Geoscience ›› 2018, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (05): 975-984.DOI: 10.19657/j.geoscience.1000-8527.2018.05.10
• Coalfield Geology • Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Di(), TIAN Jijun(
), FENG Shuo, LU Xingyu
Received:
2017-08-17
Revised:
2018-06-08
Online:
2018-10-10
Published:
2018-11-04
CLC Number:
WANG Di, TIAN Jijun, FENG Shuo, LU Xingyu. Petrography and Quality Characteristics of Lower-Middle Jurassic Coal Seam in the Southeastern Tarim Basin[J]. Geoscience, 2018, 32(05): 975-984.
地区 | 煤矿 | 煤层号 | 水分/% | 灰分/% | 挥发分/% | 硫分/% | 镜质组 含量/% | 镜质组反 射率/% | 最高古地 温值/℃ | 煤类 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
民 丰 凹 陷 | 和田布雅 | A1 | 6.44 | 18.27 | 33.51 | 1.63 | 68.90 | 0.52 | 115.86 | 31号不粘煤 | |
5.96 | 17.33 | 33.65 | 1.89 | 69.60 | 0.54 | 117.95 | 31号不粘煤 | ||||
5.97 | 26.95 | 35.13 | 2.67 | 77.80 | 0.55 | 118.97 | 31号不粘煤 | ||||
A3 | 5.60 | 33.42 | 35.73 | 0.46 | 72.40 | 0.58 | 121.92 | 31号不粘煤 | |||
于田普鲁 | A1 | 0.44 | 50.67 | 25.41 | — | 94.30 | 1.45 | 172.81 | 24号焦煤 | ||
A2 | 0.45 | 37.16 | 20.16 | 0.28 | 93.90 | 1.43 | 172.04 | 24号焦煤 | |||
A3 | 0.75 | 47.79 | 18.08 | — | 93.60 | 1.68 | 180.99 | 13号瘦煤 | |||
B1 | 1.03 | 24.13 | 15.59 | 0.52 | 93.50 | 1.64 | 179.65 | 13号瘦煤 | |||
B2 | 0.48 | 17.88 | 15.51 | 0.82 | 98.40 | 1.65 | 179.99 | 13号瘦煤 | |||
乌鲁克赛 | A1 | 1.86 | 20.96 | 36.57 | 0.83 | 95.10 | 0.84 | 142.49 | 34号气煤 | ||
A2 | 2.38 | 13.58 | 32.62 | 1.64 | 94.60 | 0.86 | 143.80 | 34号气煤 | |||
A3 | 1.86 | 24.98 | 40.78 | 1.45 | 97.10 | 0.87 | 144.44 | 45号气煤 | |||
A4 | 1.77 | 20.31 | 26.78 | 0.92 | 95.40 | 0.86 | 143.80 | 34号气煤 | |||
A5 | 1.44 | 26.48 | 37.68 | 1.06 | 95.30 | 0.84 | 142.49 | 43号气煤 | |||
A6 | 2.03 | 21.40 | 40.78 | 0.74 | 95.60 | 0.83 | 141.83 | 45号气煤 | |||
瓦 石 峡 凹 陷 | 其格勒克 | B4 | 6.23 | 27.41 | 44.36 | 0.58 | 87.20 | 0.66 | 129.10 | 41号长焰煤 | |
7.46 | 31.84 | 47.22 | 0.53 | 87.60 | 0.65 | 128.25 | 41号长焰煤 | ||||
6.55 | 28.34 | 46.46 | 0.61 | 87.50 | 0.67 | 129.93 | 41号长焰煤 | ||||
6.28 | 31.28 | 43.98 | 0.63 | 86.90 | 0.66 | 129.10 | 41号长焰煤 | ||||
B6 | 1.66 | 45.99 | 51.15 | 0.31 | 89.20 | 0.68 | 130.76 | 41号长焰煤 | |||
红 柳 沟 | 向 斜 北 翼 | A1 | 14.27 | 16.51 | 46.12 | 0.87 | 87.50 | 0.58 | 121.92 | 41号长焰煤 | |
A2 | 12.26 | 14.46 | 45.73 | 1.04 | 87.50 | 0.55 | 118.97 | 41号长焰煤 | |||
A3 | 11.12 | 11.45 | 45.26 | 0.74 | 87.30 | 0.56 | 119.97 | 41号长焰煤 | |||
A4 | 10.60 | 11.33 | 44.68 | 0.74 | 87.40 | 0.57 | 120.96 | 41号长焰煤 | |||
A5 | 3.67 | 12.16 | 42.94 | 0.83 | 86.80 | 0.59 | 122.87 | 41号长焰煤 | |||
A6 | 4.20 | 10.10 | 43.50 | 0.86 | 87.10 | 0.57 | 120.96 | 41号长焰煤 | |||
A7 | 9.92 | 13.93 | 44.08 | 0.91 | 87.30 | 0.57 | 120.96 | 41号长焰煤 | |||
向 斜 南 翼 | A3 | 3.52 | 15.46 | 45.68 | 0.97 | 86.90 | 0.82 | 141.15 | 45号气煤 | ||
A4 | 4.02 | 7.86 | 46.54 | 1.04 | 87.20 | 0.86 | 143.80 | 43号气煤 | |||
A5 | 3.88 | 13.11 | 44.80 | 0.89 | 87.20 | 0.78 | 138.38 | 45号气煤 | |||
A6 | 3.49 | 24.68 | 47.08 | 0.83 | 87.60 | 0.56 | 119.97 | 41号长焰煤 |
Table 1 Coal quality indices of the major coal seam in southeast Tarim basin
地区 | 煤矿 | 煤层号 | 水分/% | 灰分/% | 挥发分/% | 硫分/% | 镜质组 含量/% | 镜质组反 射率/% | 最高古地 温值/℃ | 煤类 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
民 丰 凹 陷 | 和田布雅 | A1 | 6.44 | 18.27 | 33.51 | 1.63 | 68.90 | 0.52 | 115.86 | 31号不粘煤 | |
5.96 | 17.33 | 33.65 | 1.89 | 69.60 | 0.54 | 117.95 | 31号不粘煤 | ||||
5.97 | 26.95 | 35.13 | 2.67 | 77.80 | 0.55 | 118.97 | 31号不粘煤 | ||||
A3 | 5.60 | 33.42 | 35.73 | 0.46 | 72.40 | 0.58 | 121.92 | 31号不粘煤 | |||
于田普鲁 | A1 | 0.44 | 50.67 | 25.41 | — | 94.30 | 1.45 | 172.81 | 24号焦煤 | ||
A2 | 0.45 | 37.16 | 20.16 | 0.28 | 93.90 | 1.43 | 172.04 | 24号焦煤 | |||
A3 | 0.75 | 47.79 | 18.08 | — | 93.60 | 1.68 | 180.99 | 13号瘦煤 | |||
B1 | 1.03 | 24.13 | 15.59 | 0.52 | 93.50 | 1.64 | 179.65 | 13号瘦煤 | |||
B2 | 0.48 | 17.88 | 15.51 | 0.82 | 98.40 | 1.65 | 179.99 | 13号瘦煤 | |||
乌鲁克赛 | A1 | 1.86 | 20.96 | 36.57 | 0.83 | 95.10 | 0.84 | 142.49 | 34号气煤 | ||
A2 | 2.38 | 13.58 | 32.62 | 1.64 | 94.60 | 0.86 | 143.80 | 34号气煤 | |||
A3 | 1.86 | 24.98 | 40.78 | 1.45 | 97.10 | 0.87 | 144.44 | 45号气煤 | |||
A4 | 1.77 | 20.31 | 26.78 | 0.92 | 95.40 | 0.86 | 143.80 | 34号气煤 | |||
A5 | 1.44 | 26.48 | 37.68 | 1.06 | 95.30 | 0.84 | 142.49 | 43号气煤 | |||
A6 | 2.03 | 21.40 | 40.78 | 0.74 | 95.60 | 0.83 | 141.83 | 45号气煤 | |||
瓦 石 峡 凹 陷 | 其格勒克 | B4 | 6.23 | 27.41 | 44.36 | 0.58 | 87.20 | 0.66 | 129.10 | 41号长焰煤 | |
7.46 | 31.84 | 47.22 | 0.53 | 87.60 | 0.65 | 128.25 | 41号长焰煤 | ||||
6.55 | 28.34 | 46.46 | 0.61 | 87.50 | 0.67 | 129.93 | 41号长焰煤 | ||||
6.28 | 31.28 | 43.98 | 0.63 | 86.90 | 0.66 | 129.10 | 41号长焰煤 | ||||
B6 | 1.66 | 45.99 | 51.15 | 0.31 | 89.20 | 0.68 | 130.76 | 41号长焰煤 | |||
红 柳 沟 | 向 斜 北 翼 | A1 | 14.27 | 16.51 | 46.12 | 0.87 | 87.50 | 0.58 | 121.92 | 41号长焰煤 | |
A2 | 12.26 | 14.46 | 45.73 | 1.04 | 87.50 | 0.55 | 118.97 | 41号长焰煤 | |||
A3 | 11.12 | 11.45 | 45.26 | 0.74 | 87.30 | 0.56 | 119.97 | 41号长焰煤 | |||
A4 | 10.60 | 11.33 | 44.68 | 0.74 | 87.40 | 0.57 | 120.96 | 41号长焰煤 | |||
A5 | 3.67 | 12.16 | 42.94 | 0.83 | 86.80 | 0.59 | 122.87 | 41号长焰煤 | |||
A6 | 4.20 | 10.10 | 43.50 | 0.86 | 87.10 | 0.57 | 120.96 | 41号长焰煤 | |||
A7 | 9.92 | 13.93 | 44.08 | 0.91 | 87.30 | 0.57 | 120.96 | 41号长焰煤 | |||
向 斜 南 翼 | A3 | 3.52 | 15.46 | 45.68 | 0.97 | 86.90 | 0.82 | 141.15 | 45号气煤 | ||
A4 | 4.02 | 7.86 | 46.54 | 1.04 | 87.20 | 0.86 | 143.80 | 43号气煤 | |||
A5 | 3.88 | 13.11 | 44.80 | 0.89 | 87.20 | 0.78 | 138.38 | 45号气煤 | |||
A6 | 3.49 | 24.68 | 47.08 | 0.83 | 87.60 | 0.56 | 119.97 | 41号长焰煤 |
[1] | 毛节华, 许惠龙. 中国煤炭资源分布现状和远景预测[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 1999, 27(3): 1-4. |
[2] | 李小彦, 晋香兰, 李贵红. 西部煤炭资源开发中“优质煤”概念及利用问题的思考[J]. 中国煤田地质, 2005, 17(3): 5-8. |
[3] | 张泓, 李恒堂, 熊存卫, 等. 中国西北侏罗纪含煤地层与聚煤规律[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1998: 1-10. |
[4] | 王双明, 张玉平. 鄂尔多斯侏罗纪盆地形成演化和聚煤规律[J]. 地学前缘, 1999, 6(1): 147-155. |
[5] | 王双明. 鄂尔多斯盆地聚煤规律及煤炭资源评价[M]. 北京: 煤炭工业出版社, 1996: 1-20. |
[6] | 吴传荣. 西北早—中侏罗世煤岩煤质与煤变质研究[M]. 北京: 煤炭工业出版社, 1995: 1-10. |
[7] | 杨起, 吴冲龙, 汤达祯, 等. 中国煤变质作用[M]. 北京: 煤炭工业出版社, 1996: 13-25,191-197. |
[8] | 韩德馨. 中国煤岩学[M]. 北京: 中国矿业大学出版社, 1996: 146-148,195. |
[9] | 黄文辉, 唐书恒, 唐修义, 等. 西北地区侏罗纪煤的煤岩学特征[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2010, 38(4): 1-6. |
[10] | 白向飞, 李文华, 陈文敏, 等. 我国西部弱还原程度煤分布及煤质特征研究[J]. 煤炭学报, 2005, 30(4): 502-506. |
[11] | 傅雪海, 田继军, 木合塔尔·扎日, 等. 新疆煤与煤层气资源地质研究现存问题分析[J]. 新疆大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 29(2): 137-141. |
[12] | 姚素平, 金奎励. 新疆侏罗系煤基质镜质体的岩石学特征及成烃性[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 1997, 25(3): 14-21. |
[13] | 程晓敢, 廖林, 陈汉林, 等. 塔里木盆地东南缘新生代构造变形特征研究[J]. 岩石学报, 2008, 24(4): 645-654. |
[14] | 陈汉林, 罗俊成, 郭群英, 等. 塔里木盆地东南缘中新生代变形史与构造演化[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2009, 33(1): 38-45. |
[15] | 何登发, 贾承造, 李德生, 等. 塔里木多旋回叠合盆地的形成与演化[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2005, 26(1): 64-77. |
[16] | 陈骥, 姜在兴, 姜正龙, 等. 塔东南坳陷侏罗系杨叶组沉积相特征及古环境研究[J]. 地球学报, 2015, 36(3): 344-352. |
[17] | 仲翔. 塔里木盆地东南缘侏罗系中下统层序地层与沉积演化[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆大学, 2017. |
[18] | 康希栋, 杨起, 潘治贵. 神木煤田延安组1-1、1-2及2-2煤层的煤岩学特征及煤相划分[J]. 地球科学, 1992, 17(4): 421-429. |
[19] | 李清. 山西延川南煤层气田2号煤层煤相研究——煤层气开发选区意义[J]. 石油实验地质, 2014, 36(2): 245-248. |
[20] | 方爱民, 雷家锦, 金奎励, 等. 山西西山煤田7号煤层煤相研究[J]. 中国煤炭地质, 2003, 15(5): 12-16. |
[21] | GB/474—2008煤样的制备方法[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2008: 1-25. |
[22] | GB/T16773—2008煤岩分析样品制备方法[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2008: 1-15. |
[23] | GB/T482—2008煤层煤样采取方法[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2008: 1-12. |
[24] | GB/T8899—2013煤的显微组分组和矿物测定方法[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2013: 1-6. |
[25] |
SUN Yuzhuang, CHEN Jianping, LIN Mingyue, et al. Influences of ore formation on biomarkers in the kupferschiefer from the Lubin mine,Poland[J]. Chinese Journal of Geochemistry, 2005, 24(2): 101-107.
DOI URL |
[26] | 施龙青, 张东. 肥城煤田层序地层及煤质指标相关性分析[J]. 矿业世界, 1998, 25(4): 15-19. |
[27] |
SOTIROV A, KORTENSKI J. Petrography of the coal from the Oranovo-Simitli basin,Bulgaria and indices of the coal facies[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2004, 57(1): 71-76.
DOI URL |
[28] | 祁斌, 郎海亮. 新疆和田布雅煤矿煤层煤质特征分析[J]. 煤, 2014, 23(4): 55-56. |
[29] | 黄文辉, 杨起, 彭苏萍, 等. 淮南二叠纪煤及其燃烧产物地球化学特征[J]. 地球科学, 2001, 26(5): 501-507. |
[30] | 汪洋, 刘志臣, 李隆富. 黔北煤田二叠系煤层含硫特征与沉积环境研究[J]. 煤炭科学技术, 2017, 45(2): 185-190. |
[31] |
SUN Yuzhuang, ZHAO Cunliang, LI Yanheng, et al. Anomalous concentrations of rare metal elements,rare-scattered (dispersed) elements and rare earth elements in the coal from Iqe coalfield,Qinghai Province,China[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2015, 89(1): 229-241.
DOI URL |
[32] |
SUN Yuzhuang, WANG Bingshan, LIN Mingyue. Maceral and geochemical characteristics of coal seam 1 and oil shale 1 in fault-controlled Huangxian basin,China[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 1998, 29: 583-591.
DOI URL |
[33] | 石松林. 内蒙古准格尔煤田晚古生代煤系富铝矿物特征及成因[D]. 北京: 中国矿业大学(北京), 2014. |
[34] | 范章群, 宋孝忠. 新疆中生代煤中半镜质组特征及其研究意义[J]. 煤田地质与勘探, 2014, 42(5): 9-12. |
[35] | 黄文辉, 敖卫华, 翁成敏, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地侏罗纪煤的煤岩特征及成因分析[J]. 现代地质, 2010, 24(6): 1186-1197. |
[36] | 夏玉成, 孙学阳, 王佟, 等. 新疆侏罗纪古构造及其对聚煤盆地的控制[J]. 中国煤炭地质, 2014, 26(8): 20-23. |
[1] | LIU Qiang, ZHANG Yintao, CHEN Shi, SONG Xingguo, Li Ting, KANG Pengfei, MA Xiaoping. Development and Evolution Characteristics of Strike-slip Faults in Tarim Basin and Its Geological Significance: A Case Study of FⅠ17 Fault in Fuman Oilfield [J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(05): 1123-1135. |
[2] | WANG Qinghua. Differential Deformation and Evolution Characteristics of the No.17 Strike-slip Fault Zone in the Tarim Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(05): 1136-1145. |
[3] | LIU Wangwei, LI Yifan, GAO Zhiqian, FAN Tailiang, ZHANG Tan, KUANG Mingzhi. Lithofacies Characteristics and Sedimentary Model of the Lower Cambrian Shale in the Northeastern Margin of Tarim Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(05): 1155-1168. |
[4] | TAN Cong, LIU Ce, WANG Tongshan, LI Qiufen, ZHU Xi, FU Jinglong, JIANG Hua. Study on Structural Dolomitization:Taking the Yingshan Formation of the Penglaiba Section in Aksu Area as An Example [J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(05): 1182-1193. |
[5] | ZUO Liang, NENG Yuan, HUANG Shaoyin, LUO Caiming, CHEN Shi, ZHU Tie, WANG Chuan, LU Chengmei. Deformation Characteristics of Ultra-deep Glide Faults in the Halahatang Area and Their Petroleum Geological Significance [J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(02): 270-282. |
[6] | ZHANG Yintao, CHEN Shi, LIU Qiang, FENG Guang, XIE Zhou, LIANG Xinxin, LI Ting, SONG Xingguo, KANG Pengfei, PENG Zijun. Development Characteristics and Evolution Model of FⅠ19 Fault in Fuman Oilfield, Tarim Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(02): 283-295. |
[7] | LIU Siyi, GAO Ping, XIAO Xianming, LIU Ruobing, QIN Jing, YUAN Tao, WANG Xu. Study on Organic Petrology Characteristics of the Wufeng-Longmaxi Formation Black Shale, Sichuan Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(05): 1281-1291. |
[8] | PENG Zijun, FENG Lei, LUO Caiming, CHEN Shi, SONG Xingguo, LIANG Xinxin, ZHOU Xiaorong. Physical Simulation Experiment on Stratification Strike-slip Fault Deformation Mechanism in the Tazhong Uplift [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(04): 1022-1034. |
[9] | LI Xinhua, KANG Zhihong, LIU Jie, YANG Debin, WANG Yan, CHEN Huaxin, HE Yu. Characteristics Identification and Formation of Ordovician Karst Collapse Reservoir Structure in Tahe Oilfield [J]. Geoscience, 2021, 35(06): 1830-1843. |
[10] | ZHANG He, JIANG Zhenglong, LI Yajun, LIANG Shuang, FU Wenkai. Hydrocarbon Generation Conditions and Regional Comparison of the Lower Jurassic Kangsu Formation in Washixia Sag, Tarim Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2019, 33(06): 1241-1251. |
[11] | YI Chuanjun, ZHANG Min, TENG Li. Influence of Thermal Action on Composition and Distribution of Steranes in Marine Crude Oil, Tarim Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2019, 33(04): 853-862. |
[12] | LIANG Wanle, LI Xianqing, WEI Qiang, LI Jin, SUN Kexin, ZHANG Min. Organic Petrology of Mesozoic Source Rocks in the Northern Piedmont Zone of the Kuqa Depression [J]. Geoscience, 2018, 32(06): 1137-1149. |
[13] | WANG Yuan, LI Xianqing, WANG Gang, XU Xinde, LIU Haiyu. Geochemical Characteristics and Hydrocarbon Generation Potential of Miocene Marine Source Rocks in the Ying-Qiong Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2018, 32(03): 500-510. |
[14] | GAO Huahua, HE Dengfa, TONG Xiaoguang, WEN Zhixin, WANG Zhaoming. Tectonic-depositional Environment and Proto-type Basin Evolution of the Cambrian in the Tarim Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2017, 31(01): 102-118. |
[15] | ZHOU Yalong,SUN Zhongjun,YANG Zhibin,ZHANG Fugui, ZHANG Shunyao. Application of Soil Free Hydrocarbon to Distinguish Properties and Preservation Conditions of Oil and Gas [J]. Geoscience, 2016, 30(6): 1370-1375. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||