The Evolution of Paleohydrodynamics of Dabashan Foreland Thrust Belt and Its Influence on Formation and Preservation of Oil and Gas Reservoirs

Abstract

Abstract:

Concerning the problems in the traditional division of paleohydrodynamic stage, this paper takes account of the specific tectonic characteristics of Dabashan foreland thrust belt, and divides its evolution into sedimentary hydrodynamic stage, infiltrating hydrodynamic stage, tectonic hydrodynamic stage and burial hydrodynamic stage in the unit of hydrocarbon accumulation play. The lower play had gone through one sedimentary hydrodynamic stage, four infiltration hydrodynamic stages, four bury hydrodynamic stages and three tectonic hydrodynamic stages; The middle play, one sedimentary hydrodynamic stage, three infiltration hydrodynamic stages, two bury hydrodynamic stages and three tectonic hydrodynamic stages, and the upper one, mainly infiltration hydrodynamic stage. The burial hydrodynamic stage from Permian to Early Cretaceous was favorable for hydrocarbon generation, migration and accumulation, but the reservoirs were adjusted and reformed a lot during the tectonic hydrodynamic stage. They were further adjusted and destroyed during the infiltrating hydrodynamic stage after Late Cretaceous. Oil crack were common in the middle hydrocarbon play in burial/connate hydrodynamic stage and tectonic hydrodynamic stage from the end of Late Triassic to Late Cretaceous, in the meantime, lots of adjustedandreformed oil and gas reservoirs were formed; after Late Cretaceous, many adjustments and reforms of oil and gas reservoirs took place in the middle hydrocarbon play in Dabashan foreland depression belt during burial/connate hydrodynamic stage and tectonic hydrodynamic stage, while the plays in Dabashan foreland basement detachment tectonic belt and Dabashan foreland decollement tectonic belt in cover strata were mainly destroyed and reformed.

Key words: paleohydrodynamics, formation and preservation of oil and gas reservoir, Dabashan foreland thrust belt

CLC Number:

TE122

ZENG Jian-hui, SUN Zhan-qiang, XU Tian-wu, GUO Kai. The Evolution of Paleohydrodynamics of Dabashan Foreland Thrust Belt and Its Influence on Formation and Preservation of Oil and Gas Reservoirs[J]. Geoscience, 2010, 24(6): 1093-1101.

References

［14］程汝楠. 古水文地质及其应用[M]. 北京：地质出版社，1981: 2-8.
［15］王焰新，李立平. 试从古水文地质学角度分析地层与矽卡岩矿床成矿之关系——以鄂东张富山铁矿为例[J].矿产与地质，1994，8(1):63-68.
［16］李立平，王焰新. 鄂东阮家湾矿床钨矿化过程中古水文地质-地球化学分析[J]. 现代地质，1993，7(2)：221-228.
［17］王文斌, 黄志超, 武晓青, 等. 华东某构造古水动力场与油气运移聚集关系研究[J]. 成都理工学院学报, 1994, 21(2): 71-78.
［18］谢名连，汪民. 东营凹陷古水文地质期的划分[J]. 河南石油, 1998, 12(4): 7-10.
［19］李定龙. 从古水文地质条件浅析阳新统气源[J]. 中国煤田地质，1994，6(2)：46-52.
［20］周文斌，李学礼. 相山铀矿田成矿古水文地质分析[J]. 高校地质学报，1995，1(1)：101-108.
［21］刘金辉，李学礼. 古水文地质方法在研究下庄花岗岩型铀矿床中的应用[J]. 华东地质学院学报，1998，21(4)：330-334.
［22］吴勇，罗梅，孙先锋. 内蒙古测老庙盆地铀矿床形成的古水文地质研究[J]. 华东地质学院学报，1994，17(2)：142-144.
［23］王志明，李森，肖丰. 某砂岩型铀矿床成矿水文地质条件研究[J]. 中国核科学报告，1997(1)：1-12.
［24］陈法正. 鄂尔多斯盆地北部古水文地质条件与铀成矿前景分析[J]. 铀矿地质，2002，18(5)：287-294.
［25］董文明，李子颖，郭庆银，等. 内蒙古西胡里吐盆地构造-水文地质演化与砂岩型铀成矿作用[J]. 铀矿地质，2005，21(5): 283-286.
［26］许来生. 盆地砂岩型铀矿区域评价中的水文地质分析[J]. 铀矿地质，2005，21(4)： 225-233.
［27］李月湘，秦明宽，孙占学. 内蒙古东乌珠穆沁旗地区水文地质特征与铀成矿关系的研究[J]. 世界核地质科学，2005，22(2)：73-81.
［28］邵飞. 查干德勒苏盆地铀成矿水文地球化学条件分析[J]. 铀矿地质，2004，20(3)：163-169.
［29］卫三元，郭华，刘红旭. 海拉尔盆地砂岩型铀成矿水文地质条件分析[J]. 世界核地质科学，2003，20(3)：138-146.
［30］乐光禹. 构造复合联合原理：川滇构造组合叠加分析[M]. 成都：成都科技大学出版社，1996：50-100.
［31］何建坤，卢华复，张庆龙，等. 南大巴山冲断构造及其剪切挤压动力学机制[J]. 高校地质学报，1997，3(4)：419-428.
［32］黄继钧. 纵弯叠加褶皱地区应力场研究——以川东北地区为例[J]. 地质科学，2000，35(2)：140-150.
［33］刘顺，刘树根，李智武，等. 南大巴山褶断带西段中新生代构造应力场的节理研究[J]. 成都理工大学学报:自然科学版，2005，32(4)：345-350.
［34］李智武，罗玉宏，刘树根，等. 川东北地区岩石声发射实验及历史构造应力研究[J]. 成都理工大学学报: 自然科学版，2005，32(6)：614-620.
［35］李智武，刘树根，罗玉宏，等. 南大巴山前陆冲断带构造样式及变形机制分析[J] . 大地构造与成矿学，2006，30(3)：294-304.
［36］乐光禹. 大巴山造山带及其前陆盆地的构造特征和构造演化[J]. 矿物岩石，1998，18(增刊)：8-15.
［37］高长林，刘光祥，张玉箴，等. 东秦岭、大巴山逆冲推覆构造与油气远景[J]. 石油实验地质，2003，25 (增刊)：523-531.
［38］汪泽成，邹才能，陶士振. 大巴山前陆盆地形成及演化与油气勘探潜力分析[J]. 石油学报，2004，25(6)：23 -28.
［39］李智武. 中新生代大巴山前陆盆地—冲断带的形成演化[D]. 成都：成都理工大学，2006:1-257.
［40］程万强, 杨坤光. 大巴山构造演化的石英ESR年代学研究[J]. 地学前缘, 2009, 16(3): 197-206.
［41］施炜，董树文，胡健民，等. 大巴山前陆西段叠加构造变形分析及其构造应力场特征[J]. 地质学报，2007，81(10):1315-1325.
［42］胡健民, 施炜, 渠洪杰, 等. 秦岭造山带大巴山弧形构造带中生代构造变形[J]. 地学前缘，2009，16(3)：49-68.
［43］汪蕴璞，林锦璇，汪林. 论含油气盆地含水系统和水文地质期的划分——以东海西湖凹陷为例[J]. 地球科学：中国地质大学学报，1995，20(4)：393-396.
［44］汪蕴璞，王焕夫. 古水文地质研究内容及方法[J]. 水文地质工程地质，1982(1): 22-25.
［45］徐田武，曾溅辉，张永旺，等. 大巴山前陆构造带主断裂碳酸盐岩碳、氧同位素特征及其对流体的响应[J]. 中国石油大学学报: 自然科学版，2009，33 (2)：34-39.
［46］沈传波. 川东北—大巴山地区中、新生代盆山体系与海相油气成藏作用[D]. 武汉：中国地质大学，2006: 23-156.
［47］马永生，蔡勋育. 四川盆地川东北区二叠系—三叠系天然气勘探成果与前景展望[J]. 石油与天然气地质，2006，27(6)：741-750.
［48］马永生，蔡勋育，郭彤楼. 四川盆地普光大型气田油气充注与富集成藏的主控因素[J]. 科学通报，2007，52(增刊1)：32-38.

[1]	ZHAO Ze-hui, SUN Ping, LUO Xia, XU Shu-juan, JIANG Xiao-hua, CHENG. Conditions of Giant Volcanic Gas Field in the Deep Fault Depressions of Songliao Basin and Its Exploration Practice [J]. Geoscience, 2014, 28(3): 592-603.
[2]	WANG Qing，ZHAO Xu，LIU Yaqian. Comparison of Petroleum Geology and Exploration Potential of Three Foreland Basins in Peru [J]. Geoscience, 2013, 27(6): 1414-1424.
[3]	JIANG Zhen-xue,LI Fend, LI Zhuo. Applying Molecular Compositions of Inclusion Data to Restore Hydrocarbon Charge History in the Tazhong Area [J]. Geoscience, 2013, 27(5): 1193-1201.
[4]	BAI Guo-ping，DENG Chao，TAO Chong-zhi，WANG Da-peng，LIU .Jun-lan. Hydrocarbon Distribution Patterns and Controlling Factors in North West Shelf，Australia [J]. Geoscience, 2013, 27(5): 1225-1232.
[5]	GUO Kai, ZENG Jian-hui, LIU Tao-tao, LEI Xin. Hydrocarbon Fluid Flow Stages and Oil Migration History in Yanchang Formation of Longdong Area, Ordos Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2013, 27(2): 382-388.
[6]	PANG Zheng-lian, FAN Tai-liang, HE Hui, WANG Jin-cai, NIU Min. Types and Petroleum Geology Characteristics of Onshore Basins in Brazil [J]. Geoscience, 2013, 27(1): 143-151.
[7]	JIANG Zhen-Hai, LIN Chang-Song, QU Ai-Yang-. Trap Controlling Factors of StructureLithology Oil/Gas Pool in Eogene of Hongxing Area,Eastern Depression,Liaohe [J]. Geoscience, 2011, 25(4): 635-641.
[8]	NIU Yu-Jing, KANG Zhi-Hong, Long-Xu, CUI Wen-Ban. Origin and Evolution of Ordovician Karst Cave Reservoir in Tahe Oilfield [J]. Geoscience, 2011, 25(4): 650-659.
[9]	WANG Dong, WANG Guo-Zhi. Formation and Evolution of Highquality Dolomite Reservoir in Dengying Formation of Sinian, Nanjiang Area, Sichuan [J]. Geoscience, 2011, 25(4): 660-667.
[10]	PAN Gao-Feng,LIU ZHen,ZHAO Shu,WANG Jing. The Study on Lower Limit of Porosity for Oil Accumulation inChang-8 Member, Zhenjing Area, Ordos Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2011, 25(2): 271-278.
[11]	WUN Li-Qun, JIAO Yang-Quan, RONG Hui. Sedimentary Characteristics of Silurian Kepingtage Formation Bituminous Sandstone at Sishichang Section, Western Tarim Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2011, 25(1): 48-54.
[12]	LIANG Fu-Kang, XU Xin-He, MU Xiao-Shui, LI Sheng-Li, XU Shu-Tang, LIU Wei. Accommodation Zones and Their Controls on Depositional System in the Middle of Third Member of Shahejie Formation, South of Dongpu Sag [J]. Geoscience, 2011, 25(1): 55-61.
[13]	MENG Jiang-hui,LIU Luo-fu,JIANG Zhen-xue,GAO Yong-jin. Characteristics and Origin Classification of the Oils from the Lower Section of the 4th Member of Shahejie Formation and Kongdian Formation in the Southern Slope of Dongying Depression, Bohai Bay Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2010, 24(6): 1085-1092.
[14]	CHEN Dong-xia, PANG Xiong-qi, LI Lin-tao, DENG Ke, ZHANG Jian-hua. Gas-water Distribution Characteristics and Genetic Mechanism of the Second Sector of the Upper Triassic Xujiahe Formation in the Middle of the Western Sichuan Depression [J]. Geoscience, 2010, 24(6): 1117-1125.
[15]	LIN Xiao-ying, ZENG Jian-hui. Gas Composition Differentiation during Natural Gas Hydrate Formation and Its Geological Significance [J]. Geoscience, 2010, 24(6): 1157-1163.