Geochronological, Geochemical and Geological Significance of Huilong Gabbroic Pluton in Southeastern Guangxi

doi:10.19657/j.geoscience.1000-8527.2020.033

Abstract

Abstract:

Early Mesozoic tectonics of South China has been disputed for decades. There are two prevailing view points for tectonic attributes: oceanic-continental subduction/collision or intracontinental tectonics. Previous studies mainly focus on the granitic rocks, causing multiple interpretations on its tectonic setting. The LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb age of Huilong gabbros is (245.8±1.7) Ma, showing that Huilong pluton was formed in the Early Triassic. The Huilong gabbros have relatively low contents of SiO₂ (47.42%-48.80 %) and MgO (2.24%-2.62 %), and relatively high contents of TFe₂O₃ (18.24%-21.49 %), P₂O₅ (0.38%-0.88%) and TiO₂ (1.66%-2.04%). The rocks are enriched in large ion lithophile elements (LILEs, such as Ba, Rb, and U) and depleted in high field strength elements (HFSEs, such as Nb, Ta, Zr, Hf, and Ti, (La/Yb)_N=3.85-5.99), showing a significant positive Eu anomaly (δEu=1.04-1.48). Sr-Nd isotope characteristics, including ( ⁸⁷Sr/ ⁸⁶Sr)_i=0.717,658 - 0.718,405 and ε_Nd(t)=-10.30 to -10.71, demonstrate affinity to the EM II enriched mantle, and imply an enriched mantle source formed under the influence of ancient subduction events at Yunkai. Based on previous studies, the Huilong pluton was probably generated from the partial melting of an enriched mantle source under the backarc spreading of paleo-Pacific subduction beneath South China, with fractionation of mafic minerals.

Key words: gabbro, zircon U-Pb age, EM II enriched mantle, Huilong pluton, southeastern Guangxi

CLC Number:

P588.1

LI Daixian, KANG Zhiqiang, LIU Di, CHEN Huan, CAO Yan, WEI Naishao, WEI Tianwei, WANG Rui, LIU Dongmei, ZHOU Tong, LAN Haiyang. Geochronological, Geochemical and Geological Significance of Huilong Gabbroic Pluton in Southeastern Guangxi[J]. Geoscience, 2020, 34(05): 1015-1027.

Figures/Tables 11

Fig.1 Simplified sketch map of the Qinzhou Bay-Hangzhou Bay juncture (a)and Yunkai block (b)and geological map of Xindi-Anping area (c)

Fig.2 Field photos and thin-section microscopic photographs of the Huilong pluton

Table 1 Zircon U-Pb isotope composition of the Huilong hornblende gabbro (17HL-01)

分析点号	含量/10^-6			Th/U	同位素比值(1σ)		同位素年龄(1σ)/Ma
分析点号	Th	U	Pb	Th/U	²⁰⁷Pb/²³⁵U	²⁰⁶Pb/²³⁸U	²⁰⁷Pb/²³⁵U	²⁰⁶Pb/²³⁸U
17HL- 01-01	79.2	169.2	8.0	0.47	0.272 8(0.013 9)	0.039 3(0.000 5)	245(11.11)	249(3.20)
17HL- 01-02	85.5	136.8	6.8	0.62	0.292 1(0.015 4)	0.039 4(0.000 5)	260(12.10)	249(3.41)
17HL- 01-03	101.2	152.5	7.4	0.66	0.260 2(0.014 0)	0.038 5(0.000 6)	235(11.27)	243(3.88)
17HL- 01-08	179.5	422.9	19.4	0.42	0.275 0(0.010 6)	0.038 3(0.000 4)	247(8.43)	242(2.65)
17HL- 01-10	101.6	232.0	10.9	0.44	0.257 2(0.014 0)	0.039 2(0.000 6)	232(11.32)	248(3.53)
17HL- 01-11	92.6	190.3	9.2	0.49	0.275 2(0.013 0)	0.039 0(0.000 6)	247(10.35)	247(3.43)
17HL- 01-13	71.6	154.1	7.4	0.46	0.301 0(0.016 4)	0.039 5(0.000 6)	267(12.77)	250(4.00)
17HL- 01-15	123.2	293.1	14.3	0.42	0.284 7(0.013 6)	0.040 1(0.000 5)	254(10.75)	254(3.18)
17HL- 01-16	178.3	435.5	20.5	0.41	0.267 9(0.010 0)	0.038 3(0.000 4)	241(8.01)	243(2.71)
17HL- 01-17	82.6	179.3	8.7	0.46	0.290 6(0.015 3)	0.038 6(0.000 5)	259(12.06)	244(3.40)
17HL- 01-18	85.1	180.7	8.9	0.47	0.294 7(0.013 8)	0.038 5(0.000 5)	262(10.84)	243(3.34)
17HL- 01-19	76.4	228.2	10.5	0.33	0.254 8(0.012 1)	0.038 1(0.000 5)	231(9.78)	241(3.08)
17HL- 01-20	93.0	141.5	7.1	0.66	0.277 1(0.013 9)	0.037 8(0.000 6)	248(11.07)	239(3.74)
17HL- 01-21	121.9	193.1	10.1	0.63	0.277 6(0.014 0)	0.039 5(0.000 5)	249(11.16)	250(3.40)
17HL- 01-22	84.3	119.7	6.4	0.70	0.293 7(0.018 8)	0.039 8(0.000 7)	261(14.75)	251(4.11)
17HL- 01-23	83.5	185.7	9.3	0.45	0.275 9(0.014 5)	0.039 5(0.000 6)	247(11.58)	250(3.45)
17HL- 01-24	51.4	131.5	6.2	0.39	0.274 6(0.015 7)	0.038 5(0.000 7)	246(12.55)	244(4.14)
17HL- 01-25	65.0	159.5	7.8	0.41	0.292 4(0.016 0)	0.039 4(0.000 7)	260(12.60)	249(4.51)
17HL- 01-27	152.8	255.8	12.7	0.60	0.269 8(0.014 0)	0.038 4(0.000 5)	243(11.23)	243(3.18)
17HL- 01-28	153.9	260.4	12.9	0.59	0.298 1(0.015 0)	0.038 5(0.000 5)	265(11.71)	244(3.22)
17HL- 01-29	162.4	479.8	22.6	0.34	0.294 9(0.012 0)	0.039 0(0.000 5)	262(9.42)	246(3.00)

Table 1 Zircon U-Pb isotope composition of the Huilong hornblende gabbro (17HL-01)

分析点号	含量/10^-6			Th/U	同位素比值(1σ)		同位素年龄(1σ)/Ma
分析点号	Th	U	Pb	Th/U	²⁰⁷Pb/²³⁵U	²⁰⁶Pb/²³⁸U	²⁰⁷Pb/²³⁵U	²⁰⁶Pb/²³⁸U
17HL- 01-01	79.2	169.2	8.0	0.47	0.272 8(0.013 9)	0.039 3(0.000 5)	245(11.11)	249(3.20)
17HL- 01-02	85.5	136.8	6.8	0.62	0.292 1(0.015 4)	0.039 4(0.000 5)	260(12.10)	249(3.41)
17HL- 01-03	101.2	152.5	7.4	0.66	0.260 2(0.014 0)	0.038 5(0.000 6)	235(11.27)	243(3.88)
17HL- 01-08	179.5	422.9	19.4	0.42	0.275 0(0.010 6)	0.038 3(0.000 4)	247(8.43)	242(2.65)
17HL- 01-10	101.6	232.0	10.9	0.44	0.257 2(0.014 0)	0.039 2(0.000 6)	232(11.32)	248(3.53)
17HL- 01-11	92.6	190.3	9.2	0.49	0.275 2(0.013 0)	0.039 0(0.000 6)	247(10.35)	247(3.43)
17HL- 01-13	71.6	154.1	7.4	0.46	0.301 0(0.016 4)	0.039 5(0.000 6)	267(12.77)	250(4.00)
17HL- 01-15	123.2	293.1	14.3	0.42	0.284 7(0.013 6)	0.040 1(0.000 5)	254(10.75)	254(3.18)
17HL- 01-16	178.3	435.5	20.5	0.41	0.267 9(0.010 0)	0.038 3(0.000 4)	241(8.01)	243(2.71)
17HL- 01-17	82.6	179.3	8.7	0.46	0.290 6(0.015 3)	0.038 6(0.000 5)	259(12.06)	244(3.40)
17HL- 01-18	85.1	180.7	8.9	0.47	0.294 7(0.013 8)	0.038 5(0.000 5)	262(10.84)	243(3.34)
17HL- 01-19	76.4	228.2	10.5	0.33	0.254 8(0.012 1)	0.038 1(0.000 5)	231(9.78)	241(3.08)
17HL- 01-20	93.0	141.5	7.1	0.66	0.277 1(0.013 9)	0.037 8(0.000 6)	248(11.07)	239(3.74)
17HL- 01-21	121.9	193.1	10.1	0.63	0.277 6(0.014 0)	0.039 5(0.000 5)	249(11.16)	250(3.40)
17HL- 01-22	84.3	119.7	6.4	0.70	0.293 7(0.018 8)	0.039 8(0.000 7)	261(14.75)	251(4.11)
17HL- 01-23	83.5	185.7	9.3	0.45	0.275 9(0.014 5)	0.039 5(0.000 6)	247(11.58)	250(3.45)
17HL- 01-24	51.4	131.5	6.2	0.39	0.274 6(0.015 7)	0.038 5(0.000 7)	246(12.55)	244(4.14)
17HL- 01-25	65.0	159.5	7.8	0.41	0.292 4(0.016 0)	0.039 4(0.000 7)	260(12.60)	249(4.51)
17HL- 01-27	152.8	255.8	12.7	0.60	0.269 8(0.014 0)	0.038 4(0.000 5)	243(11.23)	243(3.18)
17HL- 01-28	153.9	260.4	12.9	0.59	0.298 1(0.015 0)	0.038 5(0.000 5)	265(11.71)	244(3.22)
17HL- 01-29	162.4	479.8	22.6	0.34	0.294 9(0.012 0)	0.039 0(0.000 5)	262(9.42)	246(3.00)

Table 2 Contents of major elements (%) and trace elements (10-6) of the Huilong hornblende gabbro pluton

样品编号	SiO₂	TiO₂		Al₂O₃		TFe₂O₃		MnO	MgO		CaO		Na₂O		K₂O	P₂O₅		烧失量		总量
17HL-01	47.98	2.04		15.09		18.81		0.23	2.62		7.92		2.62		0.68	0.88		1.03		99.90
17HL-02	48.51	1.98		15.12		18.24		0.24	2.62		6.43		2.84		2.08	0.73		1.08		99.87
19HL-01-03	48.65	1.93		15.71		19.27		0.26	2.27		7.35		2.55		0.88	0.46		0.62		99.96
19HL-01-04	47.42	2.03		15.84		19.76		0.25	2.25		7.63		2.50		0.86	0.49		0.81		99.86
19HL-01-05	48.80	1.66		14.37		21.49		0.29	2.24		6.92		2.19		1.09	0.38		0.57		100.00
样品编号	TFeO	Mg^#		Ti		V		Cr	Co		Ni		Cu		Zn	Ga		Rb		Sr
17HL-01	16.93	24.52		12 231		22.05		5.46	32.82		7.03		29.39		164.25	23.62		30.53		262.55
17HL-02	16.42	25.06		11 852		19.42		4.57	30.59		5.08		25.19		156.30	23.70		111.80		328.70
19HL-01-03	17.34	21.57		11 559		18.90		2.35	33.21		3.03		19.29		140.92	28.27		35.27		251.13
19HL-01-04	17.78	20.98		12 149		20.68		4.01	30.98		2.87		10.06		145.51	27.51		12.88		248.01
19HL-01-05	19.34	19.57		09 952		13.23		3.13	32.59		2.49		20.64		160.03	26.31		47.18		220.39
样品编号	Y	Zr		Nb		Ba		La	Ce		Pr		Nd		Sm	Eu		Gd		Tb
17HL-01	28.10	48.14		10.73		384.25		19.42	45.19		5.85		25.35		5.81	2.69		5.62		0.95
17HL-02	28.65	36.44		9.75		650.35		19.68	44.04		5.77		24.84		5.69	2.72		5.57		0.95
19HL-01-03	37.81	30.55		11.01		290.07		18.59	43.46		6.52		29.01		7.18	2.40		6.91		1.17
19HL-01-04	32.68	31.26		12.09		275.16		15.85	37.41		5.71		25.42		6.38	2.37		6.34		1.08
19HL-01-05	30.94	38.70		11.00		303.99		21.06	45.01		6.33		26.83		5.97	2.34		5.78		0.95
样品编号	Dy	Ho		Er		Tm		Yb	Lu		Hf		Ta		Pb	Th		U		∑REE
17HL-01	5.37	0.98		3.14		0.35		2.32	0.34		1.31		0.83		11.73	1.87		0.58		123.38
17HL-02	5.39	1.00		3.20		0.37		2.46	0.35		1.19		0.74		12.34	2.77		0.67		122.01
19HL-01-03	7.04	1.42		3.68		0.58		3.46	0.50		1.18		1.01		11.90	1.90		0.82		131.91
19HL-01-04	6.46	1.30		3.35		0.52		3.09	0.45		1.13		1.04		11.04	2.02		0.97		115.74
19HL-01-05	5.69	1.15		3.06		0.49		3.03	0.46		1.37		1.02		12.39	3.73		1.30		128.15
样品编号	LREE/HREE		δEu		δCe		(La/Yb)_N			(La/Sm)_N		(Gd/Yb)_N		Nb/U			Ce/Pb		Zr/Nb
17HL-01	5.47		1.44		1.03		5.99			2.16		2.00		18.49			3.85		4.49
17HL-02	5.33		1.48		1.00		5.73			2.23		1.87		14.56			3.57		3.74
19HL-01-03	4.33		1.04		0.97		3.86			1.67		1.65		13.36			3.65		2.77
19HL-01-04	4.12		1.14		0.96		3.68			1.60		1.70		12.46			3.39		2.58
19HL-01-05	5.22		1.22		0.95		4.98			2.28		1.58		08.45			3.63		2.52

Table 2 Contents of major elements (%) and trace elements (10-6) of the Huilong hornblende gabbro pluton

样品编号	SiO₂	TiO₂		Al₂O₃		TFe₂O₃		MnO	MgO		CaO		Na₂O		K₂O	P₂O₅		烧失量		总量
17HL-01	47.98	2.04		15.09		18.81		0.23	2.62		7.92		2.62		0.68	0.88		1.03		99.90
17HL-02	48.51	1.98		15.12		18.24		0.24	2.62		6.43		2.84		2.08	0.73		1.08		99.87
19HL-01-03	48.65	1.93		15.71		19.27		0.26	2.27		7.35		2.55		0.88	0.46		0.62		99.96
19HL-01-04	47.42	2.03		15.84		19.76		0.25	2.25		7.63		2.50		0.86	0.49		0.81		99.86
19HL-01-05	48.80	1.66		14.37		21.49		0.29	2.24		6.92		2.19		1.09	0.38		0.57		100.00
样品编号	TFeO	Mg^#		Ti		V		Cr	Co		Ni		Cu		Zn	Ga		Rb		Sr
17HL-01	16.93	24.52		12 231		22.05		5.46	32.82		7.03		29.39		164.25	23.62		30.53		262.55
17HL-02	16.42	25.06		11 852		19.42		4.57	30.59		5.08		25.19		156.30	23.70		111.80		328.70
19HL-01-03	17.34	21.57		11 559		18.90		2.35	33.21		3.03		19.29		140.92	28.27		35.27		251.13
19HL-01-04	17.78	20.98		12 149		20.68		4.01	30.98		2.87		10.06		145.51	27.51		12.88		248.01
19HL-01-05	19.34	19.57		09 952		13.23		3.13	32.59		2.49		20.64		160.03	26.31		47.18		220.39
样品编号	Y	Zr		Nb		Ba		La	Ce		Pr		Nd		Sm	Eu		Gd		Tb
17HL-01	28.10	48.14		10.73		384.25		19.42	45.19		5.85		25.35		5.81	2.69		5.62		0.95
17HL-02	28.65	36.44		9.75		650.35		19.68	44.04		5.77		24.84		5.69	2.72		5.57		0.95
19HL-01-03	37.81	30.55		11.01		290.07		18.59	43.46		6.52		29.01		7.18	2.40		6.91		1.17
19HL-01-04	32.68	31.26		12.09		275.16		15.85	37.41		5.71		25.42		6.38	2.37		6.34		1.08
19HL-01-05	30.94	38.70		11.00		303.99		21.06	45.01		6.33		26.83		5.97	2.34		5.78		0.95
样品编号	Dy	Ho		Er		Tm		Yb	Lu		Hf		Ta		Pb	Th		U		∑REE
17HL-01	5.37	0.98		3.14		0.35		2.32	0.34		1.31		0.83		11.73	1.87		0.58		123.38
17HL-02	5.39	1.00		3.20		0.37		2.46	0.35		1.19		0.74		12.34	2.77		0.67		122.01
19HL-01-03	7.04	1.42		3.68		0.58		3.46	0.50		1.18		1.01		11.90	1.90		0.82		131.91
19HL-01-04	6.46	1.30		3.35		0.52		3.09	0.45		1.13		1.04		11.04	2.02		0.97		115.74
19HL-01-05	5.69	1.15		3.06		0.49		3.03	0.46		1.37		1.02		12.39	3.73		1.30		128.15
样品编号	LREE/HREE		δEu		δCe		(La/Yb)_N			(La/Sm)_N		(Gd/Yb)_N		Nb/U			Ce/Pb		Zr/Nb
17HL-01	5.47		1.44		1.03		5.99			2.16		2.00		18.49			3.85		4.49
17HL-02	5.33		1.48		1.00		5.73			2.23		1.87		14.56			3.57		3.74
19HL-01-03	4.33		1.04		0.97		3.86			1.67		1.65		13.36			3.65		2.77
19HL-01-04	4.12		1.14		0.96		3.68			1.60		1.70		12.46			3.39		2.58
19HL-01-05	5.22		1.22		0.95		4.98			2.28		1.58		08.45			3.63		2.52

Table 3 Sr and Nd isotope data for the Huilong gabbroic pluton

样号	Sm	Nd	Rb	Sr	¹⁴⁷Sm/¹⁴⁴Nd	¹⁴³Nd/¹⁴⁴Nd±2σ	ε_Nd(t)	$T D M 2$	⁸⁷Rb/⁸⁶Sr	⁸⁷Sr/⁸⁶Sr±2σ	I_Sr
17HL-01	5.81	25.35	30.5	262.6	0.138 5	0.512 015±4	-10.33	1.86	0.336 4	0.719 604±9	0.718 405
17HL-02	5.69	24.84	111.8	328.7	0.138 3	0.511 993±2	-10.75	1.89	0.984 2	0.721 166±9	0.717 658

Table 3 Sr and Nd isotope data for the Huilong gabbroic pluton

样号	Sm	Nd	Rb	Sr	¹⁴⁷Sm/¹⁴⁴Nd	¹⁴³Nd/¹⁴⁴Nd±2σ	ε_Nd(t)	$T D M 2$	⁸⁷Rb/⁸⁶Sr	⁸⁷Sr/⁸⁶Sr±2σ	I_Sr
17HL-01	5.81	25.35	30.5	262.6	0.138 5	0.512 015±4	-10.33	1.86	0.336 4	0.719 604±9	0.718 405
17HL-02	5.69	24.84	111.8	328.7	0.138 3	0.511 993±2	-10.75	1.89	0.984 2	0.721 166±9	0.717 658

Fig.3 Zircon cathodoluminescence images (a) and U-Pb concordia diagram (b) for the Huilong pluton

Fig.4 TAS (a) and Nb/Y-Zr/TiO2(b) diagrams for the Huilong gabbro pluton (base map after references[27-28])

Fig.5 AFM (a) and Y-Zr (b) diagrams for the Huilong gabbroic pluton (after references [29 - 30], data and symbology same as Fig.4)

Fig. 6 Chondrite-normalized REE patterns and primitive mantle-normalized multi-elements patterns of the Huilong gabbroic pluton (chondrite and primitive-mantle normalizing values after reference[33])

Fig. 7 Age vs.εNd(t) (a) and (87Sr/86Sr)i vs. εNd (t) (b) diagrams for the Huilong gabbroic pluton (base map modified after references [34,36], EM I and EM II mantle end-members, upper continental crust and lower continental crust are after references [37-38])

Fig.8 La/Yb vs.Ba/La diagram for the Huilong hornblende gabbro (data source: N-MORB from reference [33]; sediment and slab-derived melts from reference[49]; average subducted sediment-derived fluid from reference[50]; average subducted basaltic crust-derived fluid from reference [51])

References 80

[1]	张岳桥, 徐安兵, 贾东, 等. 华南早中生代从印支期碰撞构造体系向燕山期俯冲构造体系转换的形变记录[J]. 地学前缘, 2009,16(1):234-247.
[2]	张国伟, 郭安林, 王岳军, 等. 中国华南大陆构造与问题[J]. 中国科学(地球科学), 2013,43(10):1553-1582.
[3]	杨明桂, 梅永文. 钦—杭古板块结合带与成矿带的主要特征[J]. 华南地质与矿产, 1997(3):52-59.
[4]	殷鸿福, 吴顺宝, 杜远生, 等. 华南是特提斯多岛洋体系的一部分[J]. 地球科学, 1999,24(1):1-12.
[5]	吴根耀, 李曰俊. 桂东南马山沿灵山断裂出露的印支期洋岛玄武岩及其区域构造意义[J]. 现代地质, 2011,25(4):682-689.
[6]	覃小锋, 王宗起, 宫江华, 等. 云开地块北缘加里东期中-基性火山岩的厘定:钦—杭结合带南西段早古生代古洋盆存在的证据[J]. 岩石学报, 2017,33(3):791-809.
[7]	朱安汉, 覃小锋, 王宗起, 等. 湘西南—桂北交界地区加里东期基性岩的发现及其地质意义[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2016,16(5):19-25.
[8]	WANG J, LI Z X. History of Neoproterozoic rift basins in South China implications for Rodinia break-up[J]. Precambrian Research, 2003,122(1/4):141-158. DOI URL
[9]	舒良树. 华南构造演化的基本特征[J]. 地质通报, 2012,31(7):1035-1053.
[10]	邓奇, 汪正江, 王剑, 等. 江南造山带东段800~780 Ma陆内裂谷岩浆活动——来自浙皖赣邻区约790Ma铝质A型花岗岩的证据[J]. 地质通报, 2016,35(11):1855-1868.
[11]	张伯友, 石满全, 杨树锋, 等. 古特提斯造山带在华南两广交界地区的新证据[J]. 地质论评, 1995,41(1):1-6.
[12]	马文璞. 华南陆域内古特提斯形迹、二叠纪造山作用和互换构造域的东延[J]. 地质科学, 1996,31(2):105-113.
[13]	LI Z X, LI X H. Formation of the 1300 km-wide intracontinental orogen and postorogenic magmatic province in Mesozoic South China: A flat-slab subduction model[J]. Geology, 2007,35(2):179-182. DOI URL
[14]	WANG Y J, ZHANG A M, FAN W M, et al. Origin of paleosubduction-modified mantle for silurian gabbro in the cathaysia block: geochronological and geochemical evidence[J]. Lithos, 2013,160/161(1):37-54. DOI URL
[15]	周岱, 龙文国, 王磊, 等. 云开地区早古生代竹雅—石板辉长岩锆石 U-Pb 定年与Lu-Hf 同位素特征[J]. 地质通报, 2017,36(5):726-737.
[16]	广西壮族自治区地质矿产局. 广西壮族自治区区域地质志[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1985: 672-679.
[17]	吕劲松, 张雪辉, 孙建东, 等. 钦杭成矿带东段燕山期中酸性岩浆活动时空演化与成矿规律[J]. 岩石学报, 2017,33(11):3635-3658.
[18]	徐畅, 王岳军, 张玉芝, 等. 云开池垌志留纪辉长岩体的年代学、地球化学特征及构造意义[J]. 地球科学, 2019,44(4):1202-1216.
[19]	赵国英, 覃小锋, 王宗起, 等. 桂东南新地—安平地区辉长岩的年代学、地球化学特征及其地质意义[J]. 岩石矿物学杂志, 2016,35(5):791-803.
[20]	LIU Y S, GAO S, HU Z C, et al. Continental and oceanic crust recycling-induced melt-peridotite interactions in the trans-North China Orogen: U-Pb dating, Hf isotopes and trace elements in zircons from mantle xenoliths[J]. Journal of Petrology, 2010,51(1/2):537-571. DOI URL
[21]	ANDERSEN T. Correction of common lead in U-Pb analyses that do not report ²⁰⁴Pb [J]. Chemical Geology, 2002,192(1/2):59-79. DOI URL
[22]	LUDWIG K R. User's Manual for Isoplot 3.00: A Geochronological Toolkit for Microsoft Excel[M]. Berkeley: Berkeley Geochronology Center, 2003: 20-35.
[23]	YUAN H L, GAO S, LIU X M, et al. Accurate U-Pb age and trace element determinations of zircon by laser ablation-inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry[J]. Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research, 2010,28(3):353-370. DOI URL
[24]	刘颖, 刘海臣, 李献华. 用ICP-MS准确测定岩石样品中的40余种微量元素[J]. 地球化学, 1996,25(6):552-558.
[25]	梁细荣, 韦刚健, 李献华, 等. 利用MC-ICPMS精确测定 ¹⁴³Nd/ ¹⁴⁴Nd和Sm/Nd比值 [J]. 地球化学, 2003,32(1):91-96.
[26]	WU Y B, ZHENG Y F. Genesis of zircon and its constraints on interpretation of U-Pb age[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2004,15:1554-1569.
[27]	MIDDLEMOST E A K. Naming materials in the magma/igneous rock system[J]. Earth and Science Reviews, 1994,37(3/4):215-224. DOI URL
[28]	WINCHESTER J A, FLOYD P A. Geochemical discrimination of different magma series and their differentiation products using immobile elements[J]. Chemical Geology, 1977,20(4):325-343. DOI URL
[29]	IRVINET N, BARAGAR W R A. A guide to the chemical classification of the common volcanic rocks[J]. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 1971,8(5):523-528. DOI URL
[30]	ROSS P S, BEDARD J H. Magmatic affinity of modern and ancient subalkaline volcanic rocks determined from trace-element discriminant diagrams[J]. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 2009,46(11):823-839. DOI URL
[31]	肖兵, 陈华勇, 王云峰, 等. 东天山土屋—延东铜矿矿区晚志留世岩体的发现及构造意义[J]. 地学前缘, 2015,22(6):251-266.
[32]	韦天伟, 杨锋, 康志强, 等. 西藏拉萨地块东部尼木—加查地区林子宗群火山岩年代学、地球化学特征及其构造意义[J]. 现代地质, 2019,33(4):715-726.
[33]	SUN SS, MCDONOUGH W F. Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts: Implications for mantle composition and processes[J]. Geological Society of London, Special Publication, 1989,42(1):313-345. DOI URL
[34]	沈渭洲, 朱金初, 刘昌实, 等. 华南基底变质岩的 Sm-Nd 同位素及其对花岗岩类物质来源的制约[J]. 岩石学报, 1993,9(2):115-124.
[35]	吴锁平, 吴才来, 陈其龙, 等. Sr-Nd同位素初始比值和Nd模式年龄的误差估算[J]. 地质学报, 2009,83(7):1030-1038.
[36]	XIE W, SONG X Y, DENG Y F, et al. Geochemistry and petrogenetic implications of a Late Devonian mafic-ultramafic intrusion at the southern margin of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt[J]. Lithos, 2012,144/145:209-230. DOI URL
[37]	ZINDLER A, HART S R. Chemical dynamics[J]. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences Letters, 1986,14:493-571.
[38]	RUDNICK R L, GAO S. Composition of the continental crust[M] // RUDNICK R L, GAO S. Treatise on Geochemistry: The Crust. Oxford: Elsevier, 2003: 1-64.
[39]	罗璋. 桂东南岩浆岩同源群体的划分、组合特征与相互关系[J]. 广西地质, 1987(2):35-45.
[40]	SKLYAROV E V, GLADKOCHUB D P, MAZUKABZOV A M, et al. Neoproterozoic mafic dike swarms of the Sharyzhalgai metamorphic massif, southern Siberian craton[J]. Precambrian Research, 2003,122(1/4):359-376. DOI URL
[41]	FREY F A, GREEN D H, ROY S D. Integrated models of basalt petrogenesis: A study of quartz tholeiites to olivine melilitites from South eastern Australia utilizing geochemical and experimental petrological data[J]. Journal of Petrology, 1978,19(3):463-513. DOI URL
[42]	杨震, 木合塔尔·扎日, 吴兆宁,等. 东天山企鹅山群火山岩地球化学特征及其地质意义[J]. 现代地质, 2015,29(4):866-872.
[43]	沈利军. 云南省弥渡扬子地区基性火山岩特征及成因[D]. 成都:成都理工大学, 2016.
[44]	师江朋, 韩效忠, 乔树岩, 等. 南祁连北缘东段晚奥陶世构造演化:多藏角闪辉长岩U-Pb年代学、岩石地球化学和矿物化学证据[J]. 地学前缘, 2017,24(6):46-59.
[45]	HOFMANN A W, JOCHUM K P, SEUFERT M, et al. Nb and Pb in oceanic basalts: new constraints on mantle[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1986,79(1/2):33-45. DOI URL
[46]	贺娟, 王启宇, 闫国川. 滇西金沙江—红河构造带鲁甸始新世煌斑岩成因及动力学背景[J]. 地球科学, 2018,43(8):2586-2599.
[47]	HART S R. A large-scale isotope anomaly in the southern hemisphere mantle[J]. Nature, 1984,309:753-757. DOI URL
[48]	夏炎. 华夏地块幕式岩浆作用与大陆地壳增生和再造[D]. 南京:南京大学, 2015.
[49]	YOGODZINSKI G M, KAY R W, VOLYNETS O N, et al. Magnesian andesite in the western Aleutian Komandorsky region: Implications for slab melting and processes in the mantle wedge[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 1995,107:505-519. DOI URL
[50]	AIZAWA Y, TSTSUMI Y, YAMADA H. Element transport by dehydration of subducted sediments:Implication for arc and ocean island magmatism[J]. Island Arc, 1999,8:38-46. DOI URL
[51]	KOGISO T, TATSUMI Y, NAKANO S. Trace element transport during dehydration processes in the subducted oceanic crust: 1. Experiments and implications for the origin of ocean island basalts[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1997,148(1/2):193-205. DOI URL
[52]	ZHANG Q, JIANG Y H, WANG G C, et al. Origin of silurian gabbros and I-type granites in central Fujian, SE China: implications for the evolution of the early paleozoic orogen of South China[J]. Lithos, 2015,216/217:285-297. DOI URL
[53]	张晓静, 肖加飞. 桂西北玉凤、巴马晚二叠世辉绿岩年代学、地球化学特征及成因研究[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2014,33(2):163-176. DOI URL
[54]	夏文静, 闫全人, 向忠金, 等. 南盘江盆地八渡辉绿岩斜锆石和锆石U-Pb年龄及其地质意义[J]. 地球学报, 2019,40(2):265-278.
[55]	肖龙, 王方正, 王华, 等. 地幔柱构造对松辽盆地及渤海湾盆地形成的制约[J]. 地球科学, 2004,29(3):283-292.
[56]	凌洪飞, 沈渭洲, 邓平, 等. 粤北帽峰花岗岩体地球化学特征及成因研究[J]. 岩石学报, 2005,21(3):677-687.
[57]	孙立强, 凌洪飞, 沈渭洲, 等. 南岭地区油山岩体和坪田岩体形成年龄及其地质意义[J]. 高校地质学报, 2010,16(2):186-197.
[58]	张善果, 黄国龙, 沈渭洲, 等. 诸广山南部白云岩体岩石地球化学特征及成因[J]. 铀矿地质, 2011,27(5):265-273.
[59]	兰鸿锋, 凌洪飞, 孙立强, 等. 诸广山南体桃金洞花岗岩成因和铀成矿潜力探讨[J]. 高校地质学报, 2016,22(1):12-29.
[60]	王岳军, ZHANG Y H, 范蔚茗,等. 湖南印支期过铝质花岗岩的形成:岩浆底侵与地壳加厚热效应的数值模拟[J]. 中国科学(地球科学), 2002,32(6):491-499.
[61]	孙涛, 周新民, 陈培荣, 等. 南岭东段中生代强过铝花岗岩成因及其大地构造意义[J]. 中国科学(地球科学), 2003,33(12):1209-1218.
[62]	CHEN F K, LI X H, WANG X L, et al. Zircon age and Nd-Hf isotopic composition of the Yunnan Tethyan belt,southwestern China[J]. International Journal of Earth Science, 2007,96(6):1179-1194. DOI URL
[63]	WANG Y J, FAN W M, SUN M, et al. Geochronological,geochemical and geothermal constraints on petrogenesis of the Indosinian peraluminous granites in the South China block: A case study in the Hunan Province[J]. Lithos, 2007,96(3/4):475-502. DOI URL
[64]	金鑫镖, 王磊, 向华, 等. 湖南桃江地区印支期辉绿岩成因——地球化学、年代学和Sr-Nd-Pb同位素约束[J]. 地质通报, 2017,36(5):750-760.
[65]	刘勇, 李廷栋, 肖庆辉, 等. 湘南宁远地区碱性玄武岩形成时代的新证据:锆石LA-ICP-MS U-Pb定年[J]. 地质通报, 2010,29(6):833-841.
[66]	刘勇, 李廷栋, 肖庆辉, 等. 湘南宜章地区辉绿岩、花岗斑岩、安山岩的形成时代和成因——锆石U-Pb年龄和Hf同位素组成[J]. 地质通报, 2012,31(9):1363-1378.
[67]	袁永盛. 桂东南永安岩体岩石地球化学特征及构造环境[D]. 北京:中国地质大学(北京), 2016.
[68]	王文宝. 十万大山构造带变形—岩浆演化过程:对华南大陆印支运动的限定[D]. 北京:中国地质大学(北京), 2017.
[69]	WANG Q, LI J W, JIAN P, et al. Alkaline syenites in eastern Cathaysia (South China): link to Permian-Triassic transtension[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2005,230:339-354. DOI URL
[70]	王文宝, 李建华, 辛宇佳, 等. 华南大容山—十万大山花岗岩体LA-ICP-MS锆石U-Pb定年、地球化学特征及地质意义[J]. 地球学报, 2018,39(2):179-194.
[71]	李孙雄, 云平, 范渊, 等. 海南岛琼中地区琼中岩体锆石U-Pb年龄及其地质意义[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2005,29(2):227-233.
[72]	沈林伟. 华南东南部晚古生代构造演化:来自岩浆岩及沉积岩的证据[D]. 南京:南京大学, 2018.
[73]	覃小锋, 王宗起, 曹洁, 等. 桂南钦防构造带西南段印支早期花岗岩的成因:年代学和地球化学约束[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013,43(5):1471-1488.
[74]	钟玉芳, 马昌前, 佘振兵, 等. 赣西北蒙山岩体的锆石U-Pb-Hf、地球化学特征及成因[J]. 地球科学, 2011,36(4):703-720.
[75]	CHU Y, FAURE M, LIN W, et al. Tectonics of the Middle Triassic intracontinental Xuefengshan Belt, South China: new insights from structural and chronological constraints on the basal décollement zone[J]. International Journal of Earth Sciences, 2012,101:2025-2150. DOI URL
[76]	CHU Y, FAURE M, LIN W, et al. Early Mesozoic tectonics of the South China block: Insights from the Xuefengshan intracontinental orogen[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2012,61:199-220. DOI URL
[77]	LI W Y, MA C Q, LIU Y Y, et al. Discovery of the Indosinian aluminum A-type granite in Zhejiang Province and its geological significance[J]. Science China Earth Sciences, 2012,55(1):13-25. DOI URL
[78]	SUN Y, MA C Q, LIU YY, et al. Geochronological and geochemical constraints on the petrogenesis of late Triassic aluminous A-type granites in southeast China[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2011,42(6):1117-1131. DOI URL
[79]	MAO J R, YE H M, LIU K, et al. The Indosinian collision-extension event between the South China Block and the Palaeo-Pacific plate: Evidence from Indosinian alkaline granitic rocks in Dashuang, eastern Zhejiang, South China[J]. Lithos, 2013,172/173:81-97. DOI URL
[80]	GAO W L, WANG Z X, SONG W J, et al. Zircon U-Pb geochronology,geochemistry and tectonic implications of Triassic A-type granites from southeastern Zhejiang, South China[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2014,96:255-268. DOI URL