Analysis of the Sedimentary Environment in the North of Dongpu Depression During the Deposition of the Middle Section of the Third Member of the Shahejie Formation

doi:10.19657/j.geoscience.1000-8527.2018.02.02

Abstract

Abstract:

The salt rocks and source rocks are extensively developed in the middle section of the third Member of Shahejie Formation in the North of Dongpu Depression and the two seemingly coexisting substances are intermixed here. In this period, the sedimentary characteristics of the study area were the continuous deposition of multi-salt rhythm and multi-layer hydrocarbon source rocks. Individual salt rhythms vary in thickness from a few meters to more than ten meters, the hydrocarbon source rocks have high organic matter abundance and the type is good. In the plane, the two are symbiotic with the sedimentation center of the lake basin, and in the vertical, high organic matter abundance, good kerogen type and high salinity formation have a better correspondence.Therefore, it has become an important research object for the restoration of paleoclimate and paleoenvironment. We studied the sedimentary environment of the middle section of the third Member of Shahejie Formation in the North of Dongpu Depression through petrology, paleontology, and the methods of Sr/Ba,B/Ga,(V+Ni+Mn),Fe/Mn,Sr/Cu,Mg/Ca,V/(V+Ni),as well as REE content and chlorine isotope. The results showed that the sedimentary environment of the middle section of the third Member of Shahejie Formation in the North of Depression was the reduction environment of the deep-water deposition, and the ancient salinity was a little high,which is semi-saltwater-saltwater deposition. The trace elements and the spore fossils indicate the environment of the middle section of the third Member of Shahejie Formation in the study area was warm and humid.

Key words: Dongpu depression, the middle section of the third Member of Shahejie Formation, sedimentary environment, paleosalinity, paleoclimate, paleo-water-depth, redox property

CLC Number:

TE121.3

LI Bei, LIU Chiyang, HUANG Lei, JIANG Feihu, GUO Pei, LU Kun. Analysis of the Sedimentary Environment in the North of Dongpu Depression During the Deposition of the Middle Section of the Third Member of the Shahejie Formation[J]. Geoscience, 2018, 32(02): 227-239.

Figures/Tables 13

Fig.1 Tectonic division of Dongpu Depression[29]

Fig.2 Lithologic section of well Wei 42

Fig.3 Sedimentary characteristics of the middle section of the third Member of Shahejie Formation in Dongpu Depression

Fig.4 Salt rock micromorphology of the middle section of the third Member of Shahejie Formation in Dongpu Depression

Table 1 The synthetic classification of paleosalinity

类型	古盐度/‰	Sr/Ba	B/Ga
超咸水	>35	>1	>6
咸水	25~35	>1	>6
半咸水	10~25	0.5~1	2~6
淡水-微咸水	<10	<0.5	<2

Fig.5 The ratios of B/Ga,Sr/Ba in samples of Dongpu Depression

Fig.6 The values of (V+Ni+Mn),(Fe/Mn)in samples of Dongpu Depression

Fig.7 The content change diagram of δ37Cl in Dongpu Depression

Fig.8 The content change diagram of V/(V+Ni) in Dongpu Depression

Fig.9 Major fossil environments of the third Member of Shahejie Formation of Dongpu Depression

Fig.10 The thickness of sandstone, mudstone and saltrock in the North of Dongpu Depression

Fig.11 Stratigraphic correlation of well Wei 19 to well Wei 1 to well Wei 47 in Dongpu Depression

Fig.12 Plane stacking diagram of saltrock and source rock in the North of Dongpu Depression during the deposition of the middle section of the third Member of the Shahejie Formation

References 75

[1]	UNGERER P. State of the art of research in kinetic modeling of oil formation and expulsion[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 1990, 16(1/3):17-19.
[2]	WARREN J K. Shallow water evaporitic environments and their source rock potential[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Reasearch, 1986, 56(3): 442-454.
[3]	KIRKLAND D W, EVANS R. Source-rock potential of evaporitic environment[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1981, 65(4):181-190.
[4]	王秀林, 张孝义, 王运所, 等. 东濮凹陷盐岩成因与油气聚集[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2002, 21(5):11-12+20-66.
[5]	纪友亮, 冯建辉, 王声朗, 等. 东濮凹陷下第三系沙三段盐岩和膏盐岩的成因[J]. 沉积学报, 2005, 23(2):225-231.
[6]	纪友亮, 冯建辉, 王声朗, 等. 东濮凹陷古近系沙河街组沙三段沉积期湖岸线的变化及岩相古地理特征[J]. 古地理学报, 2005, 7(2):145-156.
[7]	屈红军, 李文厚, 苗建宇, 等. 东濮凹陷濮卫洼陷盐岩发育规律及成因探讨[J]. 中国地质, 2003, 30(3):309-314.
[8]	沈均均, 陈波, 王春连, 等. 江汉盆地江陵凹陷古近系新沟咀组含膏盐岩系沉积特征及控制因素[J]. 古地理学报, 2015, 17(2):265-274.
[9]	袁静, 赵澄林, 张善文. 东营凹陷沙四段盐湖的深水成因模式[J]. 沉积学报, 2000, 18(1):114-118.
[10]	金强. 深水和浅水盐湖相生油岩沉积及其石油地球化学特征[J]. 沉积学报, 1991, 9(2):114-120.
[11]	金强, 黄醒汉. 东濮凹陷早第三纪盐湖成因的探讨——一种深水成因模式[J]. 华东石油学院学报(自然科学版), 1985(1):1-13.
[12]	顾家裕. 东濮凹陷盐岩形成环境[J]. 石油实验地质, 1986, 8(1):22-28.
[13]	王春连, 刘成林, 胡海兵, 等. 江汉盆地江陵凹陷南缘古新统沙市组四段含盐岩系沉积特征及其沉积环境意义[J]. 古地理学报, 2012, 14(2):165-175.
[14]	张永生, 杨玉卿, 漆智先, 等. 江汉盆地潜江凹陷古近系潜江组含盐岩系沉积特征与沉积环境[J]. 古地理学报, 2003, 5(1):29-35.
[15]	金强, 查明. 柴达木盆地西部第三系蒸发岩与生油岩共生沉积作用研究[J]. 地质科学, 2000, 35(4):465-473.
[16]	金强, 朱光有, 王娟. 咸化湖盆优质烃源岩的形成与分布[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 32(4):19-23.
[17]	金强, 朱光有. 中国中新生代咸化湖盆烃源岩沉积的问题及相关进展[J]. 高校地质学报, 2006, 12(4):483-492.
[18]	金强. 柴达木盆地西部第三系蒸发岩微量元素组成及其地球化学特征[J]. 石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2003, 27(2):1-5+9.
[19]	袁静, 覃克. 东营凹陷沙四段深水成因蒸发岩特征及其与油气藏的关系[J]. 石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2001, 25(1):9-11.
[20]	冯阵东, 吴伟, 程秀申, 等. 食盐析出实验对盐湖盆地沉积研究的启示[J]. 沉积学报, 2014, 32(2):238-243.
[21]	纪友亮, 冯建辉, 王声朗, 等. 东濮凹陷沙三段高频湖平面变化及低位砂体预测[J]. 高校地质学报, 2003, 9(1):99-112.
[22]	张孝义, 王运所, 段红梅, 等. 东濮凹陷北部浅水成盐与油气分布初探[J]. 断块油气田, 2002, 9(4):12-14+89-90.
[23]	赵俊峰, 纪友亮, 苏惠, 等. 东濮凹陷沙三段盐岩成因及含盐地层层序划分[J]. 海洋石油, 2009, 29(1):9-14+37.
[24]	陈发亮, 陈业全, 魏生祥, 等. 东濮凹陷盐湖盆地油气富集规律研究[J]. 盐湖研究, 2003, 11(4):33-38.
[25]	程秀申. 河南东濮凹陷构造样式分析[J]. 现代地质, 2009, 23(3):414-422.
[26]	张洪安, 李素梅, 徐田武, 等. 东濮凹陷北部盐湖相原油特征与成因[J]. 现代地质, 2017, 31(4):768-778.
[27]	王德仁, 王生朗, 王秀林, 等. 河南东濮凹陷深层储层分析[J]. 现代地质, 2002, 16(2):199-204.
[28]	蒋有录, 房磊, 谈玉明, 等. 渤海湾盆地东濮凹陷不同区带油气成藏期差异性及主控因素[J]. 地质论评, 2015, 61(6):1321-1331.
[29]	程秀申, 徐振强, 解晨, 等. 东濮凹陷构造演化与油气聚集规律研究[R]. 濮阳: 中国石油化工股份有限公司中原油田分公司, 2005.
[30]	梁富康, 于兴河, 慕小水, 等. 东濮凹陷南部沙三中段构造调节带对沉积体系的控制作用[J]. 现代地质, 2011, 25(1):55-61+77.
[31]	王健, 操应长, 刘惠民, 等. 东营凹陷沙四下亚段沉积环境特征及沉积充填模式[J]. 沉积学报, 2012, 30(2):274-282.
[32]	王晓洁, 张世奇, 魏孟吉, 等. 东濮凹陷文东地区沙三段黄铁矿特征及形成模式[J]. 断块油气田, 2015, 22(2):178-183.
[33]	宋春晖, 鲁新川, 邢强, 等. 临夏盆地晚新生代沉积物元素特征与古气候变迁[J]. 沉积学报, 2007, 25 (3):409-416.
[34]	李明慧, 康世昌. 青藏高原湖泊沉积物对古气候环境变化的响应[J]. 盐湖研究, 2007, 15(1):63-72.
[35]	徐兆辉, 汪泽成, 胡素云, 等. 四川盆地上三叠统须家河组沉积时期古气候[J]. 古地理学报, 2010, 12(4):415-424.
[36]	汪凯明, 罗顺社. 碳酸盐岩地球化学特征与沉积环境判别意义——以冀北坳陷长城系高于庄组为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2009, 30(3):343-349.
[37]	胡明毅. 利用地球化学标志识别沉积环境——以中扬子台地北缘上震旦统为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 1999, 26(6):39-41+6.
[38]	许璟, 蒲仁海, 杨林, 等. 塔里木盆地石炭系泥岩沉积时的古盐度分析[J]. 沉积学报, 2010, 28(3):509-517.
[39]	宋明水. 东营凹陷南斜坡沙四段沉积环境的地球化学特征[J]. 矿物岩石, 2005, 25(1):67-73.
[40]	郑荣才, 柳梅青. 鄂尔多斯盆地长6油层组古盐度研究[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 1999, 20(1):22-27.
[41]	史忠生, 陈开远, 史军, 等. 运用锶钡比判定沉积环境的可行性分析[J]. 断块油气田, 2003, 10(2):12-16+89-90.
[42]	孙镇城, 杨藩, 张枝焕, 等. 中国新生代咸化湖泊沉积环境与油气生成[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1997:133-137.
[43]	李成凤, 肖继风. 用微量元素研究胜利油田东营盆地沙河街组的古盐度[J]. 沉积学报, 1988, 6(4):100-107.
[44]	钟红利, 蒲仁海, 闫华, 等. 塔里木盆地晚古生代古盐度与古环境探讨[J]. 西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 42(1):74-81.
[45]	鹿坤, 左银辉, 梅冰, 等. 东濮凹陷古沉积环境及其对有机质丰度的影响[J]. 地质与勘探, 2013, 49(3):589-594.
[46]	卫民. 生物标志的环境含义及其应用[J]. 岩相古地理, 1999, 19(1):32-58.
[47]	刘平略, 周厚清, 康桂云. 松辽盆地元素分布及其与沉积环境的关系[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 1986, 5(2):11-15.
[48]	邓宏文, 钱凯. 沉积地球化学与环境分析[M]. 兰州: 甘肃科学技术出版社, 1993:1-154.
[49]	范玉海, 屈红军, 王辉, 等. 微量元素分析在判别沉积介质环境中的应用——以鄂尔多斯盆地西部中区晚三叠世为例[J]. 中国地质, 2012, 39(2):382-389.
[50]	金明, 李妩巍. 乌兰花地区下白垩统、上新统岩石地球化学特征及其古气候演变[J]. 铀矿地质, 2003, 19(6):349-354.
[51]	刘刚, 周东升. 微量元素分析在判别沉积环境中的应用——以江汉盆地潜江组为例[J]. 石油实验地质, 2007, 29 (3):307-310+314.
[52]	XIAO Yingkai, LIU Weiguo, ZHOU Yinmin, et al. Variations in isotopic compositions of chlorine in evaporation-controlled salt lake brines of Qaidam Basin,China[J]. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 2000, 18(2):69-177.
[53]	刘卫国, 肖应凯, 韩凤清, 等. 昆特依盐湖氯同位素特征及古气候意义[J]. 海洋与湖沼, 1998, 29(4):431-435.
[54]	肖应凯, 刘卫国, 周引民, 等. 盐湖卤水及盐类矿物的氯同位素组成[J]. 科学通报, 1996, 41(22):2067-2070.
[55]	刘卫国, 肖应凯, 孙大鹏, 等. 马海盐湖区卤水和盐类矿物的氯同位素特征及意义[J]. 盐湖研究, 1995, 3 (2):29-33.
[56]	刘卫国, 肖应凯, 孙大鹏, 等. 柴达木盆地盐湖氯同位素组成的初步研究[J]. 科学通报, 1994, 39(20):1918.
[57]	罗重光, 肖应凯, 马海州, 等. 盐湖卤水蒸发过程中的稳定氯同位素分馏[J]. 科学通报, 2012, 57(14):1242-1251.
[58]	高红灿, 郑荣才, 肖应凯, 等. 渤海湾盆地东濮凹陷古近系沙河街组盐岩成因——来自沉积学和地球化学的证据[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(1):19-32. DOI
[59]	DILL H. Metallogenesis of early Paleozoic graptolite shales from the Graefenthal Horst (Northern Bavaria-Federal Republic of Germany)[J]. Economic Geology, 1986, 81(4):889-903. DOI URL
[60]	HATCH J R, LEVENTHAL J S. Relationship between inferred redox potential of the depositional environment and geochemistry of the Upper Pennsylvanian( Missourian) Stark Shale Member of the Dennis Limestone,Wabaunsee County,Kansas,USA[J]. Chemical Geology, 1992, 99 (1 /3) :65-82. DOI URL
[61]	JONES B, MANNING D A C. Comparison of geological indices used for the interpretation of palaeo redox conditions in ancient mudstones[J]. Chemical Geology, 1994, 111(1/4):111-129. DOI URL
[62]	陈衍景, 杨忠芳, 赵太平, 等. 沉积物微量元素示踪物源区和地壳成分的方法和现状[J]. 地质地球化学, 1996(3):7-11.
[63]	鲁洪波, 姜在兴. 稀土元素地球化学分析在岩相古地理研究中的应用[J]. 石油大学学报(自然科学版), 1999, 23(1):19-21+4.
[64]	刘士林, 刘蕴华, 林舸, 等. 渤海湾盆地南堡凹陷新近系泥岩稀土元素地球化学特征及其地质意义[J]. 现代地质, 2006, 20(3):449-456.
[65]	程岳宏, 于兴河, 韩宝清, 等. 东濮凹陷北部古近系沙三段地球化学特征及地质意义[J]. 中国地质, 2010, 37(2):357-366.
[66]	HARRIS N B, FREEMAN K H, PANCOST R D, et al. The character and origin of lacustrine source rocks in the Lower Cretaceous synrift section,Congo Basin,West Africa[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2004, 88(8):1163-1184. DOI URL
[67]	HUGHES W B, HOLBA A G, DZOU L I P. The ratios of dibenzothiophene to phenanthrene and pristane to phytane as indicators of depositional environment and lithology of petroleum source rocks[J]. Geochim Cosmochim Acta, 1995, 59(17):3581-3598. DOI URL
[68]	张庆峰, 沈忠民, 潘中亮, 等. 东濮凹陷文留地区沙三段盐湖相原油地球化学特征及油源分析[J]. 桂林工学院学报, 2009, 29(3):298-302.
[69]	胥菊珍, 蒋飞虎, 高平, 等. 东濮凹陷古近系沙三段、沙四段介形类生物地层及界线[J]. 地层学杂志, 2004, 28(1):87-91+94.
[70]	魏美田. 东濮凹陷沙三段生物群及其古沉积环境[J]. 中国海上油气, 1990, 4(3):13-18+5-6.
[71]	魏美田. 东濮凹陷早第三纪生物记录中的地质事件[J]. 石油学报, 1992, 13(2):77-82. DOI
[72]	苏惠, 许化政, 张金川, 等. 东濮凹陷沙三段盐岩成因[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2006, 33(5):600-605.
[73]	薛国刚, 高渐珍. 东濮凹陷古近系沙河街组火山作用与盐岩成因[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2011, 33(1):53-56+75+166.
[74]	高红灿, 郑荣才, 陈发亮, 等. 东濮凹陷古近系沙河街组震积岩的认识及意义[J]. 古地理学报, 2010, 12(4):384-398.
[75]	刘景东, 蒋有录, 谈玉明, 等. 渤海湾盆地东濮凹陷膏盐岩与油气的关系[J]. 沉积学报, 2014, 32 (1):126-137.