Geoscience ›› 2011, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (4): 668-674.
• energy geology • Previous Articles Next Articles
CUI Junping1,2, REN Zhanli1,2
Received:
Revised:
Online:
Published:
Abstract:
Wuerxun depression is a sag with a high degree exploration in the south of Hailaer basin, Inner Mongolia. It is the main oilgasbearing depression in which the deposit thickness is big, and the stratum grows entirely, and the oilgenerating condition is very superior. The main source rock is Nantun Formation, and the next is Tongbomiao Formation and Damoguaihe Formation. The average paleogeothermal gradient recovered by the fission track method is about 344 ℃/hm, which is close to present geothermal gradient (33 ℃/hm). The results of paleotemperature and thermal history simulation show that Wuerxun depression has been undergone a heating process since Mesozoic Era, and the maturity of the source rock is controlled by present geothermal field. The geothermal history and illite dating results reveal that the formation of oilgas reservoirs have two stages in Wuerxun depression, which are in the late period of Early Creaceous and since Tertiary, and the late period of Early Creaceous is the main stage, and the second stage is since Tertiary. The source rock began to generate oil and gas in a second peak since Tertiary. The second stage is important for the formation and concentration of oilgas reservoirs in Wuerxun depression.
Key words: Hailaer basin;Wuerxun depression, geothermal gradient, apatite fission track, geothermal history
CLC Number:
TE121
CUI Jun-Beng, LIN Zhan-Li. Thermal History of Wuerxun Depression in Hailaer Basin,Inner Mongolia[J]. Geoscience, 2011, 25(4): 668-674.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.geoscience.net.cn/EN/
https://www.geoscience.net.cn/EN/Y2011/V25/I4/668
[1]任战利,刘丽,崔军平,等盆地构造热演化史在油气成藏期次研究中的应用 [J].石油与天然气地质,2008,29(4):502-506. [2]任战利.鄂尔多斯盆地热演化史与油气关系的研究 [J].石油学报,1996,17(1):17-24. [3]任战利,刘池阳,张小会,等.酒东盆地热演化史与油气关系研究 [J].沉积学报,2000,18(4):619-623. [4]冯乔,柳益群,张小莉,等.叠合盆地的热演化史与油气生成——以吐鲁番—哈密盆地南部构造带为例 [J].石油与天然气地质,2004,25(3):268-273. [5]刘树根.内蒙古海拉尔盆地演化研究 [J].成都地质学院学报,1993,13(4):80-87. [6]陈均亮,吴河勇,朱德丰,等.海拉尔盆地构造演化及油气勘探前景 [J].地质科学,2007,42(1):147-159. [7]周江羽,吴冲龙,韩志军.鄂尔多斯盆地的地热场特征与有机质成熟史 [J].石油实验地质,1998,20(1):20-24. [8]袁彩萍,徐思煌.西藏伦破拉盆地地温场特征及烃源岩热演化史 [J].石油实验地质,2000,22(2):156-160. [9]张世焕,任战利,马团校,等.吐鲁番—哈密盆地现今地温与油气关系研究 [J].地质科学,2000,35(4):432-440. [10]邱楠生,魏刚,李翠翠,等.渤海海域现今地温场分布特征 [J].石油与天然气地质,2009,30(4):412-419. [11]崔军平,任战利. 内蒙古海拉尔盆地乌尔逊凹陷现今地温场特征 [J].现代地质,2011,25(5):589-593. [12]吴乾蕃,谢毅真.松辽盆地大地热流 [J].地震地质,1985,7(2):59-64. [13]任战利.中国北方沉积盆地构造热演化史研究 [M].北京:石油工业出版社,1999:1-50. [14]王钧,黄尚瑶,黄歌山,等.中国地温分布的基本特征 [M].北京:地震出版社,1990:1-100. [15]王良书,李成,刘绍文,等.库车前陆盆地大地热流分布特征 [J].石油勘探与开发,2005,32(4):79-83. [16]崔军平,任战利,肖晖,等.海拉尔盆地地温分布及控制因素研究 [J].地质科学,2007,42(4):656-665. [19]胡圣标,汪集肠.沉积盆地地热体制的研究方法原理和进展 [J].地学前缘,1995,2(4):171-179. [20]康铁笙,王世成.地质热历史研究的裂变径迹法 [M].北京:科学出版社,1991:1-100. [21]任战利.利用磷灰石裂变径迹法研究鄂尔多斯盆地地热史 [J].地球物理学报, 1995,38(3):339-349. [22]赵伟卫,金强,王伟锋.华北盆地济源凹陷古地温梯度的研究——磷灰石裂变径迹的应用 [J].石油实验地质,2002,24(6):555-560.