Geoscience ›› 2022, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (04): 988-997.DOI: 10.19657/j.geoscience.1000-8527.2022.197
• Oil and Gas Exploration • Previous Articles Next Articles
LIU Yang1,2(), LI Xianqing1,2(
), ZHAO Guangjie1,2, LIU Mancang3, DONG Caiyuan3, LI Jin3, XIAO Zhongyao4
Received:
2021-09-10
Revised:
2021-12-05
Online:
2022-08-10
Published:
2022-09-09
Contact:
LI Xianqing
CLC Number:
LIU Yang, LI Xianqing, ZHAO Guangjie, LIU Mancang, DONG Caiyuan, LI Jin, XIAO Zhongyao. Geochemical Characteristics of Natural Gas and Hydrocarbon Charging History of the Tugeerming Area in the Eastern Kuqa Depression[J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(04): 988-997.
Fig.1 Distribution of oil and gas reservoirs in eastern Kuqa Depression, and the cross-section and stratigraphic column ofTugeerming reservoir (modified after ref. [9])
井号 | 层位 | 深度/m | 各组分含量/% | 干燥系数 C1/ | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CH4 | C2H6 | C3H8 | N2 | CO2 | ||||
吐东2 | J2kz | / | 83.49 | 6.11 | 2.33 | 2.51 | 0.91 | 0.91 |
吐东2 | J2kz | / | 75.56 | 14.10 | 5.30 | 2.44 | 1.50 | 0.79 |
吐东2 | J1y | / | 86.90 | 7.65 | 1.83 | 0.02 | 2.34 | 0.89 |
吐东2 | J1a | 4 171~4 175 | 80.00 | 12.00 | 6.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.81 |
吐东201 | J1a | / | 87.00 | 8.00 | 3.50 | 1.50 | 0.80 | 0.81 |
吐东201 | J1a | / | 89.89 | 6.21 | 1.44 | 2.11 | 0.18 | 0.92 |
吐东201 | J2kz | 3 475~3 486 | 80.00 | 12.10 | 4.50 | 0.00 | 1.20 | 0.81 |
吐东201 | J1a | / | 90.11 | 4.59 | 1.67 | 1.89 | 0.52 | 0.93 |
Table 1 Natural gas components at Tugeerming
井号 | 层位 | 深度/m | 各组分含量/% | 干燥系数 C1/ | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CH4 | C2H6 | C3H8 | N2 | CO2 | ||||
吐东2 | J2kz | / | 83.49 | 6.11 | 2.33 | 2.51 | 0.91 | 0.91 |
吐东2 | J2kz | / | 75.56 | 14.10 | 5.30 | 2.44 | 1.50 | 0.79 |
吐东2 | J1y | / | 86.90 | 7.65 | 1.83 | 0.02 | 2.34 | 0.89 |
吐东2 | J1a | 4 171~4 175 | 80.00 | 12.00 | 6.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.81 |
吐东201 | J1a | / | 87.00 | 8.00 | 3.50 | 1.50 | 0.80 | 0.81 |
吐东201 | J1a | / | 89.89 | 6.21 | 1.44 | 2.11 | 0.18 | 0.92 |
吐东201 | J2kz | 3 475~3 486 | 80.00 | 12.10 | 4.50 | 0.00 | 1.20 | 0.81 |
吐东201 | J1a | / | 90.11 | 4.59 | 1.67 | 1.89 | 0.52 | 0.93 |
井号 | 层位 | 深度/m | 天然气组分碳同位素组成/‰ | 天然气成熟度 (Ro)/% | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
δ13C1 | δ13C2 | δ13C3 | δ13C4 | ||||
吐东2 | J2kz | / | -35.50 | -25.87 | -24.31 | -22.78 | 0.80 |
吐东2 | J2kz | / | -35.73 | -26.41 | -25.11 | -22.35 | 0.79 |
吐东2 | J1a | 4 211~4 220 | -34.12 | -25.79 | -22.40 | -21.30 | 1.05 |
吐东2 | J1a | 4 171~4 175 | -33.80 | -26.30 | -25.50 | -24.20 | 1.10 |
吐东201 | J2kz | 3 475~3 486 | -35.10 | -25.80 | -24.50 | -25.10 | 1.00 |
吐东201 | J1a | / | -35.00 | -25.30 | -22.70 | -22.60 | 0.91 |
Table 2 Carbon isotope compositions of natural gas components at Tugeerming
井号 | 层位 | 深度/m | 天然气组分碳同位素组成/‰ | 天然气成熟度 (Ro)/% | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
δ13C1 | δ13C2 | δ13C3 | δ13C4 | ||||
吐东2 | J2kz | / | -35.50 | -25.87 | -24.31 | -22.78 | 0.80 |
吐东2 | J2kz | / | -35.73 | -26.41 | -25.11 | -22.35 | 0.79 |
吐东2 | J1a | 4 211~4 220 | -34.12 | -25.79 | -22.40 | -21.30 | 1.05 |
吐东2 | J1a | 4 171~4 175 | -33.80 | -26.30 | -25.50 | -24.20 | 1.10 |
吐东201 | J2kz | 3 475~3 486 | -35.10 | -25.80 | -24.50 | -25.10 | 1.00 |
吐东201 | J1a | / | -35.00 | -25.30 | -22.70 | -22.60 | 0.91 |
[1] | 王峰, 何登发. 库车坳陷东部异常流体压力特征及其对构造变形的控制[J]. 地质科学, 2018, 53(1): 62-86. |
[2] | 吴海, 赵孟军, 卓勤功, 等. 库车坳陷北部单斜带油气充注史及成藏潜力分析[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2015, 26(12): 2325-2335. |
[3] | 张荣虎, 杨海军, 魏红兴, 等. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷北部构造带中东段中下侏罗统砂体特征及油气勘探意义[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(9) : 1243-1252. |
[4] |
PANG X Q, PENG J W, JIANG Z X, et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation processes and mechanisms in Lower Jurassic tight sandstone reservoirs in the Kuqa subbasin, Tarim Basin, northwest China: A case study of the Dibei tight gas field[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2018, 103(4):769-796.
DOI URL |
[5] | 刘如红, 李剑, 肖中尧, 等. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷吐格尔明地区油气地球化学特征及烃源探讨[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2019, 30(4): 574-581. |
[6] | 万佳林. 库车坳陷吐格尔明地区侏罗系油气成藏过程研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2020:26-57. |
[7] | 张海祖, 卢玉红, 张科, 等. 库车坳陷东部侏罗系天然气成藏特征与勘探方向[M]// 第31届全国天然气学术年会论文集. 合肥: 天然气学术委员会, 2019:18-24. |
[8] | 卢斌. 库车坳陷东部油气成藏特征及有利区带研究[D]. 北京: 中国科学院研究生院(渗流流体力学研究所), 2015:92-95. |
[9] | 王珂, 杨海军, 李勇, 等. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷北部构造带地质特征与勘探潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(6): 885-905. |
[10] | 何登发, 周新源, 杨海军, 等. 库车坳陷的地质结构及其对大油气田的控制作用[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2009, 33(1): 19-32. |
[11] | 汤良杰, 余一欣, 杨文静, 等. 库车前陆褶皱冲断带前缘滑脱层内部变形特征[J]. 中国地质, 2006, 33(5): 944-951. |
[12] | 孙金山, 刘国宏, 孙明安, 等. 库车坳陷侏罗系煤系烃源岩评价[J]. 西南石油学院学报, 2003, 25(6): 1-4. |
[13] |
CHEN L, ZHU G Y, ZHANG B, et al. Control factors and diversities of phase state of oil and gas pools in the Kuqa petroleum system[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2012, 86(2): 484-496.
DOI URL |
[14] | 陈湘飞, 李素梅, 王政军, 等. 南堡凹陷2号构造带天然气成因分析[J]. 现代地质, 2014, 28(6): 1297-1306. |
[15] | 戴金星. 天然气碳氢同位素特征和各类天然气鉴别[J]. 天然气地球科学, 1993, 4(增): 1-40. |
[16] | 李谨, 李剑, 王超, 等. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷致密砂岩气地球化学特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2021, 32(8): 1151-1162. |
[17] | 戴金星, 夏新宇, 秦胜飞, 等. 中国有机烷烃气碳同位素系列倒转的成因[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2003, 24(1): 1-6. |
[18] | 戴金星, 戚厚发. 我国煤成烃气的δ13C1- Ro关系[J]. 科学通报, 1989, 34(9): 690-692. |
[19] | 刘文汇, 徐永昌. 煤型气碳同位素演化二阶段分馏模式及机理[J]. 地球化学, 1999, 28(4): 359-366. |
[20] | 包建平, 朱翠山, 张秋茶, 等. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷不同构造单元天然气地球化学特征[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2007, 28(5): 664-668. |
[21] | NI Y Y, YAO L M, LIAO F R, et al. Geochemical comparison of the deep gases from the Sichuan and Tarim Basins, China[J]. Frontiers in Earth Science, 2021, 9(2): 1-22. |
[22] |
DU J H, WANG Z M, HU S Y, et al. Formation and geological characteristics of deep giant gas provinces in the Kuqa foreland thrust belt,Tarim basin,NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(4): 413-422.
DOI URL |
[23] | 刘全有, 戴金星, 金之钧, 等. 塔里木盆地前陆区和台盆区天然气的地球化学特征及成因[J]. 地质学报, 2009, 83(1):107-114. |
[24] |
CUI J, ZHU G Y, ZHANG B, et al. The origin and distribution of natural gas in the frontal uplift area of the Kuqa depression,Tarim Basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Geochemistry, 2010, 29(3): 313-318.
DOI URL |
[25] | 沈忠民, 王鹏, 刘四兵, 等. 川西坳陷中段须家河组天然气碳同位素特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2011, 22(5): 834-839. |
[26] | 李贤庆, 胡国艺, 李剑, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地中东部上古生界天然气地球化学特征[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2008, 30(4): 1-4. |
[27] | 时新强. 库车北部构造带迪北气田油气藏解剖[D]. 北京: 中国石油大学(北京), 2019:21-34. |
[28] |
HERBERT V, SIMON C G. Using petroleum inclusions to trace petroleum systems-A review[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 2019, 129: 99-123.
DOI URL |
[29] | 张亚超, 李贤庆, 魏强, 等. 库车坳陷迪北气藏侏罗系储层古流体特征与油气充注史[J]. 矿业科学学报, 2020, 5(4): 353-363. |
[30] | 孙可欣, 李贤庆, 魏强, 等. 库车坳陷克深大气田白垩系致密砂岩储层古流体地球化学特征研究[J]. 现代地质, 2019, 33(6): 1220-1228. |
[31] | EADING P J, Identifying oil well sites[J]. United States Patent Application, 1996, 5(2): 543-616. |
[32] | 仰云峰, 李贤庆, 董鹏, 等. 柴达木盆地北缘地区油气储层中流体包裹体特征及成藏期研究[J]. 地球化学, 2009, 38(6): 591-599. |
[33] | 王珂, 张荣虎, 余朝丰, 等. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷北部构造带侏罗系阿合组储层特征及控制因素[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2020, 31(5): 623-635. |
[34] | 杨树春, 卢庆治, 宋传真, 等. 库车前陆盆地中生界烃源岩有机质成熟度演化及影响因素[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2005, 26(6): 770-777. |
[35] | 吴海, 赵孟军, 卓勤功, 等. 膏盐岩对地层温度及烃源岩热演化的影响定量分析--以塔里木库车前陆盆地为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43(4): 550-558. |
[36] | 成亚, 吴超, 李龙江, 等. 先存断裂与膏盐岩发育对库车坳陷东部构造变形的影响[J]. 地质科学, 2020, 55(2): 352-368. |
[37] | 滕学清, 李勇, 杨沛, 等. 库车坳陷东段差异构造变形特征及控制因素[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2017, 24(2):15-21. |
[38] | 郭继刚, 庞雄奇, 刘丹丹, 等. 库车坳陷中、下侏罗统煤系烃源岩排烃特征及资源潜力评价[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2012, 23(2): 327-334. |
[39] | 万桂梅, 汤良杰, 金文正, 等. 膏盐层在库车秋里塔格构造带构造变形及成藏中的作用[J]. 地质科学, 2007, 42(4): 666-677. |
[1] | LUO Haiyi, LUO Xianrong, LIU Panfeng, MA Mingliang, LU Xiansheng, JIANG Xiaoming, BAO Guangui, JIANG Yuxiong. Soil Geochemical Characteristics in the Naqu Area,Chongzuo City, Guangxi,and Their Mineral Prospecting Applications [J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(06): 1553-1566. |
[2] | WANG Shengyi, ZOU Changchun, PENG Cheng, WANG Hongcai, LU Jingan, KANG Dongju, WU Caowei, LAN Xixi, XIE Yingfeng. Quantitative Characterization of Hydrate Occurrence Mode in Marine Pore-filling Gas Hydrate Reservoirs: Constraints from Acoustic and Resistivity Log Data [J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(01): 127-137. |
[3] | GUO Zihao, LI Canping, CHEN Fengying, GOU Limin, WANG Hongtao, ZENG Xianjun, LIU Yilin, TIAN Xinyu. Effect of Methane from Natural Gas Hydrate Decomposition on Marine Life [J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(01): 138-152. |
[4] | CHEN Shiming, YANG Zhenxi, LEI Ziqiang, KANG Weiliang, ZHANG Jing, ZHAO Qinghu. Geochemical Characteristics and Prospecting on Stream Sediment Survey in Qianhongquan Area of Beishan in Gansu Province, China [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(06): 1513-1524. |
[5] | LI Erting, MA Wanyun, LI Ji, MA Xinxing, PAN Changchun, ZENG Lifei, WANG Ming. Thermal Simulation Experiment for Hydrocarbon Generation: A Case Study of Jurassic Coal from the Southern Margin of Junggar Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(05): 1313-1323. |
[6] | LIU Tong, LIU Chuanpeng, KANG Pengyu, ZHAO Xiufang, DENG Jun, WANG Kaikai. Geochemical Characteristics and Source Analysis of Heavy Metals in Soils of Eastern Yinan, Shandong Province [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(04): 1173-1182. |
[7] | LIU Yang, JIANG Bing, ZHANG Hairui, SUN Zengbing, WANG Songtao. Geochemical Characteristics of Selenium in Surface Soil of Qingzhou, Shandong [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(03): 933-940. |
[8] | WANG Meihua. Geochemical Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Selenium-enriched Soils in Cultivated Land Around Typical Stone Coal Mines in Western Zhejiang [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(03): 941-952. |
[9] | ZHU Biqing, CHEN Shijia, BAI Yanjun, LEI Junjie, YIN Xiangdong. Geochemical Characteristics and Source of Crude Oil in Chang 8 Member of Yanchang Formation, Ganquan Area, Ordos Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(02): 742-754. |
[10] | HU Gaowei, WU Nengyou, LI Qi, BAI Chenyang, WAN Yizhao, HUANG Li, WANG Daigang, LI Yanlong, CHEN Qiang. Quantitative Method for Selecting Marine Natural Gas Hydrate Production Test Targets [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(01): 202-211. |
[11] | LI Chao, LUO Xianrong, QIU Wei, WANG Yuhui, ZHAO Xinyi, ZHENG Chaojie, LIU Panfeng. Geochemical Anomalies Characteristics of Stream Sediments and Ore-Search Prospect in Jinshuikou Area of Dulan County, Qinghai Province [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(05): 1397-1410. |
[12] | SHI Liang, ZHAO Tongtong, ZHA Hui, WANG Yanyan, HUO Pingping, FAN Bojiang. Geochemical Characteristics and Shale Oil Potential of Shale in the Yan’an Area [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(04): 1043-1053. |
[13] | DUAN Wei, TANG Wenchun, LI Longchang, RAN Qiang, ZHANG Fei, LI Xiaosong, XU Yongsheng. Geochemical Characteristics and Genesis Analysis of Daheba Epimetamorphic Graphite Deposit in Wangcang, Sichuan Province [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(03): 599-607. |
[14] | LI Jiehao, HOU Dujie, CAO Lanzhu, WU Piao, ZHAO Zhe, MA Xiaoxiao. Geochemical Characteristics and Source Correlation of Low-mature Oil from the Tengeer Formation (2nd Member) in the Saihantala Sag, Erlian Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(02): 315-325. |
[15] | CHEN Bingjin, ZHENG Cuiyong, ZHAO Liangliang, YUAN Bo, WANG Zhaofei, ZHANG Yi, GUO Bin, YU Hongbo. Application of Soil Geochemical Survey in the Exploration of Lead-Zinc Polymetallic Ore in Waziping,Mianxian County,Shaanxi Province [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(02): 455-465. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||