Geoscience ›› 2022, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (02): 494-506.DOI: 10.19657/j.geoscience.1000-8527.2022.004
• Water Resources and Environmental Research • Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Yixuan1(), ZHOU Xun1,2(
), CHEN Mengying1, MA Jingru1, HAI Kuo1, XIAO Meng1, SHANG Ziqi1, ZHANG Ying1, YU Mingxiao1
Received:
2021-11-18
Revised:
2022-02-22
Online:
2022-04-10
Published:
2022-06-01
Contact:
ZHOU Xun
CLC Number:
WANG Yixuan, ZHOU Xun, CHEN Mengying, MA Jingru, HAI Kuo, XIAO Meng, SHANG Ziqi, ZHANG Ying, YU Mingxiao. Hydrochemical Characteristics and Formation of Four Hot Springs in Northern Hebei[J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(02): 494-506.
Fig.1 Simplified geological map of the study area and surroundings(modified after Spatial Database of Serial Suite-Tectonic Map-sheets of Mainland China(1:250,000)[12])
温泉名称 | 地理位置 | 地形地貌 | 温度/℃ | 流量/(L/s) | 高程/m | 主要用途 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
漠河沟温泉(A10) | 隆化县郭家屯镇漠河村 | 山地峡谷地形 | 49~52 | 1.2~1.8 | 897 | 洗浴 |
三道营温泉(A11) | 隆化县汤泉沟三道营村 | 河岸边缘的箱型沟谷 | 76~80 | 1.8~20.0 | 967 | 疗养 |
山湾子温泉(A12) | 围场县山湾子乡热水汤村 | 剧烈上升侵蚀生成的中山地形 | 74~82 | 1.5~5.0 | 1 077 | 洗浴 |
北大坝温泉(A13) | 隆化县唐三营镇北大坝村 | 水库下游地区,侵蚀构造中山区 | 35.0~35.5 | 10 | 751 | 洗浴 |
Table 1 Summary of exposed hot springs in the study area
温泉名称 | 地理位置 | 地形地貌 | 温度/℃ | 流量/(L/s) | 高程/m | 主要用途 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
漠河沟温泉(A10) | 隆化县郭家屯镇漠河村 | 山地峡谷地形 | 49~52 | 1.2~1.8 | 897 | 洗浴 |
三道营温泉(A11) | 隆化县汤泉沟三道营村 | 河岸边缘的箱型沟谷 | 76~80 | 1.8~20.0 | 967 | 疗养 |
山湾子温泉(A12) | 围场县山湾子乡热水汤村 | 剧烈上升侵蚀生成的中山地形 | 74~82 | 1.5~5.0 | 1 077 | 洗浴 |
北大坝温泉(A13) | 隆化县唐三营镇北大坝村 | 水库下游地区,侵蚀构造中山区 | 35.0~35.5 | 10 | 751 | 洗浴 |
水样编号 | K+ | Na+ | Ca2+ | Mg2+ | F- | Li | Sr | Fe | Mn | Cl- |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A10-1 | 5.37 | 224 | 11.40 | 1.200 | 14.0 | 0.718 | 0.874 | 0.004 | 0.047 0 | 37.2 |
A10-2 | 4.68 | 211 | 12.60 | 0.875 | 13.6 | 0.818 | 0.915 | 0.021 | 0.096 0 | 27.9 |
A11-1 | 6.20 | 234 | 5.00 | 0.600 | 22.5 | 1.170 | 0.386 | 0.002 | 0.010 0 | 35.4 |
A11-2 | 6.32 | 236 | 6.40 | 0.570 | 20.8 | 1.350 | 0.363 | 0.003 | 0.007 0 | 26.7 |
A12-1 | 6.06 | 214 | 5.00 | 0.600 | 26.5 | 0.664 | 0.278 | 0.002 | 0.008 0 | 34.7 |
A12-2 | 5.43 | 213 | 2.15 | <0.050 | 23.1 | 0.707 | 0.249 | 0.021 | 0.017 9 | 27.8 |
A12-3 | 5.49 | 213 | 2.26 | <0.050 | 24.7 | 0.731 | 0.257 | 0.031 | 0.017 0 | 27.2 |
A12-4 | 4.97 | 190 | 8.65 | 1.220 | 20.3 | 0.621 | 0.433 | 0.005 | 0.021 2 | 25.3 |
A13-1 | 3.69 | 208 | 13.00 | <0.500 | 13.0 | 0.503 | 0.803 | 0.002 | 0.001 0 | 42.5 |
A13-2 | 3.75 | 198 | 12.70 | 0.623 | 12.6 | 0.561 | 0.837 | 0.003 | 0.000 7 | 32.5 |
水样编号 | S | HC | C | H2SiO3 | δ2H/‰ | δ18O/‰ | TDS | T/℃ | pH | Eh/mV |
A10-1 | 242.0 | 248 | 0 | 56.30 | -88.8 | -10.9 | 826 | 49.2 | 7.68 | -17 |
A10-2 | 217.0 | 245 | 0 | 80.51 | -86.8 | -11.4 | 734 | 50.7 | 7.20 | -17 |
A11-1 | 134.0 | 354 | 6.00 | 44.30 | -90.9 | -11.2 | 832 | 68.0 | 8.08 | 35 |
A11-2 | 136.0 | 361 | 8.41 | 109.76 | -86.5 | -11.4 | 802 | 71.7 | 7.40 | 35 |
A12-1 | 33.6 | 423 | 6.00 | 61.40 | -94.8 | -11.7 | 797 | 74.5 | 8.13 | -56 |
A12-2 | 32.5 | 398 | 17.60 | 84.69 | -89.1 | -12.1 | 720 | 71.3 | 7.80 | -28 |
A12-3 | 32.7 | 400 | 16.80 | 77.16 | -90.6 | -12.4 | 722 | 72.9 | 7.40 | 10 |
A12-4 | 29.8 | 414 | 0 | 68.25 | -91.8 | -12.4 | 695 | 46.0 | 7.60 | -89 |
A13-1 | 250.0 | 171 | 6.00 | 64.40 | -86.0 | -12.0 | 757 | 36.3 | 8.18 | -89 |
A13-2 | 247.0 | 157 | 5.83 | 76.61 | -84.4 | -11.8 | 671 | 37.5 | 7.80 | -151 |
Table 2 Chemical compositions of hot spring water samples from the study area
水样编号 | K+ | Na+ | Ca2+ | Mg2+ | F- | Li | Sr | Fe | Mn | Cl- |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A10-1 | 5.37 | 224 | 11.40 | 1.200 | 14.0 | 0.718 | 0.874 | 0.004 | 0.047 0 | 37.2 |
A10-2 | 4.68 | 211 | 12.60 | 0.875 | 13.6 | 0.818 | 0.915 | 0.021 | 0.096 0 | 27.9 |
A11-1 | 6.20 | 234 | 5.00 | 0.600 | 22.5 | 1.170 | 0.386 | 0.002 | 0.010 0 | 35.4 |
A11-2 | 6.32 | 236 | 6.40 | 0.570 | 20.8 | 1.350 | 0.363 | 0.003 | 0.007 0 | 26.7 |
A12-1 | 6.06 | 214 | 5.00 | 0.600 | 26.5 | 0.664 | 0.278 | 0.002 | 0.008 0 | 34.7 |
A12-2 | 5.43 | 213 | 2.15 | <0.050 | 23.1 | 0.707 | 0.249 | 0.021 | 0.017 9 | 27.8 |
A12-3 | 5.49 | 213 | 2.26 | <0.050 | 24.7 | 0.731 | 0.257 | 0.031 | 0.017 0 | 27.2 |
A12-4 | 4.97 | 190 | 8.65 | 1.220 | 20.3 | 0.621 | 0.433 | 0.005 | 0.021 2 | 25.3 |
A13-1 | 3.69 | 208 | 13.00 | <0.500 | 13.0 | 0.503 | 0.803 | 0.002 | 0.001 0 | 42.5 |
A13-2 | 3.75 | 198 | 12.70 | 0.623 | 12.6 | 0.561 | 0.837 | 0.003 | 0.000 7 | 32.5 |
水样编号 | S | HC | C | H2SiO3 | δ2H/‰ | δ18O/‰ | TDS | T/℃ | pH | Eh/mV |
A10-1 | 242.0 | 248 | 0 | 56.30 | -88.8 | -10.9 | 826 | 49.2 | 7.68 | -17 |
A10-2 | 217.0 | 245 | 0 | 80.51 | -86.8 | -11.4 | 734 | 50.7 | 7.20 | -17 |
A11-1 | 134.0 | 354 | 6.00 | 44.30 | -90.9 | -11.2 | 832 | 68.0 | 8.08 | 35 |
A11-2 | 136.0 | 361 | 8.41 | 109.76 | -86.5 | -11.4 | 802 | 71.7 | 7.40 | 35 |
A12-1 | 33.6 | 423 | 6.00 | 61.40 | -94.8 | -11.7 | 797 | 74.5 | 8.13 | -56 |
A12-2 | 32.5 | 398 | 17.60 | 84.69 | -89.1 | -12.1 | 720 | 71.3 | 7.80 | -28 |
A12-3 | 32.7 | 400 | 16.80 | 77.16 | -90.6 | -12.4 | 722 | 72.9 | 7.40 | 10 |
A12-4 | 29.8 | 414 | 0 | 68.25 | -91.8 | -12.4 | 695 | 46.0 | 7.60 | -89 |
A13-1 | 250.0 | 171 | 6.00 | 64.40 | -86.0 | -12.0 | 757 | 36.3 | 8.18 | -89 |
A13-2 | 247.0 | 157 | 5.83 | 76.61 | -84.4 | -11.8 | 671 | 37.5 | 7.80 | -151 |
水样 编号 | A10-2 | A11-2 | A12-2 | A12-3 | A12-4 | A13-2 | 平均值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ce/Ce* | 0.604 4 | 0.000 5 | 0.284 9 | 0.270 6 | 0.334 5 | 0.806 5 | 0.383 6 |
Eu/Eu* | 2.178 3 | 2.178 3 | 2.178 3 | 0.276 6 | 1.540 3 | 0.628 8 | 1.496 7 |
Table 3 Calculated Ce and Eu anomalies of hot springs in the study area
水样 编号 | A10-2 | A11-2 | A12-2 | A12-3 | A12-4 | A13-2 | 平均值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ce/Ce* | 0.604 4 | 0.000 5 | 0.284 9 | 0.270 6 | 0.334 5 | 0.806 5 | 0.383 6 |
Eu/Eu* | 2.178 3 | 2.178 3 | 2.178 3 | 0.276 6 | 1.540 3 | 0.628 8 | 1.496 7 |
水样编号 | 温泉名称 | δ2H/‰ | δ18O/‰ | 泉口 海拔/m | 式(5)δ2H 计算结果/m | 式(5)δ18O 计算结果/m | 式(6) 计算结果/m | 补给 高程/m |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A10-1 | 漠河沟温泉 | -88.8 | -10.9 | 897 | 1 657.00 | 1 198.72 | 1 237.93 | 1 200~1 900 |
A10-2 | 漠河沟温泉 | -86.8 | -11.4 | 850 | 1 543.33 | 1 237.93 | 1 993.33 | |
A11-1 | 三道营温泉 | -90.9 | -11.2 | 967 | 1 797.00 | 1 320.45 | 2 130.00 | 1 400~2 100 |
A11-2 | 三道营温泉 | -86.5 | -11.4 | 980 | 1 663.33 | 1 367.93 | 1 983.33 | |
A12-1 | 山湾子温泉 | -94.8 | -11.7 | 1 077 | 2 037.00 | 1 516.66 | 2 260.00 | 1 600~2 200 |
A12-2 | 山湾子温泉 | -89.1 | -12.1 | 1 080 | 1 850.00 | 1 588.62 | 2 070.00 | |
A12-3 | 山湾子温泉 | -90.6 | -12.4 | 1 080 | 1 900.00 | 1 640.34 | 2 120.00 | |
A12-4 | 山湾子温泉 | -91.8 | -12.4 | 1 080 | 1 940.00 | 1 640.34 | 2 160.00 | |
A13-1 | 北大坝温泉 | -86.0 | -12.0 | 751 | 1 417.67 | 1 242.38 | 1 966.67 | 1 300~1 900 |
A13-2 | 北大坝温泉 | -84.4 | -11.8 | 790 | 1 403.33 | 1 246.90 | 1 913.33 |
Table 4 Calculated recharge altitude of hot springs in the study area
水样编号 | 温泉名称 | δ2H/‰ | δ18O/‰ | 泉口 海拔/m | 式(5)δ2H 计算结果/m | 式(5)δ18O 计算结果/m | 式(6) 计算结果/m | 补给 高程/m |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A10-1 | 漠河沟温泉 | -88.8 | -10.9 | 897 | 1 657.00 | 1 198.72 | 1 237.93 | 1 200~1 900 |
A10-2 | 漠河沟温泉 | -86.8 | -11.4 | 850 | 1 543.33 | 1 237.93 | 1 993.33 | |
A11-1 | 三道营温泉 | -90.9 | -11.2 | 967 | 1 797.00 | 1 320.45 | 2 130.00 | 1 400~2 100 |
A11-2 | 三道营温泉 | -86.5 | -11.4 | 980 | 1 663.33 | 1 367.93 | 1 983.33 | |
A12-1 | 山湾子温泉 | -94.8 | -11.7 | 1 077 | 2 037.00 | 1 516.66 | 2 260.00 | 1 600~2 200 |
A12-2 | 山湾子温泉 | -89.1 | -12.1 | 1 080 | 1 850.00 | 1 588.62 | 2 070.00 | |
A12-3 | 山湾子温泉 | -90.6 | -12.4 | 1 080 | 1 900.00 | 1 640.34 | 2 120.00 | |
A12-4 | 山湾子温泉 | -91.8 | -12.4 | 1 080 | 1 940.00 | 1 640.34 | 2 160.00 | |
A13-1 | 北大坝温泉 | -86.0 | -12.0 | 751 | 1 417.67 | 1 242.38 | 1 966.67 | 1 300~1 900 |
A13-2 | 北大坝温泉 | -84.4 | -11.8 | 790 | 1 403.33 | 1 246.90 | 1 913.33 |
水样 编号 | 温泉名称 | 水温/℃ | w(SiO2) /(mg/L) | 热储温度/℃ | 热储温度/℃ | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
式(7) | 式(8) | 式(9) | 式(10) | 式(11) | ||||||
A10-1 | 漠河沟温泉 | 49.2 | 43.31 | 95.70 | 95.23 | 96.86 | 44.97 | 64.83 | 95~112 | |
A10-2 | 漠河沟温泉 | 50.7 | 61.93 | 112.36 | 112.06 | 111.38 | 61.51 | 82.94 | ||
A11-1 | 三道营温泉 | 68.0 | 34.08 | 85.26 | 84.74 | 87.72 | 34.78 | 53.69 | 85~125 | |
A11-2 | 三道营温泉 | 71.7 | 84.43 | 128.12 | 127.95 | 124.91 | 77.30 | 100.29 | ||
A12-1 | 山湾子温泉 | 74.5 | 47.23 | 99.61 | 99.17 | 100.28 | 48.83 | 69.05 | 99~113 | |
A12-2 | 山湾子温泉 | 71.3 | 65.14 | 114.84 | 114.57 | 113.52 | 63.99 | 85.67 | ||
A12-3 | 山湾子温泉 | 72.9 | 59.36 | 110.31 | 109.99 | 109.60 | 59.46 | 80.70 | ||
A12-4 | 山湾子温泉 | 46.0 | 52.50 | 104.48 | 104.10 | 104.53 | 53.66 | 74.34 | ||
A13-1 | 北大坝温泉 | 36.3 | 49.54 | 101.79 | 101.38 | 102.18 | 50.99 | 71.42 | 100~110 | |
A13-2 | 北大坝温泉 | 37.5 | 58.93 | 109.96 | 109.64 | 109.29 | 59.11 | 80.31 |
Table 5 Calculated temperature of hot-spring geothermal reservoirs in the study area
水样 编号 | 温泉名称 | 水温/℃ | w(SiO2) /(mg/L) | 热储温度/℃ | 热储温度/℃ | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
式(7) | 式(8) | 式(9) | 式(10) | 式(11) | ||||||
A10-1 | 漠河沟温泉 | 49.2 | 43.31 | 95.70 | 95.23 | 96.86 | 44.97 | 64.83 | 95~112 | |
A10-2 | 漠河沟温泉 | 50.7 | 61.93 | 112.36 | 112.06 | 111.38 | 61.51 | 82.94 | ||
A11-1 | 三道营温泉 | 68.0 | 34.08 | 85.26 | 84.74 | 87.72 | 34.78 | 53.69 | 85~125 | |
A11-2 | 三道营温泉 | 71.7 | 84.43 | 128.12 | 127.95 | 124.91 | 77.30 | 100.29 | ||
A12-1 | 山湾子温泉 | 74.5 | 47.23 | 99.61 | 99.17 | 100.28 | 48.83 | 69.05 | 99~113 | |
A12-2 | 山湾子温泉 | 71.3 | 65.14 | 114.84 | 114.57 | 113.52 | 63.99 | 85.67 | ||
A12-3 | 山湾子温泉 | 72.9 | 59.36 | 110.31 | 109.99 | 109.60 | 59.46 | 80.70 | ||
A12-4 | 山湾子温泉 | 46.0 | 52.50 | 104.48 | 104.10 | 104.53 | 53.66 | 74.34 | ||
A13-1 | 北大坝温泉 | 36.3 | 49.54 | 101.79 | 101.38 | 102.18 | 50.99 | 71.42 | 100~110 | |
A13-2 | 北大坝温泉 | 37.5 | 58.93 | 109.96 | 109.64 | 109.29 | 59.11 | 80.31 |
[1] | 王莹, 周训, 于湲, 等. 应用地热温标估算地下热储温度[J]. 现代地质, 2007, 21(4): 605-612. |
[2] | 张雪. 河北省北部承德地区中低温温泉特征研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2012. |
[3] | 郭瑞林, 郭帅, 张立剑. 河北省隆化县七家温泉特征及成因分析[J]. 东华理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2015(2): 87-95. |
[4] | 霍冬雪, 周训, 刘海生, 等. 云南祥云县王家庄碱性温泉水化学特征与成因分析[J]. 现代地质, 2019, 33(3): 680-690. |
[5] | WOOD S A, SHANNON W M. Rare-earth elements in geothermal waters from Oregon, Neveda, and California[J]. Journal of Solid State Chemistry, 2003, 171(1/2): 246-253. |
[6] | FIKET Ž, ROŽMARI M, KRMPOTI M, et al. Trace and rare earth element geochemistry of Croatian thermal waters[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research, 2015, 9(2): 595-604. |
[7] | JEAN J S, LIAO L, KAR S, et al. Hydrochemistry of hot springs in geothermal fields of central, northern, and northeastern Taiwan: implication on occurrence and enrichment of arsenic[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2016, 75(19): 1316. |
[8] | TEMIZEL E H, GÜLTEKIN F, ERSOY A F. Major, trace, and rare earth element geochemistry of the Ayder and Īkizdere (Rize, NE Turkey) geothermal waters: Constraints for water-rock interactions[J]. Geothermics, 2020: 86. |
[9] | 《中华地理志》编辑部. 华北区自然地理资料[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1957. |
[10] | 刘健. 燕山褶断带东段承德盆地及邻区燕山期构造演化[D]. 北京: 中国地质科学院, 2006. |
[11] | 许洪才, 赵华平, 彭晓, 等. 河北省围场-隆化一带古元古代岩浆活动[J]. 地质调查与研究, 2007, 30(4): 241-250. |
[12] | 左群超, 叶天竺, 冯艳芳, 等. 中国陆域1∶25万分幅建造构造图空间数据库[J]. 中国地质, 2018, 45(增): 1-26. |
[13] | 周训, 胡伏生, 何江涛, 等. 地下水科学概论[M]. 2版. 北京: 地质出版社, 2014: 95-101. |
[14] | 李成城. 运城盆地高氟地下咸水成因机制研究[D]. 武汉: 中国地质大学(武汉), 2018. |
[15] | 邢丽娜, 郭华明, 魏亮, 等. 华北平原浅层含氟地下水演化特点及成因[J]. 地球科学与环境学报, 2012, 34(4): 57-66. |
[16] | HENDERSON P. Rare Earth Element Geochemistry[M]. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1984: 510. |
[17] | HANNIGAN R E. Rare earth, major and trace elements geochemistry of surface and geothermal waters from the Tanpu volcanic zone, north island New Zealand[J]. Rare Earth Elements in Groundwater Flow Systems, 2005, 51: 67-88. |
[18] | PARKHURST D L, APPELO C A J. User’s guide to PHREEQC (version 2):A computer program for speciation, reaction-path, one-dimensional transport, and inverse geochemical calculations[R]. Denver: Water Resources Investigation Report, U.S.Geological Survey, 1999. |
[19] | 刘海燕. 华北平原典型区地下水稀土元素的分布特征及其与铁、锰络合反应的模拟研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2018. |
[20] | 周训, 金晓媚, 梁四海, 等. 地下水科学专论[M]. 2版. 北京: 地质出版社, 2017: 34-37. |
[21] | CRAIG H. Isotopic variations in meteoric waters[J]. Science, 1961, 133: 1702-1703. |
[22] | 郑淑蕙, 侯发高, 倪葆龄. 我国大气降水的氢氧稳定同位素研究[J]. 科学通报, 1983, 28(13): 801-806. |
[23] | 王恒纯. 同位素水文地质概论[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1991: 37-57. |
[24] | 卢丽, 陈余道, 代俊鸽, 等. 四川昭觉竹核温泉水文地球化学特征及成因[J]. 现代地质, 2021, 35(3): 703-710. |
[25] | ARNORSSON S. Application of the silica geothermometer in low temperature hydrothermal area sin Iceland[J]. American Journal of Science, 1975, 275(7): 763-783. |
[26] | FOURNIER R O, POTTER R W. A revised and expanded silica geothermometer[J]. US GRC Bulletin, 1982, 11(10): 3-12. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||