Geoscience ›› 2019, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (02): 271-283.DOI: 10.19657/j.geoscience.1000-8527.2019.02.03
• Ore Deposits and Petrology • Previous Articles Next Articles
QIN Jinhua1,2(), LIU Cui1(
), DENG Jinfu1, DUAN Peixin1, GUO Na3
Received:
2018-03-21
Revised:
2018-11-20
Online:
2019-05-08
Published:
2019-05-08
Contact:
LIU Cui
CLC Number:
QIN Jinhua, LIU Cui, DENG Jinfu, DUAN Peixin, GUO Na. Characteristics and Geological Significance of Alkaline Melano-minerals in Maojiatun Granite, Heilongjiang Province[J]. Geoscience, 2019, 33(02): 271-283.
测试点号 | wB/% | T占位 | C占位 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SiO2 | TiO2 | Al2O3 | FeO | MnO | MgO | CaO | Na2O | K2O | Si | ⅣAl | Ti | 总计 | ⅥAl | Ti | |
MJT1-1 | 49.00 | 1.39 | 0.51 | 34.35 | 1.04 | 0.06 | 1.12 | 7.58 | 1.95 | 7.64 | 0.09 | 0.16 | 7.89 | 0 | 0 |
MJT1-2 | 48.71 | 1.28 | 0.56 | 34.32 | 1.17 | 0.01 | 1.11 | 7.76 | 2.15 | 7.59 | 0.10 | 0.15 | 7.84 | 0 | 0 |
MJT1-3 | 49.82 | 1.33 | 0.41 | 33.72 | 1.08 | 0.13 | 0.84 | 7.74 | 2.21 | 7.74 | 0.08 | 0.16 | 7.97 | 0 | 0 |
MJT1-4 | 48.87 | 1.45 | 0.42 | 34.22 | 1.23 | - | 1.09 | 7.73 | 2.01 | 7.61 | 0.08 | 0.17 | 7.86 | 0 | 0 |
MJT2-1 | 48.79 | 1.34 | 0.45 | 34.84 | 1.28 | 0.01 | 1.21 | 7.77 | 1.86 | 7.55 | 0.08 | 0.16 | 7.79 | 0 | 0 |
MJT2-2 | 48.87 | 1.27 | 0.40 | 34.42 | 1.16 | 0.11 | 1.11 | 7.80 | 2.20 | 7.59 | 0.07 | 0.15 | 7.81 | 0 | 0 |
MJT3-1 | 51.15 | 0.71 | 1.41 | 35.36 | 0.70 | 0.01 | 0.30 | 7.04 | 1.18 | 7.87 | 0.13 | 0 | 8.00 | 0.13 | 0.08 |
MJT3-2 | 48.66 | 0.70 | 1.42 | 36.05 | 1.01 | 0.13 | 0.32 | 8.08 | 1.22 | 7.44 | 0.26 | 0.08 | 7.78 | 0 | 0 |
MJT6-1 | 49.37 | 1.26 | 1.13 | 35.15 | 1.13 | 0.07 | 0.68 | 7.25 | 1.46 | 7.64 | 0.21 | 0.15 | 8.00 | 0 | 0 |
MJT6-2 | 49.74 | 1.30 | 0.91 | 34.46 | 1.27 | 0.14 | 0.36 | 7.69 | 1.47 | 7.68 | 0.17 | 0.15 | 7.99 | 0 | 0 |
MJT12-3 | 48.06 | 0.96 | 1.36 | 35.74 | 1.18 | 0.19 | 1.24 | 7.34 | 1.28 | 7.42 | 0.25 | 0.11 | 7.78 | 0 | 0 |
MJT13-1 | 48.63 | 1.14 | 1.20 | 34.42 | 1.14 | 0.24 | 2.00 | 7.63 | 1.35 | 7.45 | 0.22 | 0.13 | 7.80 | 0 | 0 |
MJT13-2 | 48.18 | 1.24 | 1.22 | 35.00 | 1.05 | 0.28 | 1.87 | 7.72 | 1.38 | 7.37 | 0.22 | 0.14 | 7.73 | 0 | 0 |
MJT13-3 | 49.78 | 0.93 | 1.27 | 34.82 | 0.84 | 0.27 | 1.29 | 7.11 | 1.30 | 7.67 | 0.23 | 0.10 | 8.00 | 0 | 0.01 |
测试点号 | C占位 | B占位 | A占位 | 占位 总量 | |||||||||||
Fe3+ | Mg | Fe2+ | Mn | 总计 | Mg | Fe2+ | Mn | Ca | Na | 总计 | Na | K | 总计 | ||
MJT1-1 | 0 | 0.01 | 4.48 | 0.14 | 4.63 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.19 | 1.81 | 2 | 0.48 | 0.39 | 0.87 | 15.39 |
MJT1-2 | 0 | 0 | 4.47 | 0.15 | 4.63 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.19 | 1.81 | 2 | 0.53 | 0.43 | 0.96 | 15.43 |
MJT1-3 | 0 | 0.03 | 4.38 | 0.14 | 4.55 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.14 | 1.86 | 2 | 0.47 | 0.44 | 0.91 | 15.44 |
MJT1-4 | 0 | 0 | 4.46 | 0.16 | 4.62 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.18 | 1.82 | 2 | 0.52 | 0.40 | 0.92 | 15.40 |
MJT2-1 | 0 | 0 | 4.51 | 0.17 | 4.68 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.20 | 1.80 | 2 | 0.53 | 0.37 | 0.90 | 15.37 |
MJT2-2 | 0 | 0.03 | 4.47 | 0.15 | 4.65 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.18 | 1.82 | 2 | 0.53 | 0.44 | 0.97 | 15.44 |
MJT3-1 | 0 | 0 | 4.55 | 0.09 | 4.85 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.05 | 1.95 | 2 | 0.15 | 0.23 | 0.38 | 15.23 |
MJT3-2 | 0 | 0.03 | 4.61 | 0.13 | 4.77 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.05 | 1.95 | 2 | 0.45 | 0.24 | 0.69 | 15.24 |
MJT6-1 | 0 | 0.02 | 4.55 | 0.15 | 4.72 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.11 | 1.89 | 2 | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.58 | 15.29 |
MJT6-2 | 0 | 0.03 | 4.45 | 0.17 | 4.65 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.06 | 1.94 | 2 | 0.36 | 0.29 | 0.65 | 15.29 |
MJT12-3 | 0 | 0.04 | 4.62 | 0.15 | 4.81 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.21 | 1.79 | 2 | 0.40 | 0.25 | 0.66 | 15.25 |
MJT13-1 | 0 | 0.05 | 4.41 | 0.15 | 4.61 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.33 | 1.67 | 2 | 0.59 | 0.26 | 0.86 | 15.26 |
MJT13-2 | 0 | 0.06 | 4.48 | 0.14 | 4.68 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.31 | 1.69 | 2 | 0.60 | 0.27 | 0.86 | 15.27 |
MJT13-3 | 0 | 0.06 | 4.49 | 0.11 | 4.66 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.21 | 1.79 | 2 | 0.34 | 0.26 | 0.59 | 15.26 |
Table 1 EPMA results of amphibole in the Maojiatun granite
测试点号 | wB/% | T占位 | C占位 | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SiO2 | TiO2 | Al2O3 | FeO | MnO | MgO | CaO | Na2O | K2O | Si | ⅣAl | Ti | 总计 | ⅥAl | Ti | |
MJT1-1 | 49.00 | 1.39 | 0.51 | 34.35 | 1.04 | 0.06 | 1.12 | 7.58 | 1.95 | 7.64 | 0.09 | 0.16 | 7.89 | 0 | 0 |
MJT1-2 | 48.71 | 1.28 | 0.56 | 34.32 | 1.17 | 0.01 | 1.11 | 7.76 | 2.15 | 7.59 | 0.10 | 0.15 | 7.84 | 0 | 0 |
MJT1-3 | 49.82 | 1.33 | 0.41 | 33.72 | 1.08 | 0.13 | 0.84 | 7.74 | 2.21 | 7.74 | 0.08 | 0.16 | 7.97 | 0 | 0 |
MJT1-4 | 48.87 | 1.45 | 0.42 | 34.22 | 1.23 | - | 1.09 | 7.73 | 2.01 | 7.61 | 0.08 | 0.17 | 7.86 | 0 | 0 |
MJT2-1 | 48.79 | 1.34 | 0.45 | 34.84 | 1.28 | 0.01 | 1.21 | 7.77 | 1.86 | 7.55 | 0.08 | 0.16 | 7.79 | 0 | 0 |
MJT2-2 | 48.87 | 1.27 | 0.40 | 34.42 | 1.16 | 0.11 | 1.11 | 7.80 | 2.20 | 7.59 | 0.07 | 0.15 | 7.81 | 0 | 0 |
MJT3-1 | 51.15 | 0.71 | 1.41 | 35.36 | 0.70 | 0.01 | 0.30 | 7.04 | 1.18 | 7.87 | 0.13 | 0 | 8.00 | 0.13 | 0.08 |
MJT3-2 | 48.66 | 0.70 | 1.42 | 36.05 | 1.01 | 0.13 | 0.32 | 8.08 | 1.22 | 7.44 | 0.26 | 0.08 | 7.78 | 0 | 0 |
MJT6-1 | 49.37 | 1.26 | 1.13 | 35.15 | 1.13 | 0.07 | 0.68 | 7.25 | 1.46 | 7.64 | 0.21 | 0.15 | 8.00 | 0 | 0 |
MJT6-2 | 49.74 | 1.30 | 0.91 | 34.46 | 1.27 | 0.14 | 0.36 | 7.69 | 1.47 | 7.68 | 0.17 | 0.15 | 7.99 | 0 | 0 |
MJT12-3 | 48.06 | 0.96 | 1.36 | 35.74 | 1.18 | 0.19 | 1.24 | 7.34 | 1.28 | 7.42 | 0.25 | 0.11 | 7.78 | 0 | 0 |
MJT13-1 | 48.63 | 1.14 | 1.20 | 34.42 | 1.14 | 0.24 | 2.00 | 7.63 | 1.35 | 7.45 | 0.22 | 0.13 | 7.80 | 0 | 0 |
MJT13-2 | 48.18 | 1.24 | 1.22 | 35.00 | 1.05 | 0.28 | 1.87 | 7.72 | 1.38 | 7.37 | 0.22 | 0.14 | 7.73 | 0 | 0 |
MJT13-3 | 49.78 | 0.93 | 1.27 | 34.82 | 0.84 | 0.27 | 1.29 | 7.11 | 1.30 | 7.67 | 0.23 | 0.10 | 8.00 | 0 | 0.01 |
测试点号 | C占位 | B占位 | A占位 | 占位 总量 | |||||||||||
Fe3+ | Mg | Fe2+ | Mn | 总计 | Mg | Fe2+ | Mn | Ca | Na | 总计 | Na | K | 总计 | ||
MJT1-1 | 0 | 0.01 | 4.48 | 0.14 | 4.63 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.19 | 1.81 | 2 | 0.48 | 0.39 | 0.87 | 15.39 |
MJT1-2 | 0 | 0 | 4.47 | 0.15 | 4.63 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.19 | 1.81 | 2 | 0.53 | 0.43 | 0.96 | 15.43 |
MJT1-3 | 0 | 0.03 | 4.38 | 0.14 | 4.55 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.14 | 1.86 | 2 | 0.47 | 0.44 | 0.91 | 15.44 |
MJT1-4 | 0 | 0 | 4.46 | 0.16 | 4.62 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.18 | 1.82 | 2 | 0.52 | 0.40 | 0.92 | 15.40 |
MJT2-1 | 0 | 0 | 4.51 | 0.17 | 4.68 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.20 | 1.80 | 2 | 0.53 | 0.37 | 0.90 | 15.37 |
MJT2-2 | 0 | 0.03 | 4.47 | 0.15 | 4.65 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.18 | 1.82 | 2 | 0.53 | 0.44 | 0.97 | 15.44 |
MJT3-1 | 0 | 0 | 4.55 | 0.09 | 4.85 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.05 | 1.95 | 2 | 0.15 | 0.23 | 0.38 | 15.23 |
MJT3-2 | 0 | 0.03 | 4.61 | 0.13 | 4.77 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.05 | 1.95 | 2 | 0.45 | 0.24 | 0.69 | 15.24 |
MJT6-1 | 0 | 0.02 | 4.55 | 0.15 | 4.72 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.11 | 1.89 | 2 | 0.29 | 0.29 | 0.58 | 15.29 |
MJT6-2 | 0 | 0.03 | 4.45 | 0.17 | 4.65 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.06 | 1.94 | 2 | 0.36 | 0.29 | 0.65 | 15.29 |
MJT12-3 | 0 | 0.04 | 4.62 | 0.15 | 4.81 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.21 | 1.79 | 2 | 0.40 | 0.25 | 0.66 | 15.25 |
MJT13-1 | 0 | 0.05 | 4.41 | 0.15 | 4.61 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.33 | 1.67 | 2 | 0.59 | 0.26 | 0.86 | 15.26 |
MJT13-2 | 0 | 0.06 | 4.48 | 0.14 | 4.68 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.31 | 1.69 | 2 | 0.60 | 0.27 | 0.86 | 15.27 |
MJT13-3 | 0 | 0.06 | 4.49 | 0.11 | 4.66 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.21 | 1.79 | 2 | 0.34 | 0.26 | 0.59 | 15.26 |
样品编号 | SiO2 | TiO2 | Al2O3 | Cr2O3 | Fe2O3 | FeO | MnO | MgO | CaO | Na2O | K2O | 总量 | Si | ⅥAl |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MJT12-1 | 52.48 | 0.29 | 0.35 | 0.57 | 0 | 29.88 | 0.42 | 0.01 | 3.64 | 12.19 | 0.01 | 99.84 | 2.13 | 0.01 |
MJT12-2 | 52.06 | 0.25 | 0.22 | 0.07 | 0 | 30.36 | 0.33 | 0.07 | 3.14 | 12.66 | 0.02 | 99.18 | 2.13 | 0.01 |
样品编号 | Ti | Cr | Fe3+ | Fe2+ | Mn | Mg | Ca | Na | Li | 阳离子总量 | Wo | En | Fs | Ac |
MJT12-1 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.83 | 0.17 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.15 | 0.95 | 0 | 3.54 | 0.05 | 13.48 | 86.46 | 41.05 |
MJT12-2 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.91 | 0.12 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.14 | 1.01 | 0 | 3.54 | 0.36 | 11.64 | 87.99 | 43.14 |
Table 2 EPMA results of pyroxene in the Maojiatun granite(%)
样品编号 | SiO2 | TiO2 | Al2O3 | Cr2O3 | Fe2O3 | FeO | MnO | MgO | CaO | Na2O | K2O | 总量 | Si | ⅥAl |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MJT12-1 | 52.48 | 0.29 | 0.35 | 0.57 | 0 | 29.88 | 0.42 | 0.01 | 3.64 | 12.19 | 0.01 | 99.84 | 2.13 | 0.01 |
MJT12-2 | 52.06 | 0.25 | 0.22 | 0.07 | 0 | 30.36 | 0.33 | 0.07 | 3.14 | 12.66 | 0.02 | 99.18 | 2.13 | 0.01 |
样品编号 | Ti | Cr | Fe3+ | Fe2+ | Mn | Mg | Ca | Na | Li | 阳离子总量 | Wo | En | Fs | Ac |
MJT12-1 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.83 | 0.17 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.15 | 0.95 | 0 | 3.54 | 0.05 | 13.48 | 86.46 | 41.05 |
MJT12-2 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.91 | 0.12 | 0.01 | 0 | 0.14 | 1.01 | 0 | 3.54 | 0.36 | 11.64 | 87.99 | 43.14 |
样品号 | MJT1-1 | MJT1-2 | MJT1-3 | MJT1-4 | MJT2-2 | MJT3-1 | MJT3-2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ΔNNO | -4.14 | -4.12 | -4.04 | -3.78 | -3.93 | -4.08 | -3.78 |
样品号 | MJT6-1 | MJT6-2 | MJT12-3 | MJT2-1 | MJT13-1 | MJT13-2 | MJT13-3 |
ΔNNO | -3.93 | -4.08 | -4.06 | -3.98 | -4.00 | -4.01 | -3.92 |
Table 3 ΔNNO calculation results of amphiboles
样品号 | MJT1-1 | MJT1-2 | MJT1-3 | MJT1-4 | MJT2-2 | MJT3-1 | MJT3-2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ΔNNO | -4.14 | -4.12 | -4.04 | -3.78 | -3.93 | -4.08 | -3.78 |
样品号 | MJT6-1 | MJT6-2 | MJT12-3 | MJT2-1 | MJT13-1 | MJT13-2 | MJT13-3 |
ΔNNO | -3.93 | -4.08 | -4.06 | -3.98 | -4.00 | -4.01 | -3.92 |
[1] |
EBY G N, WOOLLEY A R, DIN V, et al. Geochemistry and petrogenesis of nepheline syenites:Kasungu-Chipala, Ilomba, and Ulindi Nepheline Syenite Intrusions,North Nyasa Alkaline Province,Malawi[J]. Journal of Petrology, 1998,39(8):1405-1424.
DOI URL |
[2] | 韦栋梁, 夏斌, 张玉泉, 等. 滇西卓潘—六合碱性岩的辉石成分及其岩石化学特征[J]. 矿物岩石, 2005,5(2):15-19. |
[3] | 夏斌, 李建峰, 张玉泉, 等. 江苏省东海县片麻状碱性花岗岩的成因及年代学研究[J]. 地质科学, 2009,44(1):213-230. |
[4] | 谢应雯, 张玉泉. 横断山区花岗岩类中角闪石的标型特征及其成因意义[J]. 矿物学报, 1990,10(1) : 95-105. |
[5] | 谢应雯, 张玉泉. 青藏高原东部及邻区富碱侵入岩中的角闪石和辉石[J]. 矿物学报, 1998,18(1):90-96. |
[6] | 赵广涛, 王文正. 崂山花岗岩中角闪石成分的变化及其意义[J]. 青岛海洋大学学报, 1998,28(4):609-614. |
[7] | 金秉福, 岳伟, 王昆山. 黄河沉积中角闪石矿物晶体化学特征和成因分析[J]. 海洋学报, 2013,35(1):131-143. |
[8] | 赵斌. 在高温高压条件下合成纤维状碱性角闪石的实验研究[J]. 地球化学, 1973(2):113-130. |
[9] | 杨富贵, 王中刚, 刘丛强, 等. 西北准噶尔地区碱性花岗岩体中角闪石的地质地球化学意义[J]. 矿物学报, 1999,19(1):70-76. |
[10] |
WU F Y, SUN D Y, LI H, et al. A-type granites in Northeastern China: Age and geochemical constraints on their petrogenesis[J]. Chemical Geology, 2002,187(1/2):143-173.
DOI URL |
[11] | 林强, 葛文春, 吴福元, 等. 大兴安岭中生代花岗岩类的地球化学[J]. 岩石学报, 2004,20(3):403-412. |
[12] | 尹京武, 邵兴坤, 杨海涛, 等. 新疆拜城波孜果尔碱性岩中副矿物的特征[J]. 矿床地质, 2013,32(2):337-352. |
[13] | 郑巧荣. 由电子探针分析值计算Fe3+和Fe2+[J]. 矿物学报, 1983,3(1):57-64. |
[14] | 李胜荣. 结晶学与矿物学[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2008: 1-346. |
[15] | LEAKE B E, WOOLEY A R, ARPS C E S, et al. Nomenclature of amphiboles:Report of the Subcommittee on Amphiboles of the International Mineralogical Association, Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names[J]. American Mineralogist, 1997,82(9):1019-1037. |
[16] |
LEAKE B E, WOOLLEY A R, BIRCH W D, et al. Nomenclature of amphiboles:Additions and revisions to the International Mineralogical Association’ amphibole nomenclature[J]. Mineralogical Magazine, 2004,68(1):209-215.
DOI URL |
[17] | MORIMOTO N, 黄婉康. 辉石命名法[J]. 矿物学报, 1988,8(4):3-19. |
[18] | 马莲花, 蔡永丰, 刘希军, 等. 云南个旧卡房锡矿田花岗岩黑云母矿物化学特征及其成岩成矿意义[J]. 高校地质学报, 2018,24(5):68-77. |
[19] |
WASTON E B, HARRISON T M. Zircon saturation revisited: temperature and composition effects in a variety of crustal magma types[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 1983,64(2):295-304.
DOI URL |
[20] | 陈光远. 成因矿物学与找矿矿物学[M]. 重庆: 重庆出版社, 1988: 1-50. |
[21] | RIDOLFI F, PUERINI M, RENZULLI A, et al. The magmatic feeding system of El Reventador volcano (Sub-Andean zone, Ecuador) constrained by texture, mineralogy and thermobarometry of the 2002 erupted products[J]. Journal of Volcanology & Geothermal Research, 2008,176(1):94-106. |
[22] | 刘昌实, 陈小明, 陈培荣, 等. A型岩套的分类、判别标志和成因[J]. 高校地质学报, 2003,9(4):573-591. |
[23] | 李小伟, 莫宣学, 赵志丹, 等. 关于A型花岗岩判别过程中若干问题的讨论[J]. 地质通报, 2010,29(增刊1):278-285. |
[24] | 林培英, 邰道乾, 鄂安元. 内蒙其特敖包的镁钠铁闪石的研究[J]. 地质论评, 1986,32(6):532-540. |
[25] | 薛君治, 白学让, 陈武. 成因矿物学[M]. 武汉: 中国地质大学出版社, 1990: 1-161. |
[26] | 姜常义, 安三元. 论火成岩中钙质角闪石的化学组成特征及其岩石学意义[J]. 矿物岩石, 1984(3):4-12. |
[27] | STRECK M J, DUNGAN M A, BUSSY F, et al. Mineral inventory of continuously erupting basaltic andesites at Arenal volcano,Costa Rica: implications for interpreting monotonous,crystal-rich,mafic arc stratigraphies[J]. Journal of Volcanology & Geothermal Research, 2005,140(1/3):133-155. |
[28] | 许继锋. 米仓山碱性岩中的主要矿物研究及其成因信息[J]. 岩石矿物学杂志, 1993(3):269-278. |
[29] | 王方正. 岩石物理化学[M]. 郑州: 河南科学技术出版社, 1987: 1-334. |
[30] | RIDOLFI F, RENZULLI A, PUERINI M. Stability and chemical equilibrium of amphibole in calc-alkaline magmas: an overview, new thermobarometric formulations and application to subduction-related volcanoes[J]. Contributions to Mineralogy & Petrology, 2010,160(1):45-66. |
[31] |
ERNST W G, LIU J. Experimental phase-equilibrium study of Al-and Ti-contents of calcic amphibole in MORB—a semiquantitative thermobarometer[J]. American Mineralogist, 1998,83(9/10):952-969.
DOI URL |
[32] | EUGSTER H P, WONES D R. Stability relations of the ferruginous biotite,Annite[J]. Journal of Petrology, 1962,3(1):2648-2697. |
[33] | 王濮, 潘兆橹, 翁玲宝. 系统矿物学[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1982: 1-263. |
[34] | 邵济安. 中朝板块北缘中段地壳演化[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 1991: 1-139. |
[35] | 童英, 洪大卫, 王涛, 等. 中蒙边境中段花岗岩时空分布特征及构造和找矿意义[J]. 地球学报, 2010,31(3):395-412. |
[36] | 许文良, 王枫, 裴福萍, 等. 中国东北中生代构造体制与区域成矿背景:来自中生代火山岩组合时空变化的制约[J]. 岩石学报, 2013,29(2):339-353. |
[37] |
EBY G N. Chemical subdivision of the A-type granitoids:Petrogenetic and tectonic implications[J]. Geology, 1992,20(7):641.
DOI URL |
[38] |
BONIN B. A-type granites and related rocks; evolution of a concept,problems and prospects[J]. Lithos, 2007,97:1-29.
DOI URL |
[1] | WANG Yi, LI Lixing, LI Houmin, LI Xiaosai, MA Lanjing, XING Yuliang, SUN Xinyu, DAI Yang, WANG Xiaohui. Geochronology and Genesis of the Zhaobinggou Fe-P Deposit, Northern Hebei, China [J]. Geoscience, 2024, 38(01): 46-55. |
[2] | HOU Tingting, YAO Yuzeng, FU Jianfei, LIU Jing, ZHANG Yongli, GUO Rongrong. Study of the Characteristics of Mass Transfer During the Ore-forming Process of High-grade Iron Ore in the Gongchangling Iron Deposit, Liaoning [J]. Geoscience, 2024, 38(01): 56-67. |
[3] | CHEN Yaoxin, LIU Wenheng, WANG Kaixing, LIU Xiaodong, SUN Liqiang, YIN Donghua. Petrogenesis and Tectonic Implications of the Zhongpai Fine-grained Granite in Qingshanbao, Gansu: Constraints from Geochemistry and Zircon U-Pb Chronology [J]. Geoscience, 2024, 38(01): 169-182. |
[4] | HU Shengping, HAN Shanchu, ZHANG Hongqiu, ZHANG Yong, PAN Jiayong, ZHONG Fujun, LU Jianyan, LI Weixin. Trace Element Geochemistry and Its Metallogenic Implications of the Pyrite from the Xiwan Pb-Zn Deposit in Luzong Basin, Anhui [J]. Geoscience, 2024, 38(01): 183-197. |
[5] | LIU Jinbo, ZHANG Dexian, HU Ziqi, CHEN Shaowei, XIE Xiaoyu. Mineralogy, Trace Element Chemistry, and Their Metallogenic Implications of Sphalerites from the Haopinggou Ag-Au-Pb-Zn Polymetallic Deposit, Xiong’ershan Area, Western Henan [J]. Geoscience, 2024, 38(01): 198-213. |
[6] | HAN Fei, SONG Yuanbao, ZHANG Wei, LI Daoling, HUANG Yonggao, LI Yingxu, JIA Xiaochuan, YANG Xuejun, YANG Qingsong, SONG Xubo, LU Liu. Petrogenesis and Tectonic Significance of the Late Triassic Nanmulin Intermediate-felsic Magmatic Rocks in the Gangdese Batholith, Southern Tibet [J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(03): 547-561. |
[7] | XIA Jinsheng, SUN Li, ZHANG Peng, CHEN Changkuo, WANG Junzhu, SI Jiangfu. Geochemical Characteristics and Genesis of Pinghe Crystalline Graphite Deposit in Sichuan Province [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(06): 1486-1496. |
[8] | LI Wenxia, ZHAO Zhidan, WANG Xiaoli, YAN Rong, LU Yuanfa. Re-Os Isotopic Characteristics and Geological Significance of Mafic Rocks from the Xigaze Ophiolite,Tibet [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(06): 1503-1512. |
[9] | ZHANG Yingzhao, HU Senqing, LIU Jinshui, JIANG Yiming, CHEN Zhongyun, QIN Jun, DIAO Hui, WANG Chao. Geochemical Characteristics and Genesis of Oil and Gas in the Lishuixi Sag, East China Sea Shelf Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(05): 1382-1390. |
[10] | CHAO Haide, CHEN Jianzhou, WANG Jin, LI Jiqing, WANG Guocang, ZHAO Hongyue, CAI Tingjun, LIU Libo, LI Shengfu, REN Wenkai, QIU Liang. Diagenesis of Triassic Shale and Its Influence on Reservoir in East Kunlun, Northern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(04): 1052-1064. |
[11] | YU Jingwei, LUO Gang, LI Bin, PAN Tuo, YU Haitao, KUANG Hao, CHU Xu, ZHANG Xiaotong. Diagenesis and Diagenetic Facies of Upper Wuerhe Formation in the Shawan Sag [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(04): 1095-1104. |
[12] | YANG Fengtian, SHI Yujia, LI Wenqing. Genesis Model of Geothermal Water in Dandong Area of Liaoning Province Based on Hydrogeochemical Characteristics [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(02): 474-483. |
[13] | GAO Yinhu, YIN Gang, GONG Zeqiang, GUO Mingchun. Geological Characteristics and Genesis of the Xiangtanzi Gold Deposit in Liangdang County, Gansu Province [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(06): 1523-1535. |
[14] | WANG Chao, WANG Ruiting, LIU Yunhua, XUE Yushan, HU Xishun, NIU Liang. Fluid Inclusion and C-H-O-S Stable Isotopic Studies of Sanguanmiao Gold Deposit, Shangnan, Shaanxi Province [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(06): 1551-1564. |
[15] | LIU Tianhang, GAO Yongbao, WEI Liyong, ZHANG Zhen, TANG Weidong, JIA Bin. Geological Characteristics and S-Pb Isotope Geochemistry of the Sirengou Pb-Zn Deposit in Xunyang, Shaanxi Province [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(06): 1597-1607. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||