The AmuDarya right bank area is one of the important overseas cooperative areas of the China National Petroleum Corporation. The structural feature of the Lowermiddle Jurassic series in this area is not understood well currently, which restricts the next exploration activity. In this paper, making full use of existing geological and drilling data as well as latecollective 3D seismic data, we investigate the structural feature of the Lowermiddle Jurassic series in the middle of the AmuDarya right bank area by tracing and matching of the strata surfaces, and further analyze the style of the structural trapping and their effectiveness in the formation of hydrocarbon reservoirs. The investigation indicates that four groups of faults develop in the Lowermiddle Jurassic series in this area with their strike being NWSE, nearly EW,NEESWW and NESW direction respectively, and there are obvious differences among their formation time, kinetic characteristics, evolutionary process and spatial distribution. Similarly, in this area develop three groups of fold structures with their strikes being NWSE, NESW and NNESWW, respectively. Under the influence of the structural development, the main type of structural trapping is anticline trap, which is often cut by faults and is remolded to form faultanticline composite trap. According to the main controlling factors of the trap development, the anticline traps could be classified into the anticline trap (Type A)that develops on the palaeohigh of the basement rock, and the compressive anticline trap(Type B) that develops in the Neogene era and is independent of the palaeohigh of the basement rock. The type A is drape fold in the early period and is reformed during the subsequent compressional movement, with being formalized in the Neogene era. There are obvious differences in the effectiveness of the formation of hydrocarbon reservoirs between various types of structural traps. The type A develops on the palaeohigh of the basement rock so that the reservoir of the Lowermiddle Jurassic series develops well. Contrarily, the type B is mainly located at the east of the research area, where the depositional water was so deep in the Earlymiddle Jurassic that the reservoir of the Lowermiddle Jurassic series develops badly. According to reconstruction extent of the subsequent compressional movement, the type A could be further divided into type A1 and type A2. The type A1 was reconstructed weakly during the after compressional movement, so the reactivity of the faults being located at the edge of the palaeohigh of the basement rock in the early stage couldnt destroy the primary oil gas pools of the Lowermiddle Jurassic series that were formed before Neogene completely with some native reservoirs saved. The type A2 was remolded so intensely during the after compressional movement that the reactivity of the existing faults or neogenic faults activity almost eliminate the primary oil gas pools of the Lowermiddle Jurassic series. As a whole, the effectiveness in the formation of hydrocarbon reservoirs in the Lowermiddle Jurassic series of the type A1 is better than that of the type A2, which is better than the type B.