Geoscience ›› 2012, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (2): 294-307.
• Structural Geology • Previous Articles Next Articles
TUN Lin-Bei-1, CENG Zuo-Xun-1,2, GAO Xi-1, WANG Jie-1
Received:
Revised:
Online:
Published:
Abstract:
Tieshan in southeast Hubei is the second place in the world where the trapezoidal boudinage was discovered. Using trapezoidal boudins with similar shape and locating in the same layer in this area as studying objects, this study acquired the distribution of true differential strain(ε-1-ε-2), stratum thickness ratio(S), kinematic vorticity number(Wk)and major long axe of finite strain ellipse(λ1)through finite strain measurement at different positions of its matrix with inertia moment ellipse method, then studied the data combined with its morphological and petrologic features. The results shows that the thickness ratio(S)of shear zone in the direction perpendicular to its shear direction tends to be negatively related to differential strain. This study also proved that trapezoidal boudinages in this location were formed due to comprehensive effects of difference in thickness between the upper and lower matrix layers, pure shear with extension parallel to strata and with contraction perpendicular to strata in most parts of matrix layers, and simple shear distributed mainly in partial matrix. Besides, the hydrothermal flow concentrated relatively in hornfel layers near wedgeshaped cracks also played a significant role. Characteristic features during the formation of trapezoidal boudinages similar in shape and continuous in competent layer manifest in two aspects, namely, on the one hand, a large difference in thickness between matrix layers, and on the other hand, the combined action of the sustained pure shear with extension parallel to strata and with contraction perpendicular to strata in most parts of matrix layers, and the simple shear concentrated locally in matrix layers. The above results indicate that this sort of trapezoidal boudinages is a good rheological indicator of rocks.
Key words: trapezoidal boudinage, strain measurement, strain analysis, inertia moment ellipse method, Tieshan in southeast Hubei
TUN Lin-Bei, CENG Zuo-Xun, GAO Xi, WANG Jie. Strain Measurement and Analysis of Matrix of Trapezoidal Boudinage in Tieshan, Southeast Hubei, China[J]. Geoscience, 2012, 26(2): 294-307.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.geoscience.net.cn/EN/
https://www.geoscience.net.cn/EN/Y2012/V26/I2/294
[3]刘富,曾佐勋. 湖北铁山与北京西山复合石香肠的初步研究[J].成都理工学院学报,2002,29(6): 639-645. [4]刘如琦.吉南太古宙岩群中的大型构造置换及其对BIF矿体的控制[J].地质科学,2004,39(3):407-415. [6]蔡永建,曾佐勋,赵兰.利用石香肠恢复能干层原始厚度的等面积法[J]. 吉林大学学报:地球科学版,2004,34(1):32-36. [7]许海萍,曾佐勋,程明,等.骨节状石香肠构造应变计初探[J].吉林大学学报:地球科学版,2005,35(5):570-575. [8]吴武军,曾佐勋,朱文革. 鱼嘴构造流变计研究与基于流变学的分类方案[J].地球科学进展,2005,20(9):925-931. [14]曾佐勋,樊春,刘立林,等.构造流变计[J].地质科技情报,1999,18(4):14-18. [15]张志勇,曾佐勋.菱形石香肠简单剪切成因模式及其构造流变计[J].地球学报,2006,27(6):537-542. [17]储玲林,李志勇,曾佐勋.鄂东南铁山不对称鱼嘴状石香肠构造基质层中的应变分析[J].地质科学,2006,41(4):694-699. [18]吴林波,曾佐勋,高曦.鄂东南铁山不对称骨节状石香肠构造基质层中的应变测量与分析[J].现代地质,2011,25(4):768-777. [19]马杏垣. 北京西山的香肠构造[J].地质论评, 1965,23(1):13-18. [20]马杏垣.解析构造学[M].北京:地质出版社,2004:75-85. [25]周继彬,曾佐勋.岩石有限应变测量反向轮法的计算机CSD软件设计[J].地球科学:中国地质大学学报,2001,26(1):105-109. [28]李志勇,曾佐勋.利用惯量椭圆进行岩石有限应变分析[J].地质科技情报,2006,25(6):37-40. [29]吴树仁,金振民.湖北大冶铁山矿区麻雀脑—尖山香肠构造[J].河北地质学院学报,1992,15(4):425-436. [30]储玲林,曾佐勋.湖北铁山鱼嘴状石香肠构造形成过程研究[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2004,31(4):345-351. [31]张进江,郑亚东. 运动学涡度、极摩尔圆及其在一般剪切带定量分析中的应用[J].地质力学学报,1995,1(3):55-64. [32]曾佐勋,刘立林. 构造模拟[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1992:50-100. [34]王勇生,朱光.运动学涡度及其测量方法[J].合肥工业大学学报:自然科学版,2004,27(11):1480-1484. [35]郑亚东,王涛,张进江.运动学涡度的理论与实践[J].地学前缘,2008,15(3):209-220. [37]朱志澄.构造地质学[M].武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1992:20-80. [38]路凤香,桑隆康.岩石学[M].北京:地质出版社,2006:300-330.