Geoscience ›› 2018, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (01): 105-112.DOI: 10.19657/j.geoscience.1000-8527.2018.01.10
• Geochemistry • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZENG Qingliang(), YU Tao(
), WANG Rui
Received:
2017-07-12
Revised:
2017-11-16
Online:
2018-02-10
Published:
2018-02-05
CLC Number:
ZENG Qingliang, YU Tao, WANG Rui. The Influencing Factors of Selenium in Soils and Classifying the Selenium-rich Soil Resources in the Typical Area of Enshi, Hubei[J]. Geoscience, 2018, 32(01): 105-112.
测试指标 | 分析方法 | 检出限 | 测试指标 | 分析方法 | 检出限 | 测试指标 | 分析方法 | 检出限 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
As | AFS | 1 | K2O | ICP-AES | 0.05* | B | ES | 1 | ||
Cd | ICP-MS | 0.03 | CaO | ICP-AES | 0.05* | Cl | XRF | 20 | ||
Cr | ICP-AES | 5 | Al2O3 | COL | 0.05* | I | COL | 0.5 | ||
Cu | ICP-AES | 1 | Sr | XRF | 5 | Mn | ICP-AES | 10 | ||
Zn | XRF | 4 | Se | AFS | 0.01 | pH | ISE | 0.10** | ||
Hg | AFS | 0.000 5 | N | VOL | 20 | TOC | VOL | 0.1* | ||
Pb | XRF | 2 | P | XRF | 10 |
Table 1 The analysis methods and detection limits
测试指标 | 分析方法 | 检出限 | 测试指标 | 分析方法 | 检出限 | 测试指标 | 分析方法 | 检出限 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
As | AFS | 1 | K2O | ICP-AES | 0.05* | B | ES | 1 | ||
Cd | ICP-MS | 0.03 | CaO | ICP-AES | 0.05* | Cl | XRF | 20 | ||
Cr | ICP-AES | 5 | Al2O3 | COL | 0.05* | I | COL | 0.5 | ||
Cu | ICP-AES | 1 | Sr | XRF | 5 | Mn | ICP-AES | 10 | ||
Zn | XRF | 4 | Se | AFS | 0.01 | pH | ISE | 0.10** | ||
Hg | AFS | 0.000 5 | N | VOL | 20 | TOC | VOL | 0.1* | ||
Pb | XRF | 2 | P | XRF | 10 |
测试 指标 | RE | RD | 测试 指标 | RE | RD | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | RE | n | RD/% | n | RE | n | RD/% | ||||
As | 20 | 0.010 | 20 | 4.04 | Se | 20 | 0.010 | 20 | 11.63 | ||
Cd | 20 | 0.009 | 20 | 5.73 | N | 20 | 0.020 | 20 | 8.02 | ||
Cr | 20 | 0.024 | 20 | 1.50 | P | 20 | 0.035 | 20 | 0.76 | ||
Cu | 20 | 0.029 | 20 | 1.83 | B | 20 | 0.006 | 20 | 10.46 | ||
Hg | 20 | 0.024 | 20 | 10.04 | Cl | 20 | 0.026 | 20 | 8.64 | ||
Pb | 20 | 0.018 | 20 | 4.05 | I | 20 | 0.008 | 20 | 10.70 | ||
Zn | 20 | 0.006 | 20 | 1.05 | Mn | 20 | 0.012 | 20 | 0.62 | ||
K2O | 20 | 0.005 | 20 | 0.29 | pH | 20 | 0.000 | 20 | 0.04 | ||
CaO | 20 | 0.002 | 20 | 3.66 | TOC | 20 | 0.022 | 20 | 4.30 | ||
Al2O3 | 20 | 0.015 | 20 | 0.69 | Se* | 4 | 0.010 | 60 | 4.70 | ||
Sr | 20 | 0.005 | 20 | 0.96 |
Table 2 Precision (RD) and accuracy (RE) quality monitoring for analysis
测试 指标 | RE | RD | 测试 指标 | RE | RD | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | RE | n | RD/% | n | RE | n | RD/% | ||||
As | 20 | 0.010 | 20 | 4.04 | Se | 20 | 0.010 | 20 | 11.63 | ||
Cd | 20 | 0.009 | 20 | 5.73 | N | 20 | 0.020 | 20 | 8.02 | ||
Cr | 20 | 0.024 | 20 | 1.50 | P | 20 | 0.035 | 20 | 0.76 | ||
Cu | 20 | 0.029 | 20 | 1.83 | B | 20 | 0.006 | 20 | 10.46 | ||
Hg | 20 | 0.024 | 20 | 10.04 | Cl | 20 | 0.026 | 20 | 8.64 | ||
Pb | 20 | 0.018 | 20 | 4.05 | I | 20 | 0.008 | 20 | 10.70 | ||
Zn | 20 | 0.006 | 20 | 1.05 | Mn | 20 | 0.012 | 20 | 0.62 | ||
K2O | 20 | 0.005 | 20 | 0.29 | pH | 20 | 0.000 | 20 | 0.04 | ||
CaO | 20 | 0.002 | 20 | 3.66 | TOC | 20 | 0.022 | 20 | 4.30 | ||
Al2O3 | 20 | 0.015 | 20 | 0.69 | Se* | 4 | 0.010 | 60 | 4.70 | ||
Sr | 20 | 0.005 | 20 | 0.96 |
硒含量范围/ (mg·kg-1) | 硒含量 分级[ | 样品数/件 | 所占比例/% |
---|---|---|---|
<0.125 | 缺乏 | 0 | 0 |
0.125~<0.175 | 边缘 | 0 | 0 |
0.175~<0.4 | 适量 | 10 | 5.03 |
0.4~<3.0 | 高 | 158 | 79.40 |
≥3.0 | 过剩 | 31 | 15.58 |
Table 3 Classification criteria and statistics of selenium contents of top soils
硒含量范围/ (mg·kg-1) | 硒含量 分级[ | 样品数/件 | 所占比例/% |
---|---|---|---|
<0.125 | 缺乏 | 0 | 0 |
0.125~<0.175 | 边缘 | 0 | 0 |
0.175~<0.4 | 适量 | 10 | 5.03 |
0.4~<3.0 | 高 | 158 | 79.40 |
≥3.0 | 过剩 | 31 | 15.58 |
地层 | 样品数量 | 平均值 | 最大值 | 最小值 | 标准差 | CV | K1 | K2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
志留系罗惹坪组 | 13 | 0.53 | 0.81 | 0.26 | 0.13 | — | 1.80 | 2.01 |
泥盆系—石炭系 | 21 | 1.06 | 3.03 | 0.46 | 0.54 | — | 3.60 | 4.01 |
二叠系茅口组 | 106 | 2.34 | 14.28 | 0.26 | 2.60 | — | 7.95 | 8.86 |
三叠系大冶组 | 59 | 1.63 | 15.17 | 0.19 | 2.84 | — | 5.54 | 6.17 |
汇总 | 199 | 1.88 | 15.17 | 0.19 | 2.51 | 133.51 | 6.39 | 7.12 |
Table 4 Statistics values of contents of top soils elements from different stratum in the study area
地层 | 样品数量 | 平均值 | 最大值 | 最小值 | 标准差 | CV | K1 | K2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
志留系罗惹坪组 | 13 | 0.53 | 0.81 | 0.26 | 0.13 | — | 1.80 | 2.01 |
泥盆系—石炭系 | 21 | 1.06 | 3.03 | 0.46 | 0.54 | — | 3.60 | 4.01 |
二叠系茅口组 | 106 | 2.34 | 14.28 | 0.26 | 2.60 | — | 7.95 | 8.86 |
三叠系大冶组 | 59 | 1.63 | 15.17 | 0.19 | 2.84 | — | 5.54 | 6.17 |
汇总 | 199 | 1.88 | 15.17 | 0.19 | 2.51 | 133.51 | 6.39 | 7.12 |
测试 指标 | 相关系数 | 测试 指标 | 相关系数 | 测试 指标 | 相关系数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cl | -0.028 | B | 0.046 | As | 0.211 |
Al2O3 | 0.315* | Cu | 0.416** | I | -0.047 |
P | 0.230 | Zn | 0.333** | Hg | 0.061 |
K2O | 0.258* | Pb | 0.236 | Se | 0.621** |
CaO | 0.204 | Sr | 0.196 | TOC | 0.107 |
Cr | 0.172 | Cd | 0.421** | pH | 0.156 |
N | 0.305* | Mn | 0.233 |
Table 5 Correlation of selenium concentrations of corn seeds with top-soil
测试 指标 | 相关系数 | 测试 指标 | 相关系数 | 测试 指标 | 相关系数 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cl | -0.028 | B | 0.046 | As | 0.211 |
Al2O3 | 0.315* | Cu | 0.416** | I | -0.047 |
P | 0.230 | Zn | 0.333** | Hg | 0.061 |
K2O | 0.258* | Pb | 0.236 | Se | 0.621** |
CaO | 0.204 | Sr | 0.196 | TOC | 0.107 |
Cr | 0.172 | Cd | 0.421** | pH | 0.156 |
N | 0.305* | Mn | 0.233 |
样本编号 | 预测 | 实测 | dSe |
---|---|---|---|
TR081 | 0.065 | 0.051 | 0.014 |
TR019 | 0.037 | 0.031 | 0.006 |
TR039 | 0.047 | 0.036 | 0.011 |
TR056 | 0.096 | 0.053 | 0.043 |
TR032 | 0.013 | 0.023 | -0.010 |
TR114 | 0.065 | 0.051 | 0.014 |
TR148 | 0.050 | 0.031 | 0.019 |
Table 6 Comparing of sample predicting values and measured values
样本编号 | 预测 | 实测 | dSe |
---|---|---|---|
TR081 | 0.065 | 0.051 | 0.014 |
TR019 | 0.037 | 0.031 | 0.006 |
TR039 | 0.047 | 0.036 | 0.011 |
TR056 | 0.096 | 0.053 | 0.043 |
TR032 | 0.013 | 0.023 | -0.010 |
TR114 | 0.065 | 0.051 | 0.014 |
TR148 | 0.050 | 0.031 | 0.019 |
硒含量 分级 | 粮食硒含量/ (mg·kg-1) | 硒效应 | 样品数/件 | 比例/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
缺乏 | <0.025 | 硒反应病 | 20 | 10.05 |
边缘 | 0.025~<0.040 | 潜在硒不足 | 31 | 15.58 |
中等 | 0.040~<0.070 | 足硒 | 44 | 22.11 |
高 | 0.070~<1.0 | 富硒 | 86 | 43.22 |
过剩 | ≥1.0 | 硒中毒 | 18 | 9.05 |
Table 7 Classification criteria and statistics of selenium contents of corn
硒含量 分级 | 粮食硒含量/ (mg·kg-1) | 硒效应 | 样品数/件 | 比例/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
缺乏 | <0.025 | 硒反应病 | 20 | 10.05 |
边缘 | 0.025~<0.040 | 潜在硒不足 | 31 | 15.58 |
中等 | 0.040~<0.070 | 足硒 | 44 | 22.11 |
高 | 0.070~<1.0 | 富硒 | 86 | 43.22 |
过剩 | ≥1.0 | 硒中毒 | 18 | 9.05 |
[1] |
RAYMAN M P. The importance of selenium to human health[J]. The Lancet, 2000, 356: 233-241.
DOI URL |
[2] | 李军, 张忠诚. 微量元素硒与人体健康[J]. 微量元素与健康研究, 2011, 28(5):59-63. |
[3] |
WILBER C G. Toxicology of selenium: A review[J]. Clinical Toxicology, 1980, 17(2): 171-230.
PMID |
[4] | 杨光圻, 王淑真, 周瑞华, 等. 湖北恩施地区原因不明脱发脱甲症病因的研究[J]. 中国医学科学院学报, 1981, 3(S2):1-6. |
[5] | 张丽珊, 朱岩, 可夫, 等. 东北大骨节病病区主要土壤腐殖酸硒与大骨节病关系的研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 1990, 1(4):333-337. |
[6] | 迟凤琴, 徐强, 匡恩俊, 等. 黑龙江省土壤硒分布及其影响因素研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2016, 53(5):1262-1274. |
[7] | 黄春雷, 宋明义, 魏迎春. 浙中典型富硒土壤区土壤硒含量的影响因素探讨[J]. 环境科学, 2013, 34(11):4405-4410. |
[8] | 陈显著, 李就好. 广州市土壤硒含量的分布及其影响因素研究[J]. 福建农业学报, 2016, 31(4):401-407. |
[9] | 杨忠芳, 余涛, 侯青叶, 等. 海南岛农田土壤Se的地球化学特征[J]. 现代地质, 2012, 26(5):837-849. |
[10] | 张光弟, 葛晓立, 张绮玲, 等. 湖北恩施硒中毒区土壤硒的分布及其控制因素[J]. 中国地质, 2001, 28(9):37-40. |
[11] |
杨良策, 李明龙, 杨廷安, 等. 湖北省恩施市表层土壤硒含量分布特征及其影响因素研究[J]. 资源环境与工程, 2015, 29(6):825-829,848.
DOI |
[12] | 侯现慧, 王占岐, 杨俊. 富硒区耕地质量评价及利用分区研究——以福建省三元区为例[J]. 资源科学, 2015, 37(7):1367-1375. |
[13] | 王世纪, 吴小勇, 刘军保. 浙北地区土壤硒元素特征及其生态环境效应评价[J]. 中国地质, 2004, 31(S1): 118-125. |
[14] | 郦逸根, 董岩翔, 郑洁, 等. 浙江富硒土壤资源调查与评价[J]. 第四纪研究, 2005, 25(3):323-330. |
[15] | 杨忠芳, 余涛, 李敏, 等. DZ/T 0295—2016.土地质量地球化学评价规范[S]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2016:1-52. |
[16] | 谭见安. 中华人民共和国地方病与环境图集[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1989:39. |
[17] | 仝双梅, 连国奇, 秦趣, 等. 贵州省开阳县土壤硒含量及其制约因素研究[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2013, 48(2):105-109. |
[18] | 赵西强, 张贵丽. 章丘地区土壤硒的含量分布及影响因素[J]. 山东国土资源, 2015, 31(3):46-49. |
[19] | 商靖敏, 罗维, 吴光红, 等. 洋河流域不同土地利用类型土壤硒(Se)分布及影响因素[J]. 环境科学, 2015, 36(1):301-308. |
[20] | 曹容浩. 福建省龙海市表层土壤硒含量及影响因素研究[J]. 岩矿测试, 2017, 36(3):282-288. |
[21] |
侯少范, 李德珠, 王丽珍, 等. 暖温带地理景观中土壤硒的分异特征[J]. 地理学报, 1992, 47(1):31-39.
DOI |
[22] | BARBER S A. Soil Nutrient Bioavailability: A Mechanistic Approach[M]. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 1995: 110-132. |
[23] | 吴启堂. 一个定量植物吸收土壤重金属的原理模型[J]. 土壤学报, 1994, 31(1):68-76. |
[24] | 李法云, 付宝荣, 王效举. 土壤-植物系统重金属镉、锌生物有效性的数学模型评价[J]. 辽宁大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 31(3):193-198. |
[25] |
MCBRIDE M, SAUVE S, HENDERSHOT W. Solubility control of Cu, Zn, Cd and Pb in contaminated soils[J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 1997, 48(2): 337-346.
DOI URL |
[26] |
KUBOI T, NOGUCHICHI A, YAZAKI J. Family-dependent cadmium accumulation characteristics in higher plants[J]. Plant and Soil, 1986, 92(3): 405-415.
DOI URL |
[27] | 叶新新, 孙波. 品种和土壤对水稻镉吸收的影响及镉生物有效性预测模型研究进展[J]. 土壤, 2012, 44(3):360-365. |
[28] | 刘克, 和文祥, 张红, 等. 镉在小麦各部位的富集和转运及籽粒镉含量的预测模型[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2015, 34(8):1441-1448. |
[29] | 汤丽玲. 作物吸收Cd的影响因素分析及籽实Cd含量的预测[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2007, 26(2):699-703. |
[1] | LIU Yonglin, ZHAO Jiayu, LIU Yi, WU Mei, XIAO Huixian, LIU Dinghui, TIAN Xinglei. Differentiation Mechanism of Se Concentration in Soil Covering the Jurassic Strata in Chongqing: Case Studies from Jiangjin and Shizhu Regions [J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(06): 1644-1654. |
[2] | LIU Wangwei, LI Yifan, GAO Zhiqian, FAN Tailiang, ZHANG Tan, KUANG Mingzhi. Lithofacies Characteristics and Sedimentary Model of the Lower Cambrian Shale in the Northeastern Margin of Tarim Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(05): 1155-1168. |
[3] | CHEN Gege, GAO Zhiqian, JIAO Cunli, HU Zongquan, YUAN Yuxuan, WEI Duan, ZHAI Xinqing, CHANG Zhe. Development Model of Microbial Reef-shoal in the Lower Cambrian Xiaoerbulak Formation Under Transgression-Regression Transition in the Northern Tarim Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(05): 1169-1181. |
[4] | NI Minjie, ZHU Hexuan, HE Wenjun, YANG Sen, ZOU Yang, ZHANG Yuanyuan. Depositional Environment and Sedimentary Model of the Fengcheng Formation in Mahu sag, Junggar Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(05): 1194-1207. |
[5] | LU Kai, LIU Ling, BAO Zhidong, JI Hancheng, LIU Jinxia, LI Lei, LI Jin, BAO Yifei, NIU Bo, CHEN Zhenliang, CAO Yingzhuo, CHEN Xinyi, LI Zongfeng. Favorable Drilling Target Selection Based on Drillability Analysis and 3D Geological Modeling: A Case Study in the Wumishan Formation, Xiong’an New Area [J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(05): 1398-1410. |
[6] | DUGUER Weiwei, SHI Haitao, XING Hao, LOU Xuecong, HU Hongli, BULONG Bate. Source Analysis and Spatial Distribution of Heavy Metals in Soil from Typical Open-pit Coal Mines in the Gobi Desert, Xinjiang [J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(03): 790-800. |
[7] | LIU Chen, LI Jianghai, WANG Zhichen. Dynamic Model Analysis of Formation and Evolution of the South China Sea [J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(02): 259-269. |
[8] | LI Hui, WEN Hanhui, CAI Limei, XU Yaohui, LUO Jie, MEI Jingxian, XU Shubang. Distribution of Trace Elements and Its Influencing Factors in Jiedong District, Jieyang City, Guangdong Province [J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(01): 208-216. |
[9] | ZHOU Mo, LIANG Xiaohong, ZHANG Ming, WEN Bangyong, TANG Zhimin, ZHAN Long. Geochemical Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Germanium in Surface Soil of Lishui District, Nanjing City [J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(01): 217-226. |
[10] | DONG Yan, TAN Handong, FU Xing. Three-dimensional Full-time Airborne TEM Modeling with Shift-and-Invert Krylov Subspace Method and Response Characteristic Analysis [J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(01): 74-83. |
[11] | WANG Shengtao, LIN Changhong, WANG Xudong. Effect of Transmitter Waveform on 1D Modeling and Inversion of Transient Electromagnetic Method Data [J]. Geoscience, 2023, 37(01): 99-106. |
[12] | GAN Jun, JI Hongquan, LIANG Gang, HE Xiaohu, XIONG Xiaofeng, LI Xing. Gas Accumulation Model of Mesozoic Buried Hill in Qiongdongnan Basin [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(05): 1242-1253. |
[13] | FENG Peng, LI Song, TANG Dazhen, CHEN Bo, ZHONG Guanghao. Application of Support Vector Machine in Prediction of Coal Seam Stress [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(05): 1333-1340. |
[14] | CHAO Haide, CHEN Jianzhou, WANG Jin, LI Jiqing, WANG Guocang, ZHAO Hongyue, CAI Tingjun, LIU Libo, LI Shengfu, REN Wenkai, QIU Liang. Diagenesis of Triassic Shale and Its Influence on Reservoir in East Kunlun, Northern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(04): 1052-1064. |
[15] | LU Junhui, ZHANG Xiaoli, YANG Zhen, LI Yajun, WANG Xiaolin, ZHAO Xi. Saturation Calculation Model With Variable Rock-Electrical Parameters for Tight Sandstone Reservoirs: A Case Study of the Shihezi Formation (8th Member) in Western Sulige Gas Field [J]. Geoscience, 2022, 36(04): 1131-1137. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||