北京典型地面沉降区土体压缩特征研究

现代地质 ›› 2016, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 716-722.

• 工程地质学 • 上一篇

北京典型地面沉降区土体压缩特征研究

杨艳^1,2，王荣²，罗勇^2,3

(1. 北京大学地球与空间科学学院，北京 100871；2. 北京市水文地质工程地质大队，北京 100195；3. 中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所，北京 100029)

出版日期:2016-06-14 发布日期:2016-06-15
作者简介:杨艳，女，硕士，工程师，1982年出生，水工环地质专业，主要从事地面沉降、地裂缝等监测、研究及综合防治工作。Email: wildhorse898@126.com。
基金资助:
北京市优秀人才培养资助项目(2014400617931G217)；北京市科技计划课题(Z131100005613022)。

A Study on Soil Compression Characteristics in Land Subsidence Areas within Beijing

YANG Yan^1,2, WANG Rong², LUO Yong^2,3

(1. School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871,China；2. Beijing Institute of Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology, Beijing 100195, China; 3. Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China)

Online:2016-06-14 Published:2016-06-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

北京平原区地面沉降目前处于快速发展阶段，影响因素十分复杂，其中粘性土体的存在是其赖以形成的物质基础。以北京昌平八仙庄典型地面沉降区为研究对象，采取逐级加荷、逐级卸荷以及反复加卸荷，分析100 m以浅粘性土体在不同加卸载方式下的固结特征。实验结果表明：荷载从25 kPa分级加荷到1 600 kPa，粘土变形量大于粉土，分别为2.822 mm、1.000 mm；荷载从400 kPa分级卸除到50 kPa，粘土的回弹量大于粉土，分别为0.277 mm、0.121 mm；反复加卸荷条件下粉质粘土及粉土较之粘土更容易达到固结状态，蠕变时间效应为粘土>粉质粘土>粉土。建议在制定地面沉降灾害防治措施方案时，应充分考虑沉降区地层土体特征影响。

关键词: 地面沉降, 粘性土, 固结试验, 压缩特征

Abstract:

Numerous factors are attributed to the rapid development of subsidence in the plain area of Beijing. The existence of cohesive soils in this area provides the material foundation for subsidence, and therefore, this study focuses on the consolidation characteristics of cohesive soils with depth less than 100 m under different loading condition such as progressive loading, progressive unloading, and repeated loading and unloading in a typical subsidence area in Baxianzhuang within the Changping District of Beijing. According to the test results, the deformation of cohesive soils under progressive loading from 25 kPa to 1,600 kPa is greater than that of silt, which is 2.822 mm and 1.000 mm, respectively. The rebound of cohesive soils under progressive unloading from 400 kPa to 50 kPa is also greater than that of silt, which is 0.277 mm and 0.121 mm, respectively; and under repeated loading and unloading condition, silty clay and silt attain a state of consolidation faster than clay; the creep-time effect is sorted as clay>silty clay>silt. It is therefore recommended that a full consideration should be given to the effects of soil characteristics in subsidence areas when compiling land subsidence disaster prevention and control plans.

Key words: land subsidence, cohesive soil, consolidation test, compression characteristic

中图分类号:

P642.2
P694

杨艳，王荣，罗勇. 北京典型地面沉降区土体压缩特征研究[J]. 现代地质, 2016, 30(3): 716-722.

[1]	黄健民, 郑小战, 胡让全, 陈建新, 吕镁娜, 陈小月, 郭宇, 刁群. 广州金沙洲岩溶地面塌陷灾害预警预报研究[J]. 现代地质, 2017, 31(02): 421-432.
[2]	吴建中, 王寒梅, 杨天亮. 浅层地下水人工回灌应用于上海市工程性地面沉降防治的试验研究[J]. 现代地质, 2009, 23(6): 1194-1200.
[3]	杨献忠，杨祝良，陈敬中，胡存礼，袁平，魏乃颐. 根据蒙脱石的层间水化状态探讨南京仙林盆地的地面沉降及其趋势[J]. 现代地质, 2005, 19(4): 621-626.

北京典型地面沉降区土体压缩特征研究

A Study on Soil Compression Characteristics in Land Subsidence Areas within Beijing

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 3

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价