Geoscience ›› 2022, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (01): 1-13.DOI: 10.19657/j.geoscience.1000-8527.2021.171
• Marine Geology • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2021-12-10
Revised:
2021-12-24
Online:
2022-02-10
Published:
2022-03-08
CLC Number:
FANG Nianqiao. Practice and Thinking on the Study of “Sea-Land Correlation”[J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(01): 1-13.
Fig.2 Main pattern of the signals recording uplifts of the Himalayan mountains (Tibetan Plateau) in Northeastern Indian Ocean (modified after ref. [18])
时代 | 华南—南海陆缘 | 浙闽陆缘 |
---|---|---|
中侏罗世晚期—早白垩世早期(165~135 Ma) | 惠东地区高基坪火山岩组合和丹霞地区玄武岩、安山岩均明确显示钙碱性特质。花岗质岩浆活动遍布中山、恩平、茂名、惠东等沿海地区及粤北—南岭一带,岩基主体呈东—西向展布,化学和矿物组分相近。典型如南岭者,被指认为高分异I型或S型花岗岩[ | 花岗质岩体主要分布在福建西部,呈NE—SW向展布; 同造山期NW—SE向挤压环境下下扬子区及海岸带出现大量埃达克质岩和变质花岗岩[ |
早白垩世(135~110 Ma) | 岩浆活动沉寂,各类岩浆岩记录稀少; 由众多中小型山间盆地形成,中粗碎屑磨拉石相较为发育 | 后造山期大规模伸展裂陷活动(136~118 Ma)和挤压走滑活动(117~108)交替进行[ 火山活动强烈,安山岩主要集中在早白垩世早—中期[ I型花岗岩居多,在浙江、苏南等地,出露含有碱性暗色矿物的典型A型花岗岩[ |
早白垩世晚期—晚白垩世中期(110~80 Ma) | 火山岩以中-酸性系列为主,安山岩广泛分布;花岗岩为I型和S型,指示挤压构造环境;有很多高镁安山岩和埃达克质岩出露,指示年轻洋壳的俯冲作用;粗面岩、流纹岩皆为钙碱性; 地壳普遍出现构造抬升,单组分岩屑(尤以花岗岩屑为最)砂砾岩广布,近源磨拉石相极为发育; 岩浆岩、沉积岩均指示由南向北陆缘活动强度递减 | WNW—ESE向伸展运动导致盆地沉陷,产生大量I型和A型花岗岩;双峰式火山岩以流纹岩为主,兼有少量玄武岩;未见高镁安山岩报道;出现复成分厚层块状粗碎屑岩[ |
晚白垩世中期—早古新世(80~60 Ma) | 岩浆活动减少,花岗岩体“小型化”,部分地区如珠江口盆地基底仍有I型花岗岩报道[ 部分地区如三水上白垩统大塱山组转为复成分砂砾岩,局部可见小型正断层 | 85 Ma后区域应力场由伸展转为压扭,岩浆活动停止[ |
Table 1 Correlation of major geological records between the south margin and Zhejiang-Fujian margin in China
时代 | 华南—南海陆缘 | 浙闽陆缘 |
---|---|---|
中侏罗世晚期—早白垩世早期(165~135 Ma) | 惠东地区高基坪火山岩组合和丹霞地区玄武岩、安山岩均明确显示钙碱性特质。花岗质岩浆活动遍布中山、恩平、茂名、惠东等沿海地区及粤北—南岭一带,岩基主体呈东—西向展布,化学和矿物组分相近。典型如南岭者,被指认为高分异I型或S型花岗岩[ | 花岗质岩体主要分布在福建西部,呈NE—SW向展布; 同造山期NW—SE向挤压环境下下扬子区及海岸带出现大量埃达克质岩和变质花岗岩[ |
早白垩世(135~110 Ma) | 岩浆活动沉寂,各类岩浆岩记录稀少; 由众多中小型山间盆地形成,中粗碎屑磨拉石相较为发育 | 后造山期大规模伸展裂陷活动(136~118 Ma)和挤压走滑活动(117~108)交替进行[ 火山活动强烈,安山岩主要集中在早白垩世早—中期[ I型花岗岩居多,在浙江、苏南等地,出露含有碱性暗色矿物的典型A型花岗岩[ |
早白垩世晚期—晚白垩世中期(110~80 Ma) | 火山岩以中-酸性系列为主,安山岩广泛分布;花岗岩为I型和S型,指示挤压构造环境;有很多高镁安山岩和埃达克质岩出露,指示年轻洋壳的俯冲作用;粗面岩、流纹岩皆为钙碱性; 地壳普遍出现构造抬升,单组分岩屑(尤以花岗岩屑为最)砂砾岩广布,近源磨拉石相极为发育; 岩浆岩、沉积岩均指示由南向北陆缘活动强度递减 | WNW—ESE向伸展运动导致盆地沉陷,产生大量I型和A型花岗岩;双峰式火山岩以流纹岩为主,兼有少量玄武岩;未见高镁安山岩报道;出现复成分厚层块状粗碎屑岩[ |
晚白垩世中期—早古新世(80~60 Ma) | 岩浆活动减少,花岗岩体“小型化”,部分地区如珠江口盆地基底仍有I型花岗岩报道[ 部分地区如三水上白垩统大塱山组转为复成分砂砾岩,局部可见小型正断层 | 85 Ma后区域应力场由伸展转为压扭,岩浆活动停止[ |
[1] |
ALAM M, ALAM M M, CURRAY J R, et al. An overview of the sedimentary geology of the Bengal Basin in relation to the regional tectonic framework and basin-fill history[J]. Sedimentary Geology, 2003, 155(3/4): 179-208.
DOI URL |
[2] |
BROZOVIC N, BURBANK D W. Dynamic fluvial systems and gravel progradation in the Himalayan foreland[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 2000, 112(3): 394-412.
DOI URL |
[3] | CORNER G. Geomorphology: A Systematic Analysis of Late Cenozoic Landforms[M]. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1991. |
[4] |
FITZSIMMONS R, BUCHANAN J, IZATT C. The role of outcrop geology in predicting reservoir presence in the Cretaceous and Paleocene successions of the Sulaiman Range, Pakistan[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2005, 89(2): 231-254.
DOI URL |
[5] | 施雅风, 汤懋苍, 马玉贞. 青藏高原二期隆升与亚洲季风孕育关系探讨[J]. 中国科学(D辑: 地球科学), 1998, 28(3): 263-271. |
[6] |
ACHARYYA S K. Break-up of the greater indo-Australian continent and accretion of blocks framing south and east Asia[J]. Journal of Geodynamics, 1998, 26(1): 149-170.
DOI URL |
[7] | 李吉均, 方小敏. 青藏高原隆起与环境变化研究[M]//中国科协. 中国科协首届学术年会论文集. 北京: 中国科学出版社, 1999: 308. |
[8] | 孟祥化. 沉积盆地与建造层序[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1993. |
[9] |
CURRAY J R, MOORE D G. Growth of the Bengal deep-sea fan and denudation in the Himalayas[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 1971, 82(3): 563.
DOI URL |
[10] | CURRAY J R, MOORE D G. Sedimentary and tectonic processes in the Bengal deep-sea fan and geosyncline[M]// The Geology of Continental Margins. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 1974: 617-627. |
[11] | MOORE D G, CURRAY J R, RAITT R W, et al. Stratigraphic-seismic section correlations and implications to Bengal fan history[M]// Deep Sea Drilling Project. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project.Washington:U.S.Government Printing Office, 1974:22. |
[12] | CURRAY J R, EMMEL F J, MOORE D G, et al. Structure, tectonics, and geological history of the northeastern Indian ocean[M]// The Ocean Basins and Margins. Boston: Springer, 1982: 399-450. |
[13] | COCHRAN J R. Himalayan uplift, sea level, and the record of Bengal fan sedimentation at the ODP leg 116 sites[M]//Ocean Drilling Program. Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program. Tulsa: Ocean Drilling Program, 1990: 397-414. |
[14] | STOW D. Sediment facies and processes on the distal Bengal Fan, Leg 116[M]. Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program. Tulsa: Ocean Drilling Program, 1990: 377-396. |
[15] |
FRANCE-LANORD C, DERRY L, MICHARD A. Evolution of the Himalaya since Miocene time: Isotopic and sedimentological evidence from the Bengal Fan[J]. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 1993, 74(1): 603-621.
DOI URL |
[16] | THOMPSON R W. Mineralogy of sands from the Bengal and Nicobar fans, sites 218 and 211, eastern Indian Ocean[M]// Ocean Drilling Program. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Washington: U.S.Government Printing Office, 1974: 711-713. |
[17] | 方念乔, 陈学方, 胡超涌, 等. 东北印度洋深海记录基本特征及其对青藏高原隆升的响应[J]. 第四纪研究, 2001, 21(6): 490-499. |
[18] | 方念乔, 丁旋, 张振国, 等. 东北印度洋两类主要的深水沉积序列及其对喜马拉雅隆升的响应[J]. 地质科学, 2009, 44(4): 1181-1198. |
[19] | 方念乔, 丁旋, 刘勇勤, 等. 东经90°海岭的远洋沉积记录与晚新生代重大构造环境事件[J]. 地学前缘, 2002, 9(1): 103-111. |
[20] | KROON D, STEENS T N F, TROELSTRA S R. Onset of monsoonal related upwelling in the western Arabian sea as revealed by planktonic foraminifers[M]// Ocean Drilling Program. Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program, 117 Scientific Results. Tulsa: Ocean Drilling Program, 1991: 257-263. |
[21] |
PRELL W L, KUTZBACH J E. Sensitivity of the Indian monsoon to forcing parameters and implications for its evolution[J]. Nature, 1992, 360: 647-652.
DOI URL |
[22] |
TRIPATHI S, TIWARI M, LEE J, et al. First evidence of denitrification vis-à-vis monsoon in the Arabian Sea since Late Miocene[J]. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7: 43056.
DOI URL |
[23] |
HUTCHISON C S. Ophiolite in southeast Asia[J]. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 1975, 86(6): 797.
DOI URL |
[24] |
RANGIN C, BELLON H, BENARD F, et al. Neogene arc-continent collision in Sabah, Northern Borneo (Malaysia)[J]. Tectonophysics, 1990, 183(1/2/3/4): 305-319.
DOI URL |
[25] |
FAURE M, MARCHADIER Y, RANGIN C. Pre-Eocene synmetamorphic structure in the Mindoro-Romblon-Palawan area, west Philippines, and implications for the history of Southeast Asia[J]. Tectonics, 1989, 8(5): 963-979.
DOI URL |
[26] | LEE C T A, MORTON D M, KISTLER R W, et al. Petrology and tectonics of Phanerozoic continent formation: From island arcs to accretion and continental arc magmatism[J]. Earth and Pla-netary Science Letters, 2007, 263(3/4): 370-387. |
[27] | 方念乔. “海南陆缘弧”体系的构建与“特提斯南海”的识别: 一个关于“古南海”演化新模式的探讨[J]. 地学前缘, 2016, 23(6): 107-119. |
[28] | 陈卫锋, 陈培荣, 徐夕生, 等. 华南白垩纪玄武质岩石的地球化学特征及其对太平洋板块俯冲作用的制约[J]. 中国科学(D辑: 地球科学), 2005, 35(11): 1007-1018. |
[29] | 孙卫东, 林秋婷, 张丽鹏, 等. 跳出南海看南海: 新特提斯洋闭合与南海的形成演化[J]. 岩石学报, 2018, 34(12): 3467-3478. |
[30] | 刘洋. “海南陆缘弧”延展问题研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2020. |
[31] | 李平鲁, 梁慧娴, 戴一丁, 等. 珠江口盆地燕山期岩浆岩的成因及构造环境[J]. 广东地质, 1999, 14(1): 1-8. |
[32] |
LIU Y, FANG N Q, QIANG M L, et al. The Cretaceous igneous rocks in southeastern Guangxi and their implication for tectonic environment in southwestern South China Block[J]. Open Geosciences, 2020, 12(1): 518-531.
DOI URL |
[33] | 刘洋, 方念乔, 强萌麟, 等. 粤桂地区白垩纪中期安山岩年代学、地球化学特征及其构造意义[J]. 现代地质, 2021, 35(4): 968-980. |
[34] | 强萌麟. 南海北部陆缘白垩纪安山岩基本特征及其与东南沿海安山岩对比[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2016. |
[35] | 姚伯初, 万玲. 中国南海海域岩石圈三维结构及演化[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2006. |
[36] | 钟建华, 张琴华. 衡阳盆地的准同生砾石与盆地构造反转[J]. 岩相古地理, 1995, 15(4): 43-46. |
[37] | 吴福元, 刘小驰, 纪伟强, 等. 高分异花岗岩的识别与研究[J]. 中国科学: 地球科学, 2017, 47(7): 745-765. |
[38] |
LI J H, ZHANG Y Q, DONG S W, et al. Cretaceous tectonic evolution of South China: A preliminary synthesis[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2014, 134: 98-136.
DOI URL |
[39] | 张龙坤. 浙江嵊州白垩纪火山岩地质特征及构造环境[D]. 成都: 成都理工大学, 2018. |
[40] | 邱检生, 王德滋, 彭亚鸣, 等. 浙江舟山桃花岛碱性花岗岩的岩石学和地球化学特征及成因探讨[J]. 南京大学学报(自然科学版), 1996, 32(1): 82-91. |
[41] | 邱检生, 王德滋, 蟹泽聪史, 等. 福建沿海铝质A型花岗岩的地球化学及岩石成因[J]. 地球化学, 2000, 29(4): 313-321. |
[42] |
WONG J, SUN M, XING G F, et al. Geochemical and zircon U-Pb and Hf isotopic study of the Baijuhuajian metaluminous A-type granite: Extension at 125-100 Ma and its tectonic significance for South China[J]. Lithos, 2009, 112(3/4): 289-305.
DOI URL |
[43] |
ZHAO X L, JIANG Y, XING G F, et al. A geochemical and geochronological study of the Early Cretaceous, extension-related Honggong ferroan (A-type) granite in southwestern Zhejiang Province, southeast China[J]. Geological Magazine, 2018, 155(3): 549-567.
DOI URL |
[44] | 侯明才, 林良彪, 陈洪德. 广东三水盆地沉积构造演化[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2010: 1-85. |
[45] | 唐忠驭. 广东三水盆地白垩纪-早第三纪裂谷型火山作用[J]. 广东地质, 1994, 9(1): 9. |
[46] |
CHUNG S L, CHENG H, JAHN B M, et al. Major and trace element, and Sr-Nd isotope constraints on the origin of Paleogene volcanism in South China prior to the South China Sea opening[J]. Lithos, 1997, 40(2/3/4): 203-220.
DOI URL |
[47] | 肖龙, 周海民, 董月霞, 等. 广东三水盆地火山岩: 地球化学特征及成因: 兼论火山岩性质的时空演化和南海形成的深部过程[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2006, 30(1): 72-81. |
[48] | 董月霞, 肖龙, 周海民, 等. 广东三水盆地双峰式火山岩: 空间展布、岩石学特征及其盆地动力学意义[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2006, 30(1): 82-92. |
[49] | 张维, 方念乔. 广东三水盆地始新世火山岩地球化学特征[J]. 地球科学, 2014, 39(1): 37-44. |
[50] | 张煜, 方念乔. 广东三水盆地玄武岩源区特征与南海早期演化[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2021, 41(3): 95-113. |
[51] |
CHEN Peijia, FANG Nianqiao, YUAN Xiaobo. Geochemical insights from clinopyroxene phenocrysts into the magma evolution of an alkaline magmatic system from the Sanshui Basin, South China[J]. Minerals, 2021, 11(11):1295.
DOI URL |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||