Geoscience ›› 2023, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (05): 1321-1335.DOI: 10.19657/j.geoscience.1000-8527.2023.005
• Petroleum Geology • Previous Articles Next Articles
JIN Xiao1,2,3(), FENG Yanfang1,2, LUO Xiaoling1,2, WEN Xinyu4, ZHANG Suowen5, ZHANG Zhihuan3
Received:
2022-05-28
Revised:
2023-02-27
Online:
2023-10-10
Published:
2023-11-14
CLC Number:
JIN Xiao, FENG Yanfang, LUO Xiaoling, WEN Xinyu, ZHANG Suowen, ZHANG Zhihuan. Kinetic and Hydrocarbon Generation of Middle Permian Black Shale Around the Bogda Mountain, Southern Junggar Basin: Implications for Petroleum Exploration[J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(05): 1321-1335.
Fig.1 Map showing distribution of drilling and field profiles around the Bogda Mountain in southern Junggar Basin (a) and Middle Permian sedimentary facies around the Bogda Mountain (b)
样品编号 | 井号 | 层位 | 岩性 | TOC(%) | S1+S2(mg/g) | Ro(%) | HI(mg/g) | TS(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1-100 | 奇1 | P2p | 灰质油泥岩 | 7.48 | 69.11 | 0.80 | 905.0 | |
Q1-123 | 奇1 | P2p | 深灰色泥岩 | 5.90 | 37.67 | 0.78 | 623.0 | |
D-17 | 西锅底坑 | P2l | 黑色页岩 | 3.59 | 22.37 | 0.76 | 616.6 | 0.020 |
J-6 | 井井子沟 | P2p | 黑色页岩 | 4.26 | 8.70 | 202.2 | 0.027 | |
J-11 | 井井子沟 | P2p | 黑色页岩 | 31.99 | 194.43 | 0.62 | 605.5 | 0.044 |
J-16 | 井井子沟 | P2p | 黑色页岩 | 4.85 | 15.41 | 316.9 | 0.035 | |
Q-2 | 泉子街 | P2p | 黑色泥岩 | 5.60 | 17.51 | 291.9 | 0.051 | |
Q-6 | 泉子街 | P2p | 黑色泥岩 | 10.04 | 65.90 | 0.59 | 643.1 | 0.041 |
Q-10 | 泉子街 | P2p | 黑色泥岩 | 21.35 | 195.31 | 911.6 | 0.059 |
Table 1 Geochemical information of samples for the hydrocarbon generation kinetics experiment
样品编号 | 井号 | 层位 | 岩性 | TOC(%) | S1+S2(mg/g) | Ro(%) | HI(mg/g) | TS(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1-100 | 奇1 | P2p | 灰质油泥岩 | 7.48 | 69.11 | 0.80 | 905.0 | |
Q1-123 | 奇1 | P2p | 深灰色泥岩 | 5.90 | 37.67 | 0.78 | 623.0 | |
D-17 | 西锅底坑 | P2l | 黑色页岩 | 3.59 | 22.37 | 0.76 | 616.6 | 0.020 |
J-6 | 井井子沟 | P2p | 黑色页岩 | 4.26 | 8.70 | 202.2 | 0.027 | |
J-11 | 井井子沟 | P2p | 黑色页岩 | 31.99 | 194.43 | 0.62 | 605.5 | 0.044 |
J-16 | 井井子沟 | P2p | 黑色页岩 | 4.85 | 15.41 | 316.9 | 0.035 | |
Q-2 | 泉子街 | P2p | 黑色泥岩 | 5.60 | 17.51 | 291.9 | 0.051 | |
Q-6 | 泉子街 | P2p | 黑色泥岩 | 10.04 | 65.90 | 0.59 | 643.1 | 0.041 |
Q-10 | 泉子街 | P2p | 黑色泥岩 | 21.35 | 195.31 | 911.6 | 0.059 |
时长(d) | 温度(℃) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
300 | 330 | 360 | 370 | |
1 | 13.75 | 66.28 | ||
2 | 0.83 | 7.78 | 46.07 | |
3 | 23.01 | 99.99 | ||
5 | 23.74 | 72.66 | ||
7 | 44.20 | 63.33 | 79.19 | |
9 | 4.59 | 99.68 |
Table 2 Transformation ratio of J-11 sample under high P-T(%)
时长(d) | 温度(℃) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
300 | 330 | 360 | 370 | |
1 | 13.75 | 66.28 | ||
2 | 0.83 | 7.78 | 46.07 | |
3 | 23.01 | 99.99 | ||
5 | 23.74 | 72.66 | ||
7 | 44.20 | 63.33 | 79.19 | |
9 | 4.59 | 99.68 |
样品编号 | Q1-100 | Q1-123 | D-17 | J-6 | J-11 | J-16 | Q-2 | Q-6 | Q-10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
井位/露头 | 奇1井 | 奇1井 | 西锅底坑 | 井井子沟 | 井井子沟 | 井井子沟 | 泉子街 | 泉子街 | 泉子街 |
HI(mg/g) | 905 | 623 | 616 | 202 | 606 | 317 | 292 | 643 | 911 |
A(s-1) | 9.00×1015 | 2.80×1015 | 2.35×1019 | 7.58×1020 | 2.32×1020 | 7.72×1018 | 4.18×1017 | 7.74×1018 | 3.62×1016 |
38(0.05) | 37(0.07) | 46(0.02) | 51(0.03) | 49(0.36) | 45(0.61) | 42(0.20) | 45(0.02) | 40(0.09) | |
40(0.05) | 38(0.27) | 47(0.02) | 52(0.01) | 51(0.35) | 46(0.10) | 43(0.13) | 46(0.10) | 41(0.13) | |
41(0.09) | 39(0.41) | 48(0.03) | 53(0.04) | 52(0.20) | 47(0.83) | 44(0.56) | 47(0.12) | 42(0.21) | |
42(0.05) | 40(0.37) | 49(0.08) | 54(0.01) | 53(0.35) | 48(0.25) | 45(0.42) | 48(0.21) | 43(0.21) | |
43(0.14) | 41(0.38) | 50(0.06) | 55(0.04) | 54(0.25) | 49(0.66) | 46(0.63) | 49(0.20) | 44(0.18) | |
44(0.06) | 42(0.42) | 51(0.12) | 56(0.05) | 55(0.46) | 51(0.82) | 47(0.57) | 50(0.22) | 45(0.40) | |
45(0.23) | 43(0.38) | 52(0.08) | 57(0.04) | 56(0.26) | 52(0.19) | 48(0.57) | 51(0.25) | 46(0.16) | |
46(0.07) | 44(0.45) | 53(0.16) | 58(0.06) | 57(0.58) | 53(0.47) | 49(0.60) | 52(0.21) | 47(0.62) | |
47(0.21) | 45(0.38) | 54(0.14) | 59(0.11) | 58(0.30) | 54(0.51) | 50(0.58) | 53(0.27) | 48(0.02) | |
48(0.28) | 46(0.28) | 55(0.25) | 60(0.06) | 59(0.88) | 55(0.65) | 51(0.69) | 54(0.27) | 49(1.18) | |
50(0.18) | 47(0.67) | 56(0.32) | 61(0.20) | 60(0.16) | 56(0.42) | 52(0.56) | 55(0.23) | 51(0.97) | |
51(1.30) | 51(0.37) | 57(0.37) | 62(0.11) | 61(1.58) | 57(1.08) | 53(1.16) | 56(0.43) | 52(1.43) | |
55(85.49) | 53(73.38) | 58(0.74) | 63(0.40) | 63(2.44) | 58(0.37) | 54(0.55) | 57(0.35) | 54(1.32) | |
57(5.05) | 54(14.16) | 59(0.64) | 64(0.14) | 64(2.18) | 59(1.59) | 55(2.02) | 58(0.66) | 55(10.29) | |
58(2.29) | 56(3.43) | 60(1.51) | 65(1.18) | 66(7.01) | 60(0.95) | 56(0.98) | 59(0.22) | 56(8.42) | |
60(1.33) | 57(0.26) | 61(2.13) | 66(0.40) | 67(4.47) | 61(3.28) | 57(2.62) | 60(2.12) | 57(15.42) | |
62(0.72) | 58(0.78) | 62(2.06) | 67(1.57) | 68(13.06) | 62(1.05) | 58(2.42) | 61(0.35) | 58(27.47) | |
Ea(kcal/mol) | 63(0.73) | 59(0.81) | 63(6.81) | 68(0.81) | 69(2.22) | 63(6.82) | 59(9.74) | 62(5.33) | 59(12.43) |
67(1.68) | 61(0.81) | 64(9.04) | 69(5.03) | 70(20.00) | 64(22.24) | 60(25.86) | 63(15.19) | 61(5.17) | |
62(0.46) | 65(22.90) | 70(27.98) | 72(18.21) | 65(25.06) | 61(22.51) | 64(31.21) | 62(1.40) | ||
65(0.67) | 66(21.32) | 71(24.50) | 73(0.07) | 66(10.95) | 62(8.48) | 65(17.50) | 63(0.78) | ||
66(0.66) | 67(14.16) | 72(16.79) | 74(5.30) | 67(6.77) | 63(4.57) | 66(8.55) | 64(2.85) | ||
69(0.13) | 68(6.18) | 73(6.50) | 75(1.27) | 68(2.38) | 64(2.03) | 67(3.41) | 65(0.22) | ||
69(3.12) | 74(4.12) | 76(2.18) | 69(2.11) | 65(1.90) | 68(2.67) | 66(2.76) | |||
70(1.72) | 75(1.86) | 77(3.04) | 70(1.40) | 66(1.33) | 69(1.55) | 69(3.75) | |||
71(1.38) | 76(1.62) | 78(0.27) | 71(0.96) | 67(0.95) | 70(1.45) | 70(0.38) | |||
72(0.77) | 77(1.14) | 79(2.98) | 72(1.14) | 68(1.28) | 71(1.08) | 73(1.63) | |||
73(0.86) | 78(0.97) | 80(0.25) | 73(0.35) | 69(0.25) | 72(0.95) | ||||
74(0.41) | 79(0.78) | 81(3.07) | 74(0.90) | 70(1.43) | 73(0.75) | ||||
75(0.65) | 80(0.39) | 84(4.14) | 75(0.41) | 72(0.78) | 74(0.96) | ||||
76(0.11) | 81(0.82) | 88(2.13) | 77(1.21) | 73(0.89) | 75(0.25) | ||||
77(0.68) | 83(0.85) | 83(3.45) | 78(2.74) | 76(1.19) | |||||
78(0.19) | 84(0.07) | 79(1.73) | |||||||
80(0.51) | 86(0.81) | ||||||||
81(0.28) | 90(0.50) | ||||||||
84(0.17) |
Table 3 Kinetic results of Middle Permian source rocks for hydrocarbon generation by Rock-Eval analysis in the study area
样品编号 | Q1-100 | Q1-123 | D-17 | J-6 | J-11 | J-16 | Q-2 | Q-6 | Q-10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
井位/露头 | 奇1井 | 奇1井 | 西锅底坑 | 井井子沟 | 井井子沟 | 井井子沟 | 泉子街 | 泉子街 | 泉子街 |
HI(mg/g) | 905 | 623 | 616 | 202 | 606 | 317 | 292 | 643 | 911 |
A(s-1) | 9.00×1015 | 2.80×1015 | 2.35×1019 | 7.58×1020 | 2.32×1020 | 7.72×1018 | 4.18×1017 | 7.74×1018 | 3.62×1016 |
38(0.05) | 37(0.07) | 46(0.02) | 51(0.03) | 49(0.36) | 45(0.61) | 42(0.20) | 45(0.02) | 40(0.09) | |
40(0.05) | 38(0.27) | 47(0.02) | 52(0.01) | 51(0.35) | 46(0.10) | 43(0.13) | 46(0.10) | 41(0.13) | |
41(0.09) | 39(0.41) | 48(0.03) | 53(0.04) | 52(0.20) | 47(0.83) | 44(0.56) | 47(0.12) | 42(0.21) | |
42(0.05) | 40(0.37) | 49(0.08) | 54(0.01) | 53(0.35) | 48(0.25) | 45(0.42) | 48(0.21) | 43(0.21) | |
43(0.14) | 41(0.38) | 50(0.06) | 55(0.04) | 54(0.25) | 49(0.66) | 46(0.63) | 49(0.20) | 44(0.18) | |
44(0.06) | 42(0.42) | 51(0.12) | 56(0.05) | 55(0.46) | 51(0.82) | 47(0.57) | 50(0.22) | 45(0.40) | |
45(0.23) | 43(0.38) | 52(0.08) | 57(0.04) | 56(0.26) | 52(0.19) | 48(0.57) | 51(0.25) | 46(0.16) | |
46(0.07) | 44(0.45) | 53(0.16) | 58(0.06) | 57(0.58) | 53(0.47) | 49(0.60) | 52(0.21) | 47(0.62) | |
47(0.21) | 45(0.38) | 54(0.14) | 59(0.11) | 58(0.30) | 54(0.51) | 50(0.58) | 53(0.27) | 48(0.02) | |
48(0.28) | 46(0.28) | 55(0.25) | 60(0.06) | 59(0.88) | 55(0.65) | 51(0.69) | 54(0.27) | 49(1.18) | |
50(0.18) | 47(0.67) | 56(0.32) | 61(0.20) | 60(0.16) | 56(0.42) | 52(0.56) | 55(0.23) | 51(0.97) | |
51(1.30) | 51(0.37) | 57(0.37) | 62(0.11) | 61(1.58) | 57(1.08) | 53(1.16) | 56(0.43) | 52(1.43) | |
55(85.49) | 53(73.38) | 58(0.74) | 63(0.40) | 63(2.44) | 58(0.37) | 54(0.55) | 57(0.35) | 54(1.32) | |
57(5.05) | 54(14.16) | 59(0.64) | 64(0.14) | 64(2.18) | 59(1.59) | 55(2.02) | 58(0.66) | 55(10.29) | |
58(2.29) | 56(3.43) | 60(1.51) | 65(1.18) | 66(7.01) | 60(0.95) | 56(0.98) | 59(0.22) | 56(8.42) | |
60(1.33) | 57(0.26) | 61(2.13) | 66(0.40) | 67(4.47) | 61(3.28) | 57(2.62) | 60(2.12) | 57(15.42) | |
62(0.72) | 58(0.78) | 62(2.06) | 67(1.57) | 68(13.06) | 62(1.05) | 58(2.42) | 61(0.35) | 58(27.47) | |
Ea(kcal/mol) | 63(0.73) | 59(0.81) | 63(6.81) | 68(0.81) | 69(2.22) | 63(6.82) | 59(9.74) | 62(5.33) | 59(12.43) |
67(1.68) | 61(0.81) | 64(9.04) | 69(5.03) | 70(20.00) | 64(22.24) | 60(25.86) | 63(15.19) | 61(5.17) | |
62(0.46) | 65(22.90) | 70(27.98) | 72(18.21) | 65(25.06) | 61(22.51) | 64(31.21) | 62(1.40) | ||
65(0.67) | 66(21.32) | 71(24.50) | 73(0.07) | 66(10.95) | 62(8.48) | 65(17.50) | 63(0.78) | ||
66(0.66) | 67(14.16) | 72(16.79) | 74(5.30) | 67(6.77) | 63(4.57) | 66(8.55) | 64(2.85) | ||
69(0.13) | 68(6.18) | 73(6.50) | 75(1.27) | 68(2.38) | 64(2.03) | 67(3.41) | 65(0.22) | ||
69(3.12) | 74(4.12) | 76(2.18) | 69(2.11) | 65(1.90) | 68(2.67) | 66(2.76) | |||
70(1.72) | 75(1.86) | 77(3.04) | 70(1.40) | 66(1.33) | 69(1.55) | 69(3.75) | |||
71(1.38) | 76(1.62) | 78(0.27) | 71(0.96) | 67(0.95) | 70(1.45) | 70(0.38) | |||
72(0.77) | 77(1.14) | 79(2.98) | 72(1.14) | 68(1.28) | 71(1.08) | 73(1.63) | |||
73(0.86) | 78(0.97) | 80(0.25) | 73(0.35) | 69(0.25) | 72(0.95) | ||||
74(0.41) | 79(0.78) | 81(3.07) | 74(0.90) | 70(1.43) | 73(0.75) | ||||
75(0.65) | 80(0.39) | 84(4.14) | 75(0.41) | 72(0.78) | 74(0.96) | ||||
76(0.11) | 81(0.82) | 88(2.13) | 77(1.21) | 73(0.89) | 75(0.25) | ||||
77(0.68) | 83(0.85) | 83(3.45) | 78(2.74) | 76(1.19) | |||||
78(0.19) | 84(0.07) | 79(1.73) | |||||||
80(0.51) | 86(0.81) | ||||||||
81(0.28) | 90(0.50) | ||||||||
84(0.17) |
Fig.6 Simulation of dehydrogenations and their activation free energy barriers of organic matter via quantum chemical calculation (a) dehydrogenation of ethane to form C=C double bonds; (b) cyclization of n-hexane to form cyclohexane; (c) dehydrogenatioin of cyclohexane to form cyclohexene; (d) aryl-aryl coupling by use of dibenzothiophene
芴 | 菲 | 芘 | 蒄 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
芴 | 122.26 | |||
菲 | 114.70 | 115.96 | ||
芘 | 122.22 | 123.60 | 122.51 | |
蒄 | 118.00 | 119.35 | 119.16 | 122.13 |
Table 4 Apparent activation energy for aryl-aryl coupling between different aromatic hydrocarbons(kcal/mol)
芴 | 菲 | 芘 | 蒄 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
芴 | 122.26 | |||
菲 | 114.70 | 115.96 | ||
芘 | 122.22 | 123.60 | 122.51 | |
蒄 | 118.00 | 119.35 | 119.16 | 122.13 |
Fig.7 Diagram showing the comparison of hydrocarbon generation threshold of source rocks under heating rate of virtual basin (solid gray line and the shadow denote the dynamic curve calculated by Rock-Eval method; solid red line denotes the dynamic curve of J-11 black shale calculated by the two methods; black dotted line denotes the Easy%Ro value)
[1] | 张希良, 黄晓丹, 张达, 等. 碳中和目标下的能源经济转型路径与政策研究[J]. 管理世界, 2022, 38(1): 35-66. |
[2] |
ZOU C N, DONG D Z, WANG Y M, et al. Shale gas in China: Characteristics, challenges and prospects (II)[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(2): 182-196.
DOI URL |
[3] |
ZOU C N, DONG D Z, WANG Y M, et al. Shale gas in China: Characteristics, challenges and prospects (I)[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2015, 42(6): 753-767.
DOI URL |
[4] |
GHANIZADEH A, CLARKSON C R, AQUINO S, et al. Petrophysical and geomechanical characteristics of Canadian tight oil and liquid-rich gas reservoirs: I.Pore network and permeability characterization[J]. Fuel, 2015, 153: 664-681.
DOI URL |
[5] | ZOU C N. Unconventional Petroleum Geology[M]. Burlington, Mass: Elsevier, 2013. |
[6] |
ZOU C N, ZHU R K, CHEN Z Q, et al. Organic-matter-rich shales of China[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2019, 189: 51-78.
DOI |
[7] |
LUO Q Y, GONG L, QU Y S, et al. The tight oil potential of the Lucaogou Formation from the southern Junggar Basin, China[J]. Fuel, 2018, 234: 858-871.
DOI URL |
[8] | 齐雪峰, 吴晓智, 唐勇, 等. 新疆博格达山北麓二叠系油页岩成矿特征及资源潜力[J]. 地质科学, 2013, 48(4): 1271-1285. |
[9] | 张传恒, 刘典波, 张传林, 等. 新疆博格达山初始隆升时间的地层学标定[J]. 地学前缘, 2005, 12(1): 294-302. |
[10] | MAIER C G, ZIMMERLEY S R. Chemical dynamics of the transformation of organic matter to bitumen in oil-shale[J]. Utah Univ Res Invest Bull, 1924, 14,62-81. |
[11] | TISSOT B P, WELTE D H. Petroleum Formation and Occurrence[M]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1978. |
[12] |
AHMAD THANA’ANI N A, MUSTAPHA K A, IDRIS M. Source rock pyrolysis and bulk kinetic modelling of Miocene sedimentary sequences in southeastern Sabah, Malaysia: The variability of thermal maturity to oil-gas producing kerogen[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2022, 208: 109513.
DOI URL |
[13] |
SINGH D P, HAZRA B, WOOD D A, et al. Hydrocarbon generation and kinetics: A case study of Permian shales, India[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2021, 222: 104960.
DOI URL |
[14] |
LIANG H R, XU G S, XU F H, et al. Oil generation of lacustrine Type II shale: A case study of the Shahejie Formation, Laizhou Bay Sag, Bohai Bay Basin (China)[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2020, 195: 107839.
DOI URL |
[15] |
LIAO L L, WANG Y P, CHEN C S, et al. Kinetic study of marine and lacustrine shale grains using Rock-Eval pyrolysis: Implications to hydrocarbon generation, retention and expulsion[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2018, 89: 164-173.
DOI URL |
[16] |
MONTHIOUX M, LANDAIS P, MONIN J C. Comparison between natural and artificial maturation series of humic coals from the Mahakam delta, Indonesia[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 1985, 8(4): 275-292.
DOI URL |
[17] | LEWAN M D, WILLIAMS J A. Evaluation of petroleum generation from resinites by hydrous pyrolysis[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1987, 71: 207-214. |
[18] | BEHAR F, VANDENBROUCKE M. Experimental determination of the rate constants of the n-C25 thermal cracking at 120, 400, and 800 bar: Implications for high-pressure/high-temperature prospects[J]. Energy & Fuels, 1996, 10(6): 605-612. |
[19] |
DARTIGUELONGUE C, BEHAR F, BUDZINSKI H, et al. Thermal stability of dibenzothiophene in closed system pyrolysis: Experimental study and kinetic modelling[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 2006, 37: 98-116.
DOI URL |
[20] |
LEWAN M D, RUBLE T E. Comparison of petroleum generation kinetics by isothermal hydrous and nonisothermal open-system pyrolysis[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 2002, 33(12): 1457-1475.
DOI URL |
[21] |
JIANG Z L, DU H L, LI Y J, et al. Simulation of gas generation from the Paleogene Enping formation in the Baiyun sag in the deepwater area of the Pearl River mouth basin, the South China Sea[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2015, 29(2): 577-586.
DOI URL |
[22] |
RAGAB S M, NICOLAJ M, NADIAH O L, et al. Phase kinetics for assessing the compositional evolution of petroleum generated from the early to Late Miocene source rock, Belait Formation, Brunei-Muara district, Brunei Darussalam[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2021, 206: 108965.
DOI URL |
[23] |
KUMAR S, OJHA K. Reaction kinetic, maturity, burial and thermal histories modelling of Cambay shale source rocks, Cambay Basin, Western India[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2021, 202: 108543.
DOI URL |
[24] |
XIANG B L, LI E T, GAO X W, et al. Petroleum generation kinetics for Permian lacustrine source rocks in the Junggar Basin, NW China[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 2016, 98: 1-17.
DOI URL |
[25] | 顾连兴, 胡受奚, 于春水, 等. 论博格达俯冲撕裂型裂谷的形成与演化[J]. 岩石学报, 2001, 17(4): 585-597. |
[26] | 顾连兴, 胡受奚, 于春水, 等. 博格达陆内碰撞造山带挤压-拉张构造转折期的侵入活动[J]. 岩石学报, 2001, 17(2): 187-198. |
[27] | 郑瑞辉. 准噶尔盆地柴窝堡凹陷油源条件及油气成藏研究[D]. 北京: 中国石油大学(北京), 2019. |
[28] | 郭威, 周鼎武, 欧阳征建, 等. 博格达山南缘达坂城东沟乡二叠纪岩浆岩及其形成地质环境[J]. 陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 37(1): 103-108. |
[29] | 郭威, 周鼎武, 欧阳征建, 等. 博格达二叠纪区域伸展背景下的滑塌堆积特征[J]. 西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 41(4): 658-662, 675. |
[30] |
CAI Y F, ZHANG H, FENG Z, et al. A Germaropteris-dominated flora from the upper Permian of the Dalongkou section, Xinjiang, Northwest China, and its paleoclimatic and paleoenvironmental implications[J]. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 2019, 266: 61-71.
DOI URL |
[31] |
METCALFE I, FOSTER C B, AFONIN S A, et al. Stratigraphy, biostratigraphy and C-isotopes of the permian-triassic non-marine sequence at dalongkou and lucaogou, Xinjiang Province, China[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2009, 36(6): 503-520.
DOI URL |
[32] | 李丕龙, 冯建辉, 陆永潮. 准噶尔盆地构造沉积与成藏[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2010. |
[33] |
FOSTER C B, AFONIN S A. Syndesmorion gen.nov.— a coenobial alga of Chlorococcalean affinity from the continental Permian-Triassic deposits of Dalongkou section, Xinjiang Province, China[J]. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 2006, 138(1): 1-8.
DOI URL |
[34] | 李婧婧. 博格达山北麓二叠系芦草沟组油页岩地球化学特征研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2009. |
[35] |
ZHAO Y, TRUHLAR D G. The M06 suite of density functionals for main group thermochemistry, thermochemical kinetics, noncovalent interactions,excited states, and transition elements: Two new functionals and systematic testing of four M06 functionals and 12 other functionals[J]. Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, 2008, 119(5): 525.
DOI URL |
[36] | MARENICH A V, CRAMER C J, TRUHLAR D G. Universal solvation model based on solute electron density and on a continuum model of the solvent defined by the bulk dielectric constant and atomic surface tensions[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 2009, 113(18): 6378-6396. |
[37] |
QIU N S, ZHA M, WANG X L, et al. Tectono-thermal evolution of the Junggar Basin, NW China: Constraints from Ro and apatite fission track modelling[J]. Petroleum Geoscience, 2005, 11(4): 361-372.
DOI URL |
[38] |
PETERS K E, BURNHAM A K, WALTERS C C, et al. Guidelines for kinetic input to petroleum system models from open-system pyrolysis[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2018, 92: 979-986.
DOI URL |
[39] | 张多多. 新疆博格达山北缘大龙口逆冲带构造恢复研究[D]. 西安: 西北大学, 2016. |
[40] |
SHI Y Q, JI H C, YU J W, et al. Provenance and sedimentary evolution from the Middle Permian to Early Triassic around the Bogda Mountain, NW China: A tectonic inversion responding to the consolidation of Pangea[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2020, 114: 104169.
DOI URL |
[41] |
TANG W H, ZHANG Z C, LI J F, et al. Late Paleozoic to Jurassic tectonic evolution of the Bogda area (northwest China): Evidence from detrital zircon U-Pb geochronology[J]. Tectonophysics, 2014, 626: 144-156.
DOI URL |
[42] | 李红. 准噶尔盆地柴窝堡凹陷油气地质条件综合研究[D]. 西安: 西北大学, 2006. |
[43] | 魏国财. 塔北塔中地区志留系剥蚀厚度恢复及古构造分析[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2014. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||