Geoscience ›› 2017, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (04): 734-745.
• Petrology • Previous Articles Next Articles
JIANATIGULI Wusiman1(), ZHOU Yaoqi1, YAO Xu1, XU Hanhua2, FANG Xue1
Received:
2016-12-11
Revised:
2017-01-25
Online:
2017-08-10
Published:
2017-09-15
CLC Number:
JIANATIGULI Wusiman, ZHOU Yaoqi, YAO Xu, XU Hanhua, FANG Xue. Geochemical Characteristics Comparison and Tectonic Background Analysis of Siliceous Rocks from Qixia Formation and Gufeng Formation of Permian in Chaohu Area, Anhui Province[J]. Geoscience, 2017, 31(04): 734-745.
样品编号 | SiO2 | Al2O3 | TiO2 | Fe2O3 | MnO | MgO | CaO | Na2O | K2O | P2O5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CH-qx-2 | 94.32 | 0.60 | 0.028 | 0.335 | 0.002 1 | 0.070 | 0.99 | 0.042 | 0.15 | 0.017 7 |
CH-qx-3 | 95.04 | 0.42 | 0.020 | 0.145 | 0.001 1 | 0.180 | 1.01 | 0.040 | 0.13 | 0.016 1 |
CH-qx-4 | 94.24 | 0.21 | 0.053 | 0.065 | 0.001 8 | 0.680 | 1.97 | 0.030 | 0.11 | 0.016 2 |
CH-qx-5 | 95.58 | 0.18 | 0.007 | 0.052 | 0.000 8 | 0.091 | 1.30 | 0.025 | 0.07 | 0.015 6 |
CH-qx-6 | 95.86 | 0.33 | 0.011 | 0.090 | 0.001 3 | 0.025 | 1.13 | 0.013 | 0.10 | 0.014 6 |
CH-qx-7 | 96.32 | 0.20 | 0.008 | 0.076 | 0.000 7 | 0.027 | 1.01 | 0.012 | 0.14 | 0.015 5 |
CH-qx-8 | 93.98 | 0.20 | 0.008 | 0.038 | 0.000 8 | 0.014 | 0.06 | 0.010 | 0.11 | 0.014 6 |
CH-qx-9 | 82.56 | 0.23 | 0.009 | 0.090 | 0.009 0 | 0.650 | 7.38 | 0.019 | 0.10 | 0.022 4 |
CH-gf-1 | 94.62 | 0.60 | 0.025 | 0.189 | 0.001 6 | 0.110 | 0.98 | 0.023 | 0.34 | 0.046 9 |
CH-gf-2 | 94.44 | 0.67 | 0.027 | 0.204 | 0.001 0 | 0.067 | 0.33 | 0.041 | 0.13 | 0.047 2 |
栖霞组均值 | 93.49 | 0.30 | 0.020 | 0.110 | 0.000 0 | 0.22 | 1.86 | 0.020 | 0.11 | 0.016 6 |
孤峰组均值 | 94.53 | 0.64 | 0.030 | 0.200 | 0.000 0 | 0.09 | 0.66 | 0.030 | 0.24 | 0.047 0 |
Table 1 Analysis of major elements of siliceous rocks in Qixia Formation and Gufeng Formation in Chaohu area (%)
样品编号 | SiO2 | Al2O3 | TiO2 | Fe2O3 | MnO | MgO | CaO | Na2O | K2O | P2O5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CH-qx-2 | 94.32 | 0.60 | 0.028 | 0.335 | 0.002 1 | 0.070 | 0.99 | 0.042 | 0.15 | 0.017 7 |
CH-qx-3 | 95.04 | 0.42 | 0.020 | 0.145 | 0.001 1 | 0.180 | 1.01 | 0.040 | 0.13 | 0.016 1 |
CH-qx-4 | 94.24 | 0.21 | 0.053 | 0.065 | 0.001 8 | 0.680 | 1.97 | 0.030 | 0.11 | 0.016 2 |
CH-qx-5 | 95.58 | 0.18 | 0.007 | 0.052 | 0.000 8 | 0.091 | 1.30 | 0.025 | 0.07 | 0.015 6 |
CH-qx-6 | 95.86 | 0.33 | 0.011 | 0.090 | 0.001 3 | 0.025 | 1.13 | 0.013 | 0.10 | 0.014 6 |
CH-qx-7 | 96.32 | 0.20 | 0.008 | 0.076 | 0.000 7 | 0.027 | 1.01 | 0.012 | 0.14 | 0.015 5 |
CH-qx-8 | 93.98 | 0.20 | 0.008 | 0.038 | 0.000 8 | 0.014 | 0.06 | 0.010 | 0.11 | 0.014 6 |
CH-qx-9 | 82.56 | 0.23 | 0.009 | 0.090 | 0.009 0 | 0.650 | 7.38 | 0.019 | 0.10 | 0.022 4 |
CH-gf-1 | 94.62 | 0.60 | 0.025 | 0.189 | 0.001 6 | 0.110 | 0.98 | 0.023 | 0.34 | 0.046 9 |
CH-gf-2 | 94.44 | 0.67 | 0.027 | 0.204 | 0.001 0 | 0.067 | 0.33 | 0.041 | 0.13 | 0.047 2 |
栖霞组均值 | 93.49 | 0.30 | 0.020 | 0.110 | 0.000 0 | 0.22 | 1.86 | 0.020 | 0.11 | 0.016 6 |
孤峰组均值 | 94.53 | 0.64 | 0.030 | 0.200 | 0.000 0 | 0.09 | 0.66 | 0.030 | 0.24 | 0.047 0 |
沉积环境 | 酸性 | 弱酸性 | 中性 | 弱碱性 | 碱性 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MnO/Fe | <0.013 | 0.013~0.016 | 0.016~0.026 | 0.026~0.055 | >0.055 |
pH值 | <5 | 5~6 | 6~7.8 | 7.8~9 | >9 |
Table 2 The relationship between pH of the sedimentary environment and MnO/Fe ratio
沉积环境 | 酸性 | 弱酸性 | 中性 | 弱碱性 | 碱性 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MnO/Fe | <0.013 | 0.013~0.016 | 0.016~0.026 | 0.026~0.055 | >0.055 |
pH值 | <5 | 5~6 | 6~7.8 | 7.8~9 | >9 |
样品编号 | La | Ce | Pr | Nd | Sm | Eu | Gd | Tb | Dy | Ho | Er | Tm | Yb | Lu |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CH-qx-2 | 0.77 | 1.50 | 0.200 | 0.77 | 0.160 | 0.040 | 0.160 | 0.028 | 0.15 | 0.034 | 0.110 | 0.017 | 0.120 | 0.020 |
CH-qx-3 | 0.48 | 0.98 | 0.120 | 0.47 | 0.110 | 0.023 | 0.100 | <0.02 | 0.10 | 0.016 | 0.055 | 0.0110 | 0.062 | 0.013 |
CH-qx-4 | 0.46 | 0.66 | 0.087 | 0.29 | 0.042 | 0.020 | 0.063 | <0.02 | 0.07 | 0.013 | 0.048 | <0.01 | 0.046 | <0.01 |
CH-qx-5 | 0.26 | 0.43 | 0.070 | 0.22 | 0.055 | 0.018 | 0.065 | <0.02 | 0.05 | <0.01 | 0.045 | <0.01 | 0.035 | <0.01 |
CH-qx-6 | 0.30 | 0.51 | 0.074 | 0.29 | 0.029 | 0.020 | 0.063 | <0.02 | 0.050 | <0.01 | 0.038 | <0.01 | 0.035 | <0.01 |
CH-qx-7 | 0.43 | 0.82 | 0.100 | 0.31 | 0.060 | 0.015 | 0.045 | <0.02 | 0.05 | <0.01 | 0.038 | <0.01 | 0.057 | <0.01 |
CH-qx-8 | 0.07 | 0.16 | <0.02 | 0.07 | 0.008 | 0.005 | <0.02 | <0.02 | 0.008 | 0.003 | <0.02 | <0.01 | <0.03 | <0.01 |
CH-qx-9 | 0.83 | 0.93 | 0.210 | 0.83 | 0.190 | 0.040 | 0.170 | 0.035 | 0.18 | 0.042 | 0.110 | 0.014 | 0.089 | 0.010 |
CH-gf-1 | 2.09 | 2.94 | 0.440 | 1.87 | 0.370 | 0.090 | 0.450 | 0.063 | 0.46 | 0.110 | 0.290 | 0.044 | 0.300 | 0.035 |
CH-gf-2 | 2.05 | 2.75 | 0.460 | 1.68 | 0.340 | 0.080 | 0.410 | 0.060 | 0.41 | 0.100 | 0.260 | 0.041 | 0.260 | 0.043 |
栖霞组均值 | 0.45 | 0.75 | 0.110 | 0.41 | 0.080 | 0.020 | 0.090 | 0.020 | 0.08 | 0.020 | 0.060 | 0.010 | 0.060 | 0.010 |
孤峰组均值 | 2.07 | 2.85 | 0.45 | 1.78 | 0.360 | 0.090 | 0.430 | 0.060 | 0.44 | 0.110 | 0.280 | 0.040 | 0.280 | 0.040 |
Table 3 Analysis of rare earth elements of siliceous rocks from Qixia Formation and Gufeng Formation in Chaohu area (10-6)
样品编号 | La | Ce | Pr | Nd | Sm | Eu | Gd | Tb | Dy | Ho | Er | Tm | Yb | Lu |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CH-qx-2 | 0.77 | 1.50 | 0.200 | 0.77 | 0.160 | 0.040 | 0.160 | 0.028 | 0.15 | 0.034 | 0.110 | 0.017 | 0.120 | 0.020 |
CH-qx-3 | 0.48 | 0.98 | 0.120 | 0.47 | 0.110 | 0.023 | 0.100 | <0.02 | 0.10 | 0.016 | 0.055 | 0.0110 | 0.062 | 0.013 |
CH-qx-4 | 0.46 | 0.66 | 0.087 | 0.29 | 0.042 | 0.020 | 0.063 | <0.02 | 0.07 | 0.013 | 0.048 | <0.01 | 0.046 | <0.01 |
CH-qx-5 | 0.26 | 0.43 | 0.070 | 0.22 | 0.055 | 0.018 | 0.065 | <0.02 | 0.05 | <0.01 | 0.045 | <0.01 | 0.035 | <0.01 |
CH-qx-6 | 0.30 | 0.51 | 0.074 | 0.29 | 0.029 | 0.020 | 0.063 | <0.02 | 0.050 | <0.01 | 0.038 | <0.01 | 0.035 | <0.01 |
CH-qx-7 | 0.43 | 0.82 | 0.100 | 0.31 | 0.060 | 0.015 | 0.045 | <0.02 | 0.05 | <0.01 | 0.038 | <0.01 | 0.057 | <0.01 |
CH-qx-8 | 0.07 | 0.16 | <0.02 | 0.07 | 0.008 | 0.005 | <0.02 | <0.02 | 0.008 | 0.003 | <0.02 | <0.01 | <0.03 | <0.01 |
CH-qx-9 | 0.83 | 0.93 | 0.210 | 0.83 | 0.190 | 0.040 | 0.170 | 0.035 | 0.18 | 0.042 | 0.110 | 0.014 | 0.089 | 0.010 |
CH-gf-1 | 2.09 | 2.94 | 0.440 | 1.87 | 0.370 | 0.090 | 0.450 | 0.063 | 0.46 | 0.110 | 0.290 | 0.044 | 0.300 | 0.035 |
CH-gf-2 | 2.05 | 2.75 | 0.460 | 1.68 | 0.340 | 0.080 | 0.410 | 0.060 | 0.41 | 0.100 | 0.260 | 0.041 | 0.260 | 0.043 |
栖霞组均值 | 0.45 | 0.75 | 0.110 | 0.41 | 0.080 | 0.020 | 0.090 | 0.020 | 0.08 | 0.020 | 0.060 | 0.010 | 0.060 | 0.010 |
孤峰组均值 | 2.07 | 2.85 | 0.45 | 1.78 | 0.360 | 0.090 | 0.430 | 0.060 | 0.44 | 0.110 | 0.280 | 0.040 | 0.280 | 0.040 |
样品编号 | Co | Ni | Cu | Th | U | U/Th |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CH-qx-2 | 0.39 | 4.02 | 5.93 | 0.39 | 1.13 | 2.90 |
CH-qx-3 | 0.33 | 3.19 | 2.75 | 0.29 | 1.29 | 4.45 |
CH-qx-4 | 0.12 | 2.66 | 6.22 | 0.11 | 1.85 | 16.82 |
CH-qx-5 | 0.09 | 1.87 | 3.26 | 0.07 | 1.81 | 25.86 |
CH-qx-6 | 0.086 | 2.04 | 0.50 | 0.10 | 3.67 | 36.70 |
CH-qx-7 | 0.12 | 3.37 | 0.50 | 0.14 | 11.50 | 82.14 |
CH-qx-8 | 0.13 | 3.67 | 3.18 | 0.04 | 0.20 | 5.00 |
CH-qx-9 | 0.37 | 6.01 | 1.38 | 0.10 | 1.28 | 12.80 |
CH-gf-1 | 0.44 | 24.80 | 12.80 | 0.43 | 4.58 | 10.65 |
CH-gf-2 | 0.41 | 23.30 | 7.36 | 0.20 | 4.41 | 22.05 |
Table 4 Analysis of trace elements of siliceous rocks from Qixia Formation and Gufeng Formation in Chaohu area (10-6)
样品编号 | Co | Ni | Cu | Th | U | U/Th |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CH-qx-2 | 0.39 | 4.02 | 5.93 | 0.39 | 1.13 | 2.90 |
CH-qx-3 | 0.33 | 3.19 | 2.75 | 0.29 | 1.29 | 4.45 |
CH-qx-4 | 0.12 | 2.66 | 6.22 | 0.11 | 1.85 | 16.82 |
CH-qx-5 | 0.09 | 1.87 | 3.26 | 0.07 | 1.81 | 25.86 |
CH-qx-6 | 0.086 | 2.04 | 0.50 | 0.10 | 3.67 | 36.70 |
CH-qx-7 | 0.12 | 3.37 | 0.50 | 0.14 | 11.50 | 82.14 |
CH-qx-8 | 0.13 | 3.67 | 3.18 | 0.04 | 0.20 | 5.00 |
CH-qx-9 | 0.37 | 6.01 | 1.38 | 0.10 | 1.28 | 12.80 |
CH-gf-1 | 0.44 | 24.80 | 12.80 | 0.43 | 4.58 | 10.65 |
CH-gf-2 | 0.41 | 23.30 | 7.36 | 0.20 | 4.41 | 22.05 |
Fig.5 Histograms showing Ce/Ce* variations(A),Eu/Eu* variations (B),(La/Yb)N ratios (C) and (La/Ce)N ratios(D) in different types of siliceous rocks from Middle Permian in Chaohu area
Fig.10 Middle Permian ancient continent distribution((a)modified from Kametaka M et al.[6], 2005) and Permian siliceous sedimentary dominant region((b) modified from Yao Xu et al.[33],2013) and silicalite formation model ((c) modified from Yao Xu et al.[33],2013)
[1] | 朱同兴. 安徽南部下二叠统结核状硅质岩和层状硅质岩的沉积学特征及成因探讨[J]. 岩相古地理, 1989(5):1-8. |
[2] | 夏邦栋, 钟立荣, 方中, 等. 下扬子区早二叠世孤峰组层状硅质岩成因[J]. 地质学报, 1995, 69(2):125-137. |
[3] | 杨水源, 姚静. 安徽巢湖平顶山中二叠统孤峰组硅质岩的地球化学特征及成因[J]. 高校地质学报, 2008, 14(1):39-48. |
[4] | 韩宗珠, 肖楠, 李安龙, 等. 安徽巢湖下二叠统孤峰组硅质岩沉积地球化学特征与沉积环境[J]. 中国海洋大学学报, 2014, 44(4):78-85. |
[5] | 程成, 李双应, 赵大千, 等. 扬子地台北缘中上二叠统层状硅质岩的地球化学特征及其对古地理、古海洋演化的响应[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2015, 34(1):155-166. |
[6] |
KAMETAKA M, TAKEBE M, NAGAI H, et al. Sedimentary environments of the Middle Permian phosphorite-chert complex from the northeastern Yangtze platform, China; the Gufeng Formation: a continental shelf radiolarian chert[J]. Sedimentary Geology, 2005, 174(3/4): 197-222.
DOI URL |
[7] | 吕炳全, 瞿建忠. 下扬子地区早二叠世海进和上升流形成的缺氧环境的沉积[J]. 科学通报, 1989, 34(22):1721-1724. |
[8] | 王汝建, 沈高平, KATSUO Sashida. 苏皖地区孤峰组放射虫动物群及其古环境意义[J]. 地质论评, 1997, 25(5):559-564. |
[9] | 邱振, 王清晨. 广西来宾中上二叠统硅质岩海底热液成因的地球化学证据[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2011, 41(5):725-737. |
[10] | 柴华, 胡望水, 唐友军, 等. 安徽宿松地区中二叠统栖霞组上升流相烃源岩地球化学特征[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2012, 34(3): 1-6. |
[11] | 杨锐, 李红, 柳益群, 等. 安徽巢湖地区中二叠统栖霞组灰岩中燧石成因[J]. 现代地质, 2014, 28(3):501-511. |
[12] |
MURCHEY B L, JONES D L. A mid-Permian chert event:Widespread deposition of biogenic siliceous sediments in coastal,island arc and oceanic basins[J]. Palaeogeography,Palaeoclimatology,Palaeoecology, 1992, 96: 161-174.
DOI URL |
[13] | 罗志立, 金以钟, 朱夔玉, 等. 试论上扬子地台的峨眉地裂运动[J]. 地质论评, 1988, 34(1):11-24. |
[14] |
YAO X, ZHOU Y, HINNOV L A. Astronomical forcing of a Middle Permian chert sequence in Chaohu,South China[J]. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 2015, 422:206-221.
DOI URL |
[15] |
WANG Yue, JIN Yugan. Permian palaeogeographic evolution of the Jiangnan Basin,South China[J]. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 2000, 160 (1) :35-44.
DOI URL |
[16] | 何雨旸, 赵广涛, 赵利, 等. 巢北地区二叠系栖霞组碳酸盐岩地球化学特征及其古环境意义[J]. 中国海洋大学学报, 2014, 44(5): 79-88. |
[17] | 杨瑞东. 贵州晚二叠世硅质岩类型及沉积地球化学特征[J]. 贵州地质, 1992, 23(2):171-176. |
[18] |
CHEN D, QING H, YAN X, et al. Hydrothermal venting and basin evolution (Devonian, South China): Constraints from rare earth element geochemistry of chert[J]. Sedimentary Geology, 2006, 183(3): 203-216.
DOI URL |
[19] | FLEET A J. Hydrothermal and Heterogeneous Ferromanganese Deposits[M]. New York: Plenum Press, 1983:1-20. |
[20] | 刘家军, 郑明华. 硅岩的新成因——热水沉积作用[J]. 四川地质学报, 1991, 11(4):251-255. |
[21] | 刘家军, 郑明华, 刘建明, 等. 西秦岭寒武系金矿床中硅岩的地质地球化学特征及其沉积环境意义[J]. 岩石学报, 1999, 15(1): 145-154. |
[22] | 周永章, 何俊国, 杨志军, 等. 华南热水沉积硅岩建造及其成矿效应[J]. 地学前缘, 2004, 11(2):373-377. |
[23] |
MURRAY R W, TEN BRINK M R B, JONES D L, et al. Rare earth elements as indicators of different marine depositional environments in chert and shale[J]. Geology, 1990, 18(3): 268-271.
DOI URL |
[24] |
MURRAY R W. Chemical criteria to identify the depositional environment of chert: general principles and applications[J]. Sedimentary Geology, 1994, 90(3): 213-232.
DOI URL |
[25] | HASKIN L A, HASKIN M A, FREY F A, et al. Relative and absolute terrestrial abundances of the rare earths[J]. Origin and Distribution of the Elements, 1968, 1: 889-911. |
[26] |
CRERAR D A, NAMSON J, CHYI M S, et al. Manganiferous cherts of the Franciscan assemblage;I,General geology, ancient and modern analogues, and implications for hydrothermal convection at oceanic spreading centers[J]. Economic Geology, 1982, 77(3): 519-540.
DOI URL |
[27] |
KIMURA H, WATANABE Y. Oceanic anoxia at the Precambrian—Cambrian boundary[J]. Geology, 2001, 29(11):55-80.
DOI URL |
[28] | 杨恩林, 陈恨水, 陈焕, 等. 黔东留茶坡组硅质岩元素地球化学特征与形成环境[J]. 矿物学报, 2011, 31(3):406-411. |
[29] |
RONA P A. Criteria for recognition of hydrothermal mineral deposits in oceanic crust[J]. Economic Geology, 1978, 73(2):135-160.
DOI URL |
[30] |
ADACHI M, YAMAMOTO K, SUGISAKI R. Hydrothermal chert and associated siliceous rocks from the Northern Pacific their geological significance as indication of ocean ridge activity[J]. Sedimentary Geology, 1986, 47(1):125-148.
DOI URL |
[31] | 朱嗣昭, HIROMI Nagai, MASAO Kametaka, 等. 一种特殊类型硅质岩——浮石状燧石[J]. 高校地质学报, 1999, 5(3):345-350. |
[32] | 曹秋香, 郭福生, 刘向铜, 等. 浙江江山丁家山组层状硅质岩阴极发光特征及成因探讨[J]. 沉积学报, 2008, 26(5):797-803. |
[33] | 姚旭, 周瑶琪, 李素, 等. 硅质岩与二叠纪硅质沉积事件研究现状及进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2013, 28(11):1189-1200. |
[34] | 冯少南. 东吴运动的新认识[J]. 现代地质, 1991, 5(4):378-384. |
[35] | 颜佳新, 赵坤. 二叠-三叠纪东特提斯地区古地理、古气候和古海洋演化与地球表层多圈层事件耦合[J]. 中国科学:D辑, 2002, 32(9):751-759. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||