG G W, GUO A L, WANG Y J, et al. Tectonics of South China continent and its implications[J]. Science China (Earth Sciences), 2013, 56(11): 1804-1828.
[66]	LI J H, ZHANG Y Q, RATSCHBACHER L, et al. Polyphase deformation in the Badu complex: Insights into Triassic intraplate orogeny in South China[J]. Journal of Structural Geology, 2022, 154: 104475.
[67]	万天丰, 朱鸿. 中国大陆及邻区中生代—新生代大地构造与环境变迁[J]. 现代地质, 2002, 16(2): 107-120.
[68]	张岳桥, 徐先兵, 贾东, 等. 华南早中生代从印支期碰撞构造体系向燕山期俯冲构造体系转换的形变记录[J]. 地学前缘, 2009, 16(1): 234-247.
[69]	SHI W, DONG S W, ZHANG Y Q, et al. The typical large-scale superposed folds in the central South China: Implications for Mesozoic intracontinental deformation of the South China Block[J]. Tectonophysics, 2015, 664: 50-66.
[70]	WANG Y J, ZHANG Y H, FAN W M, et al. Structural signatures and ⁴⁰Ar/³⁹Ar geochronology of the Indosinian Xuefengshan tectonic belt, South China Block[J]. Journal of Structural Geology, 2005, 27(6): 985-998.
[71]	柏道远, 钟响, 贾朋远, 等. 湘东南晚三叠世—侏罗纪沉积特征及盆地性质和成因机制[J]. 地质力学学报, 2011, 17(4): 338-349.
[72]	柏道远, 李彬, 金华, 等. 湘中龙山地区变形序列及金锑矿控矿构造[J]. 地质论评, 2023, 69(1): 88-112.
[73]	柏道远, 李彬, 曾广乾, 等. 湖南省印支运动应力场特征及其动力机制[J/OL]. 华南地质, 2024: 1-17 [2024-04-09]. https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/42.1913.P.20240407.2005.002.html.
[74]	MARUYAMA S, SENO T. Orogeny and relative plate motions:example of the Japanese islands[J]. Tectonophysics, 1986, 127(3/4): 305-329.
[75]	MAO J R, TAO K Y, YANG Z L, et al. Geodynamic background of the Mesozoic intracontinental magmatism in southeast China[J]. Chinese Journal of Geochemistry, 1997, 16(3): 230-239.
[76]	ZHOU X M, LI W X. Origin of Late Mesozoic igneous rocks in Southeastern China: Implications for lithosphere subduction and underplating of mafic magmas[J]. Tectonophysics, 2000, 326(3/4): 269-287.
[77]	ZHOU X M, SUN T, SHEN W Z, et al. Petrogenesis of Meso-zoic granitoids and volcanic rocks in South China: A response to tectonic evolution[J]. Episodes, 2006, 29(1): 26-33.
[78]	舒良树, 周新民, 邓平, 等. 南岭构造带的基本地质特征[J]. 地质论评, 2006, 52(2): 251-265.
[79]	邢光福, 卢清地, 陈荣, 等. 华南晚中生代构造体制转折结束时限研究: 兼与华北燕山地区对比[J]. 地质学报, 2008, 82(4): 451-463.
[80]	HE Z Y, XU X S, NIU Y L. Petrogenesis and tectonic significance of a Mesozoic granite-syenite-gabbro association from inland South China[J]. Lithos, 2010, 119(3/4): 621-641.
[81]	XU X B. Late Triassic to Middle Jurassic tectonic evolution of the South China Block: Geodynamic transition from the Paleo-Tethys to the Paleo-Pacific regimes[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2023,241: 104404.
[82]	LI C L, WANG Z X, LÜ Q T, et al. Mesozoic tectonic evolution of the eastern South China Block: A review on the synthesis of the regional deformation and magmatism[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2021, 131: 104028.
[83]	WANG Y J, FAN W M, ZHANG G W, et al. Phanerozoic tectonics of the South China Block: Key observations and controversies[J]. Gondwana Research, 2013, 23(4): 1273-1305.
[84]	YAN D P, ZHOU M F, SONG H L, et al. Origin and tectonic significance of a Mesozoic multi-layer over-thrust system within the Yangtze Block (South China)[J]. Tectonophysics, 2003, 361(3/4): 239-254.
[85]	YAN D P, ZHANG B, ZHOU M F, et al. Constraints on the depth, geometry and kinematics of blind detachment faults provi-ded by fault-propagation folds: An example from the Mesozoic fold belt of South China[J]. Journal of Structural Geology, 2009, 31(2): 150-162.
[86]	LI J H, DONG S W, CAWOOD P A, et al. An Andean-type retro-arc foreland system beneath northwest South China revealed by SINOPROBE profiling[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2018, 490: 170-179.
[87]	ZHANG Y Q, DONG S W, SHI W. Cretaceous deformation history of the middle Tan-Lu fault zone in Shandong Province, Eastern China[J]. Tectonophysics, 2003, 363(3/4): 243-258.
[88]	申文杰, 刘少峰, 张博, 等. 胶莱盆地白垩纪构造演化[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2020, 44(3): 325-339.
[89]	ALLEN M B, MACDONALD D I M, XUN Z, et al. Early Cenozoic two-phase extension and Late Cenozoic thermal subsidence and inversion of the Bohai Basin, Northern China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 1997, 14(7/8): 951-972.
[90]	XU X B, TANG S, LIN S F. Paleostress inversion of fault-slip data from the Jurassic to Cretaceous Huangshan Basin and implications for the tectonic evolution of southeastern China[J]. Journal of Geodynamics, 2016, 98: 31-52.
[91]	张进, 马宗晋, 杨健, 等. 雪峰山西麓中生代盆地属性及构造意义[J]. 地质学报, 2010, 84(5): 631-650.
[92]	刘景彦, 林畅松, 卢林, 等. 江汉盆地白垩-新近系主要不整合面剥蚀量分布及其构造意义[J]. 地质科技情报, 2009, 28(1): 1-8.
[93]	SHINN Y J, CHOUGH S K, HWANG I G. Structural development and tectonic evolution of Gunsan Basin (Cretaceous-Tertiary) in the central Yellow Sea[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2010, 27(2): 500-514.
[94]	AITCHISON J C, DAVIS A M. When did the India-Asia collision really happen?[J]. Gondwana Research, 2001, 4(4): 560-561.
[95]	万天丰. 中国东部中—新生代板内变形构造应力场及其应用[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1993.
[96]	李宏伟, 许坤. 郯庐断裂走滑活动与辽河盆地构造古地理格局[J]. 地学前缘, 2001, 8(4): 467-470.
[97]	GILDER S A, LELOUP P H, COURTILLOT V, et al. Tectonic evolution of the Tancheng-Lujiang (Tan-Lu)fault via Middle Triassic to Early Cenozoic paleomagnetic data[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research(Solid Earth), 1999, 104(7): 15365-15390.
[98]	崔盛芹, 李锦蓉. 试论中国滨太平洋带的印支运动[J]. 地质学报, 1983, 57(1): 51-62.
[99]	任纪舜. 印支运动及其在中国大地构造演化中的意义[J]. 中国地质科学院院报, 1984, 5(2): 31-44.
[100]	任纪舜. 论中国南部的大地构造[J]. 地质学报, 1990, 64(4): 275-288.
[101]	丘元禧, 张渝昌, 马文璞. 雪峰山陆内造山带的构造特征与演化[J]. 高校地质学报, 1998, 4(4): 432-433.
[102]	LI X H, LI Z X, LI W X, et al. Initiation of the indosinian oro-geny in South China: Evidence for a Permian magmatic arc on Hainan Island[J]. The Journal of Geology, 2006, 114(3): 341-353.
[103]	丁道桂, 郭彤楼, 刘运黎, 等. 对江南-雪峰带构造属性的讨论[J]. 地质通报, 2007, 26(7): 801-809.
[104]	郭福祥. 中国南方中新生代大地构造属性和南华造山带褶皱过程[J]. 地质学报, 1998, 72(1): 22-33.
[105]	李武显, 周新民. 古太平洋岩石圈消减与中国东南部晚中生代火成岩成因: 岩石圈消减与玄武岩底侵相结合模式的补充证据[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2001, 25(1): 55-63.
[106]	舒良树, 周新民. 中国东南部晚中生代构造作用[J]. 地质论评, 2002, 48(3): 249-260.
[107]	舒良树, 周新民, 邓平, 等. 中国东南部中、新生代盆地特征与构造演化[J]. 地质通报, 2004, 23(2): 876-884.
[108]	胡召齐, 朱光, 张必龙, 等. 雪峰隆起北部加里东事件的K-Ar年代学研究[J]. 地质论评, 2010, 56(4): 490-500.
[109]	苏金宝, 张岳桥, 董树文, 等. 雪峰山构造带古构造应力场[J]. 地球学报, 2013, 34(6): 671-679.
[110]	董树文, 张岳桥, 李海龙, 等. “燕山运动” 与东亚大陆晚中生代多板块汇聚构造: 纪念“燕山运动” 90周年[J]. 中国科学(地球科学), 2019, 49(6): 913-938.
[111]	柏道远, 熊延望, 王先辉, 等. 湖南常德—安仁NW向断裂左旋走滑与安仁“y” 字型构造[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2005, 29(4): 435-442.

构造点	经度(E)	纬度(N)	岩性	σ₁	σ₂	σ₃	构造体制
D15	112°37'33″	26°11'10″	泥盆系灰岩	71°∠11°	199°∠72°	337°∠13°	NEE—SWW 向挤压
D34	112°36'38″	26°12'14″	石炭系灰岩	56°∠3°	154°∠79°	325°∠10°
SC03-1	112°35'26″	26°15'08″	泥盆系灰岩	250°∠24°	56°∠64°	156°∠6°
SC08	112°36'40″	26°11'26″	泥盆系灰岩	66°∠6°	278°∠72°	156°∠3°
SC11-1	112°37'37″	26°10'40″	泥盆系矽卡岩化灰岩	245°∠3°	126°∠85°	335°∠4°
D05	112°36'05″	26°12'22″	石炭系灰岩	331°∠11°	212°∠68°	64°∠18°	近S—N 向挤压
SC01-1	112°33'38″	26°17'06″	石炭系灰岩	8°∠17°	217°∠70°	101°∠9°
SC03-2	112°35'26″	26°15'08″	泥盆系灰岩	188°∠21°	41°∠65°	283°∠12°
SC06-1	112°36'09″	26°12'03″	石炭系灰岩	181°∠7°	309°∠80°	90°∠8°
SC11-2	112°37'37″	26°10'40″	泥盆系矽卡岩化灰岩	181°∠6°	312°∠82°	90°∠5°
SC03-3	112°35'26″	26°15'08″	泥盆系灰岩	299°∠7°	90°∠83°	209°∠3°	NWW—SEE 向挤压
SC06-2	112°36'09″	26°12'03″	石炭系灰岩	273°∠36°	71°∠50°	174°∠11°
SC11-3	112°37'37″	26°10'40″	泥盆系矽卡岩化灰岩	95°∠26°	196°∠17°	312°∠57°
D24	112°37'30″	26°10'59″	晚侏罗世花岗岩	5°∠56°	182°∠33°	273°∠2°	岩浆动力
SC09	112°36'49″	26°11'20″	晚侏罗世花岗岩	139°∠62°	352°∠21°	256°∠16°
SC10-1	112°37'06″	26°11'49″	晚侏罗世花岗岩	222°∠48°	349°∠30°	98°∠27°
SC12	112°39'57″	26°07'38″	晚侏罗世花岗岩	174°∠71°	58°∠9°	324°∠16°
SC13	112°40'03″	26°07'41″	晚侏罗世花岗岩	294°∠47°	46°∠20°	152°∠37°
D30	112°36'29″	26°11'59″	石炭系灰岩	34°∠31°	240°∠57°	132°∠22°	N(N)E— S(S)W 向挤压
SC01-2	112°33'38″	26°17'06″	石炭系灰岩	50°∠18°	320°∠0°	230°∠72°
SC04-1	112°35'18″	26°14'46″	泥盆系灰岩	26°∠22°	218°∠67°	118°∠4°
SC04-2	112°35'18″	26°14'46″	泥盆系灰岩	57°∠13°	184°∠69°	324°∠17°
SC06-3	112°36'09″	26°12'03″	石炭系灰岩	207°∠16°	38°∠66°	300°∠7°
SC07	112°36'22″	26°11'56″	晚侏罗世花岗岩	46°∠25°	276°∠54°	149°∠24°
SC10-2	112°37'06″	26°11'49″	晚侏罗世花岗岩	52°∠3°	281°∠86°	142°∠3°
SC10-3	112°37'06″	26°11'49″	晚侏罗世花岗岩	52°∠9°	250°∠81°	143°∠4°
SC15	112°34'56″	26°14'06″	晚侏罗世花岗岩	49°∠1°	316°∠85°	140°∠6°
SC16	112°29'00″	26°16'12″	石炭系砂岩	20°∠31°	251°∠48°	128°∠28°

构造点	经度(E)	纬度(N)	岩性	σ₁	σ₂	σ₃	构造体制
D15	112°37'33″	26°11'10″	泥盆系灰岩	71°∠11°	199°∠72°	337°∠13°	NEE—SWW 向挤压
D34	112°36'38″	26°12'14″	石炭系灰岩	56°∠3°	154°∠79°	325°∠10°
SC03-1	112°35'26″	26°15'08″	泥盆系灰岩	250°∠24°	56°∠64°	156°∠6°
SC08	112°36'40″	26°11'26″	泥盆系灰岩	66°∠6°	278°∠72°	156°∠3°
SC11-1	112°37'37″	26°10'40″	泥盆系矽卡岩化灰岩	245°∠3°	126°∠85°	335°∠4°
D05	112°36'05″	26°12'22″	石炭系灰岩	331°∠11°	212°∠68°	64°∠18°	近S—N 向挤压
SC01-1	112°33'38″	26°17'06″	石炭系灰岩	8°∠17°	217°∠70°	101°∠9°
SC03-2	112°35'26″	26°15'08″	泥盆系灰岩	188°∠21°	41°∠65°	283°∠12°
SC06-1	112°36'09″	26°12'03″	石炭系灰岩	181°∠7°	309°∠80°	90°∠8°
SC11-2	112°37'37″	26°10'40″	泥盆系矽卡岩化灰岩	181°∠6°	312°∠82°	90°∠5°
SC03-3	112°35'26″	26°15'08″	泥盆系灰岩	299°∠7°	90°∠83°	209°∠3°	NWW—SEE 向挤压
SC06-2	112°36'09″	26°12'03″	石炭系灰岩	273°∠36°	71°∠50°	174°∠11°
SC11-3	112°37'37″	26°10'40″	泥盆系矽卡岩化灰岩	95°∠26°	196°∠17°	312°∠57°
D24	112°37'30″	26°10'59″	晚侏罗世花岗岩	5°∠56°	182°∠33°	273°∠2°	岩浆动力
SC09	112°36'49″	26°11'20″	晚侏罗世花岗岩	139°∠62°	352°∠21°	256°∠16°
SC10-1	112°37'06″	26°11'49″	晚侏罗世花岗岩	222°∠48°	349°∠30°	98°∠27°
SC12	112°39'57″	26°07'38″	晚侏罗世花岗岩	174°∠71°	58°∠9°	324°∠16°
SC13	112°40'03″	26°07'41″	晚侏罗世花岗岩	294°∠47°	46°∠20°	152°∠37°
D30	112°36'29″	26°11'59″	石炭系灰岩	34°∠31°	240°∠57°	132°∠22°	N(N)E— S(S)W 向挤压
SC01-2	112°33'38″	26°17'06″	石炭系灰岩	50°∠18°	320°∠0°	230°∠72°
SC04-1	112°35'18″	26°14'46″	泥盆系灰岩	26°∠22°	218°∠67°	118°∠4°
SC04-2	112°35'18″	26°14'46″	泥盆系灰岩	57°∠13°	184°∠69°	324°∠17°
SC06-3	112°36'09″	26°12'03″	石炭系灰岩	207°∠16°	38°∠66°	300°∠7°
SC07	112°36'22″	26°11'56″	晚侏罗世花岗岩	46°∠25°	276°∠54°	149°∠24°
SC10-2	112°37'06″	26°11'49″	晚侏罗世花岗岩	52°∠3°	281°∠86°	142°∠3°
SC10-3	112°37'06″	26°11'49″	晚侏罗世花岗岩	52°∠9°	250°∠81°	143°∠4°
SC15	112°34'56″	26°14'06″	晚侏罗世花岗岩	49°∠1°	316°∠85°	140°∠6°
SC16	112°29'00″	26°16'12″	石炭系砂岩	20°∠31°	251°∠48°	128°∠28°